From a9ad8526bb1af0741a5c0e01155dac08e7bdde60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 10:23:13 +1000
Subject: DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each
Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe
Commit dafb20fa34320a472deb7442f25a0c086e0feb33 mistakenly replaced a safe
iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
---
drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(limited to 'drivers/md/dm-raid.c')
diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
index b0ba52459ed7..68965e663248 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
@@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
int ret;
unsigned redundancy = 0;
struct raid_dev *dev;
- struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest;
+ struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest;
struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
}
freshest = NULL;
- rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
+ rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {
if (!rdev->meta_bdev)
continue;
--
cgit