TTY: ldisc, wait for ldisc infinitely in hangup

For /dev/console case, we do not kill all ldisc users. It's due to
redirected_tty_write test in __tty_hangup. In that case there still
might be a process waiting e.g. in n_tty_read for input.

We wait for such processes to disappear. The problem is that we use a
timeout. After this timeout, we continue closing the ldisc and start
freeing tty resources. It obviously leads to crashes when the other
process is woken.

So to fix this, we wait infinitely before reiniting the ldisc. (The
tiocsetd remains untouched -- times out after 5s.)

This is nicely reproducible with this run from shell:
  exec 0<>/dev/console 1<>/dev/console 2<>/dev/console
and stopping a getty like:
  systemctl stop [email protected]

The crash proper may be produced only under load or with constified
timing the same as for 92f6fa09b.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Young <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
Cc: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitriy Matrosov <[email protected]>
Cc: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
Cc: stable <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
index a69a755035b6..8e0924f55446 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/kmod.h>
 #include <linux/nsproxy.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 
 /*
  *	This guards the refcounted line discipline lists. The lock
@@ -837,7 +838,7 @@ void tty_ldisc_hangup(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	tty_unlock();
 	cancel_work_sync(&tty->buf.work);
 	mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
-
+retry:
 	tty_lock();
 	mutex_lock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
 
@@ -846,7 +847,21 @@ void tty_ldisc_hangup(struct tty_struct *tty)
 	   it means auditing a lot of other paths so this is
 	   a FIXME */
 	if (tty->ldisc) {	/* Not yet closed */
-		WARN_ON_ONCE(tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty, 5 * HZ));
+		if (atomic_read(&tty->ldisc->users) != 1) {
+			char cur_n[TASK_COMM_LEN], tty_n[64];
+			long timeout = 3 * HZ;
+			tty_unlock();
+
+			while (tty_ldisc_wait_idle(tty, timeout) == -EBUSY) {
+				timeout = MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT;
+				printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
+					"%s: waiting (%s) for %s took too long, but we keep waiting...\n",
+					__func__, get_task_comm(cur_n, current),
+					tty_name(tty, tty_n));
+			}
+			mutex_unlock(&tty->ldisc_mutex);
+			goto retry;
+		}
 
 		if (reset == 0) {