irq: Improve a bit softirq debugging

do_softirq() has a debug check that verifies that it is not nesting
on softirqs processing, nor miscounting the softirq part of the preempt
count.

But making sure that softirqs processing don't nest is actually a more
generic concern that applies to any caller of __do_softirq().

Do take it one step further and generalize that debug check to
any softirq processing.

Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: James Hogan <[email protected]>
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <[email protected]>
Cc: Helge Deller <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 17c5cd2e3dae..9f8092b82a94 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -133,7 +133,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(local_bh_disable);
 
 static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
 
 	if (softirq_count() == cnt)
@@ -148,6 +147,7 @@ static void __local_bh_enable(unsigned int cnt)
  */
 void _local_bh_enable(void)
 {
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_irq());
 	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_DISABLE_OFFSET);
 }
 
@@ -279,6 +279,7 @@ restart:
 
 	account_irq_exit_time(current);
 	__local_bh_enable(SOFTIRQ_OFFSET);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(in_interrupt());
 	tsk_restore_flags(current, old_flags, PF_MEMALLOC);
 }
 
@@ -299,7 +300,6 @@ asmlinkage void do_softirq(void)
 	if (pending)
 		do_softirq_own_stack();
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(softirq_count());
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }