aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/lib/test_lockup.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-08-17lib/test_lockup: Adapt to changed variablesSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-3/+3
The inner parts of certain locks (mutex, rwlocks) changed due to a rework for RT and non RT code. Most users remain unaffected, but those who fiddle around in the inner parts need to be updated. Match the struct names to the new layout. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2021-08-17locking/mutex: Make mutex::wait_lock rawThomas Gleixner1-1/+1
The wait_lock of mutex is really a low level lock. Convert it to a raw_spinlock like the wait_lock of rtmutex. [ mingo: backmerged the test_lockup.c build fix by bigeasy. ] Co-developed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-12-15lib/test_lockup.c: minimum fix to get it compiled on PREEMPT_RTSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-0/+16
On PREEMPT_RT the locks are quite different so they can't be tested as it is done below. The alternative is to test for the waitlock within rtmutex. This is the bare minimun to get it compiled. Problems which exist on PREEMP_RT: - none of the locks (spinlock_t, rwlock_t, mutex_t, rw_semaphore) may be acquired with disabled preemption or interrupts. If I read the code correct the it is possible to acquire a mutex_t with disabled interrupts. I don't know how to obtain a lock pointer. Technically they are not exported to userland. - memory can not be allocated with disabled preemption or interrupts even with GFP_ATOMIC. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-08-12lib/test_lockup.c: fix return value of test_lockup_init()Tiezhu Yang1-2/+2
Since filp_open() returns an error pointer, we should use IS_ERR() to check the return value and then return PTR_ERR() if failed to get the actual return value instead of always -EINVAL. E.g. without this patch: [root@localhost loongson]# ls no_such_file ls: cannot access no_such_file: No such file or directory [root@localhost loongson]# modprobe test_lockup file_path=no_such_file lock_sb_umount time_secs=60 state=S modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'test_lockup': Invalid argument [root@localhost loongson]# dmesg | tail -1 [ 126.100596] test_lockup: cannot find file_path With this patch: [root@localhost loongson]# ls no_such_file ls: cannot access no_such_file: No such file or directory [root@localhost loongson]# modprobe test_lockup file_path=no_such_file lock_sb_umount time_secs=60 state=S modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'test_lockup': Unknown symbol in module, or unknown parameter (see dmesg) [root@localhost loongson]# dmesg | tail -1 [ 95.134362] test_lockup: failed to open no_such_file: -2 Fixes: aecd42df6d39 ("lib/test_lockup.c: add parameters for locking generic vfs locks") Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-08-12lib/test_lockup.c: make symbol 'test_works' staticWei Yongjun1-1/+1
Fix sparse build warning: lib/test_lockup.c:403:1: warning: symbol '__pcpu_scope_test_works' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-07-16treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usageKees Cook1-1/+1
Using uninitialized_var() is dangerous as it papers over real bugs[1] (or can in the future), and suppresses unrelated compiler warnings (e.g. "unused variable"). If the compiler thinks it is uninitialized, either simply initialize the variable or make compiler changes. In preparation for removing[2] the[3] macro[4], remove all remaining needless uses with the following script: git grep '\buninitialized_var\b' | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u | \ xargs perl -pi -e \ 's/\buninitialized_var\(([^\)]+)\)/\1/g; s:\s*/\* (GCC be quiet|to make compiler happy) \*/$::g;' drivers/video/fbdev/riva/riva_hw.c was manually tweaked to avoid pathological white-space. No outstanding warnings were found building allmodconfig with GCC 9.3.0 for x86_64, i386, arm64, arm, powerpc, powerpc64le, s390x, mips, sparc64, alpha, and m68k. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFw+Vbj0i=1TGqCR5vQkCzWJ0QxK6CernOU6eedsudAixw@mail.gmail.com/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFwgbgqhbp1fkxvRKEpzyR5J8n1vKT1VZdz9knmPuXhOeg@mail.gmail.com/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+55aFz2500WfbKXAx8s67wrm9=yVJu65TpLgN_ybYNv0VEOKA@mail.gmail.com/ Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <[email protected]> # drivers/infiniband and mlx4/mlx5 Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> # IB Acked-by: Kalle Valo <[email protected]> # wireless drivers Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <[email protected]> # erofs Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]>
2020-06-18maccess: rename probe_kernel_address to get_kernel_nofaultChristoph Hellwig1-3/+3
Better describe what this helper does, and match the naming of copy_from_kernel_nofault. Also switch the argument order around, so that it acts and looks like get_user(). Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09mmap locking API: convert mmap_sem commentsMichel Lespinasse1-4/+4
Convert comments that reference mmap_sem to reference mmap_lock instead. [[email protected]: fix up linux-next leftovers] [[email protected]: s/lockaphore/lock/, per Vlastimil] [[email protected]: more linux-next fixups, per Michel] Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Jerome Glisse <[email protected]> Cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]> Cc: Laurent Dufour <[email protected]> Cc: Liam Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ying Han <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-09mmap locking API: use coccinelle to convert mmap_sem rwsem call sitesMichel Lespinasse1-4/+4
This change converts the existing mmap_sem rwsem calls to use the new mmap locking API instead. The change is generated using coccinelle with the following rule: // spatch --sp-file mmap_lock_api.cocci --in-place --include-headers --dir . @@ expression mm; @@ ( -init_rwsem +mmap_init_lock | -down_write +mmap_write_lock | -down_write_killable +mmap_write_lock_killable | -down_write_trylock +mmap_write_trylock | -up_write +mmap_write_unlock | -downgrade_write +mmap_write_downgrade | -down_read +mmap_read_lock | -down_read_killable +mmap_read_lock_killable | -down_read_trylock +mmap_read_trylock | -up_read +mmap_read_unlock ) -(&mm->mmap_sem) +(mm) Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Jordan <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]> Cc: Jerome Glisse <[email protected]> Cc: John Hubbard <[email protected]> Cc: Liam Howlett <[email protected]> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Ying Han <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-06-04lib/test_lockup.c: make test_inode staticJason Yan1-1/+1
Fix the following sparse warning: lib/test_lockup.c:145:14: warning: symbol 'test_inode' was not declared. Should it be static? Reported-by: Hulk Robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-04-07lib/test_lockup.c: add parameters for locking generic vfs locksKonstantin Khlebnikov1-0/+45
file_path=<path> defines file or directory to open lock_inode=Y set lock_rwsem_ptr to inode->i_rwsem lock_mapping=Y set lock_rwsem_ptr to mapping->i_mmap_rwsem lock_sb_umount=Y set lock_rwsem_ptr to sb->s_umount This gives safe and simple way to see how system reacts to contention of common vfs locks and how syscalls depend on them directly or indirectly. For example to block s_umount for 60 seconds: # modprobe test_lockup file_path=. lock_sb_umount time_secs=60 state=S This is useful for checking/testing scalability issues like this: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/158497590858.7371.9311902565121473436.stgit@buzz/ Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158498153964.5621.83061779039255681.stgit@buzz Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-04-07lib/test_lockup.c: fix spelling mistake "iteraions" -> "iterations"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
There is a spelling mistake in a pr_notice message. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2020-04-07lib/test_lockup: test module to generate lockupsKonstantin Khlebnikov1-0/+554
CONFIG_TEST_LOCKUP=m adds module "test_lockup" that helps to make sure that watchdogs and lockup detectors are working properly. Depending on module parameters test_lockup could emulate soft or hard lockup, "hung task", hold arbitrary lock, allocate bunch of pages. Also it could generate series of lockups with cooling-down periods, in this way it could be used as "ping" for locks or page allocator. Loop checks signals between iteration thus could be stopped by ^C. # modinfo test_lockup ... parm: time_secs:lockup time in seconds, default 0 (uint) parm: time_nsecs:nanoseconds part of lockup time, default 0 (uint) parm: cooldown_secs:cooldown time between iterations in seconds, default 0 (uint) parm: cooldown_nsecs:nanoseconds part of cooldown, default 0 (uint) parm: iterations:lockup iterations, default 1 (uint) parm: all_cpus:trigger lockup at all cpus at once (bool) parm: state:wait in 'R' running (default), 'D' uninterruptible, 'K' killable, 'S' interruptible state (charp) parm: use_hrtimer:use high-resolution timer for sleeping (bool) parm: iowait:account sleep time as iowait (bool) parm: lock_read:lock read-write locks for read (bool) parm: lock_single:acquire locks only at one cpu (bool) parm: reacquire_locks:release and reacquire locks/irq/preempt between iterations (bool) parm: touch_softlockup:touch soft-lockup watchdog between iterations (bool) parm: touch_hardlockup:touch hard-lockup watchdog between iterations (bool) parm: call_cond_resched:call cond_resched() between iterations (bool) parm: measure_lock_wait:measure lock wait time (bool) parm: lock_wait_threshold:print lock wait time longer than this in nanoseconds, default off (ulong) parm: disable_irq:disable interrupts: generate hard-lockups (bool) parm: disable_softirq:disable bottom-half irq handlers (bool) parm: disable_preempt:disable preemption: generate soft-lockups (bool) parm: lock_rcu:grab rcu_read_lock: generate rcu stalls (bool) parm: lock_mmap_sem:lock mm->mmap_sem: block procfs interfaces (bool) parm: lock_rwsem_ptr:lock rw_semaphore at address (ulong) parm: lock_mutex_ptr:lock mutex at address (ulong) parm: lock_spinlock_ptr:lock spinlock at address (ulong) parm: lock_rwlock_ptr:lock rwlock at address (ulong) parm: alloc_pages_nr:allocate and free pages under locks (uint) parm: alloc_pages_order:page order to allocate (uint) parm: alloc_pages_gfp:allocate pages with this gfp_mask, default GFP_KERNEL (uint) parm: alloc_pages_atomic:allocate pages with GFP_ATOMIC (bool) parm: reallocate_pages:free and allocate pages between iterations (bool) Parameters for locking by address are unsafe and taints kernel. With CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK=y they at least check magics for embedded spinlocks. Examples: task hang in D-state: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=D task hang in io-wait D-state: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=D iowait softlockup: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=R hardlockup: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=R disable_irq system-wide hardlockup: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=R \ disable_irq all_cpus rcu stall: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=R \ lock_rcu touch_softlockup lock mmap_sem / block procfs interfaces: modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=S lock_mmap_sem lock tasklist_lock for read / block forks: TASKLIST_LOCK=$(awk '$3 == "tasklist_lock" {print "0x"$1}' /proc/kallsyms) modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=R \ disable_irq lock_read lock_rwlock_ptr=$TASKLIST_LOCK lock namespace_sem / block vfs mount operations: NAMESPACE_SEM=$(awk '$3 == "namespace_sem" {print "0x"$1}' /proc/kallsyms) modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=S \ lock_rwsem_ptr=$NAMESPACE_SEM lock cgroup mutex / block cgroup operations: CGROUP_MUTEX=$(awk '$3 == "cgroup_mutex" {print "0x"$1}' /proc/kallsyms) modprobe test_lockup time_secs=1 iterations=60 state=S \ lock_mutex_ptr=$CGROUP_MUTEX ping cgroup_mutex every second and measure maximum lock wait time: modprobe test_lockup cooldown_secs=1 iterations=60 state=S \ lock_mutex_ptr=$CGROUP_MUTEX reacquire_locks measure_lock_wait [[email protected]: rename disable_irq to fix build error] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Cc: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Cc: Petr Mladek <[email protected]> Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <[email protected]> Cc: Dmitry Monakhov <[email protected] Cc: Colin Ian King <[email protected]> Cc: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/158132859146.2797.525923171323227836.stgit@buzz Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>