aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChris Wilson <[email protected]>2019-01-23 13:51:55 +0000
committerChris Wilson <[email protected]>2019-01-23 14:25:58 +0000
commit6e062b60b0b1bd82cac475e63cdb8c451647182b (patch)
treea69be4347bbe7ea0a5aebcf12ece7f2b427cc963
parent03ca3cf8e9aa7549e6c398462af0f68bdd43e7fe (diff)
drm/i915/execlists: Mark up priority boost on preemption
Record the priority boost we giving to the preempted client or else we may end up in a situation where the priority queue no longer matches the request priority order and so we can end up in an infinite loop of preempting the same pair of requests. Fixes: e9eaf82d97a2 ("drm/i915: Priority boost for waiting clients") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c4
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 436e59724900..8aa8a4862543 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -302,6 +302,7 @@ static void __unwind_incomplete_requests(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
*/
if (!(prio & I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT)) {
prio |= I915_PRIORITY_NEWCLIENT;
+ active->sched.attr.priority = prio;
list_move_tail(&active->sched.link,
i915_sched_lookup_priolist(engine, prio));
}
@@ -625,6 +626,9 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
int i;
priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
+ GEM_BUG_ON(last &&
+ need_preempt(engine, last, rq_prio(rq)));
+
/*
* Can we combine this request with the current port?
* It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not