From 30ac4e2f54ec067b7b9ca0db27e75681581378d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antonio Quartulli Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:25:43 +0100 Subject: wireguard: avoid double unlikely() notation when using IS_ERR() The definition of IS_ERR() already applies the unlikely() notation when checking the error status of the passed pointer. For this reason there is no need to have the same notation outside of IS_ERR() itself. Clean up code by removing redundant notation. Signed-off-by: Antonio Quartulli Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski --- drivers/net/wireguard/device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/wireguard/device.c') diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c index a3ed49cd95c3..cd51a2afa28e 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/device.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t wg_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) } else { struct sk_buff *segs = skb_gso_segment(skb, 0); - if (unlikely(IS_ERR(segs))) { + if (IS_ERR(segs)) { ret = PTR_ERR(segs); goto err_peer; } -- cgit