diff options
| author | Glauber Costa <[email protected]> | 2013-02-04 14:28:49 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> | 2013-02-05 20:38:48 +1100 |
| commit | 91c777d86752b00bb3a1d8efa3d8f7e1264f38a9 (patch) | |
| tree | bb9f3340c8109da5c29e57608f205e97a5f0e03d | |
| parent | 631b0cfdbd801ceae8762e8d287f15da26792ebe (diff) | |
memcg: fix typo in kmemcg cache walk macro
The macro for_each_memcg_cache_index contains a silly yet potentially
deadly mistake. Although the macro parameter is _idx, the loop tests
are done over i, not _idx.
This hasn't generated any problems so far, because all users use i as a
loop index. However, while playing with an extension of the code I
ended using another loop index and the compiler was quick to complain.
Unfortunately, this is not the kind of thing that testing reveals =(
Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <[email protected]>
Cc: Kamezawa Hiroyuki <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/memcontrol.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h index 0108a56f814e..28bd5fa2ff2e 100644 --- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h +++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h @@ -429,7 +429,7 @@ extern int memcg_limited_groups_array_size; * the slab_mutex must be held when looping through those caches */ #define for_each_memcg_cache_index(_idx) \ - for ((_idx) = 0; i < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; (_idx)++) + for ((_idx) = 0; (_idx) < memcg_limited_groups_array_size; (_idx)++) static inline bool memcg_kmem_enabled(void) { |