diff options
author | Mark Brown <[email protected]> | 2024-06-16 09:34:45 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Takashi Iwai <[email protected]> | 2024-06-18 12:00:18 +0200 |
commit | 1b1285e4759e4d9df4f8e46d92802ff87ce8709b (patch) | |
tree | b53c80f3826c243dd3b207f72543220bc29aa08b | |
parent | 50ed081284fe2bfd1f25e8b92f4f6a4990e73c0a (diff) |
kselftest/alsa: Fix validation of writes to volatile controls
When validating writes to controls we check that whatever value we wrote
actually appears in the control. For volatile controls we cannot assume
that this will be the case, the value may be changed at any time
including between our write and read. Handle this by moving the check
for volatile controls that we currently do for events to a separate
block and just verifying that whatever value we read is valid for the
control.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c | 45 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c index 1c04e5f638a0..dd74f8cc7ece 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/alsa/mixer-test.c @@ -626,28 +626,41 @@ static int write_and_verify(struct ctl_data *ctl, } /* + * We can't verify any specific value for volatile controls + * but we should still check that whatever we read is a valid + * vale for the control. + */ + if (snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) { + if (!ctl_value_valid(ctl, read_val)) { + ksft_print_msg("Volatile control %s has invalid value\n", + ctl->name); + return -EINVAL; + } + + return 0; + } + + /* * Check for an event if the value changed, or confirm that * there was none if it didn't. We rely on the kernel * generating the notification before it returns from the * write, this is currently true, should that ever change this * will most likely break and need updating. */ - if (!snd_ctl_elem_info_is_volatile(ctl->info)) { - err = wait_for_event(ctl, 0); - if (snd_ctl_elem_value_compare(initial_val, read_val)) { - if (err < 1) { - ksft_print_msg("No event generated for %s\n", - ctl->name); - show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val); - ctl->event_missing++; - } - } else { - if (err != 0) { - ksft_print_msg("Spurious event generated for %s\n", - ctl->name); - show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val); - ctl->event_spurious++; - } + err = wait_for_event(ctl, 0); + if (snd_ctl_elem_value_compare(initial_val, read_val)) { + if (err < 1) { + ksft_print_msg("No event generated for %s\n", + ctl->name); + show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val); + ctl->event_missing++; + } + } else { + if (err != 0) { + ksft_print_msg("Spurious event generated for %s\n", + ctl->name); + show_values(ctl, initial_val, read_val); + ctl->event_spurious++; } } |