| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This was added to the kernel code in <1658d35ead5d> ("list: Use
READ_ONCE() when testing for empty lists").
There's nothing special we need to do about it in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1455864533-7536-2-git-send-email-alfredoalvarezernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
These were added to the kernel code in cee34d88c ("lockdep: Fix a race between
/proc/lock_stat and module unload"). There's nothing special we need to do
about them in userspace.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
kernel/locking/lockdep.c deals with validating locking scenarios for
various architectures supported by the kernel. There isn't
anything kernel specific going on in lockdep, and when we
compare userspace to other architectures that don't have to deal
with irqs such as s390, they become all too similar.
We wrap kernel/locking/lockdep.c and include/linux/lockdep.h with
several headers which allow us to build and use lockdep from
userspace. We don't touch the kernel code itself which means
that any work done on lockdep in the kernel will automatically
benefit userspace lockdep as well!
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|