aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorXuewen Yan <[email protected]>2024-04-22 16:22:38 +0800
committerPeter Zijlstra <[email protected]>2024-04-22 13:01:27 +0200
commit1560d1f6eb6b398bddd80c16676776c0325fe5fe (patch)
tree8d730e638bc7b98354c51987b2e2affaec272a07
parentafae8002b4fd3560c8f5f1567f3c3202c30a70fa (diff)
sched/eevdf: Prevent vlag from going out of bounds in reweight_eevdf()
It was possible to have pick_eevdf() return NULL, which then causes a NULL-deref. This turned out to be due to entity_eligible() returning falsely negative because of a s64 multiplcation overflow. Specifically, reweight_eevdf() computes the vlag without considering the limit placed upon vlag as update_entity_lag() does, and then the scaling multiplication (remember that weight is 20bit fixed point) can overflow. This then leads to the new vruntime being weird which then causes the above entity_eligible() to go side-ways and claim nothing is eligible. Thus limit the range of vlag accordingly. All this was quite rare, but fatal when it does happen. Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+9S74ih+45M_2TPUY_mPPVDhNvyYfy1J1ftSix+KjiTVxg8nw@mail.gmail.com/ Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ Fixes: eab03c23c2a1 ("sched/eevdf: Fix vruntime adjustment on reweight") Reported-by: Sergei Trofimovich <[email protected]> Reported-by: Igor Raits <[email protected]> Reported-by: Breno Leitao <[email protected]> Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Reported-by: Yujie Liu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xuewen Yan <[email protected]> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Chen Yu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
-rw-r--r--kernel/sched/fair.c18
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 6d266917d38d..c62805dbd608 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -696,15 +696,21 @@ u64 avg_vruntime(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
*
* XXX could add max_slice to the augmented data to track this.
*/
-static void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+static s64 entity_lag(u64 avruntime, struct sched_entity *se)
{
- s64 lag, limit;
+ s64 vlag, limit;
+
+ vlag = avruntime - se->vruntime;
+ limit = calc_delta_fair(max_t(u64, 2*se->slice, TICK_NSEC), se);
+
+ return clamp(vlag, -limit, limit);
+}
+static void update_entity_lag(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
+{
SCHED_WARN_ON(!se->on_rq);
- lag = avg_vruntime(cfs_rq) - se->vruntime;
- limit = calc_delta_fair(max_t(u64, 2*se->slice, TICK_NSEC), se);
- se->vlag = clamp(lag, -limit, limit);
+ se->vlag = entity_lag(avg_vruntime(cfs_rq), se);
}
/*
@@ -3760,7 +3766,7 @@ static void reweight_eevdf(struct sched_entity *se, u64 avruntime,
* = V - vl'
*/
if (avruntime != se->vruntime) {
- vlag = (s64)(avruntime - se->vruntime);
+ vlag = entity_lag(avruntime, se);
vlag = div_s64(vlag * old_weight, weight);
se->vruntime = avruntime - vlag;
}