From f6e659b7f97c76d0471d12bf274ea2a097cf3c5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joanne Koong Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 19:06:21 -0800 Subject: selftests/bpf: Measure bpf_loop verifier performance This patch tests bpf_loop in pyperf and strobemeta, and measures the verifier performance of replacing the traditional for loop with bpf_loop. The results are as follows: ~strobemeta~ Baseline verification time 6808200 usec stack depth 496 processed 554252 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 16 total_states 15878 peak_states 13489 mark_read 3110 #192 verif_scale_strobemeta:OK (unrolled loop) Using bpf_loop verification time 31589 usec stack depth 96+400 processed 1513 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 2 total_states 106 peak_states 106 mark_read 60 #193 verif_scale_strobemeta_bpf_loop:OK ~pyperf600~ Baseline verification time 29702486 usec stack depth 368 processed 626838 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 7 total_states 30368 peak_states 30279 mark_read 748 #182 verif_scale_pyperf600:OK (unrolled loop) Using bpf_loop verification time 148488 usec stack depth 320+40 processed 10518 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 10 total_states 705 peak_states 517 mark_read 38 #183 verif_scale_pyperf600_bpf_loop:OK Using the bpf_loop helper led to approximately a 99% decrease in the verification time and in the number of instructions. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211130030622.4131246-4-joannekoong@fb.com --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c') diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c index 27f5d8ea7964..1fb16f8dad56 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c @@ -115,6 +115,12 @@ void test_verif_scale_pyperf600() scale_test("pyperf600.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); } +void test_verif_scale_pyperf600_bpf_loop(void) +{ + /* use the bpf_loop helper*/ + scale_test("pyperf600_bpf_loop.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + void test_verif_scale_pyperf600_nounroll() { /* no unroll at all. @@ -165,6 +171,12 @@ void test_verif_scale_strobemeta() scale_test("strobemeta.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); } +void test_verif_scale_strobemeta_bpf_loop(void) +{ + /* use the bpf_loop helper*/ + scale_test("strobemeta_bpf_loop.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT, false); +} + void test_verif_scale_strobemeta_nounroll1() { /* no unroll, tiny loops */ -- cgit