From 945626db0961d8388543b2c96b6f16df57947392 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2018 12:51:27 -0500 Subject: sparc64: Use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() instead of curr_ret_stack The structure of the ret_stack array on the task struct is going to change, and accessing it directly via the curr_ret_stack index will no longer give the ret_stack entry that holds the return address. To access that, architectures must now use ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack() to get the associated ret_stack that matches the saved return address. Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Acked-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) --- arch/sparc/kernel/stacktrace.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/sparc/kernel/stacktrace.c') diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/stacktrace.c index be4c14cccc05..dd654e651500 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/stacktrace.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/stacktrace.c @@ -57,9 +57,11 @@ static void __save_stack_trace(struct thread_info *tp, trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = pc; #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER if ((pc + 8UL) == (unsigned long) &return_to_handler) { - int index = t->curr_ret_stack; - if (t->ret_stack && index >= graph) { - pc = t->ret_stack[index - graph].ret; + struct ftrace_ret_stack *ret_stack; + ret_stack = ftrace_graph_get_ret_stack(t, + graph); + if (ret_stack) { + pc = ret_stack->ret; if (trace->nr_entries < trace->max_entries) trace->entries[trace->nr_entries++] = pc; -- cgit