XArray: add xa_get_order

Patch series "Fix read-only THP for non-tmpfs filesystems".

As described more verbosely in the [3/3] changelog, we can inadvertently
put an order-0 page in the page cache which occupies 512 consecutive
entries.  Users are running into this if they enable the
READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS config option; see
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206569 and Qian Cai has also
reported it here:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

This is a rather intrusive way of fixing the problem, but has the
advantage that I've actually been testing it with the THP patches, which
means that it sees far more use than it does upstream -- indeed, Song has
been entirely unable to reproduce it.  It also has the advantage that it
removes a few patches from my gargantuan backlog of THP patches.

This patch (of 3):

This function returns the order of the entry at the index.  We need this
because there isn't space in the shadow entry to encode its order.

[[email protected]: export xa_get_order to modules]

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <[email protected]>
Cc: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

3 files changed, 70 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/xarray.h b/include/linux/xarray.h
index b4d70e7568b2..5b7f4ebcf4ff 100644
--- a/include/linux/xarray.h
+++ b/include/linux/xarray.h
@@ -1505,6 +1505,15 @@ void xas_pause(struct xa_state *);
 
 void xas_create_range(struct xa_state *);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI
+int xa_get_order(struct xarray *, unsigned long index);
+#else
+static inline int xa_get_order(struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 /**
  * xas_reload() - Refetch an entry from the xarray.
  * @xas: XArray operation state.
diff --git a/lib/test_xarray.c b/lib/test_xarray.c
index d4f97925dbd8..bdd4d7995f79 100644
--- a/lib/test_xarray.c
+++ b/lib/test_xarray.c
@@ -1649,6 +1649,26 @@ static noinline void check_account(struct xarray *xa)
 #endif
 }
 
+static noinline void check_get_order(struct xarray *xa)
+{
+	unsigned int max_order = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI) ? 20 : 1;
+	unsigned int order;
+	unsigned long i, j;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++)
+		XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, i) != 0);
+
+	for (order = 0; order < max_order; order++) {
+		for (i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
+			xa_store_order(xa, i << order, order,
+					xa_mk_index(i << order), GFP_KERNEL);
+			for (j = i << order; j < (i + 1) << order; j++)
+				XA_BUG_ON(xa, xa_get_order(xa, j) != order);
+			xa_erase(xa, i << order);
+		}
+	}
+}
+
 static noinline void check_destroy(struct xarray *xa)
 {
 	unsigned long index;
@@ -1697,6 +1717,7 @@ static int xarray_checks(void)
 	check_reserve(&array);
 	check_reserve(&xa0);
 	check_multi_store(&array);
+	check_get_order(&array);
 	check_xa_alloc();
 	check_find(&array);
 	check_find_entry(&array);
diff --git a/lib/xarray.c b/lib/xarray.c
index e9e641d3c0c3..f24cb9a43af8 100644
--- a/lib/xarray.c
+++ b/lib/xarray.c
@@ -1592,6 +1592,46 @@ unlock:
 	return xas_result(&xas, NULL);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(xa_store_range);
+
+/**
+ * xa_get_order() - Get the order of an entry.
+ * @xa: XArray.
+ * @index: Index of the entry.
+ *
+ * Return: A number between 0 and 63 indicating the order of the entry.
+ */
+int xa_get_order(struct xarray *xa, unsigned long index)
+{
+	XA_STATE(xas, xa, index);
+	void *entry;
+	int order = 0;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	entry = xas_load(&xas);
+
+	if (!entry)
+		goto unlock;
+
+	if (!xas.xa_node)
+		goto unlock;
+
+	for (;;) {
+		unsigned int slot = xas.xa_offset + (1 << order);
+
+		if (slot >= XA_CHUNK_SIZE)
+			break;
+		if (!xa_is_sibling(xas.xa_node->slots[slot]))
+			break;
+		order++;
+	}
+
+	order += xas.xa_node->shift;
+unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return order;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(xa_get_order);
 #endif /* CONFIG_XARRAY_MULTI */
 
 /**