From 68ca5d4eebb8c4de246ee5f634eee26bc689562d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2024 16:38:50 -0700 Subject: bpf: support BPF cookie in raw tracepoint (raw_tp, tp_btf) programs Wire up BPF cookie for raw tracepoint programs (both BTF and non-BTF aware variants). This brings them up to part w.r.t. BPF cookie usage with classic tracepoint and fentry/fexit programs. Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Message-ID: <20240319233852.1977493-4-andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'tools/include') diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 3c42b9f1bada..bf80b614c4db 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -1664,6 +1664,7 @@ union bpf_attr { struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */ __u64 name; __u32 prog_fd; + __aligned_u64 cookie; } raw_tracepoint; struct { /* anonymous struct for BPF_BTF_LOAD */ -- cgit From af8d27bf15c8d68c60d830552055fcdba5b5f045 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jiri Olsa Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 14:49:36 +0100 Subject: selftests/bpf: Mark uprobe trigger functions with nocf_check attribute Some distros seem to enable the -fcf-protection=branch by default, which breaks our setup on first instruction of uprobe trigger functions and place there endbr64 instruction. Marking them with nocf_check attribute to skip that. Ignoring unknown attribute warning in gcc for bench objects, because nocf_check can be used only when -fcf-protection=branch is enabled, otherwise we get a warning and break compilation. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240322134936.1075395-1-jolsa@kernel.org --- tools/include/linux/compiler.h | 4 ++++ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c | 8 +++++--- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/include') diff --git a/tools/include/linux/compiler.h b/tools/include/linux/compiler.h index 7b65566f3e42..8a63a9913495 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/compiler.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/compiler.h @@ -58,6 +58,10 @@ #define noinline #endif +#ifndef __nocf_check +#define __nocf_check __attribute__((nocf_check)) +#endif + /* Are two types/vars the same type (ignoring qualifiers)? */ #ifndef __same_type # define __same_type(a, b) __builtin_types_compatible_p(typeof(a), typeof(b)) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c index 9c50412f72e9..d66eddacd642 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_trigger.c @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ /* adjust slot shift in inc_hits() if changing */ #define MAX_BUCKETS 256 +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wattributes" + /* BPF triggering benchmarks */ static struct trigger_ctx { struct trigger_bench *skel; @@ -167,7 +169,7 @@ static void trigger_fmodret_setup(void) * GCC doesn't generate stack setup preample for these functions due to them * having no input arguments and doing nothing in the body. */ -__weak void uprobe_target_nop(void) +__nocf_check __weak void uprobe_target_nop(void) { asm volatile ("nop"); } @@ -176,7 +178,7 @@ __weak void opaque_noop_func(void) { } -__weak int uprobe_target_push(void) +__nocf_check __weak int uprobe_target_push(void) { /* overhead of function call is negligible compared to uprobe * triggering, so this shouldn't affect benchmark results much @@ -185,7 +187,7 @@ __weak int uprobe_target_push(void) return 1; } -__weak void uprobe_target_ret(void) +__nocf_check __weak void uprobe_target_ret(void) { asm volatile (""); } -- cgit From 476a5e929119725fbfcf1307cc8517d9dd2a014d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yonghong Song Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 20:38:42 -0700 Subject: bpf: Sync uapi bpf.h to tools directory There is a difference between kernel uapi bpf.h and tools uapi bpf.h. There is no functionality difference, but let us sync properly to make it easy for later bpf.h update. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240325033842.1693553-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev --- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'tools/include') diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index bf80b614c4db..9585f5345353 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -1662,9 +1662,10 @@ union bpf_attr { } query; struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN command */ - __u64 name; - __u32 prog_fd; - __aligned_u64 cookie; + __u64 name; + __u32 prog_fd; + __u32 :32; + __aligned_u64 cookie; } raw_tracepoint; struct { /* anonymous struct for BPF_BTF_LOAD */ -- cgit