selftests/x86: Add tests for the STR and SLDT instructions

The STR and SLDT instructions are not valid when running on virtual-8086
mode and generate an invalid operand exception. These two instructions are
protected by the Intel User-Mode Instruction Prevention (UMIP) security
feature. In protected mode, if UMIP is enabled, these instructions generate
a general protection fault if called from CPL > 0. Linux traps the general
protection fault and emulates the instructions sgdt, sidt and smsw; but not
str and sldt.

These tests are added to verify that the emulation code does not emulate
these two instructions but the expected invalid operand exception is
seen.

Tests fallback to exit with INT3 in case emulation does happen.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Cc: Brian Gerst <[email protected]>
Cc: Chen Yucong <[email protected]>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Huang Rui <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <[email protected]>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Ravi V. Shankar <[email protected]>
Cc: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>
Cc: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509935277-22138-13-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
index f7d9ceac7e06..361466a2eaef 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/entry_from_vm86.c
@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ asm (
 	"smsw %ax\n\t"
 	"mov %ax, (2080)\n\t"
 	"int3\n\t"
+	"vmcode_umip_str:\n\t"
+	"str %eax\n\t"
+	"vmcode_umip_sldt:\n\t"
+	"sldt %eax\n\t"
+	"int3\n\t"
 	".size vmcode, . - vmcode\n\t"
 	"end_vmcode:\n\t"
 	".code32\n\t"
@@ -119,7 +124,8 @@ asm (
 
 extern unsigned char vmcode[], end_vmcode[];
 extern unsigned char vmcode_bound[], vmcode_sysenter[], vmcode_syscall[],
-	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[];
+	vmcode_sti[], vmcode_int3[], vmcode_int80[], vmcode_umip[],
+	vmcode_umip_str[], vmcode_umip_sldt[];
 
 /* Returns false if the test was skipped. */
 static bool do_test(struct vm86plus_struct *v86, unsigned long eip,
@@ -226,6 +232,16 @@ void do_umip_tests(struct vm86plus_struct *vm86, unsigned char *test_mem)
 		printf("[FAIL]\tAll the results of SIDT should be the same.\n");
 	else
 		printf("[PASS]\tAll the results from SIDT are identical.\n");
+
+	sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
+	do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_str - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
+		"STR instruction");
+	clearhandler(SIGILL);
+
+	sethandler(SIGILL, sighandler, 0);
+	do_test(vm86, vmcode_umip_sldt - vmcode, VM86_SIGNAL, 0,
+		"SLDT instruction");
+	clearhandler(SIGILL);
 }
 
 int main(void)