aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/time/posix-cpu-timers.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2020-03-30Merge tag 'timers-core-2020-03-30' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-78/+70
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull timekeeping and timer updates from Thomas Gleixner: "Core: - Consolidation of the vDSO build infrastructure to address the difficulties of cross-builds for ARM64 compat vDSO libraries by restricting the exposure of header content to the vDSO build. This is achieved by splitting out header content into separate headers. which contain only the minimaly required information which is necessary to build the vDSO. These new headers are included from the kernel headers and the vDSO specific files. - Enhancements to the generic vDSO library allowing more fine grained control over the compiled in code, further reducing architecture specific storage and preparing for adopting the generic library by PPC. - Cleanup and consolidation of the exit related code in posix CPU timers. - Small cleanups and enhancements here and there Drivers: - The obligatory new drivers: Ingenic JZ47xx and X1000 TCU support - Correct the clock rate of PIT64b global clock - setup_irq() cleanup - Preparation for PWM and suspend support for the TI DM timer - Expand the fttmr010 driver to support ast2600 systems - The usual small fixes, enhancements and cleanups all over the place" * tag 'timers-core-2020-03-30' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (80 commits) Revert "clocksource/drivers/timer-probe: Avoid creating dead devices" vdso: Fix clocksource.h macro detection um: Fix header inclusion arm64: vdso32: Enable Clang Compilation lib/vdso: Enable common headers arm: vdso: Enable arm to use common headers x86/vdso: Enable x86 to use common headers mips: vdso: Enable mips to use common headers arm64: vdso32: Include common headers in the vdso library arm64: vdso: Include common headers in the vdso library arm64: Introduce asm/vdso/processor.h arm64: vdso32: Code clean up linux/elfnote.h: Replace elf.h with UAPI equivalent scripts: Fix the inclusion order in modpost common: Introduce processor.h linux/ktime.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/jiffies.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/time64.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/time32.h: Extract common header for vDSO linux/time.h: Extract common header for vDSO ...
2020-03-21lockdep: Add posixtimer context tracing bitsSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-1/+5
Splitting run_posix_cpu_timers() into two parts is work in progress which is stuck on other entry code related problems. The heavy lifting which involves locking of sighand lock will be moved into task context so the necessary execution time is burdened on the task and not on interrupt context. Until this work completes lockdep with the spinlock nesting rules enabled would emit warnings for this known context. Prevent it by setting "->irq_config = 1" for the invocation of run_posix_cpu_timers() so lockdep does not complain when sighand lock is acquried. This will be removed once the split is completed. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-03-04posix-cpu-timers: Store a reference to a pid not a taskEric W. Biederman1-18/+55
posix cpu timers do not handle the death of a process well. This is most clearly seen when a multi-threaded process calls exec from a thread that is not the leader of the thread group. The posix cpu timer code continues to pin the old thread group leader and is unable to find the siglock from there. This results in posix_cpu_timer_del being unable to delete a timer, posix_cpu_timer_set being unable to set a timer. Further to compensate for the problems in posix_cpu_timer_del on a multi-threaded exec all timers that point at the multi-threaded task are stopped. The code for the timers fundamentally needs to check if the target process/thread is alive. This needs an extra level of indirection. This level of indirection is already available in struct pid. So replace cpu.task with cpu.pid to get the needed extra layer of indirection. In addition to handling things more cleanly this reduces the amount of memory a timer can pin when a process exits and then is reaped from a task_struct to the vastly smaller struct pid. Fixes: e0a70217107e ("posix-cpu-timers: workaround to suppress the problems with mt exec") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-03-01posix-cpu-timers: Pass the task into arm_timer()Eric W. Biederman1-4/+3
The task has been already computed to take siglock before calling arm_timer. So pass the benefit of that labor into arm_timer(). Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-03-01posix-cpu-timers: Remove unnecessary locking around cpu_clock_sample_groupEric W. Biederman1-54/+12
As of e78c3496790e ("time, signal: Protect resource use statistics with seqlock") cpu_clock_sample_group no longers needs siglock protection. Unfortunately no one realized it at the time. Remove the extra locking that is for cpu_clock_sample_group and not for cpu_clock_sample. This significantly simplifies the code. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-03-01posix-cpu-timers: cpu_clock_sample_group() no longer needs siglockEric W. Biederman1-3/+1
As of e78c3496790e ("time, signal: Protect resource use statistics with seqlock") cpu_clock_sample_group() no longer needs siglock protection so remove the stale comment. Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2020-01-14posix-clocks: Rename the clock_get() callback to clock_get_timespec()Andrei Vagin1-16/+16
The upcoming support for time namespaces requires to have access to: - The time in a task's time namespace for sys_clock_gettime() - The time in the root name space for common_timer_get() That adds a valid reason to finally implement a separate callback which returns the time in ktime_t format, rather than in (struct timespec). Rename the clock_get() callback to clock_get_timespec() as a preparation for introducing clock_get_ktime(). Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-10-23posix-cpu-timers: Fix two trivial commentsYi Wang1-3/+3
Recent changes modified the function arguments of thread_group_sample_cputime() and task_cputimers_expired(), but forgot to update the comments. Fix it up. [ tglx: Changed the argument name of task_cputimers_expired() as the pointer points to an array of samples. ] Fixes: b7be4ef1365d ("posix-cpu-timers: Switch thread group sampling to array") Fixes: 001f7971433a ("posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry checks array based") Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-09-10posix-cpu-timers: Fix permission check regressionThomas Gleixner1-9/+35
The recent consolidation of the three permission checks introduced a subtle regression. For timer_create() with a process wide timer it returns the current task if the lookup through the PID which is encoded into the clockid results in returning current. That's broken because it does not validate whether the current task is the group leader. That was caused by the two different variants of permission checks: - posix_cpu_timer_get() allowed access to the process wide clock when the looked up task is current. That's not an issue because the process wide clock is in the shared sighand. - posix_cpu_timer_create() made sure that the looked up task is the group leader. Restore the previous state. Note, that these permission checks are more than questionable, but that's subject to follow up changes. Fixes: 6ae40e3fdcd3 ("posix-cpu-timers: Provide task validation functions") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-29posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry_active check actually work correctlyThomas Gleixner1-4/+5
The state tracking changes broke the expiry active check by not writing to it and instead sitting timers_active, which is already set. That's not a big issue as the actual expiry is protected by sighand lock, so concurrent handling is not possible. That means that the second task which invokes that function executes the expiry code for nothing. Write to the proper flag. Also add a check whether the flag is set into check_process_timers(). That check had been missing in the code before the rework already. The check for another task handling the expiry of process wide timers was only done in the fastpath check. If the fastpath check returns true because a per task timer expired, then the checking of process wide timers was done in parallel which is as explained above just a waste of cycles. Fixes: 244d49e30653 ("posix-cpu-timers: Move state tracking to struct posix_cputimers") Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]>
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Utilize timerqueue for storageThomas Gleixner1-93/+96
Using a linear O(N) search for timer insertion affects execution time and D-cache footprint badly with a larger number of timers. Switch the storage to a timerqueue which is already used for hrtimers and alarmtimers. It does not affect the size of struct k_itimer as it.alarm is still larger. The extra list head for the expiry list will go away later once the expiry is moved into task work context. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Move state tracking to struct posix_cputimersThomas Gleixner1-33/+40
Put it where it belongs and clean up the ifdeffery in fork completely. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Deduplicate rlimit handlingThomas Gleixner1-42/+25
Both thread and process expiry functions have the same functionality for sending signals for soft and hard RLIMITs duplicated in 4 different ways. Split it out into a common function and cleanup the callsites. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Remove pointless comparisonsThomas Gleixner1-9/+7
The soft RLIMIT expiry code checks whether the soft limit is greater than the hard limit. That's pointless because if the soft RLIMIT is greater than the hard RLIMIT then that code cannot be reached as the hard RLIMIT check is before that and already killed the process. Remove it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Get rid of 64bit divisionsThomas Gleixner1-10/+14
Instead of dividing A to match the units of B it's more efficient to multiply B to match the units of A. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate timer expiry furtherThomas Gleixner1-33/+30
With the array based samples and expiry cache, the expiry function can use a loop to collect timers from the clock specific lists. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Get rid of zero checksThomas Gleixner1-23/+15
Deactivation of the expiry cache is done by setting all clock caches to 0. That requires to have a check for zero in all places which update the expiry cache: if (cache == 0 || new < cache) cache = new; Use U64_MAX as the deactivated value, which allows to remove the zero checks when updating the cache and reduces it to the obvious check: if (new < cache) cache = new; This also removes the weird workaround in do_prlimit() which was required to convert a RLIMIT_CPU value of 0 (immediate expiry) to 1 because handing in 0 to the posix CPU timer code would have effectively disarmed it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Respect INFINITY for hard RTTIME limitThomas Gleixner1-1/+1
The RTIME limit expiry code does not check the hard RTTIME limit for INFINITY, i.e. being disabled. Add it. While this could be considered an ABI breakage if something would depend on this behaviour. Though it's highly unlikely to have an effect because RLIM_INFINITY is at minimum INT_MAX and the RTTIME limit is in seconds, so the timer would fire after ~68 years. Adding this obvious correct limit check also allows further consolidation of that code and is a prerequisite for cleaning up the 0 based checks and the rlimit setter code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Switch thread group sampling to arrayThomas Gleixner1-59/+45
That allows more simplifications in various places. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Restructure expiry arrayThomas Gleixner1-49/+56
Now that the abused struct task_cputime is gone, it's more natural to bundle the expiry cache and the list head of each clock into a struct and have an array of those structs. Follow the hrtimer naming convention of 'bases' and rename the expiry cache to 'nextevt' and adapt all usage sites. Generates also better code .text size shrinks by 80 bytes. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Remove cputime_expiresThomas Gleixner1-10/+0
The last users of the magic struct cputime based expiry cache are gone. Remove the leftovers. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Make expiry checks array basedThomas Gleixner1-49/+36
The expiry cache is an array indexed by clock ids. The new sample functions allow to retrieve a corresponding array of samples. Convert the fastpath expiry checks to make use of the new sample functions and do the comparisons on the sample and the expiry array. Make the check for the expiry array being zero array based as well. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based sample functionsThomas Gleixner1-0/+26
Instead of using task_cputime and doing the addition of utime and stime at all call sites, it's way simpler to have a sample array which allows indexed based checks against the expiry cache array. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Switch check_*_timers() to array cacheThomas Gleixner1-15/+11
Use the array based expiry cache in check_thread_timers() and convert the store in check_process_timers() for consistency. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Simplify set_process_cpu_timer()Thomas Gleixner1-16/+8
The expiry cache can now be accessed as an array. Replace the per clock checks with a simple comparison of the clock indexed array member. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Simplify timer queueingThomas Gleixner1-34/+21
Now that the expiry cache can be accessed as an array, the per clock checking can be reduced to just comparing the corresponding array elements. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based access to expiry cacheThomas Gleixner1-1/+11
Using struct task_cputime for the expiry cache is a pretty odd choice and comes with magic defines to rename the fields for usage in the expiry cache. struct task_cputime is basically a u64 array with 3 members, but it has distinct members. The expiry cache content is different than the content of task_cputime because expiry[PROF] = task_cputime.stime + task_cputime.utime expiry[VIRT] = task_cputime.utime expiry[SCHED] = task_cputime.sum_exec_runtime So there is no direct mapping between task_cputime and the expiry cache and the #define based remapping is just a horrible hack. Having the expiry cache array based allows further simplification of the expiry code. To avoid an all in one cleanup which is hard to review add a temporary anonymous union into struct task_cputime which allows array based access to it. That requires to reorder the members. Add a build time sanity check to validate that the members are at the same place. The union and the build time checks will be removed after conversion. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Move expiry cache into struct posix_cputimersThomas Gleixner1-18/+27
The expiry cache belongs into the posix_cputimers container where the other cpu timers information is. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Create a container structThomas Gleixner1-10/+10
Per task/process data of posix CPU timers is all over the place which makes the code hard to follow and requires ifdeffery. Create a container to hold all this information in one place, so data is consolidated and the ifdeffery can be confined to the posix timer header file and removed from places like fork. As a first step, move the cpu_timers list head array into the new struct and clean up the initializers and simplify fork. The remaining #ifdef in fork will be removed later. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Move prof/virt_ticks into callerThomas Gleixner1-21/+9
The functions have only one caller left. No point in having them. Move the almost duplicated code into the caller and simplify it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Sample task times once in expiry checkThomas Gleixner1-4/+6
Sampling the task times twice does not make sense. Do it once. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Get rid of pointer indirectionThomas Gleixner1-28/+22
Now that the sample functions have no return value anymore, the result can simply be returned instead of using pointer indirection. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Simplify sample functionsThomas Gleixner1-15/+13
All callers hand in a valdiated clock id. Remove the return value which was unchecked in most places anyway. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Remove pointless return value checkThomas Gleixner1-3/+2
set_process_cpu_timer() checks already whether the clock id is valid. No point in checking the return value of the sample function. That allows to simplify the sample function later. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Use clock ID in posix_cpu_timer_rearm()Thomas Gleixner1-2/+3
Extract the clock ID (PROF/VIRT/SCHED) from the clock selector and use it as argument to the sample functions. That allows to simplify them once all callers are fixed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Use clock ID in posix_cpu_timer_get()Thomas Gleixner1-2/+3
Extract the clock ID (PROF/VIRT/SCHED) from the clock selector and use it as argument to the sample functions. That allows to simplify them once all callers are fixed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Use clock ID in posix_cpu_timer_set()Thomas Gleixner1-5/+6
Extract the clock ID (PROF/VIRT/SCHED) from the clock selector and use it as argument to the sample functions. That allows to simplify them once all callers are fixed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Consolidate thread group sample codeThomas Gleixner1-39/+20
cpu_clock_sample_group() and cpu_timer_sample_group() are almost the same. Before the rename one called thread_group_cputimer() and the other thread_group_cputime(). Really intuitive function names. Consolidate the functions and also avoid the thread traversal when the thread group's accounting is already active. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Rename thread_group_cputimer() and make it staticThomas Gleixner1-2/+15
thread_group_cputimer() is a complete misnomer. The function does two things: - For arming process wide timers it makes sure that the atomic time storage is up to date. If no cpu timer is armed yet, then the atomic time storage is not updated by the scheduler for performance reasons. In that case a full summing up of all threads needs to be done and the update needs to be enabled. - Samples the current time into the caller supplied storage. Rename it to thread_group_start_cputime(), make it static and fixup the callsite. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Sample directly in timer checkThomas Gleixner1-3/+4
The thread group accounting is active, otherwise the expiry function would not be running. Sample the thread group time directly. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Provide quick sample function for itimerThomas Gleixner1-0/+21
get_itimer() needs a sample of the current thread group cputime. It invokes thread_group_cputimer() - which is a misnomer. That function also starts eventually the group cputime accouting which is bogus because the accounting is already active when a timer is armed. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Use common permission check in posix_cpu_timer_create()Thomas Gleixner1-32/+3
Yet another copy of the same thing gone... Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Use common permission check in posix_cpu_clock_get()Thomas Gleixner1-43/+14
Replace the next slightly different copy of permission checks. That also removes the necessarity to check the return value of the sample functions because the clock id is already validated. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-28posix-cpu-timers: Provide task validation functionsThomas Gleixner1-21/+44
The code contains three slightly different copies of validating whether a given clock resolves to a valid task and whether the current caller has permissions to access it. Create central functions. Replace check_clock() as a first step and rename it to something sensible. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-21posix-cpu-timers: Remove tsk argument from run_posix_cpu_timers()Thomas Gleixner1-2/+3
It's always current. Don't give people wrong ideas. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-21posix-cpu-timers: Sanitize bogus WARNONSThomas Gleixner1-7/+13
Warning when p == NULL and then proceeding and dereferencing p does not make any sense as the kernel will crash with a NULL pointer dereference right away. Bailing out when p == NULL and returning an error code does not cure the underlying problem which caused p to be NULL. Though it might allow to do proper debugging. Same applies to the clock id check in set_process_cpu_timer(). Clean them up and make them return without trying to do further damage. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-08-20posix-cpu-timers: Fixup stale commentThomas Gleixner1-3/+4
The comment above cleanup_timers() is outdated. The timers are only removed from the task/process list heads but not modified in any other way. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-01-15posix-cpu-timers: Remove private interval storageThomas Gleixner1-7/+6
Posix CPU timers store the interval in private storage for historical reasons (it_interval used to be a non scalar representation on 32bit systems). This is gone and there is no reason for duplicated storage anymore. Use it_interval everywhere. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: "H.J. Lu" <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2019-01-15posix-cpu-timers: Unbreak timer rearmingThomas Gleixner1-0/+1
The recent commit which prevented a division by 0 issue in the alarm timer code broke posix CPU timers as an unwanted side effect. The reason is that the common rearm code checks for timer->it_interval being 0 now. What went unnoticed is that the posix cpu timer setup does not initialize timer->it_interval as it stores the interval in CPU timer specific storage. The reason for the separate storage is historical as the posix CPU timers always had a 64bit nanoseconds representation internally while timer->it_interval is type ktime_t which used to be a modified timespec representation on 32bit machines. Instead of reverting the offending commit and fixing the alarmtimer issue in the alarmtimer code, store the interval in timer->it_interval at CPU timer setup time so the common code check works. This also repairs the existing inconistency of the posix CPU timer code which kept a single shot timer armed despite of the interval being 0. The separate storage can be removed in mainline, but that needs to be a separate commit as the current one has to be backported to stable kernels. Fixes: 0e334db6bb4b ("posix-timers: Fix division by zero bug") Reported-by: H.J. Lu <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: John Stultz <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2018-11-08posix-cpu-timers: Remove useless call to check_dl_overrun()Juri Lelli1-3/+0
check_dl_overrun() is used to send a SIGXCPU to users that asked to be informed when a SCHED_DEADLINE runtime overruns occur. The function is called by check_thread_timers() already, so the call in check_process_timers() is redundant/wrong (even though harmless). Remove it. Fixes: 34be39305a77 ("sched/deadline: Implement "runtime overrun signal" support") Signed-off-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Luca Abeni <[email protected]> Cc: Claudio Scordino <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]