diff options
| author | Miaohe Lin <[email protected]> | 2020-10-13 16:53:05 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> | 2020-10-13 18:38:30 -0700 |
| commit | 7a52d4d88ade00c99db007708bbcc5b9311f9ea4 (patch) | |
| tree | 1b58d8672eb2168507f342f68bcc14d87e90ce8d | |
| parent | d437024e69b8c005d4eec65ee075d6725b4b8e58 (diff) | |
mm: memcontrol: reword obsolete comment of mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom()
Since commit 79dfdaccd1d5 ("memcg: make oom_lock 0 and 1 based rather than
counter"), the mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom() is added and the comment of
the mem_cgroup_oom_unlock() is moved here. But this comment make no sense
here because mem_cgroup_oom_lock() does not operate on under_oom field.
So we reword the comment as this would be helpful. [Thanks Michal Hocko
for rewording this comment.]
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
| -rw-r--r-- | mm/memcontrol.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index e9fa32a943c5..c04b57ccefe9 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -1826,8 +1826,8 @@ static void mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) struct mem_cgroup *iter; /* - * When a new child is created while the hierarchy is under oom, - * mem_cgroup_oom_lock() may not be called. Watch for underflow. + * Be careful about under_oom underflows becase a child memcg + * could have been added after mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom. */ spin_lock(&memcg_oom_lock); for_each_mem_cgroup_tree(iter, memcg) |