Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
It's become a common pattern to have a collection of small BPF programs
in one BPF object file, each representing one test case. On user-space
side of such tests we maintain a table of program names and expected
failure or success, along with optional expected verifier log message.
This works, but each set of tests reimplement this mundane code over and
over again, which is a waste of time for anyone trying to add a new set
of tests. Furthermore, it's quite error prone as it's way too easy to miss
some entries in these manually maintained test tables (as evidences by
dynptr_fail tests, in which ringbuf_release_uninit_dynptr subtest was
accidentally missed; this is fixed in next patch).
So this patch implements generic test_loader, which accepts skeleton
name and handles the rest of details: opens and loads BPF object file,
making sure each program is tested in isolation. Optionally each test
case can specify expected BPF verifier log message. In case of failure,
tester makes sure to report verifier log, but it also reports verifier
log in verbose mode unconditionally.
Now, the interesting deviation from existing custom implementations is
the use of btf_decl_tag attribute to specify expected-to-fail vs
expected-to-succeed markers and, optionally, expected log message
directly next to BPF program source code, eliminating the need to
manually create and update table of tests.
We define few macros wrapping btf_decl_tag with a convention that all
values of btf_decl_tag start with "comment:" prefix, and then utilizing
a very simple "just_some_text_tag" or "some_key_name=<value>" pattern to
define things like expected success/failure, expected verifier message,
extra verifier log level (if necessary). This approach is demonstrated
by next patch in which two existing sets of failure tests are converted.
Tester supports both expected-to-fail and expected-to-succeed programs,
though this patch set didn't convert any existing expected-to-succeed
programs yet, as existing tests couple BPF program loading with their
further execution through attach or test_prog_run. One way to allow
testing scenarios like this would be ability to specify custom callback,
executed for each successfully loaded BPF program. This is left for
follow up patches, after some more analysis of existing test cases.
This test_loader is, hopefully, a start of a test_verifier-like runner,
but integrated into test_progs infrastructure. It will allow much better
"user experience" of defining low-level verification tests that can take
advantage of all the libbpf-provided nicety features on BPF side: global
variables, declarative maps, etc. All while having a choice of defining
it in C or as BPF assembly (through __attribute__((naked)) functions and
using embedded asm), depending on what makes most sense in each
particular case. This will be explored in follow up patches as well.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
A series of prior patches added some kfuncs that allow struct
task_struct * objects to be used as kptrs. These kfuncs leveraged the
'refcount_t rcu_users' field of the task for performing refcounting.
This field was used instead of 'refcount_t usage', as we wanted to
leverage the safety provided by RCU for ensuring a task's lifetime.
A struct task_struct is refcounted by two different refcount_t fields:
1. p->usage: The "true" refcount field which task lifetime. The
task is freed as soon as this refcount drops to 0.
2. p->rcu_users: An "RCU users" refcount field which is statically
initialized to 2, and is co-located in a union with
a struct rcu_head field (p->rcu). p->rcu_users
essentially encapsulates a single p->usage
refcount, and when p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU
callback is scheduled on the struct rcu_head which
decrements the p->usage refcount.
Our logic was that by using p->rcu_users, we would be able to use RCU to
safely issue refcount_inc_not_zero() a task's rcu_users field to
determine if a task could still be acquired, or was exiting.
Unfortunately, this does not work due to p->rcu_users and p->rcu sharing
a union. When p->rcu_users goes to 0, an RCU callback is scheduled to
drop a single p->usage refcount, and because the fields share a union,
the refcount immediately becomes nonzero again after the callback is
scheduled.
If we were to split the fields out of the union, this wouldn't be a
problem. Doing so should also be rather non-controversial, as there are
a number of places in struct task_struct that have padding which we
could use to avoid growing the structure by splitting up the fields.
For now, so as to fix the kfuncs to be correct, this patch instead
updates bpf_task_acquire() and bpf_task_release() to use the p->usage
field for refcounting via the get_task_struct() and put_task_struct()
functions. Because we can no longer rely on RCU, the change also guts
the bpf_task_acquire_not_zero() and bpf_task_kptr_get() functions
pending a resolution on the above problem.
In addition, the task fixes the kfunc and rcu_read_lock selftests to
expect this new behavior.
Fixes: 90660309b0c7 ("bpf: Add kfuncs for storing struct task_struct * as a kptr")
Fixes: fca1aa75518c ("bpf: Handle MEM_RCU type properly")
Reported-by: Matus Jokay <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
CONFIG_TEST_BPF can only be a module, so let's indicate it as such in
the selftests config.
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
"=n" is not valid kconfig syntax. Use "is not set" instead to indicate
the option should be disabled.
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
When installing the selftests using
"make -C tools/testing/selftests install", we need to make sure
all the required files to run the selftests are installed. Let's
make sure this is the case.
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
It is useful to use vmlinux.h in the xfrm_info test like other kfunc
tests do. In particular, it is common for kfunc bpf prog that requires
to use other core kernel structures in vmlinux.h
Although vmlinux.h is preferred, it needs a ___local flavor of
struct bpf_xfrm_info in order to build the bpf selftests
when CONFIG_XFRM_INTERFACE=[m|n].
Cc: Eyal Birger <[email protected]>
Fixes: 90a3a05eb33f ("selftests/bpf: add xfrm_info tests")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Test the xfrm_info kfunc helpers.
The test setup creates three name spaces - NS0, NS1, NS2.
XFRM tunnels are setup between NS0 and the two other NSs.
The kfunc helpers are used to steer traffic from NS0 to the other
NSs based on a userspace populated bpf global variable and validate
that the return traffic had arrived from the desired NS.
Signed-off-by: Eyal Birger <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
Both tolower and toupper are built in c functions, we should not
redefine them as this can result in a build error.
Fixes the following errors:
progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:10:20: error: conflicting types for built-in function 'tolower'; expected 'int(int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
10 | static inline char tolower(char c)
| ^~~~~~~
progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:5:1: note: 'tolower' is declared in header '<ctype.h>'
4 | #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+++ |+#include <ctype.h>
5 |
progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:17:20: error: conflicting types for built-in function 'toupper'; expected 'int(int)' [-Werror=builtin-declaration-mismatch]
17 | static inline char toupper(char c)
| ^~~~~~~
progs/bpf_iter_ksym.c:17:20: note: 'toupper' is declared in header '<ctype.h>'
See background on this sort of issue:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/20582607
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12213
(C99, 7.1.3p1) "All identifiers with external linkage in any of the
following subclauses (including the future library directions) are
always reserved for use as identifiers with external linkage."
This is documented behavior in GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Other-Builtins.html#index-std-2
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Add three tests for cgrp local storage support for sleepable progs.
Two tests can load and run properly, one for cgroup_iter, another
for passing current->cgroups->dfl_cgrp to bpf_cgrp_storage_get()
helper. One test has bpf_rcu_read_lock() and failed to load.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Martin mentioned that the verifier cannot assume arguments from
LSM hook sk_alloc_security being trusted since after the hook
is called, the sk ref_count is set to 1. This will overwrite
the ref_count changed by the bpf program and may cause ref_count
underflow later on.
I then further checked some other hooks. For example,
for bpf_lsm_file_alloc() hook in fs/file_table.c,
f->f_cred = get_cred(cred);
error = security_file_alloc(f);
if (unlikely(error)) {
file_free_rcu(&f->f_rcuhead);
return ERR_PTR(error);
}
atomic_long_set(&f->f_count, 1);
The input parameter 'f' to security_file_alloc() cannot be trusted
as well.
Specifically, I investiaged bpf_map/bpf_prog/file/sk/task alloc/free
lsm hooks. Except bpf_map_alloc and task_alloc, arguments for all other
hooks should not be considered as trusted. This may not be a complete
list, but it covers common usage for sk and task.
Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Add MEM_RCU pointer null checking for related tests. Also
modified task_acquire test so it takes a rcu ptr 'ptr' where
'ptr = rcu_ptr->rcu_field'.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The bpf_legacy.h header uses llvm specific load functions, add
GCC compatible variants as well to fix tests using these functions
under GCC.
Signed-off-by: James Hilliard <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Modify list_push_pop_multiple to alloc and insert nodes 2-at-a-time.
Without the previous patch's fix, this block of code:
bpf_spin_lock(lock);
bpf_list_push_front(head, &f[i]->node);
bpf_list_push_front(head, &f[i + 1]->node);
bpf_spin_unlock(lock);
would fail check_reference_leak check as release_on_unlock logic would miss
a ref that should've been released.
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
cc: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, the ingress redirect is not covered in "txmsg test apply".
Signed-off-by: Pengcheng Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
The networking programs typically don't require CAP_PERFMON, but through kfuncs
like bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() they can access memory through PTR_TO_BTF_ID. In
such case enforce CAP_PERFMON.
Also make sure that only GPL programs can access kernel data structures.
All kfuncs require GPL already.
Also remove allow_ptr_to_map_access. It's the same as allow_ptr_leaks and
different name for the same check only causes confusion.
Fixes: fd264ca02094 ("bpf: Add a kfunc to type cast from bpf uapi ctx to kernel ctx")
Fixes: 50c6b8a9aea2 ("selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu"")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
BPF CI fails for arm64 and s390x each with the following result:
[...]
All error logs:
serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:PASS:get_syms 0 nsec
serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:PASS:kprobe_multi_empty__open_and_load 0 nsec
libbpf: prog 'test_kprobe_empty': failed to attach: Operation not supported
serial_test_kprobe_multi_bench_attach:FAIL:bpf_program__attach_kprobe_multi_opts unexpected error: -95
#92 kprobe_multi_bench_attach:FAIL
[...]
Add the test to the deny list.
Fixes: 5b6c7e5c4434 ("selftests/bpf: Add attach bench test")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
|
|
Just a simple test to make sure we don't introduce unwanted compiler
warnings and API still supports passing enums as input argument.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
btf_skc_cls_ingress
This patch removes the need to pin prog when attaching to tc ingress
in the btf_skc_cls_ingress test. Instead, directly use the
bpf_tc_hook_create() and bpf_tc_attach(). The qdisc clsact
will go away together with the netns, so no need to
bpf_tc_hook_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
After removing the mount/umount dance from {open,close}_netns()
in the pervious patch, "serial_" can be removed from
the tests using {open,close}_netns().
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
The previous patches have removed the need to do the mount and umount
dance when switching netns. In particular:
* Avoid remounting /sys/fs/bpf to have a clean start
* Avoid remounting /sys to get a ifindex of a particular netns
This patch can finally remove the mount and umount dance in
{open,close}_netns which is unnecessarily complicated and
error-prone.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This patch removes the need to pin prog in the remaining tests in
tc_redirect.c by directly using the bpf_tc_hook_create() and
bpf_tc_attach(). The clsact qdisc will go away together with
the test netns, so no need to do bpf_tc_hook_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This patch removes the need to pin prog in the tc_redirect_peer_l3
test by directly using the bpf_tc_hook_create() and bpf_tc_attach().
The clsact qdisc will go away together with the test netns, so
no need to do bpf_tc_hook_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This patch removes the need to pin prog in the tc_redirect_dtime
test by directly using the bpf_tc_hook_create() and bpf_tc_attach().
The clsact qdisc will go away together with the test netns, so
no need to do bpf_tc_hook_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
/sys/net/class/*/ifindex
When switching netns, the setns_by_fd() is doing dances in mount/umounting
the /sys directories. One reason is the tc_redirect.c test is depending
on the /sys/net/class/*/ifindex instead of using the if_nametoindex().
if_nametoindex() uses ioctl() to get the ifindex.
This patch is to move all /sys/net/class/*/ifindex usages to
if_nametoindex(). The current code checks ifindex >= 0 which is
incorrect. ifindex > 0 should be checked instead. This patch also
stores ifindex_veth_src and ifindex_veth_dst since the latter patch
will need them.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
tools/lib/bpf/ringbuf.c
927cbb478adf ("libbpf: Handle size overflow for ringbuf mmap")
b486d19a0ab0 ("libbpf: checkpatch: Fixed code alignments in ringbuf.c")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
|
|
====================
bpf-next 2022-11-25
We've added 101 non-merge commits during the last 11 day(s) which contain
a total of 109 files changed, 8827 insertions(+), 1129 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Support for user defined BPF objects: the use case is to allocate own
objects, build own object hierarchies and use the building blocks to
build own data structures flexibly, for example, linked lists in BPF,
from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi.
2) Add bpf_rcu_read_{,un}lock() support for sleepable programs,
from Yonghong Song.
3) Add support storing struct task_struct objects as kptrs in maps,
from David Vernet.
4) Batch of BPF map documentation improvements, from Maryam Tahhan
and Donald Hunter.
5) Improve BPF verifier to propagate nullness information for branches
of register to register comparisons, from Eduard Zingerman.
6) Fix cgroup BPF iter infra to hold reference on the start cgroup,
from Hou Tao.
7) Fix BPF verifier to not mark fentry/fexit program arguments as trusted
given it is not the case for them, from Alexei Starovoitov.
8) Improve BPF verifier's realloc handling to better play along with dynamic
runtime analysis tools like KASAN and friends, from Kees Cook.
9) Remove legacy libbpf mode support from bpftool,
from Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui.
10) Rework zero-len skb redirection checks to avoid potentially breaking
existing BPF test infra users, from Stanislav Fomichev.
11) Two small refactorings which are independent and have been split out
of the XDP queueing RFC series, from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen.
12) Fix a memory leak in LSM cgroup BPF selftest, from Wang Yufen.
13) Documentation on how to run BPF CI without patch submission,
from Daniel Müller.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a few positive/negative tests to test bpf_rcu_read_lock()
and its corresponding verifier support. The new test will fail
on s390x and aarch64, so an entry is added to each of their
respective deny lists.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Add some selftest testcases that validate the expected behavior of the
bpf_task_from_pid() kfunc that was added in the prior patch.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
It should trigger a WARN_ON_ONCE in btf_type_id_size:
RIP: 0010:btf_type_id_size+0x8bd/0x940 kernel/bpf/btf.c:1952
btf_func_proto_check kernel/bpf/btf.c:4506 [inline]
btf_check_all_types kernel/bpf/btf.c:4734 [inline]
btf_parse_type_sec+0x1175/0x1980 kernel/bpf/btf.c:4763
btf_parse kernel/bpf/btf.c:5042 [inline]
btf_new_fd+0x65a/0xb00 kernel/bpf/btf.c:6709
bpf_btf_load+0x6f/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4342
__sys_bpf+0x50a/0x6c0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5034
__do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5093 [inline]
__se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091 [inline]
__x64_sys_bpf+0x7c/0x90 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:5091
do_syscall_64+0x54/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:48
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Jiri reports broken test_progs after recent commit 68f8e3d4b916
("selftests/bpf: Make sure zero-len skbs aren't redirectable").
Apparently we don't remount debugfs when we switch back networking namespace.
Let's explicitly mount /sys/kernel/debug.
0: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/T/#ma66ca9c92e99eee0a25e40f422489b26ee0171c1
Fixes: a30338840fa5 ("selftests/bpf: Move open_netns() and close_netns() into network_helpers.c")
Reported-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
bpf_cgroup_ancestor() allows BPF programs to access the ancestor of a
struct cgroup *. This patch adds selftests that validate its expected
behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch adds a selftest suite to validate the cgroup kfuncs that were
added in the prior patch.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently LLVM fails to recognize .data.* as data section and defaults to .text
section. Later BPF backend tries to emit 4-byte NOP instruction which doesn't
exist in BPF ISA and aborts.
The fix for LLVM is pending:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D138477
While waiting for the fix lets workaround the linked_list test case
by using .bss.* prefix which is properly recognized by LLVM as BSS section.
Fix libbpf to support .bss. prefix and adjust tests.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This reverts commit 0a2f85a1be4328d29aefa54684d10c23a3298fef.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
LWT_XMIT to test L3 case, TC to test L2 case.
v2:
- s/veth_ifindex/ipip_ifindex/ in two places (Martin)
- add comment about which condition triggers the rejection (Martin)
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
Alexei hit another rcu warnings because of this test.
Making test_bench_attach serial so it does not disrupts
other tests during parallel tests run.
While this change is not the fix, it should be less likely
to hit it with this test being executed serially.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Alexei hit following rcu warning when running prog_test -j.
[ 128.049567] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 128.049569] 6.1.0-rc2 #912 Tainted: G O
...
[ 128.050944] kprobe_multi_link_handler+0x6c/0x1d0
[ 128.050947] ? kprobe_multi_link_handler+0x42/0x1d0
[ 128.050950] ? __cpuidle_text_start+0x8/0x8
[ 128.050952] ? __cpuidle_text_start+0x8/0x8
[ 128.050958] fprobe_handler.part.1+0xac/0x150
[ 128.050964] 0xffffffffa02130c8
[ 128.050991] ? default_idle+0x5/0x20
[ 128.050998] default_idle+0x5/0x20
It's caused by bench test attaching kprobe_multi link to default_idle
function, which is not executed in rcu safe context so the kprobe
handler on top of it will trigger the rcu warning.
Filtering out default_idle function from the bench test.
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Update sk_storage_map_test to make sure kernel does not copy user
non-zero value spin lock to kernel, and does not copy kernel spin
lock value to user.
If user spin lock value is copied to kernel, this test case will
make kernel spin on the copied lock, resulting in rcu stall and
softlockup.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The test closes both iterator link fd and cgroup fd, and removes the
cgroup file to make a dead cgroup before reading from cgroup iterator.
It also uses kern_sync_rcu() and usleep() to wait for the release of
start cgroup. If the start cgroup is not pinned by cgroup iterator,
reading from iterator fd will trigger use-after-free.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Add remove_cgroup() to remove a cgroup which doesn't have any children
or live processes. It will be used by the following patch to test cgroup
iterator on a dead cgroup.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Following:
commit bd054102a8c7 ("libbpf: enforce strict libbpf 1.0 behaviors")
commit 93b8952d223a ("libbpf: deprecate legacy BPF map definitions")
The --legacy option is no longer relevant as libbpf no longer supports
it. libbpf_set_strict_mode() is a no-op operation.
Signed-off-by: Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Three tests are added. One is from John Fastabend ({1]) which tests
tracing style access for xdp program from the kernel ctx.
Another is a tc test to test both kernel ctx tracing style access
and explicit non-ctx type cast. The third one is for negative tests
including two tests, a tp_bpf test where the bpf_rdonly_cast()
returns a untrusted ptr which cannot be used as helper argument,
and a tracepoint test where the kernel ctx is a u64.
Also added the test to DENYLIST.s390x since s390 does not currently
support calling kernel functions in JIT mode.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
A previous change added a series of kfuncs for storing struct
task_struct objects as referenced kptrs. This patch adds a new
task_kfunc test suite for validating their expected behavior.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Kfuncs currently support specifying the KF_TRUSTED_ARGS flag to signal
to the verifier that it should enforce that a BPF program passes it a
"safe", trusted pointer. Currently, "safe" means that the pointer is
either PTR_TO_CTX, or is refcounted. There may be cases, however, where
the kernel passes a BPF program a safe / trusted pointer to an object
that the BPF program wishes to use as a kptr, but because the object
does not yet have a ref_obj_id from the perspective of the verifier, the
program would be unable to pass it to a KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS
kfunc.
The solution is to expand the set of pointers that are considered
trusted according to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, so that programs can invoke kfuncs
with these pointers without getting rejected by the verifier.
There is already a PTR_UNTRUSTED flag that is set in some scenarios,
such as when a BPF program reads a kptr directly from a map
without performing a bpf_kptr_xchg() call. These pointers of course can
and should be rejected by the verifier. Unfortunately, however,
PTR_UNTRUSTED does not cover all the cases for safety that need to
be addressed to adequately protect kfuncs. Specifically, pointers
obtained by a BPF program "walking" a struct are _not_ considered
PTR_UNTRUSTED according to BPF. For example, say that we were to add a
kfunc called bpf_task_acquire(), with KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, to
acquire a struct task_struct *. If we only used PTR_UNTRUSTED to signal
that a task was unsafe to pass to a kfunc, the verifier would mistakenly
allow the following unsafe BPF program to be loaded:
SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask")
int BPF_PROG(unsafe_acquire_task,
struct task_struct *task,
u64 clone_flags)
{
struct task_struct *acquired, *nested;
nested = task->last_wakee;
/* Would not be rejected by the verifier. */
acquired = bpf_task_acquire(nested);
if (!acquired)
return 0;
bpf_task_release(acquired);
return 0;
}
To address this, this patch defines a new type flag called PTR_TRUSTED
which tracks whether a PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer is safe to pass to a
KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc or a BPF helper function. PTR_TRUSTED pointers are
passed directly from the kernel as a tracepoint or struct_ops callback
argument. Any nested pointer that is obtained from walking a PTR_TRUSTED
pointer is no longer PTR_TRUSTED. From the example above, the struct
task_struct *task argument is PTR_TRUSTED, but the 'nested' pointer
obtained from 'task->last_wakee' is not PTR_TRUSTED.
A subsequent patch will add kfuncs for storing a task kfunc as a kptr,
and then another patch will add selftests to validate.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Instead of adding the whole test to DENYLIST.s390x, which also has
success test cases that should be run, just skip over failure test
cases in case the JIT does not support kfuncs.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The latest clang nightly as of writing crashes with the given test case
for BPF linked lists wherever global glock, ghead, glock2 are used,
hence comment out the parts that cause the crash, and prepare this commit
so that it can be reverted when the fix has been made. More context in [0].
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Preparing the metadata for bpf_list_head involves a complicated parsing
step and type resolution for the contained value. Ensure that corner
cases are tested against and invalid specifications in source are duly
rejected. Also include tests for incorrect ownership relationships in
the BTF.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Include various tests covering the success and failure cases. Also, run
the success cases at runtime to verify correctness of linked list
manipulation routines, in addition to ensuring successful verification.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
First, ensure that whenever a bpf_spin_lock is present in an allocation,
the reg->id is preserved. This won't be true for global variables
however, since they have a single map value per map, hence the verifier
harcodes it to 0 (so that multiple pseudo ldimm64 insns can yield the
same lock object per map at a given offset).
Next, add test cases for all possible combinations (kptr, global, map
value, inner map value). Since we lifted restriction on locking in inner
maps, also add test cases for them. Currently, each lookup into an inner
map gets a fresh reg->id, so even if the reg->map_ptr is same, they will
be treated as separate allocations and the incorrect unlock pairing will
be rejected.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Make updates in preparation for adding more test cases to this selftest:
- Convert from CHECK_ to ASSERT macros.
- Use BPF skeleton
- Fix typo sping -> spin
- Rename spinlock.c -> spin_lock.c
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|