aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-08-24selftests/bpf: Enable cpu v4 tests for RV64Pu Lehui6-6/+12
Enable cpu v4 tests for RV64, and the relevant tests have passed. Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-24selftests/bpf: Add a local kptr test with no special fieldsYonghong Song2-0/+51
Add a local kptr test with no special fields in the struct. Without the previous patch, the following warning will hit: [ 44.683877] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 485 at kernel/bpf/syscall.c:660 bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.684640] Modules linked in: bpf_testmod(OE) [ 44.685044] CPU: 3 PID: 485 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Tainted: G OE 6.5.0-rc5-01703-g260d855e9b90 #248 [ 44.685827] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 44.686693] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred [ 44.687297] RIP: 0010:bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.687775] Code: e8 55 17 1f 00 49 8b 74 24 08 4c 89 ef e8 e8 14 05 00 e8 a3 da e2 ff e9 55 fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 4e fe ff ff 0f 0b e9 47 fe ff ff <0f> 0b e8 d9 d9 e2 ff 31 f6 eb d5 48 83 c4 10 5b 41 5c e [ 44.689353] RSP: 0018:ffff888106467cb8 EFLAGS: 00010246 [ 44.689806] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888112b3a200 RCX: 0000000000000001 [ 44.690433] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: ffff8881128ad988 [ 44.691094] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: ffffffff81370bd0 R09: 1ffff110216231a5 [ 44.691643] R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: ffffed10216231a6 R12: ffff88810d68a488 [ 44.692245] R13: ffff88810767c288 R14: ffff88810d68a400 R15: ffff88810d68a418 [ 44.692829] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881f7580000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 44.693484] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 44.693964] CR2: 000055c7f2afce28 CR3: 000000010fee4002 CR4: 0000000000370ee0 [ 44.694513] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 [ 44.695102] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 [ 44.695747] Call Trace: [ 44.696001] <TASK> [ 44.696183] ? __warn+0xfe/0x270 [ 44.696447] ? bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.696817] ? report_bug+0x220/0x2d0 [ 44.697180] ? handle_bug+0x3d/0x70 [ 44.697507] ? exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x50 [ 44.697887] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20 [ 44.698282] ? btf_find_struct_meta+0xd0/0xd0 [ 44.698634] ? bpf_obj_free_fields+0x220/0x240 [ 44.699027] ? bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1e2/0x240 [ 44.699414] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260 [ 44.699763] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0 [ 44.700154] process_one_work+0x46d/0x750 [ 44.700523] worker_thread+0x49e/0x900 [ 44.700892] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270 [ 44.701224] kthread+0x1ae/0x1d0 [ 44.701516] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 44.701860] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50 [ 44.702178] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50 [ 44.702508] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 [ 44.702880] </TASK> With the previous patch, there is no warnings. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-23libbpf: fix signedness determination in CO-RE relo handling logicAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+1
Extracting btf_int_encoding() is only meaningful for BTF_KIND_INT, so we need to check that first before inferring signedness. Closes: https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/issues/704 Reported-by: Lorenz Bauer <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-23selftests/bpf: add uprobe_multi test binary to .gitignoreAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+1
It seems like it was forgotten to add uprobe_multi binary to .gitignore. Fix this trivial omission. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-23libbpf: Add bpf_object__unpin()Daniel Xu3-0/+17
For bpf_object__pin_programs() there is bpf_object__unpin_programs(). Likewise bpf_object__unpin_maps() for bpf_object__pin_maps(). But no bpf_object__unpin() for bpf_object__pin(). Adding the former adds symmetry to the API. It's also convenient for cleanup in application code. It's an API I would've used if it was available for a repro I was writing earlier. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/b2f9d41da4a350281a0b53a804d11b68327e14e5.1692832478.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
2023-08-23selftests/bpf: Add selftest for allow_ptr_leaksYafang Shao2-1/+48
- Without prev commit $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=tc_bpf #232/1 tc_bpf/tc_bpf_root:OK test_tc_bpf_non_root:PASS:set_cap_bpf_cap_net_admin 0 nsec test_tc_bpf_non_root:PASS:disable_cap_sys_admin 0 nsec 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; if ((long)(iph + 1) > (long)skb->data_end) 0: (61) r2 = *(u32 *)(r1 +80) ; R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R2_w=pkt_end(off=0,imm=0) ; struct iphdr *iph = (void *)(long)skb->data + sizeof(struct ethhdr); 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +76) ; R1_w=pkt(off=0,r=0,imm=0) ; if ((long)(iph + 1) > (long)skb->data_end) 2: (07) r1 += 34 ; R1_w=pkt(off=34,r=0,imm=0) 3: (b4) w0 = 1 ; R0_w=1 4: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+1 R2 pointer comparison prohibited processed 5 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0 test_tc_bpf_non_root:FAIL:test_tc_bpf__open_and_load unexpected error: -13 #233/2 tc_bpf_non_root:FAIL - With prev commit $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=tc_bpf #232/1 tc_bpf/tc_bpf_root:OK #232/2 tc_bpf/tc_bpf_non_root:OK #232 tc_bpf:OK Summary: 1/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-22libbpf: Free btf_vmlinux when closing bpf_objectHao Luo1-0/+1
I hit a memory leak when testing bpf_program__set_attach_target(). Basically, set_attach_target() may allocate btf_vmlinux, for example, when setting attach target for bpf_iter programs. But btf_vmlinux is freed only in bpf_object_load(), which means if we only open bpf object but not load it, setting attach target may leak btf_vmlinux. So let's free btf_vmlinux in bpf_object__close() anyway. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-08-22selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_obj_drop with bad reg->offKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+20
Add a selftest for the fix provided in the previous commit. Without the fix, the selftest passes the verifier while it should fail. The special logic for detecting graph root or node for reg->off and bypassing reg->off == 0 guarantee for release helpers/kfuncs has been dropped. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-22selftests/bpf: Add a failure test for bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptrYonghong Song2-1/+74
For a bpf_kptr_xchg() with local kptr, if the map value kptr type and allocated local obj type does not match, with the previous patch, the below verifier error message will be logged: R2 is of type <allocated local obj type> but <map value kptr type> is expected Without the previous patch, the test will have unexpected success. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add extra link to uprobe_multi testsJiri Olsa2-0/+22
Attaching extra program to same functions system wide for api and link tests. This way we can test the pid filter works properly when there's extra system wide consumer on the same uprobe that will trigger the original uprobe handler. We expect to have the same counts as before. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi pid filter testsJiri Olsa2-12/+126
Running api and link tests also with pid filter and checking the probe gets executed only for specific pid. Spawning extra process to trigger attached uprobes and checking we get correct counts from executed programs. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi cookie testJiri Olsa1-0/+78
Adding test for cookies setup/retrieval in uprobe_link uprobes and making sure bpf_get_attach_cookie works properly. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi usdt bench testJiri Olsa2-0/+55
Adding test that attaches 50k usdt probes in usdt_multi binary. After the attach is done we run the binary and make sure we get proper amount of hits. With current uprobes: # perf stat --null ./test_progs -n 254/6 #254/6 uprobe_multi_test/bench_usdt:OK #254 uprobe_multi_test:OK Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Performance counter stats for './test_progs -n 254/6': 1353.659680562 seconds time elapsed With uprobe_multi link: # perf stat --null ./test_progs -n 254/6 #254/6 uprobe_multi_test/bench_usdt:OK #254 uprobe_multi_test:OK Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Performance counter stats for './test_progs -n 254/6': 0.322046364 seconds time elapsed Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi usdt test codeJiri Olsa1-1/+25
Adding code in uprobe_multi test binary that defines 50k usdts and will serve as attach point for uprobe_multi usdt bench test in following patch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi bench testJiri Olsa2-0/+55
Adding test that attaches 50k uprobes in uprobe_multi binary. After the attach is done we run the binary and make sure we get proper amount of hits. The resulting attach/detach times on my setup: test_bench_attach_uprobe:PASS:uprobe_multi__open 0 nsec test_bench_attach_uprobe:PASS:uprobe_multi__attach 0 nsec test_bench_attach_uprobe:PASS:uprobes_count 0 nsec test_bench_attach_uprobe: attached in 0.346s test_bench_attach_uprobe: detached in 0.419s #262/5 uprobe_multi_test/bench_uprobe:OK Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi test programJiri Olsa2-0/+72
Adding uprobe_multi test program that defines 50k uprobe_multi_func_* functions and will serve as attach point for uprobe_multi bench test in following patch. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi link testJiri Olsa1-0/+69
Adding uprobe_multi test for bpf_link_create attach function. Testing attachment using the struct bpf_link_create_opts. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi api testJiri Olsa1-0/+65
Adding uprobe_multi test for bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi attach function. Testing attachment using glob patterns and via bpf_uprobe_multi_opts paths/syms fields. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Add uprobe_multi skel testJiri Olsa2-0/+167
Adding uprobe_multi test for skeleton load/attach functions, to test skeleton auto attach for uprobe_multi link. Test that bpf_get_func_ip works properly for uprobe_multi attachment. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21selftests/bpf: Move get_time_ns to testing_helpers.hJiri Olsa3-17/+10
We'd like to have single copy of get_time_ns used b bench and test_progs, but we can't just include bench.h, because of conflicting 'struct env' objects. Moving get_time_ns to testing_helpers.h which is being included by both bench and test_progs objects. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add uprobe multi link support to bpf_program__attach_usdtJiri Olsa2-17/+82
Adding support for usdt_manager_attach_usdt to use uprobe_multi link to attach to usdt probes. The uprobe_multi support is detected before the usdt program is loaded and its expected_attach_type is set accordingly. If uprobe_multi support is detected the usdt_manager_attach_usdt gathers uprobes info and calls bpf_program__attach_uprobe to create all needed uprobes. If uprobe_multi support is not detected the old behaviour stays. Also adding usdt.s program section for sleepable usdt probes. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add uprobe multi link detectionJiri Olsa2-0/+38
Adding uprobe-multi link detection. It will be used later in bpf_program__attach_usdt function to check and use uprobe_multi link over standard uprobe links. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add support for u[ret]probe.multi[.s] program sectionsJiri Olsa1-0/+36
Adding support for several uprobe_multi program sections to allow auto attach of multi_uprobe programs. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi functionJiri Olsa3-0/+166
Adding bpf_program__attach_uprobe_multi function that allows to attach multiple uprobes with uprobe_multi link. The user can specify uprobes with direct arguments: binary_path/func_pattern/pid or with struct bpf_uprobe_multi_opts opts argument fields: const char **syms; const unsigned long *offsets; const unsigned long *ref_ctr_offsets; const __u64 *cookies; User can specify 2 mutually exclusive set of inputs: 1) use only path/func_pattern/pid arguments 2) use path/pid with allowed combinations of: syms/offsets/ref_ctr_offsets/cookies/cnt - syms and offsets are mutually exclusive - ref_ctr_offsets and cookies are optional Any other usage results in error. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add bpf_link_create support for multi uprobesJiri Olsa2-1/+21
Adding new uprobe_multi struct to bpf_link_create_opts object to pass multiple uprobe data to link_create attr uapi. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add elf_resolve_pattern_offsets functionJiri Olsa3-1/+67
Adding elf_resolve_pattern_offsets function that looks up offsets for symbols specified by pattern argument. The 'pattern' argument allows wildcards (*?' supported). Offsets are returned in allocated array together with its size and needs to be released by the caller. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add elf_resolve_syms_offsets functionJiri Olsa2-0/+112
Adding elf_resolve_syms_offsets function that looks up offsets for symbols specified in syms array argument. Offsets are returned in allocated array with the 'cnt' size, that needs to be released by the caller. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add elf symbol iteratorJiri Olsa1-64/+115
Adding elf symbol iterator object (and some functions) that follow open-coded iterator pattern and some functions to ease up iterating elf object symbols. The idea is to iterate single symbol section with: struct elf_sym_iter iter; struct elf_sym *sym; if (elf_sym_iter_new(&iter, elf, binary_path, SHT_DYNSYM)) goto error; while ((sym = elf_sym_iter_next(&iter))) { ... } I considered opening the elf inside the iterator and iterate all symbol sections, but then it gets more complicated wrt user checks for when the next section is processed. Plus side is the we don't need 'exit' function, because caller/user is in charge of that. The returned iterated symbol object from elf_sym_iter_next function is placed inside the struct elf_sym_iter, so no extra allocation or argument is needed. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add elf_open/elf_close functionsJiri Olsa3-42/+57
Adding elf_open/elf_close functions and using it in elf_find_func_offset_from_file function. It will be used in following changes to save some common code. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Move elf_find_func_offset* functions to elf objectJiri Olsa4-186/+202
Adding new elf object that will contain elf related functions. There's no functional change. Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21libbpf: Add uprobe_multi attach type and link namesJiri Olsa1-0/+2
Adding new uprobe_multi attach type and link names, so the functions can resolve the new values. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21bpf: Add pid filter support for uprobe_multi linkJiri Olsa1-0/+1
Adding support to specify pid for uprobe_multi link and the uprobes are created only for task with given pid value. Using the consumer.filter filter callback for that, so the task gets filtered during the uprobe installation. We still need to check the task during runtime in the uprobe handler, because the handler could get executed if there's another system wide consumer on the same uprobe (thanks Oleg for the insight). Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21bpf: Add cookies support for uprobe_multi linkJiri Olsa1-0/+1
Adding support to specify cookies array for uprobe_multi link. The cookies array share indexes and length with other uprobe_multi arrays (offsets/ref_ctr_offsets). The cookies[i] value defines cookie for i-the uprobe and will be returned by bpf_get_attach_cookie helper when called from ebpf program hooked to that specific uprobe. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21bpf: Add multi uprobe linkJiri Olsa1-0/+16
Adding new multi uprobe link that allows to attach bpf program to multiple uprobes. Uprobes to attach are specified via new link_create uprobe_multi union: struct { __aligned_u64 path; __aligned_u64 offsets; __aligned_u64 ref_ctr_offsets; __u32 cnt; __u32 flags; } uprobe_multi; Uprobes are defined for single binary specified in path and multiple calling sites specified in offsets array with optional reference counters specified in ref_ctr_offsets array. All specified arrays have length of 'cnt'. The 'flags' supports single bit for now that marks the uprobe as return probe. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-21bpf: Switch BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN macro to enumJiri Olsa1-1/+3
Switching BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN macro to anonymous enum, so it'd show up in vmlinux.h. There's not functional change compared to having this as macro. Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-08-18selftests/bpf: Fix a selftest compilation errorYonghong Song1-1/+1
When building the kernel and selftest with clang compiler (llvm17 or llvm18), I hit the following compilation failure: In file included from progs/test_lwt_redirect.c:3: In file included from /usr/include/linux/ip.h:21: In file included from /usr/include/asm/byteorder.h:5: In file included from /usr/include/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:13: /usr/include/linux/swab.h:136:8: error: unknown type name '__always_inline' 136 | static __always_inline unsigned long __swab(const unsigned long y) | ^ /usr/include/linux/swab.h:171:8: error: unknown type name '__always_inline' 171 | static __always_inline __u16 __swab16p(const __u16 *p) ... bpf_helpers.h file provided a definition for __always_inline. Putting 'ip.h' after 'bpf_helpers.h' fixed the issue. Fixes: 43a7c3ef8a15 ("selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REDIRECT") Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-18selftests/bpf: Add CO-RE relocs kfunc flavors testsDave Marchevsky2-0/+53
This patch adds selftests that exercise kfunc flavor relocation functionality added in the previous patch. The actual kfunc defined in kernel/bpf/helpers.c is: struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p) The following relocation behaviors are checked: struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire___one(struct task_struct *name) * Should succeed despite differing param name struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire___two(struct task_struct *p, void *ctx) * Should fail because there is no two-param bpf_task_acquire struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire___three(void *ctx) * Should fail because, despite vmlinux's bpf_task_acquire having one param, the types don't match Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-08-18libbpf: Support triple-underscore flavors for kfunc relocationDave Marchevsky1-1/+19
The function signature of kfuncs can change at any time due to their intentional lack of stability guarantees. As kfuncs become more widely used, BPF program writers will need facilities to support calling different versions of a kfunc from a single BPF object. Consider this simplified example based on a real scenario we ran into at Meta: /* initial kfunc signature */ int some_kfunc(void *ptr) /* Oops, we need to add some flag to modify behavior. No problem, change the kfunc. flags = 0 retains original behavior */ int some_kfunc(void *ptr, long flags) If the initial version of the kfunc is deployed on some portion of the fleet and the new version on the rest, a fleetwide service that uses some_kfunc will currently need to load different BPF programs depending on which some_kfunc is available. Luckily CO-RE provides a facility to solve a very similar problem, struct definition changes, by allowing program writers to declare my_struct___old and my_struct___new, with ___suffix being considered a 'flavor' of the non-suffixed name and being ignored by bpf_core_type_exists and similar calls. This patch extends the 'flavor' facility to the kfunc extern relocation process. BPF program writers can now declare extern int some_kfunc___old(void *ptr) extern int some_kfunc___new(void *ptr, int flags) then test which version of the kfunc exists with bpf_ksym_exists. Relocation and verifier's dead code elimination will work in concert as expected, allowing this pattern: if (bpf_ksym_exists(some_kfunc___old)) some_kfunc___old(ptr); else some_kfunc___new(ptr, 0); Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-08-18selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REROUTEYan Zhai3-0/+299
There is no lwt test case for BPF_REROUTE yet. Add test cases for both normal and abnormal situations. The abnormal situation is set up with an fq qdisc on the reroute target device. Without proper fixes, overflow this qdisc queue limit (to trigger a drop) would panic the kernel. Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/62c8ddc1e924269dcf80d2e8af1a1e632cee0b3a.1692326837.git.yan@cloudflare.com
2023-08-18selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REDIRECTYan Zhai4-0/+560
There is no lwt_xmit test case for BPF_REDIRECT yet. Add test cases for both normal and abnormal situations. For abnormal test cases, devices are set down or have its carrier set down. Without proper fixes, BPF_REDIRECT to either ingress or egress of such device would panic the kernel. Signed-off-by: Yan Zhai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/96bf435243641939d9c9da329fab29cb45f7df22.1692326837.git.yan@cloudflare.com
2023-08-18selftests/bpf: Enable cpu v4 tests for arm64Xu Kuohai6-6/+6
Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from BPF test_progs selftests: # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap #115/1 ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK #115/2 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK #115/3 ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK #115 ldsx_insn:OK #302/1 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK #302/2 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK #302/3 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK #302/4 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK #302/5 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK #302/6 verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK #302 verifier_bswap:OK #316/1 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK #316/2 verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK #316 verifier_gotol:OK #324/1 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK #324/2 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK #324/3 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK #324/4 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK #324/5 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK #324/6 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK #324/7 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK #324/8 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK #324/9 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK #324/10 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK #324/11 verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK #324 verifier_ldsx:OK #335/1 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK #335/2 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK #335/3 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK #335/4 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK #335/5 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK #335/6 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK #335/7 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK #335/8 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK #335/9 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK #335/10 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK #335/11 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK #335/12 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK #335/13 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK #335/14 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK #335/15 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK #335/16 verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK #335/17 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK #335/18 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK #335/19 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK #335/20 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK #335/21 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK #335/22 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK #335/23 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK #335/24 verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK #335 verifier_movsx:OK #347/1 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #347/2 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/3 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #347/4 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/5 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #347/6 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/7 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #347/8 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/9 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #347/10 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/11 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #347/12 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/13 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK #347/14 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #347/15 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK #347/16 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #347/17 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #347/18 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/19 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #347/20 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/21 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #347/22 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/23 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #347/24 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/25 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #347/26 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/27 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #347/28 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/29 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK #347/30 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #347/31 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK #347/32 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #347/33 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #347/34 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/35 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #347/36 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/37 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #347/38 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/39 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #347/40 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/41 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #347/42 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/43 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #347/44 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/45 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #347/46 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/47 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #347/48 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/49 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #347/50 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/51 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #347/52 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/53 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #347/54 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/55 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #347/56 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/57 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #347/58 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/59 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #347/60 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/61 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #347/62 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/63 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #347/64 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/65 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #347/66 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/67 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #347/68 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/69 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #347/70 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/71 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #347/72 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/73 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #347/74 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/75 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #347/76 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/77 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #347/78 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/79 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #347/80 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/81 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK #347/82 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/83 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK #347/84 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/85 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK #347/86 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/87 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK #347/88 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/89 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK #347/90 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/91 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK #347/92 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/93 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK #347/94 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #347/95 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK #347/96 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #347/97 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK #347/98 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK #347/99 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK #347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK #347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK #347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK #347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK #347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK #347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK #347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK #347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK #347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK #347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK #347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK #347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK #347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK #347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK #347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK #347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK #347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK #347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK #347 verifier_sdiv:OK Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Tested-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Florent Revest <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-08-16Merge tag 'for-netdev' of ↵Jakub Kicinski13-24/+1079
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2023-08-16 We've added 17 non-merge commits during the last 6 day(s) which contain a total of 20 files changed, 1179 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add a BPF hook in sys_socket() to change the protocol ID from IPPROTO_TCP to IPPROTO_MPTCP to cover migration for legacy applications, from Geliang Tang. 2) Follow-up/fallout fix from the SO_REUSEPORT + bpf_sk_assign work to fix a splat on non-fullsock sks in inet[6]_steal_sock, from Lorenz Bauer. 3) Improvements to struct_ops links to avoid forcing presence of update/validate callbacks. Also add bpf_struct_ops fields documentation, from David Vernet. 4) Ensure libbpf sets close-on-exec flag on gzopen, from Marco Vedovati. 5) Several new tcx selftest additions and bpftool link show support for tcx and xdp links, from Daniel Borkmann. 6) Fix a smatch warning on uninitialized symbol in bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe, from Yafang Shao. 7) BPF selftest fixes e.g. misplaced break in kfunc_call test, from Yipeng Zou. 8) Small cleanup to remove unused declaration bpf_link_new_file, from Yue Haibing. 9) Small typo fix to bpftool's perf help message, from Daniel T. Lee. * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: selftests/bpf: Add mptcpify test selftests/bpf: Fix error checks of mptcp open_and_load selftests/bpf: Add two mptcp netns helpers bpf: Add update_socket_protocol hook bpftool: Implement link show support for xdp bpftool: Implement link show support for tcx selftests/bpf: Add selftest for fill_link_info bpf: Fix uninitialized symbol in bpf_perf_link_fill_kprobe() net: Fix slab-out-of-bounds in inet[6]_steal_sock bpf: Document struct bpf_struct_ops fields bpf: Support default .validate() and .update() behavior for struct_ops links selftests/bpf: Add various more tcx test cases selftests/bpf: Clean up fmod_ret in bench_rename test script selftests/bpf: Fix repeat option when kfunc_call verification fails libbpf: Set close-on-exec flag on gzopen bpftool: fix perf help message bpf: Remove unused declaration bpf_link_new_file() ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: Add mptcpify testGeliang Tang2-0/+161
Implement a new test program mptcpify: if the family is AF_INET or AF_INET6, the type is SOCK_STREAM, and the protocol ID is 0 or IPPROTO_TCP, set it to IPPROTO_MPTCP. It will be hooked in update_socket_protocol(). Extend the MPTCP test base, add a selftest test_mptcpify() for the mptcpify case. Open and load the mptcpify test prog to mptcpify the TCP sockets dynamically, then use start_server() and connect_to_fd() to create a TCP socket, but actually what's created is an MPTCP socket, which can be verified through 'getsockopt(SOL_PROTOCOL)' and 'getsockopt(MPTCP_INFO)'. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/364e72f307e7bb38382ec7442c182d76298a9c41.1692147782.git.geliang.tang@suse.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: Fix error checks of mptcp open_and_loadGeliang Tang1-11/+1
Return libbpf_get_error(), instead of -EIO, for the error from mptcp_sock__open_and_load(). Load success means prog_fd and map_fd are always valid. So drop these unneeded ASSERT_GE checks for them in mptcp run_test(). Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db5fcb93293df9ab173edcbaf8252465b80da6f2.1692147782.git.geliang.tang@suse.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: Add two mptcp netns helpersGeliang Tang1-10/+21
Add two netns helpers for mptcp tests: create_netns() and cleanup_netns(). Use them in test_base(). These new helpers will be re-used in the following commits introducing new tests. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matthieu Baerts <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7506371fb6c417b401cc9d7365fe455754f4ba3f.1692147782.git.geliang.tang@suse.com Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-16bpftool: Implement link show support for xdpDaniel Borkmann1-0/+7
Add support to dump XDP link information to bpftool. This reuses the recently added show_link_ifindex_{plain,json}(). The XDP link info only exposes the ifindex. Below shows an example link dump output, and a cgroup link is included for comparison, too: # bpftool link [...] 10: cgroup prog 2466 cgroup_id 1 attach_type cgroup_inet6_post_bind [...] 16: xdp prog 2477 ifindex enp5s0(3) [...] Equivalent json output: # bpftool link --json [...] { "id": 10, "type": "cgroup", "prog_id": 2466, "cgroup_id": 1, "attach_type": "cgroup_inet6_post_bind" }, [...] { "id": 16, "type": "xdp", "prog_id": 2477, "devname": "enp5s0", "ifindex": 3 } [...] Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-16bpftool: Implement link show support for tcxDaniel Borkmann1-0/+37
Add support to dump tcx link information to bpftool. This adds a common helper show_link_ifindex_{plain,json}() which can be reused also for other link types. The plain text and json device output is the same format as in bpftool net dump. Below shows an example link dump output along with a cgroup link for comparison: # bpftool link [...] 10: cgroup prog 1977 cgroup_id 1 attach_type cgroup_inet6_post_bind [...] 13: tcx prog 2053 ifindex enp5s0(3) attach_type tcx_ingress 14: tcx prog 2080 ifindex enp5s0(3) attach_type tcx_egress [...] Equivalent json output: # bpftool link --json [...] { "id": 10, "type": "cgroup", "prog_id": 1977, "cgroup_id": 1, "attach_type": "cgroup_inet6_post_bind" }, [...] { "id": 13, "type": "tcx", "prog_id": 2053, "devname": "enp5s0", "ifindex": 3, "attach_type": "tcx_ingress" }, { "id": 14, "type": "tcx", "prog_id": 2080, "devname": "enp5s0", "ifindex": 3, "attach_type": "tcx_egress" } [...] Suggested-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-08-16selftests/bpf: Add selftest for fill_link_infoYafang Shao3-0/+387
Add selftest for the fill_link_info of uprobe, kprobe and tracepoint. The result: $ tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs --name=fill_link_info #79/1 fill_link_info/kprobe_link_info:OK #79/2 fill_link_info/kretprobe_link_info:OK #79/3 fill_link_info/kprobe_invalid_ubuff:OK #79/4 fill_link_info/tracepoint_link_info:OK #79/5 fill_link_info/uprobe_link_info:OK #79/6 fill_link_info/uretprobe_link_info:OK #79/7 fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_link_info:OK #79/8 fill_link_info/kretprobe_multi_link_info:OK #79/9 fill_link_info/kprobe_multi_invalid_ubuff:OK #79 fill_link_info:OK Summary: 1/9 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED The test case for kprobe_multi won't be run on aarch64, as it is not supported. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-08-16selftests: fib_tests: Add a test case for IPv6 garbage collectionKui-Feng Lee1-3/+69
Add 1000 IPv6 routes with expiration time (w/ and w/o additional 5000 permanet routes in the background.) Wait for a few seconds to make sure they are removed correctly. The expected output of the test looks like the following example. > Fib6 garbage collection test > TEST: ipv6 route garbage collection [ OK ] Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: David Ahern <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
2023-08-16selftests: bonding: remove redundant delete action of device link1_1Zhengchao Shao1-1/+0
When run command "ip netns delete client", device link1_1 has been deleted. So, it is no need to delete link1_1 again. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Zhengchao Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.