diff options
author | Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> | 2023-06-05 08:27:23 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]> | 2023-06-05 08:27:23 +0200 |
commit | 628f725d3b090fadcc3735aaf4332e778335188e (patch) | |
tree | 2dd2fdc8189b5cd3b5b4fb6788f5836de9308dd5 | |
parent | 2a84aea80e925ecba6349090559754f8e8eb68ef (diff) | |
parent | 9f16eb106aa5fce15904625661312623ec783ed3 (diff) |
Merge patch series "can: j1939: avoid possible use-after-free when j1939_can_rx_register fails"
Fedor Pchelkin <[email protected]> says:
The patch series fixes a possible racy use-after-free scenario
described in 2/2: if j1939_can_rx_register() fails then the concurrent
thread may have already read the invalid priv structure.
The 1/2 makes j1939_netdev_lock a mutex so that access to
j1939_can_rx_register() can be serialized without changing GFP_KERNEL
to GFP_ATOMIC inside can_rx_register(). This seems to be safe.
Note that the patch series has been tested only via Syzkaller and not
with a real device.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r-- | net/can/j1939/main.c | 24 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/net/can/j1939/main.c b/net/can/j1939/main.c index 821d4ff303b3..ecff1c947d68 100644 --- a/net/can/j1939/main.c +++ b/net/can/j1939/main.c @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void j1939_can_recv(struct sk_buff *iskb, void *data) #define J1939_CAN_ID CAN_EFF_FLAG #define J1939_CAN_MASK (CAN_EFF_FLAG | CAN_RTR_FLAG) -static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(j1939_netdev_lock); +static DEFINE_MUTEX(j1939_netdev_lock); static struct j1939_priv *j1939_priv_create(struct net_device *ndev) { @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void __j1939_rx_release(struct kref *kref) j1939_can_rx_unregister(priv); j1939_ecu_unmap_all(priv); j1939_priv_set(priv->ndev, NULL); - spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); } /* get pointer to priv without increasing ref counter */ @@ -248,9 +248,9 @@ static struct j1939_priv *j1939_priv_get_by_ndev(struct net_device *ndev) { struct j1939_priv *priv; - spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); priv = j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked(ndev); - spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); return priv; } @@ -260,14 +260,14 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(struct net_device *ndev) struct j1939_priv *priv, *priv_new; int ret; - spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); priv = j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked(ndev); if (priv) { kref_get(&priv->rx_kref); - spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); return priv; } - spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); priv = j1939_priv_create(ndev); if (!priv) @@ -277,29 +277,31 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(struct net_device *ndev) spin_lock_init(&priv->j1939_socks_lock); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->j1939_socks); - spin_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_lock(&j1939_netdev_lock); priv_new = j1939_priv_get_by_ndev_locked(ndev); if (priv_new) { /* Someone was faster than us, use their priv and roll * back our's. */ kref_get(&priv_new->rx_kref); - spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); dev_put(ndev); kfree(priv); return priv_new; } j1939_priv_set(ndev, priv); - spin_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); ret = j1939_can_rx_register(priv); if (ret < 0) goto out_priv_put; + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); return priv; out_priv_put: j1939_priv_set(ndev, NULL); + mutex_unlock(&j1939_netdev_lock); + dev_put(ndev); kfree(priv); @@ -308,7 +310,7 @@ struct j1939_priv *j1939_netdev_start(struct net_device *ndev) void j1939_netdev_stop(struct j1939_priv *priv) { - kref_put_lock(&priv->rx_kref, __j1939_rx_release, &j1939_netdev_lock); + kref_put_mutex(&priv->rx_kref, __j1939_rx_release, &j1939_netdev_lock); j1939_priv_put(priv); } |