Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Convert x86's userspace I/O test to use printf-based guest asserts.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's TSC MSRs test, and it's liberal use of GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(), to
use printf-based guest assert reporting.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's nested SVM software interrupt injection test to use printf-
based guest asserts. Opportunistically use GUEST_ASSERT() and
GUEST_FAIL() in a few locations to spit out more debug information.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert the set_boot_cpu_id test to use printf-based guest asserts,
specifically the EQ and NE variants.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's nested exceptions test to printf-based guest asserts, and
use REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT() instead of TEST_FAIL() so that output is
formatted correctly.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's MONITOR/MWAIT test to use printf-based guest asserts. Add a
macro to handle reporting failures to reduce the amount of copy+paste
needed for MONITOR vs. MWAIT.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's KVM paravirtualization test to use the printf-based
GUEST_ASSERT_EQ().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's Hyper-V feature test to use print-based guest asserts.
Opportunistically use the EQ and NE variants in a few places to capture
additional information.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's Hyper-V extended hypercalls test to use printf-based
GUEST_ASSERT_EQ().
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert x86's CPUID test to use printf-based GUEST_ASSERT_EQ() so that
the test prints out debug information. Note, the test previously used
REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT_2(), but that was pointless because none of the
guest-side code passed any parameters to the assert.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert the steal_time test to use printf-based GUEST_ASERT.
Opportunistically use GUEST_ASSERT_EQ() and GUEST_ASSERT_NE() so that the
test spits out debug information on failure.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert set_memory_region_test to print-based GUEST_ASSERT, using a combo
of newfangled macros to report (hopefully) useful information.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert s390's tprot test to printf-based GUEST_ASSERT.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert s390's memop test to printf-based GUEST_ASSERT, and
opportunistically use GUEST_FAIL() to report invalid sizes.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Use the printf-based GUEST_ASSERT_EQ() in the memslot perf test instead of
an half-baked open code version.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Use printf-based guest assert reporting in ARM's vGIC IRQ test. Note,
this is not as innocuous as it looks! The printf-based version of
GUEST_ASSERT_EQ() ensures the expressions are evaluated only once, whereas
the old version did not!
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Use GUEST_FAIL() in ARM's page fault test to report unexpected faults.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert ARM's hypercalls test to use printf-based GUEST_ASSERT().
Opportunistically use GUEST_FAIL() to complain about an unexpected stage.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert ARM's debug exceptions test to use printf-based GUEST_ASSERT().
Opportunistically Use GUEST_ASSERT_EQ() in guest_code_ss() so that the
expected vs. actual values get printed out.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Convert ARM's aarch_timer test to use printf-based GUEST_ASSERT().
To maintain existing functionality, manually print the host information,
e.g. stage and iteration, to stderr prior to reporting the guest assert.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a test to exercise the various features in KVM selftest's local
snprintf() and compare them to LIBC's snprintf() to ensure they behave
the same.
This is not an exhaustive test. KVM's local snprintf() does not
implement all the features LIBC does, e.g. KVM's local snprintf() does
not support floats or doubles, so testing for those features were
excluded.
Testing was added for the features that are expected to work to
support a minimal version of printf() in the guest.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <[email protected]>
[sean: use UCALL_EXIT_REASON, enable for all architectures]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Define the expected architecture specific exit reason for a successful
ucall so that common tests can assert that a ucall occurred without the
test needing to implement arch specific code.
Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add an architecture specific ucall.h and inline the simple arch hooks,
e.g. the init hook for everything except ARM, and the actual "do ucall"
hook for everything except x86 (which should be simple, but temporarily
isn't due to carrying a workaround).
Having a per-arch ucall header will allow adding a #define for the
expected KVM exit reason for a ucall that is colocated (for everything
except x86) with the ucall itself.
Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add printf-based GUEST_ASSERT macros and accompanying host-side support to
provide an assert-specific versions of GUEST_PRINTF(). To make it easier
to parse assert messages, for humans and bots alike, preserve/use the same
layout as host asserts, e.g. in the example below, the reported expression,
file, line number, and message are from the guest assertion, not the host
reporting of the assertion.
The call stack still captures the host reporting, but capturing the guest
stack is a less pressing concern, i.e. can be done in the future, and an
optimal solution would capture *both* the host and guest stacks, i.e.
capturing the host stack isn't an outright bug.
Running soft int test
==== Test Assertion Failure ====
x86_64/svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c:39: regs->rip != (unsigned long)l2_guest_code_int
pid=214104 tid=214104 errno=4 - Interrupted system call
1 0x0000000000401b35: run_test at svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c:191
2 0x00000000004017d2: main at svm_nested_soft_inject_test.c:212
3 0x0000000000415b03: __libc_start_call_main at libc-start.o:?
4 0x000000000041714f: __libc_start_main_impl at ??:?
5 0x0000000000401660: _start at ??:?
Expected IRQ at RIP 0x401e50, received IRQ at 0x401e50
Don't bother sharing code between ucall_assert() and ucall_fmt(), as
forwarding the variable arguments would either require using macros or
building a va_list, i.e. would make the code less readable and/or require
just as much copy+paste code anyways.
Gate the new macros with a flag so that tests can more or less be switched
over one-by-one. The slow conversion won't be perfect, e.g. library code
won't pick up the flag, but the only asserts in library code are of the
vanilla GUEST_ASSERT() variety, i.e. don't print out variables.
Add a temporary alias to GUEST_ASSERT_1() to fudge around ARM's
arch_timer.h header using GUEST_ASSERT_1(), thus thwarting any attempt to
convert tests one-by-one.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add more flexibility to guest debugging and testing by adding
GUEST_PRINTF() and GUEST_ASSERT_FMT() to the ucall framework.
Add a sized buffer to the ucall structure to hold the formatted string,
i.e. to allow the guest to easily resolve the string, and thus avoid the
ugly pattern of the host side having to make assumptions about the desired
format, as well as having to pass around a large number of parameters.
The buffer size was chosen to accommodate most use cases, and based on
similar usage. E.g. printf() uses the same size buffer in
arch/x86/boot/printf.c. And 1KiB ought to be enough for anybody.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <[email protected]>
[sean: massage changelog, wrap macro param in ()]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add additional pages to the guest to account for the number of pages
the ucall headers need. The only reason things worked before is the
ucall headers are fairly small. If they were ever to increase in
size the guest could run out of memory.
This is done in preparation for adding string formatting options to
the guest through the ucall framework which increases the size of
the ucall headers.
Fixes: 426729b2cf2e ("KVM: selftests: Add ucall pool based implementation")
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a local version of guest_snprintf() for use in the guest.
Having a local copy allows the guest access to string formatting
options without dependencies on LIBC. LIBC is problematic because
it heavily relies on both AVX-512 instructions and a TLS, neither of
which are guaranteed to be set up in the guest.
The file guest_sprintf.c was lifted from arch/x86/boot/printf.c and
adapted to work in the guest, including the addition of buffer length.
I.e. s/sprintf/snprintf/
The functions where prefixed with "guest_" to allow guests to
explicitly call them.
A string formatted by this function is expected to succeed or die. If
something goes wrong during the formatting process a GUEST_ASSERT()
will be thrown.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/mtdi6smhur5rqffvpu7qux7mptonw223y2653x2nwzvgm72nlo@zyc4w3kwl3rg
[sean: add a link to the discussion of other options]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add strnlen() to the string overrides to allow it to be called in the
guest.
The implementation for strnlen() was taken from the kernel's generic
version, lib/string.c.
This will be needed when printf() is introduced.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lewis <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Preserve or clobber all GPRs (except RIP and RSP, as they're saved and
restored via the VMCS) when performing a ucall on x86 to fudge around a
horrific long-standing bug in selftests' nested VMX support where L2's
GPRs are not preserved across a nested VM-Exit. I.e. if a test triggers a
nested VM-Exit to L1 in response to a ucall, e.g. GUEST_SYNC(), then L2's
GPR state can be corrupted.
The issues manifests as an unexpected #GP in clear_bit() when running the
hyperv_evmcs test due to RBX being used to track the ucall object, and RBX
being clobbered by the nested VM-Exit. The problematic hyperv_evmcs
testcase is where L0 (test's host userspace) injects an NMI in response to
GUEST_SYNC(8) from L2, but the bug could "randomly" manifest in any test
that induces a nested VM-Exit from L0. The bug hasn't caused failures in
the past due to sheer dumb luck.
The obvious fix is to rework the nVMX helpers to save/restore L2 GPRs
across VM-Exit and VM-Enter, but that is a much bigger task and carries
its own risks, e.g. nSVM does save/restore GPRs, but not in a thread-safe
manner, and there is a _lot_ of cleanup that can be done to unify code
for doing VM-Enter on nVMX, nSVM, and eVMCS.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Clean up TEST_ASSERT_EQ() so that the (mostly) raw code is captured in the
main assert message, not the helper macro's code. E.g. make this:
x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c:106: __a == __b
pid=40470 tid=40470 errno=0 - Success
1 0x000000000040170e: main at tsc_msrs_test.c:106
2 0x0000000000416f23: __libc_start_call_main at libc-start.o:?
3 0x000000000041856f: __libc_start_main_impl at ??:?
4 0x0000000000401ef0: _start at ??:?
TEST_ASSERT_EQ(rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC), val + 1) failed.
rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC) is 0
val + 1 is 0x1
look like this:
x86_64/tsc_msrs_test.c:106: rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC) == val + 1
pid=5737 tid=5737 errno=0 - Success
1 0x0000000000401714: main at tsc_msrs_test.c:106
2 0x0000000000415c23: __libc_start_call_main at libc-start.o:?
3 0x000000000041726f: __libc_start_main_impl at ??:?
4 0x0000000000401e60: _start at ??:?
0 != 0x1 (rounded_host_rdmsr(MSR_IA32_TSC) != val + 1)
Opportunstically clean up the formatting of the entire macro.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
There is already an ASSERT_EQ macro in the file
tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_harness.h, so currently KVM selftests
can't include test_util.h from the KVM selftests together with that file.
Rename the macro in the KVM selftests to TEST_ASSERT_EQ to avoid the
problem - it is also more similar to the other macros in test_util.h that
way.
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a test case for the tracepoint of xdp attaching failure by bpf
tracepoint when attach XDP to a device with invalid flags option.
The bpf tracepoint retrieves error message from the tracepoint, and
then put the error message to a perf buffer. The testing code receives
error message from perf buffer, and then ASSERT "Invalid XDP flags for
BPF link attachment".
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
commit bdeeed3498c7 ("libbpf: fix offsetof() and container_of() to work with CO-RE")
...was backported to stable trees such as 5.15. The problem is that with older
LLVM/clang (14/15) - which is often used for older kernels - we see compilation
failures in BPF selftests now:
In file included from progs/test_cls_redirect_subprogs.c:2:
progs/test_cls_redirect.c:90:2: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression
sizeof(flow_ports_t) !=
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
progs/test_cls_redirect.c:91:3: note: cast that performs the conversions of a reinterpret_cast is not allowed in a constant expression
offsetofend(struct bpf_sock_tuple, ipv4.dport) -
^
progs/test_cls_redirect.c:32:3: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend'
(offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof((((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER)))
^
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:86:33: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
^
In file included from progs/test_cls_redirect_subprogs.c:2:
progs/test_cls_redirect.c:95:2: error: static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression
sizeof(flow_ports_t) !=
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
progs/test_cls_redirect.c:96:3: note: cast that performs the conversions of a reinterpret_cast is not allowed in a constant expression
offsetofend(struct bpf_sock_tuple, ipv6.dport) -
^
progs/test_cls_redirect.c:32:3: note: expanded from macro 'offsetofend'
(offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) + sizeof((((TYPE *)0)->MEMBER)))
^
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/tools/include/bpf/bpf_helpers.h:86:33: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
^
2 errors generated.
make: *** [Makefile:594: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cls_redirect_subprogs.bpf.o] Error 1
The problem is the new offsetof() does not play nice with static asserts.
Given that the context is a static assert (and CO-RE relocation is not
needed at compile time), offsetof() usage can be replaced by restoring
the original offsetof() definition as __builtin_offsetof().
Fixes: bdeeed3498c7 ("libbpf: fix offsetof() and container_of() to work with CO-RE")
Reported-by: Colm Harrington <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Yipeng Zou <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Don't nullify "nodep" to NULL one line before it's set to "tmp".
Signed-off-by: Minjie Du <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[sean: massage shortlog+changelog]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Capitalize ABI (acronym) and fix spelling of "destination".
Fixes: 706819495921 ("libbpf: Improve usability of libbpf Makefile")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: Xin Liu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The following error happens:
In file included from vstate_exec_nolibc.c:2:
/usr/include/riscv64-linux-gnu/sys/prctl.h:42:12: error: conflicting types for ‘prctl’; h
ave ‘int(int, ...)’
42 | extern int prctl (int __option, ...) __THROW;
| ^~~~~
In file included from ./../../../../include/nolibc/nolibc.h:99,
from <command-line>:
./../../../../include/nolibc/sys.h:892:5: note: previous definition of ‘prctl’ with type
‘int(int, long unsigned int, long unsigned int, long unsigned int, long unsigned int)
’
892 | int prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
| ^~~~~
Fix this by not including <sys/prctl.h>, which is not needed here since
prctl syscall is directly called using its number.
Fixes: 7cf6198ce22d ("selftests: Test RISC-V Vector prctl interface")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
|
|
The riscv selftests (which were modeled after the arm64 selftests) are
improperly declaring the "emit_tests" target to depend upon the "all"
target. This approach, when combined with commit 9fc96c7c19df
("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built"), has
caused build failures [1] on arm64, and is likely to cause similar
failures for riscv.
To fix this, simply remove the unnecessary "all" dependency from the
emit_tests target. The dependency is still effectively honored, because
again, invocation is via "install", which also depends upon "all".
An alternative approach would be to harden the emit_tests target so that
it can depend upon "all", but that's a lot more complicated and hard to
get right, and doesn't seem worth it, especially given that emit_tests
should probably not be overridden at all.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Fixes: 9fc96c7c19df ("selftests: error out if kernel header files are not yet built")
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Alexandre Ghiti <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <[email protected]>
|
|
With test case kvm_page_table_test, start time is acquired with
time type CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, however end time in timespec_elapsed()
is acquired with time type CLOCK_MONOTONIC. This can cause inaccurate
elapsed time calculation due to mixing timebases, e.g. LoongArch in
particular will see weirdness.
Modify kvm_page_table_test to use unified time type CLOCK_MONOTONIC for
start time.
Signed-off-by: Bibo Mao <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Oliver Upton <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[sean: massage changelog]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Attempt to set the to-be-queued exception to be both pending and injected
_after_ KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS's kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events() squashes
the pending exception (if there's also an injected exception). Buggy KVM
versions will eventually yell loudly about having impossible state when
processing queued excpetions, e.g.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1115 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:10095 kvm_check_and_inject_events+0x220/0x500 [kvm]
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_check_and_inject_events():
WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.exception.injected &&
vcpu->arch.exception.pending);
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[sean: split to separate patch, massage changelog and comment]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Attempt to modify the to-be-injected exception vector to an illegal value
_after_ the sanity checks performed by KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS's
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events(). Buggy KVM
versions will eventually yells loudly about attempting to inject a bogus
vector, e.g.
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1107 at arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:547 kvm_check_and_inject_events+0x4a0/0x500 [kvm]
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:exception_type():
WARN_ON(vector > 31 || vector == NMI_VECTOR)
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[sean: split to separate patch]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
Attempt to modify vcpu->run->s.regs _after_ the sanity checks performed by
KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS's arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:sync_regs(). This can lead to some
nonsensical vCPU states accompanied by kernel splats, e.g. disabling PAE
while long mode is enabled makes KVM all kinds of confused:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1142 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h:358 paging32_walk_addr_generic+0x431/0x8f0 [kvm]
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h:
KVM_BUG_ON(is_long_mode(vcpu) && !is_pae(vcpu), vcpu->kvm)
Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[sean: see link]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
|
|
While the target is volatile, the temporary variables used to access the
target cast away the volatile. This is undefined behaviour, and a
compiler may optimise away/reorder these accesses, breaking the test.
This was observed with GCC 13.1.1, but it can be difficult to reproduce
because of the dependency on compiler behaviour.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
|
|
pid_max_addr() searches for the 'pid_max' symbol in /proc/kallsyms, and
prints an error if it cannot find it. The error message has a typo,
calling it pix_max.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
|
|
Many tests require specific hardware features/configurations that a
typical machine might not have. As a result, it's common to see a test
is skipped. But it is tedious to find out why a test is skipped
when all it gives is the file location of the skip macro.
Convert SKIP_IF() to SKIP_IF_MSG(), with appropriate descriptions of why
the test is being skipped. This gives a general idea of why a test is
skipped, which can be looked into further if it doesn't make sense.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gray <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://msgid.link/[email protected]
|
|
tcp_mmap tests TCP_ZEROCOPY_RECEIVE. If 0% of data is received using
mmap, this may be due to mss. Report rcv_mss to identify this cause.
Output of a run failed due to too small mss:
received 32768 MB (0 % mmap'ed) in 8.40458 s, 32.7057 Gbit
cpu usage user:0.027922 sys:8.21126, 251.44 usec per MB, 3252 c-switches, rcv_mss 1428
Output on a successful run:
received 32768 MB (99.9507 % mmap'ed) in 4.69023 s, 58.6064 Gbit
cpu usage user:0.029172 sys:2.56105, 79.0473 usec per MB, 57591 c-switches, rcv_mss 4096
Suggested-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
This test verifies driver behavior with regards to creation of RIFs for a
bridge as LAGs are added or removed to/from it, and ports added or removed
to/from the LAG.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
This test verifies driver behavior with regards to creation of RIFs for LAG
VLAN uppers as ports are added or removed to/from the LAG.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
This test verifies driver behavior with regards to creation of RIFs for a
LAG as ports are added or removed to/from it.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a selftest to verify that routing through several bridges works when
LAG VLANs are used instead of physical ports, and that routing through LAG
VLANs themselves works as physical ports are de/enslaved.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a selftest to verify that routing through a bridge works when LAG is
used instead of physical ports.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|