locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement

Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu()
is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev
pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Waiman Long <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 81388d028ac7..346b5a1fd062 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
 	class->key = key;
 	class->name = lock->name;
 	class->subclass = subclass;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after);
 	class->name_version = count_matching_names(class);