aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Add tests for RCU lock transfer between subprogsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-0/+126
Add selftests covering the following cases: - A static or global subprog called from within a RCU read section works - A static subprog taking an RCU read lock which is released in caller works - A static subprog releasing the caller's RCU read lock works Global subprogs that leave the lock in an imbalanced state will not work, as they are verified separately, so ensure those cases fail as well. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Add test for static subprog call in lock csKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi3-0/+111
Add selftests for static subprog calls within bpf_spin_lock critical section, and ensure we still reject global subprog calls. Also test the case where a subprog call will unlock the caller's held lock, or the caller will unlock a lock taken by a subprog call, ensuring correct transfer of lock state across frames on exit. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-02-05bpf: Allow calling static subprogs while holding a bpf_spin_lockKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-1/+1
Currently, calling any helpers, kfuncs, or subprogs except the graph data structure (lists, rbtrees) API kfuncs while holding a bpf_spin_lock is not allowed. One of the original motivations of this decision was to force the BPF programmer's hand into keeping the bpf_spin_lock critical section small, and to ensure the execution time of the program does not increase due to lock waiting times. In addition to this, some of the helpers and kfuncs may be unsafe to call while holding a bpf_spin_lock. However, when it comes to subprog calls, atleast for static subprogs, the verifier is able to explore their instructions during verification. Therefore, it is similar in effect to having the same code inlined into the critical section. Hence, not allowing static subprog calls in the bpf_spin_lock critical section is mostly an annoyance that needs to be worked around, without providing any tangible benefit. Unlike static subprog calls, global subprog calls are not safe to permit within the critical section, as the verifier does not explore them during verification, therefore whether the same lock will be taken again, or unlocked, cannot be ascertained. Therefore, allow calling static subprogs within a bpf_spin_lock critical section, and only reject it in case the subprog linkage is global. Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Fix flaky selftest lwt_redirect/lwt_rerouteYonghong Song3-2/+2
Recently, when running './test_progs -j', I occasionally hit the following errors: test_lwt_redirect:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_lwt_redirect_run:FAIL:netns_create unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) #142/2 lwt_redirect/lwt_redirect_normal_nomac:FAIL #142 lwt_redirect:FAIL test_lwt_reroute:PASS:pthread_create 0 nsec test_lwt_reroute_run:FAIL:netns_create unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) test_lwt_reroute:PASS:pthread_join 0 nsec #143/2 lwt_reroute/lwt_reroute_qdisc_dropped:FAIL #143 lwt_reroute:FAIL The netns_create() definition looks like below: #define NETNS "ns_lwt" static inline int netns_create(void) { return system("ip netns add " NETNS); } One possibility is that both lwt_redirect and lwt_reroute create netns with the same name "ns_lwt" which may cause conflict. I tried the following example: $ sudo ip netns add abc $ echo $? 0 $ sudo ip netns add abc Cannot create namespace file "/var/run/netns/abc": File exists $ echo $? 1 $ The return code for above netns_create() is 256. The internet search suggests that the return value for 'ip netns add ns_lwt' is 1, which matches the above 'sudo ip netns add abc' example. This patch tried to use different netns names for two tests to avoid 'ip netns add <name>' failure. I ran './test_progs -j' 10 times and all succeeded with lwt_redirect/lwt_reroute tests. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Tested-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Suppress warning message of an unused variable.Kui-Feng Lee3-7/+4
"r" is used to receive the return value of test_2 in bpf_testmod.c, but it is not actually used. So, we remove "r" and change the return type to "void". Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2024-02-05selftests/bpf: Fix flaky test ptr_untrustedYonghong Song1-3/+3
Somehow recently I frequently hit the following test failure with either ./test_progs or ./test_progs-cpuv4: serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:lsm_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:PASS:raw_tp_attach 0 nsec serial_test_ptr_untrusted:FAIL:cmp_tp_name unexpected cmp_tp_name: actual -115 != expected 0 #182 ptr_untrusted:FAIL Further investigation found the failure is due to bpf_probe_read_user_str() where reading user-level string attr->raw_tracepoint.name is not successfully, most likely due to the string itself still in disk and not populated into memory yet. One solution is do a printf() call of the string before doing bpf syscall which will force the raw_tracepoint.name into memory. But I think a more robust solution is to use bpf_copy_from_user() which is used in sleepable program and can tolerate page fault, and the fix here used the latter approach. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-02selftests/bpf: add more cases for __arg_trusted __arg_nullable argsAndrii Nakryiko1-3/+29
Add extra layer of global functions to ensure that passing around (trusted) PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL registers works as expected. We also extend trusted_task_arg_nullable subtest to check three possible valid argumements: known NULL, known non-NULL, and maybe NULL cases. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-02-02selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: do not use poisoned typeShung-Hsi Yu1-1/+1
After commit c698eaebdf47 ("selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: Optimize kallsyms cache") trace_helpers.c now includes libbpf_internal.h, and thus can no longer use the u32 type (among others) since they are poison in libbpf_internal.h. Replace u32 with __u32 to fix the following error when building trace_helpers.c on powerpc: error: attempt to use poisoned "u32" Fixes: c698eaebdf47 ("selftests/bpf: trace_helpers.c: Optimize kallsyms cache") Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2024-02-02selftests/bpf: States pruning checks for scalar vs STACK_MISCEduard Zingerman1-0/+154
Check that stacksafe() compares spilled scalars with STACK_MISC. The following combinations are explored: - old spill of imprecise scalar is equivalent to cur STACK_{MISC,INVALID} (plus error in unpriv mode); - old spill of precise scalar is not equivalent to cur STACK_MISC; - old STACK_MISC is equivalent to cur scalar; - old STACK_MISC is not equivalent to cur non-scalar. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-02selftests/bpf: Add test cases for narrowing fillMaxim Mikityanskiy1-0/+111
The previous commit allowed to preserve boundaries and track IDs of scalars on narrowing fills. Add test cases for that pattern. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-02bpf: Preserve boundaries and track scalars on narrowing fillMaxim Mikityanskiy1-7/+19
When the width of a fill is smaller than the width of the preceding spill, the information about scalar boundaries can still be preserved, as long as it's coerced to the right width (done by coerce_reg_to_size). Even further, if the actual value fits into the fill width, the ID can be preserved as well for further tracking of equal scalars. Implement the above improvements, which makes narrowing fills behave the same as narrowing spills and MOVs between registers. Two tests are adjusted to accommodate for endianness differences and to take into account that it's now allowed to do a narrowing fill from the least significant bits. reg_bounds_sync is added to coerce_reg_to_size to correctly adjust umin/umax boundaries after the var_off truncation, for example, a 64-bit value 0xXXXXXXXX00000000, when read as a 32-bit, gets umin = 0, umax = 0xFFFFFFFF, var_off = (0x0; 0xffffffff00000000), which needs to be synced down to umax = 0, otherwise reg_bounds_sanity_check doesn't pass. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-02selftests/bpf: Test tracking spilled unbounded scalarsMaxim Mikityanskiy1-0/+27
The previous commit added tracking for unbounded scalars on spill. Add the test case to check the new functionality. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-02bpf: Track spilled unbounded scalarsMaxim Mikityanskiy1-3/+3
Support the pattern where an unbounded scalar is spilled to the stack, then boundary checks are performed on the src register, after which the stack frame slot is refilled into a register. Before this commit, the verifier didn't treat the src register and the stack slot as related if the src register was an unbounded scalar. The register state wasn't copied, the id wasn't preserved, and the stack slot was marked as STACK_MISC. Subsequent boundary checks on the src register wouldn't result in updating the boundaries of the spilled variable on the stack. After this commit, the verifier will preserve the bond between src and dst even if src is unbounded, which permits to do boundary checks on src and refill dst later, still remembering its boundaries. Such a pattern is sometimes generated by clang when compiling complex long functions. One test is adjusted to reflect that now unbounded scalars are tracked. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: Fix bench runner SIGSEGVAndrii Nakryiko1-2/+10
Some benchmarks don't have either "consumer" or "producer" sides. For example, trig-tp and other BPF triggering benchmarks don't have consumers, as they only do "producing" by calling into syscall or predefined uproes. As such it's valid for some benchmarks to have zero consumers or producers. So allows to specify `-c0` explicitly. This triggers another problem. If benchmark doesn't support either consumer or producer side, consumer_thread/producer_thread callback will be NULL, but benchmark runner will attempt to use those NULL callback to create threads anyways. So instead of crashing with SIGSEGV in case of misconfigured benchmark, detect the condition and report error. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-02-01selftests/bpf: Enable inline bpf_kptr_xchg() test for RV64Pu Lehui1-1/+2
Enable inline bpf_kptr_xchg() test for RV64, and the test have passed as show below: Summary: 1/0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-31bpf: treewide: Annotate BPF kfuncs in BTFDaniel Xu1-4/+4
This commit marks kfuncs as such inside the .BTF_ids section. The upshot of these annotations is that we'll be able to automatically generate kfunc prototypes for downstream users. The process is as follows: 1. In source, use BTF_KFUNCS_START/END macro pair to mark kfuncs 2. During build, pahole injects into BTF a "bpf_kfunc" BTF_DECL_TAG for each function inside BTF_KFUNCS sets 3. At runtime, vmlinux or module BTF is made available in sysfs 4. At runtime, bpftool (or similar) can look at provided BTF and generate appropriate prototypes for functions with "bpf_kfunc" tag To ensure future kfunc are similarly tagged, we now also return error inside kfunc registration for untagged kfuncs. For vmlinux kfuncs, we also WARN(), as initcall machinery does not handle errors. Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e55150ceecbf0a5d961e608941165c0bee7bc943.1706491398.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-31selftests/bpf: Disable IPv6 for lwt_redirect testManu Bretelle1-0/+1
After a recent change in the vmtest runner, this test started failing sporadically. Investigation showed that this test was subject to race condition which got exacerbated after the vm runner change. The symptoms being that the logic that waited for an ICMPv4 packet is naive and will break if 5 or more non-ICMPv4 packets make it to tap0. When ICMPv6 is enabled, the kernel will generate traffic such as ICMPv6 router solicitation... On a system with good performance, the expected ICMPv4 packet would very likely make it to the network interface promptly, but on a system with poor performance, those "guarantees" do not hold true anymore. Given that the test is IPv4 only, this change disable IPv6 in the test netns by setting `net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6` to 1. This essentially leaves "ping" as the sole generator of traffic in the network namespace. If this test was to be made IPv6 compatible, the logic in `wait_for_packet` would need to be modified. In more details... At a high level, the test does: - create a new namespace - in `setup_redirect_target` set up lo, tap0, and link_err interfaces as well as add 2 routes that attaches ingress/egress sections of `test_lwt_redirect.bpf.o` to the xmit path. - in `send_and_capture_test_packets` send an ICMP packet and read off the tap interface (using `wait_for_packet`) to check that a ICMP packet with the right size is read. `wait_for_packet` will try to read `max_retry` (5) times from the tap0 fd looking for an ICMPv4 packet matching some criteria. The problem is that when we set up the `tap0` interface, because IPv6 is enabled by default, traffic such as Router solicitation is sent through tap0, as in: # tcpdump -r /tmp/lwt_redirect.pc reading from file /tmp/lwt_redirect.pcap, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet) 04:46:23.578352 IP6 :: > ff02::1:ffc0:4427: ICMP6, neighbor solicitation, who has fe80::fcba:dff:fec0:4427, length 32 04:46:23.659522 IP6 :: > ff02::16: HBH ICMP6, multicast listener report v2, 1 group record(s), length 28 04:46:24.389169 IP 10.0.0.1 > 20.0.0.9: ICMP echo request, id 122, seq 1, length 108 04:46:24.618599 IP6 fe80::fcba:dff:fec0:4427 > ff02::16: HBH ICMP6, multicast listener report v2, 1 group record(s), length 28 04:46:24.619985 IP6 fe80::fcba:dff:fec0:4427 > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16 04:46:24.767326 IP6 fe80::fcba:dff:fec0:4427 > ff02::16: HBH ICMP6, multicast listener report v2, 1 group record(s), length 28 04:46:28.936402 IP6 fe80::fcba:dff:fec0:4427 > ff02::2: ICMP6, router solicitation, length 16 If `wait_for_packet` sees 5 non-ICMPv4 packets, it will return 0, which is what we see in: 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0336992Z test_lwt_redirect_run:PASS:netns_create 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0341309Z open_netns:PASS:malloc token 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0344844Z open_netns:PASS:open /proc/self/ns/net 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0350071Z open_netns:PASS:open netns fd 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0353516Z open_netns:PASS:setns 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0356560Z test_lwt_redirect_run:PASS:setns 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0360140Z open_tuntap:PASS:open(/dev/net/tun) 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0363822Z open_tuntap:PASS:ioctl(TUNSETIFF) 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0367402Z open_tuntap:PASS:fcntl(O_NONBLOCK) 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0371167Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:open_tuntap 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0375180Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:if_nametoindex 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0379929Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip link add link_err type dummy 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0384874Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip link set lo up 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0389678Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip addr add dev lo 10.0.0.1/32 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0394814Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip link set link_err up 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0399874Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip link set tap0 up 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0407731Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip route add 10.0.0.0/24 dev link_err encap bpf xmit obj test_lwt_redirect.bpf.o sec redir_ingress 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0419105Z setup_redirect_target:PASS:ip route add 20.0.0.0/24 dev link_err encap bpf xmit obj test_lwt_redirect.bpf.o sec redir_egress 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0427209Z test_lwt_redirect_normal:PASS:setup_redirect_target 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0431424Z ping_dev:PASS:if_nametoindex 0 nsec 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0437222Z send_and_capture_test_packets:FAIL:wait_for_epacket unexpected wait_for_epacket: actual 0 != expected 1 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0448298Z (/tmp/work/bpf/bpf/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/lwt_redirect.c:175: errno: Success) test_lwt_redirect_normal egress test fails 2024-01-31T03:51:25.0457124Z close_netns:PASS:setns 0 nsec When running in a VM which potential resource contrains, the odds that calling `ping` is not scheduled very soon after bringing `tap0` up increases, and with this the chances to get our ICMP packet pushed to position 6+ in the network trace. To confirm this indeed solves the issue, I ran the test 100 times in a row with: errors=0 successes=0 for i in `seq 1 100` do ./test_progs -t lwt_redirect/lwt_redirect_normal if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then successes=$((successes+1)) else errors=$((errors+1)) fi done echo "successes: $successes/errors: $errors" While this test would at least fail a couple of time every 10 runs, here it ran 100 times with no error. Fixes: 43a7c3ef8a15 ("selftests/bpf: Add lwt_xmit tests for BPF_REDIRECT") Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-30selftests/bpf: convert bpf_rdonly_cast() uses to bpf_core_cast() macroAndrii Nakryiko8-18/+12
Use more ergonomic bpf_core_cast() macro instead of bpf_rdonly_cast() in selftests code. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2024-01-30libbpf: add bpf_core_cast() macroAndrii Nakryiko3-6/+2
Add bpf_core_cast() macro that wraps bpf_rdonly_cast() kfunc. It's more ergonomic than kfunc, as it automatically extracts btf_id with bpf_core_type_id_kernel(), and works with type names. It also casts result to (T *) pointer. See the definition of the macro, it's self-explanatory. libbpf declares bpf_rdonly_cast() extern as __weak __ksym and should be safe to not conflict with other possible declarations in user code. But we do have a conflict with current BPF selftests that declare their externs with first argument as `void *obj`, while libbpf opts into more permissive `const void *obj`. This causes conflict, so we fix up BPF selftests uses in the same patch. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2024-01-30selftests/bpf: add trusted global subprog arg testsAndrii Nakryiko2-0/+158
Add a bunch of test cases validating behavior of __arg_trusted and its combination with __arg_nullable tag. We also validate CO-RE flavor support by kernel for __arg_trusted args. Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-30bpf: Move -Wno-compare-distinct-pointer-types to BPF_CFLAGSJose E. Marchesi1-3/+3
Clang supports enabling/disabling certain conversion diagnostics via the -W[no-]compare-distinct-pointer-types command line options. Disabling this warning is required by some BPF selftests due to -Werror. Until very recently GCC would emit these warnings unconditionally, which was a problem for gcc-bpf, but we added support for the command-line options to GCC upstream [1]. This patch moves the -Wno-cmopare-distinct-pointer-types from CLANG_CFLAGS to BPF_CFLAGS in selftests/bpf/Makefile so the option is also used in gcc-bpf builds, not just in clang builds. Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/627769.html Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-30bpf: Build type-punning BPF selftests with -fno-strict-aliasingJose E. Marchesi1-0/+13
A few BPF selftests perform type punning and they may break strict aliasing rules, which are exploited by both GCC and clang by default while optimizing. This can lead to broken compiled programs. This patch disables strict aliasing for these particular tests, by mean of the -fno-strict-aliasing command line option. This will make sure these tests are optimized properly even if some strict aliasing rule gets violated. After this patch, GCC is able to build all the selftests without warning about potential strict aliasing issue. bpf@vger discussion on strict aliasing and BPF selftests: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/T/#t Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-29bpf: Use -Wno-error in certain tests when building with GCCJose E. Marchesi1-1/+11
Certain BPF selftests contain code that, albeit being legal C, trigger warnings in GCC that cannot be disabled. This is the case for example for the tests progs/btf_dump_test_case_bitfields.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_namespacing.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_packing.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_padding.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c which contain struct type declarations inside function parameter lists. This is problematic, because: - The BPF selftests are built with -Werror. - The Clang and GCC compilers sometimes differ when it comes to handle warnings. in the handling of warnings. One compiler may emit warnings for code that the other compiles compiles silently, and one compiler may offer the possibility to disable certain warnings, while the other doesn't. In order to overcome this problem, this patch modifies the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile in order to: 1. Enable the possibility of specifing per-source-file extra CFLAGS. This is done by defining a make variable like: <source-filename>-CFLAGS := <whateverflags> And then modifying the proper Make rule in order to use these flags when compiling <source-filename>. 2. Use the mechanism above to add -Wno-error to CFLAGS for the following selftests: progs/btf_dump_test_case_bitfields.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_namespacing.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_packing.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_padding.c progs/btf_dump_test_case_syntax.c Note the corresponding -CFLAGS variables for these files are defined only if the selftests are being built with GCC. Note that, while compiler pragmas can generally be used to disable particular warnings per file, this 1) is only possible for warning that actually can be disabled in the command line, i.e. that have -Wno-FOO options, and 2) doesn't apply to -Wno-error. Tested in bpf-next master branch. No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-29selftests/bpf: Remove "&>" usage in the selftestsMartin KaFai Lau10-20/+25
In s390, CI reported that the sock_iter_batch selftest hits this error very often: 2024-01-26T16:56:49.3091804Z Bind /proc/self/ns/net -> /run/netns/sock_iter_batch_netns failed: No such file or directory 2024-01-26T16:56:49.3149524Z Cannot remove namespace file "/run/netns/sock_iter_batch_netns": No such file or directory 2024-01-26T16:56:49.3772213Z test_sock_iter_batch:FAIL:ip netns add sock_iter_batch_netns unexpected error: 256 (errno 0) It happens very often in s390 but Manu also noticed it happens very sparsely in other arch also. It turns out the default dash shell does not recognize "&>" as a redirection operator, so the command went to the background. In the sock_iter_batch selftest, the "ip netns delete" went into background and then race with the following "ip netns add" command. This patch replaces the "&> /dev/null" usage with ">/dev/null 2>&1" and does this redirection in the SYS_NOFAIL macro instead of doing it individually by its caller. The SYS_NOFAIL callers do not care about failure, so it is no harm to do this redirection even if some of the existing callers do not redirect to /dev/null now. It touches different test files, so I skipped the Fixes tags in this patch. Some of the changed tests do not use "&>" but they use the SYS_NOFAIL, so these tests are also changed to avoid doing its own redirection because SYS_NOFAIL does it internally now. Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-29selftests/bpf: Drop return in bpf_testmod_exitGeliang Tang1-1/+1
bpf_testmod_exit() does not need to have a return value (given the void), so this patch drops this useless 'return' in it. Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/5765b287ea088f0c820f2a834faf9b20fb2f8215.1706442113.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn
2024-01-26selftests/bpf: Add missing line break in test_verifierTiezhu Yang1-1/+1
There are no break lines in the test log for test_verifier #106 ~ #111 if jit is disabled, add the missing line break at the end of printf() to fix it. Without this patch: [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier 106 #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call SKIP (requires BPF JIT)Summary: 0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED With this patch: [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier 106 #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call SKIP (requires BPF JIT) Summary: 0 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Fixes: 0b50478fd877 ("selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test_verifier") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Incorporate LSM policy to token-based testsAndrii Nakryiko2-17/+104
Add tests for LSM interactions (both bpf_token_capable and bpf_token_cmd LSM hooks) with BPF token in bpf() subsystem. Now child process passes back token FD for parent to be able to do tests with token originating in "wrong" userns. But we also create token in initns and check that token LSMs don't accidentally reject BPF operations when capable() checks pass without BPF token. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Add tests for LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvarAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+98
Add new subtest validating LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH envvar semantics. Extend existing test to validate that LIBBPF_BPF_TOKEN_PATH allows to disable implicit BPF token creation by setting envvar to empty string. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Add tests for BPF object load with implicit tokenAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+64
Add a test to validate libbpf's implicit BPF token creation from default BPF FS location (/sys/fs/bpf). Also validate that disabling this implicit BPF token creation works. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Add BPF object loading tests with explicit token passingAndrii Nakryiko3-0/+166
Add a few tests that attempt to load BPF object containing privileged map, program, and the one requiring mandatory BTF uploading into the kernel (to validate token FD propagation to BPF_BTF_LOAD command). Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Utilize string values for delegate_xxx mount optionsAndrii Nakryiko1-20/+32
Use both hex-based and string-based way to specify delegate mount options for BPF FS. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Add BPF token-enabled testsAndrii Nakryiko1-0/+683
Add a selftest that attempts to conceptually replicate intended BPF token use cases inside user namespaced container. Child process is forked. It is then put into its own userns and mountns. Child creates BPF FS context object. This ensures child userns is captured as the owning userns for this instance of BPF FS. Given setting delegation mount options is privileged operation, we ensure that child cannot set them. This context is passed back to privileged parent process through Unix socket, where parent sets up delegation options, creates, and mounts it as a detached mount. This mount FD is passed back to the child to be used for BPF token creation, which allows otherwise privileged BPF operations to succeed inside userns. We validate that all of token-enabled privileged commands (BPF_BTF_LOAD, BPF_MAP_CREATE, and BPF_PROG_LOAD) work as intended. They should only succeed inside the userns if a) BPF token is provided with proper allowed sets of commands and types; and b) namespaces CAP_BPF and other privileges are set. Lacking a) or b) should lead to -EPERM failures. Based on suggested workflow by Christian Brauner ([0]). [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230704-hochverdient-lehne-eeb9eeef785e@brauner/ Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24bpf: Add BPF token support to BPF_PROG_LOAD commandAndrii Nakryiko2-0/+5
Add basic support of BPF token to BPF_PROG_LOAD. BPF_F_TOKEN_FD flag should be set in prog_flags field when providing prog_token_fd. Wire through a set of allowed BPF program types and attach types, derived from BPF FS at BPF token creation time. Then make sure we perform bpf_token_capable() checks everywhere where it's relevant. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24bpf: Add BPF token support to BPF_MAP_CREATE commandAndrii Nakryiko2-0/+5
Allow providing token_fd for BPF_MAP_CREATE command to allow controlled BPF map creation from unprivileged process through delegated BPF token. New BPF_F_TOKEN_FD flag is added to specify together with BPF token FD for BPF_MAP_CREATE command. Wire through a set of allowed BPF map types to BPF token, derived from BPF FS at BPF token creation time. This, in combination with allowed_cmds allows to create a narrowly-focused BPF token (controlled by privileged agent) with a restrictive set of BPF maps that application can attempt to create. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Wait for the netstamp_needed_key static key to be turned onMartin KaFai Lau1-4/+75
After the previous patch that speeded up the test (by avoiding neigh discovery in IPv6), the BPF CI occasionally hits this error: rcv tstamp unexpected pkt rcv tstamp: actual 0 == expected 0 The test complains about the cmsg returned from the recvmsg() does not have the rcv timestamp. Setting skb->tstamp or not is controlled by a kernel static key "netstamp_needed_key". The static key is enabled whenever this is at least one sk with the SOCK_TIMESTAMP set. The test_redirect_dtime does use setsockopt() to turn on the SOCK_TIMESTAMP for the reading sk. In the kernel net_enable_timestamp() has a delay to enable the "netstamp_needed_key" when CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL is set. This potential delay is the likely reason for packet missing rcv timestamp occasionally. This patch is to create udp sockets with SOCK_TIMESTAMP set. It sends and receives some packets until the received packet has a rcv timestamp. It currently retries at most 5 times with 1s in between. This should be enough to wait for the "netstamp_needed_key". It then holds on to the socket and only closes it at the end of the test. This guarantees that the test has the "netstamp_needed_key" key turned on from the beginning. To simplify the udp sockets setup, they are sending/receiving packets in the same netns (ns_dst is used) and communicate over the "lo" dev. Hence, the patch enables the "lo" dev in the ns_dst. Fixes: c803475fd8dd ("bpf: selftests: test skb->tstamp in redirect_neigh") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-24selftests/bpf: Fix the flaky tc_redirect_dtime testMartin KaFai Lau1-0/+11
BPF CI has been reporting the tc_redirect_dtime test failing from time to time: test_inet_dtime:PASS:setns src 0 nsec (network_helpers.c:253: errno: No route to host) Failed to connect to server close_netns:PASS:setns 0 nsec test_inet_dtime:FAIL:connect_to_fd unexpected connect_to_fd: actual -1 < expected 0 test_tcp_clear_dtime:PASS:tcp ip6 clear dtime ingress_fwdns_p100 0 nsec The connect_to_fd failure (EHOSTUNREACH) is from the test_tcp_clear_dtime() test and it is the very first IPv6 traffic after setting up all the links, addresses, and routes. The symptom is this first connect() is always slow. In my setup, it could take ~3s. After some tracing and tcpdump, the slowness is mostly spent in the neighbor solicitation in the "ns_fwd" namespace while the "ns_src" and "ns_dst" are fine. I forced the kernel to drop the neighbor solicitation messages. I can then reproduce EHOSTUNREACH. What actually happen could be: - the neighbor advertisement came back a little slow. - the "ns_fwd" namespace concluded a neighbor discovery failure and triggered the ndisc_error_report() => ip6_link_failure() => icmpv6_send(skb, ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH, ICMPV6_ADDR_UNREACH, 0) - the client's connect() reports EHOSTUNREACH after receiving the ICMPV6_DEST_UNREACH message. The neigh table of both "ns_src" and "ns_dst" namespace has already been manually populated but not the "ns_fwd" namespace. This patch fixes it by manually populating the neigh table also in the "ns_fwd" namespace. Although the namespace configuration part had been existed before the tc_redirect_dtime test, still Fixes-tagging the patch when the tc_redirect_dtime test was added since it is the only test hitting it so far. Fixes: c803475fd8dd ("bpf: selftests: test skb->tstamp in redirect_neigh") Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Skip callback tests if jit is disabled in test_verifierTiezhu Yang2-0/+17
If CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set and bpf_jit_enable is 0, there exist 6 failed tests. [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL #106/p inline simple bpf_loop call FAIL #107/p don't inline bpf_loop call, flags non-zero FAIL #108/p don't inline bpf_loop call, callback non-constant FAIL #109/p bpf_loop_inline and a dead func FAIL #110/p bpf_loop_inline stack locations for loop vars FAIL #111/p inline bpf_loop call in a big program FAIL Summary: 768 PASSED, 15 SKIPPED, 6 FAILED The test log shows that callbacks are not allowed in non-JITed programs, interpreter doesn't support them yet, thus these tests should be skipped if jit is disabled. Add an explicit flag F_NEEDS_JIT_ENABLED to those tests to mark that they require JIT enabled in bpf_loop_inline.c, check the flag and jit_disabled at the beginning of do_test_single() to handle this case. With this patch: [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable [root@linux bpf]# echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/unprivileged_bpf_disabled [root@linux bpf]# ./test_verifier | grep FAIL Summary: 768 PASSED, 21 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Move is_jit_enabled() into testing_helpersTiezhu Yang3-18/+19
Currently, is_jit_enabled() is only used in test_progs, move it into testing_helpers so that it can be used in test_verifier. While at it, remove the second argument "0" of open() as Hou Tao suggested. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: test case for register_bpf_struct_ops().Kui-Feng Lee4-0/+176
Create a new struct_ops type called bpf_testmod_ops within the bpf_testmod module. When a struct_ops object is registered, the bpf_testmod module will invoke test_2 from the module. Signed-off-by: Kui-Feng Lee <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Add fill_link_info test for perf eventJiri Olsa2-0/+46
Adding fill_link_info test for perf event and testing we get its values back through the bpf_link_info interface. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Add cookies check for perf_event fill_link_info testJiri Olsa1-5/+21
Now that we get cookies for perf_event probes, adding tests for cookie for kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint. The perf_event test needs to be added completely and is coming in following change. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Add cookies check for kprobe_multi fill_link_info testJiri Olsa1-12/+36
Adding cookies check for kprobe_multi fill_link_info test, plus tests for invalid values related to cookies. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23bpf: Use r constraint instead of p constraint in selftestsJose E. Marchesi2-3/+3
Some of the BPF selftests use the "p" constraint in inline assembly snippets, for input operands for MOV (rN = rM) instructions. This is mainly done via the __imm_ptr macro defined in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_misc.h: #define __imm_ptr(name) [name]"p"(&name) Example: int consume_first_item_only(void *ctx) { struct bpf_iter_num iter; asm volatile ( /* create iterator */ "r1 = %[iter];" [...] : : __imm_ptr(iter) : CLOBBERS); [...] } The "p" constraint is a tricky one. It is documented in the GCC manual section "Simple Constraints": An operand that is a valid memory address is allowed. This is for ``load address'' and ``push address'' instructions. p in the constraint must be accompanied by address_operand as the predicate in the match_operand. This predicate interprets the mode specified in the match_operand as the mode of the memory reference for which the address would be valid. There are two problems: 1. It is questionable whether that constraint was ever intended to be used in inline assembly templates, because its behavior really depends on compiler internals. A "memory address" is not the same than a "memory operand" or a "memory reference" (constraint "m"), and in fact its usage in the template above results in an error in both x86_64-linux-gnu and bpf-unkonwn-none: foo.c: In function ‘bar’: foo.c:6:3: error: invalid 'asm': invalid expression as operand 6 | asm volatile ("r1 = %[jorl]" : : [jorl]"p"(&jorl)); | ^~~ I would assume the same happens with aarch64, riscv, and most/all other targets in GCC, that do not accept operands of the form A + B that are not wrapped either in a const or in a memory reference. To avoid that error, the usage of the "p" constraint in internal GCC instruction templates is supposed to be complemented by the 'a' modifier, like in: asm volatile ("r1 = %a[jorl]" : : [jorl]"p"(&jorl)); Internally documented (in GCC's final.cc) as: %aN means expect operand N to be a memory address (not a memory reference!) and print a reference to that address. That works because when the modifier 'a' is found, GCC prints an "operand address", which is not the same than an "operand". But... 2. Even if we used the internal 'a' modifier (we shouldn't) the 'rN = rM' instruction really requires a register argument. In cases involving automatics, like in the examples above, we easily end with: bar: #APP r1 = r10-4 #NO_APP In other cases we could conceibly also end with a 64-bit label that may overflow the 32-bit immediate operand of `rN = imm32' instructions: r1 = foo All of which is clearly wrong. clang happens to do "the right thing" in the current usage of __imm_ptr in the BPF tests, because even with -O2 it seems to "reload" the fp-relative address of the automatic to a register like in: bar: r1 = r10 r1 += -4 #APP r1 = r1 #NO_APP Which is what GCC would generate with -O0. Whether this is by chance or by design, the compiler shouln't be expected to do that reload driven by the "p" constraint. This patch changes the usage of the "p" constraint in the BPF selftests macros to use the "r" constraint instead. If a register is what is required, we should let the compiler know. Previous discussion in bpf@vger: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/T/#ef0df83d6975c34dff20bf0dd52e078f5b8ca2767 Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23bpf: fix constraint in test_tcpbpf_kern.cJose E. Marchesi1-1/+1
GCC emits a warning: progs/test_tcpbpf_kern.c:60:9: error: ‘op’ is used uninitialized [-Werror=uninitialized] when an uninialized op is used with a "+r" constraint. The + modifier means a read-write operand, but that operand in the selftest is just written to. This patch changes the selftest to use a "=r" constraint. This pacifies GCC. Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23bpf: avoid VLAs in progs/test_xdp_dynptr.cJose E. Marchesi1-5/+5
VLAs are not supported by either the BPF port of clang nor GCC. The selftest test_xdp_dynptr.c contains the following code: const size_t tcphdr_sz = sizeof(struct tcphdr); const size_t udphdr_sz = sizeof(struct udphdr); const size_t ethhdr_sz = sizeof(struct ethhdr); const size_t iphdr_sz = sizeof(struct iphdr); const size_t ipv6hdr_sz = sizeof(struct ipv6hdr); [...] static __always_inline int handle_ipv4(struct xdp_md *xdp, struct bpf_dynptr *xdp_ptr) { __u8 eth_buffer[ethhdr_sz + iphdr_sz + ethhdr_sz]; __u8 iph_buffer_tcp[iphdr_sz + tcphdr_sz]; __u8 iph_buffer_udp[iphdr_sz + udphdr_sz]; [...] } The eth_buffer, iph_buffer_tcp and other automatics are fixed size only if the compiler optimizes away the constant global variables. clang does this, but GCC does not, turning these automatics into variable length arrays. This patch removes the global variables and turns these values into preprocessor constants. This makes the selftest to build properly with GCC. Tested in bpf-next master. No regressions. Signed-off-by: Jose E. Marchesi <[email protected]> Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Cc: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Enable kptr_xchg_inline test for arm64Hou Tao1-1/+1
Now arm64 bpf jit has enable bpf_jit_supports_ptr_xchg(), so enable the test for arm64 as well. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftest/bpf: Add map_in_maps with BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY valuesAndrey Grafin2-1/+31
Check that bpf_object__load() successfully creates map_in_maps with BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERF_EVENT_ARRAY values. These changes cover fix in the previous patch "libbpf: Apply map_set_def_max_entries() for inner_maps on creation". A command line output is: - w/o fix $ sudo ./test_maps libbpf: map 'mim_array_pe': failed to create inner map: -22 libbpf: map 'mim_array_pe': failed to create: Invalid argument(-22) libbpf: failed to load object './test_map_in_map.bpf.o' Failed to load test prog - with fix $ sudo ./test_maps ... test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED Fixes: 646f02ffdd49 ("libbpf: Add BTF-defined map-in-map support") Signed-off-by: Andrey Grafin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Acked-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftest: bpf: Test bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk().Kuniyuki Iwashima7-0/+953
This commit adds a sample selftest to demonstrate how we can use bpf_sk_assign_tcp_reqsk() as the backend of SYN Proxy. The test creates IPv4/IPv6 x TCP connections and transfer messages over them on lo with BPF tc prog attached. The tc prog will process SYN and returns SYN+ACK with the following ISN and TS. In a real use case, this part will be done by other hosts. MSB LSB ISN: | 31 ... 8 | 7 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 2 1 0 | | Hash_1 | MSS | ECN | SACK | WScale | TS: | 31 ... 8 | 7 ... 0 | | Random | Hash_2 | WScale in SYN is reused in SYN+ACK. The client returns ACK, and tc prog will recalculate ISN and TS from ACK and validate SYN Cookie. If it's valid, the prog calls kfunc to allocate a reqsk for skb and configure the reqsk based on the argument created from SYN Cookie. Later, the reqsk will be processed in cookie_v[46]_check() to create a connection. Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23selftests/bpf: Fix potential premature unload in bpf_testmodArtem Savkov1-0/+9
It is possible for bpf_kfunc_call_test_release() to be called from bpf_map_free_deferred() when bpf_testmod is already unloaded and perf_test_stuct.cnt which it tries to decrease is no longer in memory. This patch tries to fix the issue by waiting for all references to be dropped in bpf_testmod_exit(). The issue can be triggered by running 'test_progs -t map_kptr' in 6.5, but is obscured in 6.6 by d119357d07435 ("rcu-tasks: Treat only synchronous grace periods urgently"). Fixes: 65eb006d85a2 ("bpf: Move kernel test kfuncs to bpf_testmod") Signed-off-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2024-01-23bpf: Minor improvements for bpf_cmp.Alexei Starovoitov1-9/+12
Few minor improvements for bpf_cmp() macro: . reduce number of args in __bpf_cmp() . rename NOFLIP to UNLIKELY . add a comment about 64-bit truncation in "i" constraint . use "ri" constraint for sizeof(rhs) <= 4 . improve error message for bpf_cmp_likely() Before: progs/iters_task_vma.c:31:7: error: variable 'ret' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized] 31 | if (bpf_cmp_likely(seen, <==, 1000)) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ../bpf/bpf_experimental.h:325:3: note: expanded from macro 'bpf_cmp_likely' 325 | ret; | ^~~ progs/iters_task_vma.c:31:7: note: variable 'ret' is declared here ../bpf/bpf_experimental.h:310:3: note: expanded from macro 'bpf_cmp_likely' 310 | bool ret; | ^ After: progs/iters_task_vma.c:31:7: error: invalid operand for instruction 31 | if (bpf_cmp_likely(seen, <==, 1000)) | ^ ../bpf/bpf_experimental.h:324:17: note: expanded from macro 'bpf_cmp_likely' 324 | asm volatile("r0 " #OP " invalid compare"); | ^ <inline asm>:1:5: note: instantiated into assembly here 1 | r0 <== invalid compare | ^ Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>