From fd86344823b521149bb31d91eba900ba3525efa6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 19:19:28 -0700 Subject: af_unix: Try not to hold unix_gc_lock during accept(). Commit dcf70df2048d ("af_unix: Fix up unix_edge.successor for embryo socket.") added spin_lock(&unix_gc_lock) in accept() path, and it caused regression in a stress test as reported by kernel test robot. If the embryo socket is not part of the inflight graph, we need not hold the lock. To decide that in O(1) time and avoid the regression in the normal use case, 1. add a new stat unix_sk(sk)->scm_stat.nr_unix_fds 2. count the number of inflight AF_UNIX sockets in the receive queue under unix_state_lock() 3. move unix_update_edges() call under unix_state_lock() 4. avoid locking if nr_unix_fds is 0 in unix_update_edges() Reported-by: kernel test robot Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202404101427.92a08551-oliver.sang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240413021928.20946-1-kuniyu@amazon.com Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- net/unix/af_unix.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'net/unix/af_unix.c') diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 142d210b5b03..ed16d5f66df8 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -1719,12 +1719,12 @@ static int unix_accept(struct socket *sock, struct socket *newsock, int flags, } tsk = skb->sk; - unix_update_edges(unix_sk(tsk)); skb_free_datagram(sk, skb); wake_up_interruptible(&unix_sk(sk)->peer_wait); /* attach accepted sock to socket */ unix_state_lock(tsk); + unix_update_edges(unix_sk(tsk)); newsock->state = SS_CONNECTED; unix_sock_inherit_flags(sock, newsock); sock_graft(tsk, newsock); -- cgit