From 22e5751b0524fedd4f345412d8d3394387471ab7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kuniyuki Iwashima Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 13:56:23 -0700 Subject: af_unix: Don't use spin_lock_nested() in copy_peercred(). When (AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM) socket connect()s to a listening socket, the listener's sk_peer_pid/sk_peer_cred are copied to the client in copy_peercred(). Then, two sk_peer_locks are held there; one is client's and another is listener's. However, the latter is not needed because we hold the listner's unix_state_lock() there and unix_listen() cannot update the cred concurrently. Let's drop the unnecessary spin_lock() and use the bare spin_lock() for the client to protect concurrent read by getsockopt(SO_PEERCRED). Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni --- net/unix/af_unix.c | 13 +++---------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/unix/af_unix.c') diff --git a/net/unix/af_unix.c b/net/unix/af_unix.c index 3d0ace7ca017..103a7909cb1a 100644 --- a/net/unix/af_unix.c +++ b/net/unix/af_unix.c @@ -772,19 +772,12 @@ static void update_peercred(struct sock *sk) static void copy_peercred(struct sock *sk, struct sock *peersk) { - if (sk < peersk) { - spin_lock(&sk->sk_peer_lock); - spin_lock_nested(&peersk->sk_peer_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - } else { - spin_lock(&peersk->sk_peer_lock); - spin_lock_nested(&sk->sk_peer_lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); - } + lockdep_assert_held(&unix_sk(peersk)->lock); - sk->sk_peer_pid = get_pid(peersk->sk_peer_pid); + spin_lock(&sk->sk_peer_lock); + sk->sk_peer_pid = get_pid(peersk->sk_peer_pid); sk->sk_peer_cred = get_cred(peersk->sk_peer_cred); - spin_unlock(&sk->sk_peer_lock); - spin_unlock(&peersk->sk_peer_lock); } static int unix_listen(struct socket *sock, int backlog) -- cgit