| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
GCC's -Wall includes -Wsign-compare while clang does not.
Since BPF programs are built with clang we need to add this flag explicitly
to catch problematic comparisons like:
int i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is false.
long i = -1;
unsigned int j = 1;
if (i < j) // this is true.
C standard for reference:
- If either operand is unsigned long the other shall be converted to unsigned long.
- Otherwise, if one operand is a long int and the other unsigned int, then if a
long int can represent all the values of an unsigned int, the unsigned int
shall be converted to a long int; otherwise both operands shall be converted to
unsigned long int.
- Otherwise, if either operand is long, the other shall be converted to long.
- Otherwise, if either operand is unsigned, the other shall be converted to unsigned.
Unfortunately clang's -Wsign-compare is very noisy.
It complains about (s32)a == (u32)b which is safe and doen't have surprising behavior.
This patch fixes some of the issues. It needs a follow up to fix the rest.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
When linking statically, libraries may require other dependencies to be
included to ld flags. In particular, libelf may require libzstd. Use
pkg-config to determine such dependencies.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
pkg-config is used to build sign-file executable. It should use the
library for the target instead of the host as it is called during tests.
Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Add a minimal netlink helper library for the BPF selftests. This has been
taken and cut down and cleaned up from iproute2. This covers basics such
as netdevice creation which we need for BPF selftests / BPF CI given
iproute2 package cannot cover it yet.
Stanislav Fomichev suggested that this could be replaced in future by ynl
tool generated C code once it has RTNL support to create devices. Once we
get to this point the BPF CI would also need to add libmnl. If no further
extensions are needed, a second option could be that we remove this code
again once iproute2 package has support.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
Add support for building selftests with -O2 level of optimization, which
allows more compiler warnings detection (like lots of potentially
uninitialized usage), but also is useful to have a faster-running test
for some CPU-intensive tests.
One can build optimized versions of libbpf and selftests by running:
$ make RELEASE=1
There is a measurable speed up of about 10 seconds for me locally,
though it's mostly capped by non-parallelized serial tests. User CPU
time goes down by total 40 seconds, from 1m10s to 0m28s.
Unoptimized build (-O0)
=======================
Summary: 430/3544 PASSED, 25 SKIPPED, 4 FAILED
real 1m59.937s
user 1m10.877s
sys 3m14.880s
Optimized build (-O2)
=====================
Summary: 425/3543 PASSED, 25 SKIPPED, 9 FAILED
real 1m50.540s
user 0m28.406s
sys 3m13.198s
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Fix a bunch of potentially unitialized variable usage warnings that are
reported by GCC in -O2 mode. Also silence overzealous stringop-truncation
class of warnings.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
The uprobe_multi program was not picked up for the gen_tar target. Fix
by adding it to TEST_GEN_FILES.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
RISC-V has proper lld support. Use that, similar to what x86 does, for
urandom_read et al.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Some userland programs in the BPF test suite, e.g. urandom_read, is
missing cross-build support. Add cross-build support for these
programs
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Improve the receive_pkt() function to enable it to receive packets from
multiple sockets. Define a sock_num variable to iterate through all the
sockets in the Rx path. Add nb_valid_entries to check that all the
expected number of packets are received.
Revise the function __receive_pkts() to only inspect the receive ring
once, handle any received packets, and promptly return. Implement a bitmap
to store the value of number of sockets. Update Makefile to include
find_bit.c for compiling xskxceiver.
Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This exercises the newly added dynsym symbol versioning logics.
Now we accept symbols in form of func, func@LIB_VERSION or
func@@LIB_VERSION.
The test rely on liburandom_read.so. For liburandom_read.so, we have:
$ nm -D liburandom_read.so
w __cxa_finalize@GLIBC_2.17
w __gmon_start__
w _ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable
w _ITM_registerTMCloneTable
0000000000000000 A LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000000000 A LIBURANDOM_READ_2.0.0
000000000000081c T urandlib_api@@LIBURANDOM_READ_2.0.0
0000000000000814 T urandlib_api@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000000824 T urandlib_api_sameoffset@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000000824 T urandlib_api_sameoffset@@LIBURANDOM_READ_2.0.0
000000000000082c T urandlib_read_without_sema@@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
00000000000007c4 T urandlib_read_with_sema@@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
0000000000011018 D urandlib_read_with_sema_semaphore@@LIBURANDOM_READ_1.0.0
For `urandlib_api`, specifying `urandlib_api` will cause a conflict because
there are two symbols named urandlib_api and both are global bind.
For `urandlib_api_sameoffset`, there are also two symbols in the .so, but
both are at the same offset and essentially they refer to the same function
so no conflict.
Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
When using the "install" or targets depending on install, e.g. "gen_tar",
the BPF machine flavors weren't included.
A command like:
| make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- O=/workspace/kbuild \
| HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \
| -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar
would not include bpf/no_alu32, bpf/cpuv4, or bpf/bpf-gcc.
Include the BPF machine flavors for "install" make target.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Adding uprobe_multi test program that defines 50k uprobe_multi_func_*
functions and will serve as attach point for uprobe_multi bench test
in following patch.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
These selftests tests 2 major scenarios: the BPF based defragmentation
can successfully be done and that packet pointers are invalidated after
calls to the kfunc. The logic is similar for both ipv4 and ipv6.
In the first scenario, we create a UDP client and UDP echo server. The
the server side is fairly straightforward: we attach the prog and simply
echo back the message.
The on the client side, we send fragmented packets to and expect the
reassembled message back from the server.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/33e40fdfddf43be93f2cb259303f132f46750953.1689970773.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, test_progs-cpuv4 is generated with clang build kernel
when bpf cpu=v4 is supported by the clang compiler.
Let us enable test_progs-cpuv4 for gcc build kernel as well.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Similar to no-alu32 runner, if clang compiler supports -mcpu=v4,
a cpuv4 runner is created to test bpf programs compiled with
-mcpu=v4.
The following are some num-of-insn statistics for each newer
instructions based on existing selftests, excluding subsequent
cpuv4 insn specific tests.
insn pattern # of instructions
reg = (s8)reg 4
reg = (s16)reg 4
reg = (s32)reg 144
reg = *(s8 *)(reg + off) 13
reg = *(s16 *)(reg + off) 14
reg = *(s32 *)(reg + off) 15215
reg = bswap16 reg 142
reg = bswap32 reg 38
reg = bswap64 reg 14
reg s/= reg 0
reg s%= reg 0
gotol <offset> 58
Note that in llvm -mcpu=v4 implementation, the compiler is a little
bit conservative about generating 'gotol' insn (32-bit branch offset)
as it didn't precise count the number of insns (e.g., some insns are
debug insns, etc.). Compared to old 'goto' insn, newer 'gotol' insn
should have comparable verification states to 'goto' insn.
With current patch set, all selftests passed with -mcpu=v4
when running test_progs-cpuv4 binary. The -mcpu=v3 and -mcpu=v2 run
are also successful.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The benchmark could be used to compare the performance of hash map
operations and the memory usage between different flavors of bpf memory
allocator (e.g., no bpf ma vs bpf ma vs reuse-after-gp bpf ma). It also
could be used to check the performance improvement or the memory saving
provided by optimization.
The benchmark creates a non-preallocated hash map which uses bpf memory
allocator and shows the operation performance and the memory usage of
the hash map under different use cases:
(1) overwrite
Each CPU overwrites nonoverlapping part of hash map. When each CPU
completes overwriting of 64 elements in hash map, it increases the
op_count.
(2) batch_add_batch_del
Each CPU adds then deletes nonoverlapping part of hash map in batch.
When each CPU adds and deletes 64 elements in hash map, it increases
the op_count twice.
(3) add_del_on_diff_cpu
Each two-CPUs pair adds and deletes nonoverlapping part of map
cooperatively. When each CPU adds or deletes 64 elements in hash map,
it will increase the op_count.
The following is the benchmark results when comparing between different
flavors of bpf memory allocator. These tests are conducted on a KVM guest
with 8 CPUs and 16 GB memory. The command line below is used to do all
the following benchmarks:
./bench htab-mem --use-case $name ${OPTS} -w3 -d10 -a -p8
These results show that preallocated hash map has both better performance
and smaller memory footprint.
(1) non-preallocated + no bpf memory allocator (v6.0.19)
use kmalloc() + call_rcu
overwrite per-prod-op: 11.24 ± 0.07k/s, avg mem: 82.64 ± 26.32MiB, peak mem: 119.18MiB
batch_add_batch_del per-prod-op: 18.45 ± 0.10k/s, avg mem: 50.47 ± 14.51MiB, peak mem: 94.96MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu per-prod-op: 14.50 ± 0.03k/s, avg mem: 4.64 ± 0.73MiB, peak mem: 7.20MiB
(2) preallocated
OPTS=--preallocated
overwrite per-prod-op: 191.42 ± 0.09k/s, avg mem: 1.24 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
batch_add_batch_del per-prod-op: 221.83 ± 0.17k/s, avg mem: 1.23 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 1.49MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu per-prod-op: 39.66 ± 0.31k/s, avg mem: 1.47 ± 0.13MiB, peak mem: 1.75MiB
(3) normal bpf memory allocator
overwrite per-prod-op: 126.59 ± 0.02k/s, avg mem: 2.26 ± 0.00MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
batch_add_batch_del per-prod-op: 83.37 ± 0.20k/s, avg mem: 2.14 ± 0.17MiB, peak mem: 2.74MiB
add_del_on_diff_cpu per-prod-op: 21.25 ± 0.24k/s, avg mem: 17.50 ± 3.32MiB, peak mem: 28.87MiB
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When building the kselftests out-of-tree, e.g. ...
| make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- \
| O=/tmp/kselftest headers
| make ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- \
| O=/tmp/kselftest HOSTCC=gcc FORMAT= \
| SKIP_TARGETS="arm64 ia64 powerpc sparc64 x86 sgx" \
| -C tools/testing/selftests gen_tar
... the kselftest build would not pick up the correct GENDIR path, and
therefore not including autoconf.h.
Correct that by taking $(O) into consideration when figuring out the
GENDIR path.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
The -target option has been deprecated since clang 3.4 in 2013. Therefore, use
the preferred --target=bpf form instead. This also matches how we use --target=
in scripts/Makefile.clang.
Signed-off-by: Fangrui Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/274b6f0c87a6a1798de0a68135afc7f95def6277
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-05-26
We've added 54 non-merge commits during the last 10 day(s) which contain
a total of 76 files changed, 2729 insertions(+), 1003 deletions(-).
The main changes are:
1) Add the capability to destroy sockets in BPF through a new kfunc,
from Aditi Ghag.
2) Support O_PATH fds in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands,
from Andrii Nakryiko.
3) Add capability for libbpf to resize datasec maps when backed via mmap,
from JP Kobryn.
4) Move all the test kfuncs for CI out of the kernel and into bpf_testmod,
from Jiri Olsa.
5) Big batch of xsk selftest improvements to prep for multi-buffer testing,
from Magnus Karlsson.
6) Show the target_{obj,btf}_id in tracing link's fdinfo and dump it
via bpftool, from Yafang Shao.
7) Various misc BPF selftest improvements to work with upcoming LLVM 17,
from Yonghong Song.
8) Extend bpftool to specify netdevice for resolving XDP hints,
from Larysa Zaremba.
9) Document masking in shift operations for the insn set document,
from Dave Thaler.
10) Extend BPF selftests to check xdp_feature support for bond driver,
from Lorenzo Bianconi.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (54 commits)
bpf: Fix bad unlock balance on freeze_mutex
libbpf: Ensure FD >= 3 during bpf_map__reuse_fd()
libbpf: Ensure libbpf always opens files with O_CLOEXEC
selftests/bpf: Check whether to run selftest
libbpf: Change var type in datasec resize func
bpf: drop unnecessary bpf_capable() check in BPF_MAP_FREEZE command
libbpf: Selftests for resizing datasec maps
libbpf: Add capability for resizing datasec maps
selftests/bpf: Add path_fd-based BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET tests
libbpf: Add opts-based bpf_obj_pin() API and add support for path_fd
bpf: Support O_PATH FDs in BPF_OBJ_PIN and BPF_OBJ_GET commands
libbpf: Start v1.3 development cycle
bpf: Validate BPF object in BPF_OBJ_PIN before calling LSM
bpftool: Specify XDP Hints ifname when loading program
selftests/bpf: Add xdp_feature selftest for bond device
selftests/bpf: Test bpf_sock_destroy
selftests/bpf: Add helper to get port using getsockname
bpf: Add bpf_sock_destroy kfunc
bpf: Add kfunc filter function to 'struct btf_kfunc_id_set'
bpf: udp: Implement batching for sockets iterator
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
|
|
The sign-file utility (from scripts/) is used in prog_tests/verify_pkcs7_sig.c,
but the utility should not be called as a test. Executing this utility produces
the following error:
selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: urandom_read
ok 16 selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: urandom_read
selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: sign-file
not ok 17 selftests: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf: sign-file # exit=2
Also, urandom_read is mistakenly used as a test. It does not lead to an error,
but should be moved over to TEST_GEN_FILES as well. The empty TEST_CUSTOM_PROGS
can then be removed.
Fixes: fc97590668ae ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/88e3ab23029d726a2703adcf6af8356f7a2d3483.1684316821.git.legion@kernel.org
|
|
When building sign-file, the call to get the CFLAGS for libcrypto is
missing white-space between `pkg-config` and `--cflags`:
$(shell $(HOSTPKG_CONFIG)--cflags libcrypto 2> /dev/null)
Removing the redirection of stderr, we see:
$ make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf sign-file
make: Entering directory '[...]/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
make: pkg-config--cflags: No such file or directory
SIGN-FILE sign-file
make: Leaving directory '[...]/tools/testing/selftests/bpf'
Add the missing space.
Fixes: fc97590668ae ("selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc")
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Sowden <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Roberto Sassu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
test_prog's prog_tests/verifier_log.c is superseding test_verifier_log
stand-alone test. It cover same checks and adds more, and is also
integrated into test_progs test runner.
Just remove test_verifier_log.c.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
xskxceiver depends on xskxceiver.h so tell make about it.
Signed-off-by: Kal Conley <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
bpf_testmod.ko sometimes fails to build from a clean checkout:
BTF [M] linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.ko
/bin/sh: 1: linux-build//tools/build/resolve_btfids/resolve_btfids: not found
The reason is that RESOLVE_BTFIDS may not yet be built. Fix by adding a
dependency.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Extends test_loader.c:test_loader__run_subtests() by allowing to
execute tests in unprivileged mode, similar to test_verifier.c.
Adds the following new attributes controlling test_loader behavior:
__msg_unpriv
__success_unpriv
__failure_unpriv
* If any of these attributes is present the test would be loaded in
unprivileged mode.
* If only "privileged" attributes are present the test would be loaded
only in privileged mode.
* If both "privileged" and "unprivileged" attributes are present the
test would be loaded in both modes.
* If test has to be executed in both modes, __msg(text) is specified
and __msg_unpriv is not specified the behavior is the same as if
__msg_unpriv(text) is specified.
* For test filtering purposes the name of the program loaded in
unprivileged mode is derived from the usual program name by adding
`@unpriv' suffix.
Also adds attribute '__description'. This attribute specifies text to
be used instead of a program name for display and filtering purposes.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, test_progs outputs all stdout/stderr as it runs, and when it
is done, prints a summary.
It is non-trivial for tooling to parse that output and extract meaningful
information from it.
This change adds a new option, `--json-summary`/`-J` that let the caller
specify a file where `test_progs{,-no_alu32}` can write a summary of the
run in a json format that can later be parsed by tooling.
Currently, it creates a summary section with successes/skipped/failures
followed by a list of failed tests and subtests.
A test contains the following fields:
- name: the name of the test
- number: the number of the test
- message: the log message that was printed by the test.
- failed: A boolean indicating whether the test failed or not. Currently
we only output failed tests, but in the future, successful tests could
be added.
- subtests: A list of subtests associated with this test.
A subtest contains the following fields:
- name: same as above
- number: sanme as above
- message: the log message that was printed by the subtest.
- failed: same as above but for the subtest
An example run and json content below:
```
$ sudo ./test_progs -a $(grep -v '^#' ./DENYLIST.aarch64 | awk '{print
$1","}' | tr -d '\n') -j -J /tmp/test_progs.json
$ jq < /tmp/test_progs.json | head -n 30
{
"success": 29,
"success_subtest": 23,
"skipped": 3,
"failed": 28,
"results": [
{
"name": "bpf_cookie",
"number": 10,
"message": "test_bpf_cookie:PASS:skel_open 0 nsec\n",
"failed": true,
"subtests": [
{
"name": "multi_kprobe_link_api",
"number": 2,
"message": "kprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:PASS:load_kallsyms 0 nsec\nlibbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_link_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n",
"failed": true
},
{
"name": "multi_kprobe_attach_api",
"number": 3,
"message": "libbpf: extern 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' (strong): not resolved\nlibbpf: failed to load object 'kprobe_multi'\nlibbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'kprobe_multi': -3\nkprobe_multi_attach_api_subtest:FAIL:fentry_raw_skel_load unexpected error: -3\n",
"failed": true
},
{
"name": "lsm",
"number": 8,
"message": "lsm_subtest:PASS:lsm.link_create 0 nsec\nlsm_subtest:FAIL:stack_mprotect unexpected stack_mprotect: actual 0 != expected -1\n",
"failed": true
}
```
The file can then be used to print a summary of the test run and list of
failing tests/subtests:
```
$ jq -r < /tmp/test_progs.json '"Success: \(.success)/\(.success_subtest), Skipped: \(.skipped), Failed: \(.failed)"'
Success: 29/23, Skipped: 3, Failed: 28
$ jq -r < /tmp/test_progs.json '.results | map([
if .failed then "#\(.number) \(.name)" else empty end,
(
. as {name: $tname, number: $tnum} | .subtests | map(
if .failed then "#\($tnum)/\(.number) \($tname)/\(.name)" else empty end
)
)
]) | flatten | .[]' | head -n 20
#10 bpf_cookie
#10/2 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api
#10/3 bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
#10/8 bpf_cookie/lsm
#15 bpf_mod_race
#15/1 bpf_mod_race/ksym (used_btfs UAF)
#15/2 bpf_mod_race/kfunc (kfunc_btf_tab UAF)
#36 cgroup_hierarchical_stats
#61 deny_namespace
#61/1 deny_namespace/unpriv_userns_create_no_bpf
#73 fexit_stress
#83 get_func_ip_test
#99 kfunc_dynptr_param
#99/1 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null
#99/4 kfunc_dynptr_param/dynptr_data_null
#100 kprobe_multi_bench_attach
#100/1 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/kernel
#100/2 kprobe_multi_bench_attach/modules
#101 kprobe_multi_test
#101/1 kprobe_multi_test/skel_api
```
Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This patch tests how many kmallocs is needed to create and free
a batch of UDP sockets and each socket has a 64bytes bpf storage.
It also measures how fast the UDP sockets can be created.
The result is from my qemu setup.
Before bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free:
./bench -p 1 local-storage-create
Setting up benchmark 'local-storage-create'...
Benchmark 'local-storage-create' started.
Iter 0 ( 73.193us): creates 213.552k/s (213.552k/prod), 3.09 kmallocs/create
Iter 1 (-20.724us): creates 211.908k/s (211.908k/prod), 3.09 kmallocs/create
Iter 2 ( 9.280us): creates 212.574k/s (212.574k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter 3 ( 11.039us): creates 213.209k/s (213.209k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter 4 (-11.411us): creates 213.351k/s (213.351k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter 5 ( -7.915us): creates 214.754k/s (214.754k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Iter 6 ( 11.317us): creates 210.942k/s (210.942k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
Summary: creates 212.789 ± 1.310k/s (212.789k/prod), 3.12 kmallocs/create
After bpf_mem_cache_alloc/free:
./bench -p 1 local-storage-create
Setting up benchmark 'local-storage-create'...
Benchmark 'local-storage-create' started.
Iter 0 ( 68.265us): creates 243.984k/s (243.984k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter 1 ( 30.357us): creates 238.424k/s (238.424k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter 2 (-18.712us): creates 232.963k/s (232.963k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter 3 (-15.885us): creates 238.879k/s (238.879k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter 4 ( 5.590us): creates 237.490k/s (237.490k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter 5 ( 8.577us): creates 237.521k/s (237.521k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Iter 6 ( -6.263us): creates 238.508k/s (238.508k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Summary: creates 237.298 ± 2.198k/s (237.298k/prod), 1.04 kmallocs/create
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
We recently added -Wuninitialized, but it's not enough to catch various
silly mistakes or omissions. Let's go all the way to -Wall, just like we
do for user-space code.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Function verifier.c:convert_ctx_access() applies some rewrites to BPF
instructions that read or write BPF program context. This commit adds
machinery to allow test cases that inspect BPF program after these
rewrites are applied.
An example of a test case:
{
// Shorthand for field offset and size specification
N(CGROUP_SOCKOPT, struct bpf_sockopt, retval),
// Pattern generated for field read
.read = "$dst = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::current_task);"
"$dst = *(u64 *)($dst + task_struct::bpf_ctx);"
"$dst = *(u32 *)($dst + bpf_cg_run_ctx::retval);",
// Pattern generated for field write
.write = "*(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::tmp_reg) = r9;"
"r9 = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::current_task);"
"r9 = *(u64 *)(r9 + task_struct::bpf_ctx);"
"*(u32 *)(r9 + bpf_cg_run_ctx::retval) = $src;"
"r9 = *(u64 *)($ctx + bpf_sockopt_kern::tmp_reg);" ,
},
For each test case, up to three programs are created:
- One that uses BPF_LDX_MEM to read the context field.
- One that uses BPF_STX_MEM to write to the context field.
- One that uses BPF_ST_MEM to write to the context field.
The disassembly of each program is compared with the pattern specified
in the test case.
Kernel code for disassembly is reused (as is in the bpftool).
To keep Makefile changes to the minimum, symbolic links to
`kernel/bpf/disasm.c` and `kernel/bpf/disasm.h ` are added.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Per C99 standard [0], Section 6.7.8, Paragraph 10:
If an object that has automatic storage duration is not initialized
explicitly, its value is indeterminate.
And in the same document, in appendix "J.2 Undefined behavior":
The behavior is undefined in the following circumstances:
[...]
The value of an object with automatic storage duration is used while
it is indeterminate (6.2.4, 6.7.8, 6.8).
This means that use of an uninitialized stack variable is undefined
behavior, and therefore that clang can choose to do a variety of scary
things, such as not generating bytecode for "bunch of useful code" in
the below example:
void some_func()
{
int i;
if (!i)
return;
// bunch of useful code
}
To add insult to injury, if some_func above is a helper function for
some BPF program, clang can choose to not generate an "exit" insn,
causing verifier to fail with "last insn is not an exit or jmp". Going
from that verification failure to the root cause of uninitialized use
is certain to be frustrating.
This patch adds -Wuninitialized to the cflags for selftest BPF progs and
fixes up existing instances of uninitialized use.
[0]: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/WG14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
Cc: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
If target is bpf, there is no __loongarch__ definition, __BITS_PER_LONG
defaults to 32, __NR_nanosleep is not defined:
#if defined(__ARCH_WANT_TIME32_SYSCALLS) || __BITS_PER_LONG != 32
#define __NR_nanosleep 101
__SC_3264(__NR_nanosleep, sys_nanosleep_time32, sys_nanosleep)
#endif
Work around this problem, by explicitly setting __BITS_PER_LONG to
__loongarch_grlen which is defined by compiler as 64 for LA64.
This is similar with commit 36e70b9b06bf ("selftests, bpf: Fix broken
riscv build").
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Add a new benchmark which measures hashmap lookup operations speed. A user can
control the following parameters of the benchmark:
* key_size (max 1024): the key size to use
* max_entries: the hashmap max entries
* nr_entries: the number of entries to insert/lookup
* nr_loops: the number of loops for the benchmark
* map_flags The hashmap flags passed to BPF_MAP_CREATE
The BPF program performing the benchmarks calls two nested bpf_loop:
bpf_loop(nr_loops/nr_entries)
bpf_loop(nr_entries)
bpf_map_lookup()
So the nr_loops determines the number of actual map lookups. All lookups are
successful.
Example (the output is generated on a AMD Ryzen 9 3950X machine):
for nr_entries in `seq 4096 4096 65536`; do echo -n "$((nr_entries*100/65536))% full: "; sudo ./bench -d2 -a bpf-hashmap-lookup --key_size=4 --nr_entries=$nr_entries --max_entries=65536 --nr_loops=1000000 --map_flags=0x40 | grep cpu; done
6% full: cpu01: lookup 50.739M ± 0.018M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~19ms)
12% full: cpu01: lookup 47.751M ± 0.015M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~20ms)
18% full: cpu01: lookup 45.153M ± 0.013M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~22ms)
25% full: cpu01: lookup 43.826M ± 0.014M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~22ms)
31% full: cpu01: lookup 41.971M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~23ms)
37% full: cpu01: lookup 41.034M ± 0.015M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~24ms)
43% full: cpu01: lookup 39.946M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~25ms)
50% full: cpu01: lookup 38.256M ± 0.014M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~26ms)
56% full: cpu01: lookup 36.580M ± 0.018M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~27ms)
62% full: cpu01: lookup 36.252M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~27ms)
68% full: cpu01: lookup 35.200M ± 0.012M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~28ms)
75% full: cpu01: lookup 34.061M ± 0.009M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~29ms)
81% full: cpu01: lookup 34.374M ± 0.010M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~29ms)
87% full: cpu01: lookup 33.244M ± 0.011M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~30ms)
93% full: cpu01: lookup 32.182M ± 0.013M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~31ms)
100% full: cpu01: lookup 31.497M ± 0.016M events/sec (approximated from 32 samples of ~31ms)
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
When the BPF selftests are cross-compiled, only the a host version of
bpftool is built. This version of bpftool is used on the host-side to
generate various intermediates, e.g., skeletons.
The test runners are also using bpftool, so the Makefile will symlink
bpftool from the selftest/bpf root, where the test runners will look
the tool:
| $(Q)ln -sf $(if $2,..,.)/tools/build/bpftool/bootstrap/bpftool \
| $(OUTPUT)/$(if $2,$2/)bpftool
There are two problems for cross-compilation builds:
1. There is no native (cross-compilation target) of bpftool
2. The bootstrap/bpftool is never cross-compiled (by design)
Make sure that a native/cross-compiled version of bpftool is built,
and if CROSS_COMPILE is set, symlink the native/non-bootstrap version.
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Building BPF selftests out of srctree fails with:
make: *** No rule to make target '/linux-build//ima_setup.sh', needed by 'ima_setup.sh'. Stop.
The culprit is the rule that defines convenient shorthands like
"make test_progs", which builds $(OUTPUT)/test_progs. These shorthands
make sense only for binaries that are built though; scripts that live
in the source tree do not end up in $(OUTPUT).
Therefore drop $(TEST_PROGS) and $(TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED) from the rule.
The issue exists for a while, but it became a problem only after commit
d68ae4982cb7 ("selftests/bpf: Install all required files to run selftests"),
which added dependencies on these scripts.
Fixes: 03dcb78460c2 ("selftests/bpf: Add simple per-test targets to Makefile")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
To get useful results from the Memory Sanitizer, all code running in a
process needs to be instrumented. When building tests with other
sanitizers, it's not strictly necessary, but is also helpful.
So make sure runqslower and libbpf are compiled with SAN_CFLAGS and
linked with SAN_LDFLAGS.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Memory Sanitizer requires passing different options to CFLAGS and
LDFLAGS: besides the mandatory -fsanitize=memory, one needs to pass
header and library paths, and passing -L to a compilation step
triggers -Wunused-command-line-argument. So introduce a separate
variable for linker flags. Use $(SAN_CFLAGS) as a default in order to
avoid complicating the ASan usage.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Using HOSTCC="ccache clang" breaks building the tests, since, when it's
forwarded to e.g. bpftool, the child make sees HOSTCC=ccache and
"clang" is considered a target. Fix by quoting it, and also HOSTLD and
HOSTAR for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Introduce xdp_features tool in order to test XDP features supported by
the NIC and match them against advertised ones.
In order to test supported/advertised XDP features, xdp_features must
run on the Device Under Test (DUT) and on a Tester device.
xdp_features opens a control TCP channel between DUT and Tester devices
to send control commands from Tester to the DUT and a UDP data channel
where the Tester sends UDP 'echo' packets and the DUT is expected to
reply back with the same packet. DUT installs multiple XDP programs on the
NIC to test XDP capabilities and reports back to the Tester some XDP stats.
Currently xdp_features supports the following XDP features:
- XDP_DROP
- XDP_ABORTED
- XDP_PASS
- XDP_TX
- XDP_REDIRECT
- XDP_NDO_XMIT
Co-developed-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/7c1af8e7e6ef0614cf32fa9e6bdaa2d8d605f859.1675245258.git.lorenzo@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When building with O=, the following error occurs:
ln: failed to create symbolic link 'no_alu32/bpftool': No such file or directory
Adjust the code to account for $(OUTPUT).
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When building with O=, the following linker error occurs:
clang: error: no such file or directory: 'liburandom_read.so'
Fix by adding $(OUTPUT) to the linker search path.
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
As stated in README.rst, in order to resolve errors with linker errors,
'LDLIBS=-static' should be used. Most problems will be solved by this
option, but in the case of urandom_read, this won't fix the problem. So
the Makefile is currently implemented to strip the 'static' option when
compiling the urandom_read. However, stripping this static option isn't
configured properly on $(LDLIBS) correctly, which is now causing errors
on static compilation.
# LDLIBS=-static ./vmtest.sh
ld.lld: error: attempted static link of dynamic object liburandom_read.so
clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
make: *** [Makefile:190: /linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/urandom_read] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
This commit fixes this problem by configuring the strip with $(LDLIBS).
Fixes: 68084a136420 ("selftests/bpf: Fix building bpf selftests statically")
Signed-off-by: Daniel T. Lee <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
To be used for verification of driver implementations. Note that
the skb path is gone from the series, but I'm still keeping the
implementation for any possible future work.
$ xdp_hw_metadata <ifname>
On the other machine:
$ echo -n xdp | nc -u -q1 <target> 9091 # for AF_XDP
$ echo -n skb | nc -u -q1 <target> 9092 # for skb
Sample output:
# xdp
xsk_ring_cons__peek: 1
0x19f9090: rx_desc[0]->addr=100000000008000 addr=8100 comp_addr=8000
rx_timestamp_supported: 1
rx_timestamp: 1667850075063948829
0x19f9090: complete idx=8 addr=8000
# skb
found skb hwtstamp = 1668314052.854274681
Decoding:
# xdp
rx_timestamp=1667850075.063948829
$ date -d @1667850075
Mon Nov 7 11:41:15 AM PST 2022
$ date
Mon Nov 7 11:42:05 AM PST 2022
# skb
$ date -d @1668314052
Sat Nov 12 08:34:12 PM PST 2022
$ date
Sat Nov 12 08:37:06 PM PST 2022
Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>
Cc: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Maryam Tahhan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
- create new netns
- create veth pair (veTX+veRX)
- setup AF_XDP socket for both interfaces
- attach bpf to veRX
- send packet via veTX
- verify the packet has expected metadata at veRX
Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]>
Cc: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]>
Cc: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]>
Cc: Maryam Tahhan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
Get rid of the built-in XDP program that was part of the old libbpf
code in xsk.c and replace it with an eBPF program build using the
framework by all the other bpf selftests. This will form the base for
adding more programs in later commits.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Remove the empty vmlinux.h if bpftool failed to dump btf info.
The empty vmlinux.h can hide real error when reading output
of make.
This is done by adding .DELETE_ON_ERROR special target in related
makefiles.
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Quentin Monnet <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
It's become a common pattern to have a collection of small BPF programs
in one BPF object file, each representing one test case. On user-space
side of such tests we maintain a table of program names and expected
failure or success, along with optional expected verifier log message.
This works, but each set of tests reimplement this mundane code over and
over again, which is a waste of time for anyone trying to add a new set
of tests. Furthermore, it's quite error prone as it's way too easy to miss
some entries in these manually maintained test tables (as evidences by
dynptr_fail tests, in which ringbuf_release_uninit_dynptr subtest was
accidentally missed; this is fixed in next patch).
So this patch implements generic test_loader, which accepts skeleton
name and handles the rest of details: opens and loads BPF object file,
making sure each program is tested in isolation. Optionally each test
case can specify expected BPF verifier log message. In case of failure,
tester makes sure to report verifier log, but it also reports verifier
log in verbose mode unconditionally.
Now, the interesting deviation from existing custom implementations is
the use of btf_decl_tag attribute to specify expected-to-fail vs
expected-to-succeed markers and, optionally, expected log message
directly next to BPF program source code, eliminating the need to
manually create and update table of tests.
We define few macros wrapping btf_decl_tag with a convention that all
values of btf_decl_tag start with "comment:" prefix, and then utilizing
a very simple "just_some_text_tag" or "some_key_name=<value>" pattern to
define things like expected success/failure, expected verifier message,
extra verifier log level (if necessary). This approach is demonstrated
by next patch in which two existing sets of failure tests are converted.
Tester supports both expected-to-fail and expected-to-succeed programs,
though this patch set didn't convert any existing expected-to-succeed
programs yet, as existing tests couple BPF program loading with their
further execution through attach or test_prog_run. One way to allow
testing scenarios like this would be ability to specify custom callback,
executed for each successfully loaded BPF program. This is left for
follow up patches, after some more analysis of existing test cases.
This test_loader is, hopefully, a start of a test_verifier-like runner,
but integrated into test_progs infrastructure. It will allow much better
"user experience" of defining low-level verification tests that can take
advantage of all the libbpf-provided nicety features on BPF side: global
variables, declarative maps, etc. All while having a choice of defining
it in C or as BPF assembly (through __attribute__((naked)) functions and
using embedded asm), depending on what makes most sense in each
particular case. This will be explored in follow up patches as well.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When installing the selftests using
"make -C tools/testing/selftests install", we need to make sure
all the required files to run the selftests are installed. Let's
make sure this is the case.
Signed-off-by: Daan De Meyer <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
When cross-compiling [1], the get_sys_includes make macro should use
the target system include path, and not the build hosts system include
path.
Make clang honor the CROSS_COMPILE triple.
[1] e.g. "ARCH=riscv CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- make"
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
When cross-compiling selftests/bpf, the resolve_btfids binary end up
in a different directory, than the regular resolve_btfids
builds. Populate RESOLVE_BTFIDS for sub-make, so it can find the
binary.
Signed-off-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|