diff options
| author | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> | 2023-10-24 11:57:15 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> | 2023-11-13 11:51:26 +0000 |
| commit | 3fad96e9b21bed214c1593d7d7fb3e40d1fbf6f4 (patch) | |
| tree | fd87f0e36fe103308494fe9ceee7a47c3b8be746 | |
| parent | b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86 (diff) | |
firmware: arm_ffa: Declare ffa_bus_type structure in the header
smatch reports:
drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/bus.c:108:17: warning:
symbol 'ffa_bus_type' was not declared. Should it be static?
ffa_bus_type is exported to be useful in the FF-A driver. So this
warning is not correct. However, declaring the ffa_bus_type structure
in the header like many other bus_types do already removes this warning.
So let us just do the same and get rid of the warning.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231024105715.2369638-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | include/linux/arm_ffa.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h index 1abedb5b2e48..3d0fde57ba90 100644 --- a/include/linux/arm_ffa.h +++ b/include/linux/arm_ffa.h @@ -209,6 +209,8 @@ bool ffa_device_is_valid(struct ffa_device *ffa_dev) { return false; } #define module_ffa_driver(__ffa_driver) \ module_driver(__ffa_driver, ffa_register, ffa_unregister) +extern struct bus_type ffa_bus_type; + /* FFA transport related */ struct ffa_partition_info { u16 id; |