From 429ac8b75a0b1c3478ffd584de8a63075cbe25e7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fenghua Yu Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:46:35 -0700 Subject: x86/split_lock: Add Icelake microserver and Tigerlake CPU models Icelake microserver CPU supports split lock detection while it doesn't have the split lock enumeration bit in IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES. Tigerlake CPUs do enumerate the MSR. [ bp: Merge the two model-adding patches into one. ] Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Reviewed-by: Tony Luck Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1588290395-2677-1-git-send-email-fenghua.yu@intel.com --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c index a19a680542ce..6abbcc774b82 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c @@ -1135,9 +1135,12 @@ void switch_to_sld(unsigned long tifn) static const struct x86_cpu_id split_lock_cpu_ids[] __initconst = { X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_X, 0), X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_L, 0), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ICELAKE_D, 0), X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_TREMONT, 1), X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_TREMONT_D, 1), X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(ATOM_TREMONT_L, 1), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(TIGERLAKE_L, 1), + X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL(TIGERLAKE, 1), {} }; -- cgit From 21998a351512eba4ed5969006f0c55882d995ada Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Steinhauser Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 06:40:42 -0700 Subject: x86/speculation: Avoid force-disabling IBPB based on STIBP and enhanced IBRS. When STIBP is unavailable or enhanced IBRS is available, Linux force-disables the IBPB mitigation of Spectre-BTB even when simultaneous multithreading is disabled. While attempts to enable IBPB using prctl(PR_SET_SPECULATION_CTRL, PR_SPEC_INDIRECT_BRANCH, ...) fail with EPERM, the seccomp syscall (or its prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, ...) equivalent) which are used e.g. by Chromium or OpenSSH succeed with no errors but the application remains silently vulnerable to cross-process Spectre v2 attacks (classical BTB poisoning). At the same time the SYSFS reporting (/sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v2) displays that IBPB is conditionally enabled when in fact it is unconditionally disabled. STIBP is useful only when SMT is enabled. When SMT is disabled and STIBP is unavailable, it makes no sense to force-disable also IBPB, because IBPB protects against cross-process Spectre-BTB attacks regardless of the SMT state. At the same time since missing STIBP was only observed on AMD CPUs, AMD does not recommend using STIBP, but recommends using IBPB, so disabling IBPB because of missing STIBP goes directly against AMD's advice: https://developer.amd.com/wp-content/resources/Architecture_Guidelines_Update_Indirect_Branch_Control.pdf Similarly, enhanced IBRS is designed to protect cross-core BTB poisoning and BTB-poisoning attacks from user space against kernel (and BTB-poisoning attacks from guest against hypervisor), it is not designed to prevent cross-process (or cross-VM) BTB poisoning between processes (or VMs) running on the same core. Therefore, even with enhanced IBRS it is necessary to flush the BTB during context-switches, so there is no reason to force disable IBPB when enhanced IBRS is available. Enable the prctl control of IBPB even when STIBP is unavailable or enhanced IBRS is available. Fixes: 7cc765a67d8e ("x86/speculation: Enable prctl mode for spectre_v2_user") Signed-off-by: Anthony Steinhauser Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index ed54b3b21c39..8d57562b1d2c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -495,7 +495,9 @@ early_param("nospectre_v1", nospectre_v1_cmdline); static enum spectre_v2_mitigation spectre_v2_enabled __ro_after_init = SPECTRE_V2_NONE; -static enum spectre_v2_user_mitigation spectre_v2_user __ro_after_init = +static enum spectre_v2_user_mitigation spectre_v2_user_stibp __ro_after_init = + SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE; +static enum spectre_v2_user_mitigation spectre_v2_user_ibpb __ro_after_init = SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE; #ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE @@ -641,15 +643,6 @@ spectre_v2_user_select_mitigation(enum spectre_v2_mitigation_cmd v2_cmd) break; } - /* - * At this point, an STIBP mode other than "off" has been set. - * If STIBP support is not being forced, check if STIBP always-on - * is preferred. - */ - if (mode != SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT && - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP_ALWAYS_ON)) - mode = SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED; - /* Initialize Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier */ if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_IBPB)) { setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBPB); @@ -672,23 +665,36 @@ spectre_v2_user_select_mitigation(enum spectre_v2_mitigation_cmd v2_cmd) pr_info("mitigation: Enabling %s Indirect Branch Prediction Barrier\n", static_key_enabled(&switch_mm_always_ibpb) ? "always-on" : "conditional"); + + spectre_v2_user_ibpb = mode; } - /* If enhanced IBRS is enabled no STIBP required */ - if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_IBRS_ENHANCED) + /* + * If enhanced IBRS is enabled or SMT impossible, STIBP is not + * required. + */ + if (!smt_possible || spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_IBRS_ENHANCED) return; /* - * If SMT is not possible or STIBP is not available clear the STIBP - * mode. + * At this point, an STIBP mode other than "off" has been set. + * If STIBP support is not being forced, check if STIBP always-on + * is preferred. + */ + if (mode != SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT && + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_STIBP_ALWAYS_ON)) + mode = SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED; + + /* + * If STIBP is not available, clear the STIBP mode. */ - if (!smt_possible || !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_STIBP)) + if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_STIBP)) mode = SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE; + + spectre_v2_user_stibp = mode; + set_mode: - spectre_v2_user = mode; - /* Only print the STIBP mode when SMT possible */ - if (smt_possible) - pr_info("%s\n", spectre_v2_user_strings[mode]); + pr_info("%s\n", spectre_v2_user_strings[mode]); } static const char * const spectre_v2_strings[] = { @@ -921,7 +927,7 @@ void cpu_bugs_smt_update(void) { mutex_lock(&spec_ctrl_mutex); - switch (spectre_v2_user) { + switch (spectre_v2_user_stibp) { case SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE: break; case SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT: @@ -1164,14 +1170,16 @@ static int ib_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl) { switch (ctrl) { case PR_SPEC_ENABLE: - if (spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE) + if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE && + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE) return 0; /* * Indirect branch speculation is always disabled in strict * mode. */ - if (spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || - spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED) + if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED) return -EPERM; task_clear_spec_ib_disable(task); task_update_spec_tif(task); @@ -1182,10 +1190,12 @@ static int ib_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl) * Indirect branch speculation is always allowed when * mitigation is force disabled. */ - if (spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE) + if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE && + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE) return -EPERM; - if (spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || - spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED) + if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED) return 0; task_set_spec_ib_disable(task); if (ctrl == PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE) @@ -1216,7 +1226,8 @@ void arch_seccomp_spec_mitigate(struct task_struct *task) { if (ssb_mode == SPEC_STORE_BYPASS_SECCOMP) ssb_prctl_set(task, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE); - if (spectre_v2_user == SPECTRE_V2_USER_SECCOMP) + if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_SECCOMP || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_SECCOMP) ib_prctl_set(task, PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE); } #endif @@ -1247,22 +1258,24 @@ static int ib_prctl_get(struct task_struct *task) if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_SPECTRE_V2)) return PR_SPEC_NOT_AFFECTED; - switch (spectre_v2_user) { - case SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE: + if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE && + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE) return PR_SPEC_ENABLE; - case SPECTRE_V2_USER_PRCTL: - case SPECTRE_V2_USER_SECCOMP: + else if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED) + return PR_SPEC_DISABLE; + else if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_PRCTL || + spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_SECCOMP || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_PRCTL || + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_SECCOMP) { if (task_spec_ib_force_disable(task)) return PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE; if (task_spec_ib_disable(task)) return PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_DISABLE; return PR_SPEC_PRCTL | PR_SPEC_ENABLE; - case SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT: - case SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED: - return PR_SPEC_DISABLE; - default: + } else return PR_SPEC_NOT_AFFECTED; - } } int arch_prctl_spec_ctrl_get(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long which) @@ -1501,7 +1514,7 @@ static char *stibp_state(void) if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_IBRS_ENHANCED) return ""; - switch (spectre_v2_user) { + switch (spectre_v2_user_stibp) { case SPECTRE_V2_USER_NONE: return ", STIBP: disabled"; case SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT: -- cgit From 4d8df8cbb9156b0a0ab3f802b80cb5db57acc0bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Anthony Steinhauser Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 05:44:19 -0700 Subject: x86/speculation: PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE enforcement for indirect branches. Currently, it is possible to enable indirect branch speculation even after it was force-disabled using the PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE option. Moreover, the PR_GET_SPECULATION_CTRL command gives afterwards an incorrect result (force-disabled when it is in fact enabled). This also is inconsistent vs. STIBP and the documention which cleary states that PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE cannot be undone. Fix this by actually enforcing force-disabled indirect branch speculation. PR_SPEC_ENABLE called after PR_SPEC_FORCE_DISABLE now fails with -EPERM as described in the documentation. Fixes: 9137bb27e60e ("x86/speculation: Add prctl() control for indirect branch speculation") Signed-off-by: Anthony Steinhauser Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/kernel/cpu') diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 8d57562b1d2c..56f573aa764f 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -1175,11 +1175,14 @@ static int ib_prctl_set(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long ctrl) return 0; /* * Indirect branch speculation is always disabled in strict - * mode. + * mode. It can neither be enabled if it was force-disabled + * by a previous prctl call. + */ if (spectre_v2_user_ibpb == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT || - spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED) + spectre_v2_user_stibp == SPECTRE_V2_USER_STRICT_PREFERRED || + task_spec_ib_force_disable(task)) return -EPERM; task_clear_spec_ib_disable(task); task_update_spec_tif(task); -- cgit