kernfs: fix missing kernfs_iattr_rwsem locking

When the kernfs_iattr_rwsem was introduced a case was missed.

The update of the kernfs directory node child count was also protected
by the kernfs_rwsem and needs to be included in the change so that the
child count (and so the inode n_link attribute) does not change while
holding the rwsem for read.

Fixes: 9caf69614225 ("kernfs: Introduce separate rwsem to protect inode attributes.")
Cc: stable <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ian Kent <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Imran Khan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <[email protected]>
Cc: Anders Roxell <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/fs/kernfs/dir.c b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
index 5a1a4af9d3d2..bf243015834e 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/dir.c
@@ -383,9 +383,11 @@ static int kernfs_link_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	rb_insert_color(&kn->rb, &kn->parent->dir.children);
 
 	/* successfully added, account subdir number */
+	down_write(&kernfs_root(kn)->kernfs_iattr_rwsem);
 	if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
 		kn->parent->dir.subdirs++;
 	kernfs_inc_rev(kn->parent);
+	up_write(&kernfs_root(kn)->kernfs_iattr_rwsem);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -408,9 +410,11 @@ static bool kernfs_unlink_sibling(struct kernfs_node *kn)
 	if (RB_EMPTY_NODE(&kn->rb))
 		return false;
 
+	down_write(&kernfs_root(kn)->kernfs_iattr_rwsem);
 	if (kernfs_type(kn) == KERNFS_DIR)
 		kn->parent->dir.subdirs--;
 	kernfs_inc_rev(kn->parent);
+	up_write(&kernfs_root(kn)->kernfs_iattr_rwsem);
 
 	rb_erase(&kn->rb, &kn->parent->dir.children);
 	RB_CLEAR_NODE(&kn->rb);