From e3be011e828037be60fc91fa2d1791f9ee612a46 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Yan Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:37:42 +0800 Subject: scsi: libsas: Simplify sas_check_eeds() In sas_check_eeds() there is an empty branch. We can reverse the test expression and then remove the empty branch. Also the test expression is a little bit complex so it deserves an individual function. And make the continuing prototype lines indented after the opening parenthesis to follow the standard coding style. Signed-off-by: Jason Yan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421093744.1583609-2-yanaijie@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index dc670304f181..e6101a511cc7 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -1198,37 +1198,37 @@ static void sas_print_parent_topology_bug(struct domain_device *child, sas_route_char(child, child_phy)); } +static bool sas_eeds_valid(struct domain_device *parent, + struct domain_device *child) +{ + struct sas_discovery *disc = &parent->port->disc; + + return (SAS_ADDR(disc->eeds_a) == SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr) || + SAS_ADDR(disc->eeds_a) == SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)) && + (SAS_ADDR(disc->eeds_b) == SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr) || + SAS_ADDR(disc->eeds_b) == SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)); +} + static int sas_check_eeds(struct domain_device *child, - struct ex_phy *parent_phy, - struct ex_phy *child_phy) + struct ex_phy *parent_phy, + struct ex_phy *child_phy) { int res = 0; struct domain_device *parent = child->parent; + struct sas_discovery *disc = &parent->port->disc; - if (SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.fanout_sas_addr) != 0) { + if (SAS_ADDR(disc->fanout_sas_addr) != 0) { res = -ENODEV; pr_warn("edge ex %016llx phy S:%02d <--> edge ex %016llx phy S:%02d, while there is a fanout ex %016llx\n", SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr), parent_phy->phy_id, SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr), child_phy->phy_id, - SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.fanout_sas_addr)); - } else if (SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.eeds_a) == 0) { - memcpy(parent->port->disc.eeds_a, parent->sas_addr, - SAS_ADDR_SIZE); - memcpy(parent->port->disc.eeds_b, child->sas_addr, - SAS_ADDR_SIZE); - } else if (((SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.eeds_a) == - SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr)) || - (SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.eeds_a) == - SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr))) - && - ((SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.eeds_b) == - SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr)) || - (SAS_ADDR(parent->port->disc.eeds_b) == - SAS_ADDR(child->sas_addr)))) - ; - else { + SAS_ADDR(disc->fanout_sas_addr)); + } else if (SAS_ADDR(disc->eeds_a) == 0) { + memcpy(disc->eeds_a, parent->sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); + memcpy(disc->eeds_b, child->sas_addr, SAS_ADDR_SIZE); + } else if (!sas_eeds_valid(parent, child)) { res = -ENODEV; pr_warn("edge ex %016llx phy%02d <--> edge ex %016llx phy%02d link forms a third EEDS!\n", SAS_ADDR(parent->sas_addr), -- cgit From ba9be7e70e15dd75375131826f4b8a484efec4d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Yan Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:37:43 +0800 Subject: scsi: libsas: Remove an empty branch in sas_check_parent_topology() There is an empty "all good" branch in sas_check_parent_topology(). We can reverse the test statement and remove the empty branch. Moreover, factor out a helper sas_check_edge_expander_topo() to make the code more readable. Signed-off-by: Jason Yan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421093744.1583609-3-yanaijie@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index e6101a511cc7..1b4eb01d14ec 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -1240,6 +1240,37 @@ static int sas_check_eeds(struct domain_device *child, return res; } +static int sas_check_edge_expander_topo(struct domain_device *child, + struct ex_phy *parent_phy) +{ + struct expander_device *child_ex = &child->ex_dev; + struct expander_device *parent_ex = &child->parent->ex_dev; + struct ex_phy *child_phy; + + child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id]; + + if (child->dev_type == SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE) { + if (parent_phy->routing_attr != SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING || + child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING) + goto error; + } else if (parent_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) { + if (child_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) + return sas_check_eeds(child, parent_phy, child_phy); + else if (child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING) + goto error; + } else if (parent_phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING) { + if (child_phy->routing_attr != SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING && + (child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING || + !child_ex->t2t_supp || !parent_ex->t2t_supp)) + goto error; + } + + return 0; +error: + sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy); + return -ENODEV; +} + /* Here we spill over 80 columns. It is intentional. */ static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) @@ -1272,29 +1303,8 @@ static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) switch (child->parent->dev_type) { case SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER_DEVICE: - if (child->dev_type == SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE) { - if (parent_phy->routing_attr != SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING || - child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING) { - sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy); - res = -ENODEV; - } - } else if (parent_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) { - if (child_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) { - res = sas_check_eeds(child, parent_phy, child_phy); - } else if (child_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING) { - sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy); - res = -ENODEV; - } - } else if (parent_phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING) { - if (child_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING || - (child_phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING && - child_ex->t2t_supp && parent_ex->t2t_supp)) { - /* All good */; - } else { - sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy); - res = -ENODEV; - } - } + if (sas_check_edge_expander_topo(child, parent_phy)) + res = -ENODEV; break; case SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE: if (parent_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING || -- cgit From cf3cd61e76607801081adc35ae288b90921e6097 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jason Yan Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 17:37:44 +0800 Subject: scsi: libsas: factor out sas_check_fanout_expander_topo() To be consistent with sas_check_edge_expander_topo(), factor out sas_check_fanout_expander_topo(). And remove the comment since we are not spilling over 80 colums now. Signed-off-by: Jason Yan Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230421093744.1583609-4-yanaijie@huawei.com Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen --- drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c index 1b4eb01d14ec..adcac57aaee6 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_expander.c @@ -1271,11 +1271,25 @@ error: return -ENODEV; } -/* Here we spill over 80 columns. It is intentional. - */ -static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) +static int sas_check_fanout_expander_topo(struct domain_device *child, + struct ex_phy *parent_phy) { struct expander_device *child_ex = &child->ex_dev; + struct ex_phy *child_phy; + + child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id]; + + if (parent_phy->routing_attr == TABLE_ROUTING && + child_phy->routing_attr == SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) + return 0; + + sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy); + + return -ENODEV; +} + +static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) +{ struct expander_device *parent_ex; int i; int res = 0; @@ -1290,7 +1304,6 @@ static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) for (i = 0; i < parent_ex->num_phys; i++) { struct ex_phy *parent_phy = &parent_ex->ex_phy[i]; - struct ex_phy *child_phy; if (parent_phy->phy_state == PHY_VACANT || parent_phy->phy_state == PHY_NOT_PRESENT) @@ -1299,19 +1312,14 @@ static int sas_check_parent_topology(struct domain_device *child) if (!sas_phy_match_dev_addr(child, parent_phy)) continue; - child_phy = &child_ex->ex_phy[parent_phy->attached_phy_id]; - switch (child->parent->dev_type) { case SAS_EDGE_EXPANDER_DEVICE: if (sas_check_edge_expander_topo(child, parent_phy)) res = -ENODEV; break; case SAS_FANOUT_EXPANDER_DEVICE: - if (parent_phy->routing_attr != TABLE_ROUTING || - child_phy->routing_attr != SUBTRACTIVE_ROUTING) { - sas_print_parent_topology_bug(child, parent_phy, child_phy); + if (sas_check_fanout_expander_topo(child, parent_phy)) res = -ENODEV; - } break; default: break; -- cgit