locking/spinlocks: Always evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested()

Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options
have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always
evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested().

An intentional side effect of this patch is that it avoids that
the following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested()
when building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1:

  include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested':
  include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
    int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
        ^

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Cc: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 3f2867ff0ced..262ba4ef9a8e 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -197,7 +197,13 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
 		 _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, &(nest_lock)->dep_map);	\
 	 } while (0)
 #else
-# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		_raw_spin_lock(lock)
+/*
+ * Always evaluate the 'subclass' argument to avoid that the compiler
+ * warns about set-but-not-used variables when building with
+ * CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1.
+ */
+# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		\
+	_raw_spin_lock(((void)(subclass), (lock)))
 # define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)	_raw_spin_lock(lock)
 #endif