From 1cb59a6074e23c6f6513642f752a6d8d38327354 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ilya Leoshkevich Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:58:27 +0200 Subject: selftests/bpf: fix perf_buffer on s390 perf_buffer test fails for exactly the same reason test_attach_probe used to fail: different nanosleep syscall kprobe name. Reuse the test_attach_probe fix. Fixes: ee5cf82ce04a ("selftests/bpf: test perf buffer API") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c index 3f1ef95865ff..3003fddc0613 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/perf_buffer.c @@ -5,12 +5,6 @@ #include #include -#ifdef __x86_64__ -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep" -#else -#define SYS_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep" -#endif - static void on_sample(void *ctx, int cpu, void *data, __u32 size) { int cpu_data = *(int *)data, duration = 0; @@ -56,7 +50,7 @@ void test_perf_buffer(void) /* attach kprobe */ link = bpf_program__attach_kprobe(prog, false /* retprobe */, - SYS_KPROBE_NAME); + SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME); if (CHECK(IS_ERR(link), "attach_kprobe", "err %ld\n", PTR_ERR(link))) goto out_close; -- cgit