From 766ece54f4c9c29b25eabd091a2ee939feb1669e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:07:14 +0100
Subject: btrfs: merge btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw with it's caller
The last caller that does not have a fixed value of lock is
btrfs_set_path_blocking, that actually does the same conditional swtich
by the lock type so we can merge the branches together and remove the
helper.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/locking.h | 12 ------------
1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)
(limited to 'fs/btrfs/locking.h')
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/locking.h b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
index 84ea6ed60047..595014f64830 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/locking.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/locking.h
@@ -39,16 +39,4 @@ static inline void btrfs_tree_unlock_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
BUG();
}
-/*
- * If we currently have a spinning reader or writer lock (indicated by the rw
- * flag) this will bump the count of blocking holders and drop the spinlock.
- */
-static inline void btrfs_set_lock_blocking_rw(struct extent_buffer *eb, int rw)
-{
- if (rw == BTRFS_WRITE_LOCK)
- btrfs_set_lock_blocking_write(eb);
- else if (rw == BTRFS_READ_LOCK)
- btrfs_set_lock_blocking_read(eb);
-}
-
#endif
--
cgit