Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
We can read /proc/kallsyms in a fraction of a second, so why waste
a further fraction of a second showing progress?
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
The sort order of dictionaries in Python is undocumented. Use
tuples instead, which are documented to be lexically ordered.
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
The comparison between traced and symbol addresses is backwards: if
the traced address doesn't exactly match a symbol (which we don't
expect it to), we'll show the next symbol and the offset to it,
whereas we should show the previous symbol and the offset from it.
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
This works much better if we don't treat protocol numbers as addresses.
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
|
|
A while back I created the dropmonitor protocol, which allowed users to get
reports of dropped frames communicated to them via a netlink socket.
While useful, several people have now asked that I integrate the ability
to do drop monitoring with perf, so they don't have to run additional
tools.
This patch adds a drop monitor script to the perf suite, and provides
the same output that the netlink socket does.
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
|