aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDarrick J. Wong <[email protected]>2024-08-30 15:37:05 -0700
committerDarrick J. Wong <[email protected]>2024-09-01 08:58:19 -0700
commit74c234bbe51a1b142400ab018b605e2f16274e10 (patch)
treee2f389cbcb21aea75e441a29c2d47f2ee3933814
parent62c3d2496808ab47714906e24eed67cfdf5735c7 (diff)
xfs: reduce excessive clamping of maxlen in xfs_rtallocate_extent_near
The near rt allocator employs two allocation strategies -- first it tries to allocate at exactly @start. If that fails, it will pivot back and forth around that starting point looking for an appropriately sized free space. However, I clamped maxlen ages ago to prevent the exact allocation scan from running off the end of the rt volume. This, I realize, was excessive. If the allocation request is (say) for 32 rtx but the start position is 5 rtx from the end of the volume, we clamp maxlen to 5. If the exact allocation fails, we then pivot back and forth looking for 5 rtx, even though the original intent was to try to get 32 rtx. If we then find 5 rtx when we could have gotten 32 rtx, we've not done as well as we could have. This may be moot if the caller immediately comes back for more space, but it might not be. Either way, we can do better here. Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r--fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c23
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
index af357704895d..d27bfec08ef8 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_rtalloc.c
@@ -338,23 +338,29 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent_exact(
xfs_rtxlen_t prod, /* extent product factor */
xfs_rtxnum_t *rtx) /* out: start rtext allocated */
{
+ struct xfs_mount *mp = args->mp;
xfs_rtxnum_t next; /* next rtext to try (dummy) */
xfs_rtxlen_t alloclen; /* candidate length */
+ xfs_rtxlen_t scanlen; /* number of free rtx to look for */
int isfree; /* extent is free */
int error;
ASSERT(minlen % prod == 0);
ASSERT(maxlen % prod == 0);
- /*
- * Check if the range in question (for maxlen) is free.
- */
- error = xfs_rtcheck_range(args, start, maxlen, 1, &next, &isfree);
+
+ /* Make sure we don't run off the end of the rt volume. */
+ scanlen = xfs_rtallocate_clamp_len(mp, start, maxlen, prod);
+ if (scanlen < minlen)
+ return -ENOSPC;
+
+ /* Check if the range in question (for scanlen) is free. */
+ error = xfs_rtcheck_range(args, start, scanlen, 1, &next, &isfree);
if (error)
return error;
if (isfree) {
- /* start to maxlen is all free; allocate it. */
- *len = maxlen;
+ /* start to scanlen is all free; allocate it. */
+ *len = scanlen;
*rtx = start;
return 0;
}
@@ -410,11 +416,6 @@ xfs_rtallocate_extent_near(
if (start >= mp->m_sb.sb_rextents)
start = mp->m_sb.sb_rextents - 1;
- /* Make sure we don't run off the end of the rt volume. */
- maxlen = xfs_rtallocate_clamp_len(mp, start, maxlen, prod);
- if (maxlen < minlen)
- return -ENOSPC;
-
/*
* Try the exact allocation first.
*/