| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Other scheduling classes already postfix their similar methods
with the class name.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
|
|
Remove duplicated includes of linux/cgroup.h and linux/psi.h. Both of
these includes are included regardless of the config and they are all
protected by ifndef, so no point including them again.
Signed-off-by: GUO Zihua <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
When using sysbench to benchmark Postgres in a single docker instance
with sysbench's nr_threads set to nr_cpu, it is observed there are times
update_cfs_group() and update_load_avg() shows noticeable overhead on
a 2sockets/112core/224cpu Intel Sapphire Rapids(SPR):
13.75% 13.74% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_cfs_group
10.63% 10.04% [kernel.vmlinux] [k] update_load_avg
Annotate shows the cycles are mostly spent on accessing tg->load_avg
with update_load_avg() being the write side and update_cfs_group() being
the read side. tg->load_avg is per task group and when different tasks
of the same taskgroup running on different CPUs frequently access
tg->load_avg, it can be heavily contended.
E.g. when running postgres_sysbench on a 2sockets/112cores/224cpus Intel
Sappire Rapids, during a 5s window, the wakeup number is 14millions and
migration number is 11millions and with each migration, the task's load
will transfer from src cfs_rq to target cfs_rq and each change involves
an update to tg->load_avg. Since the workload can trigger as many wakeups
and migrations, the access(both read and write) to tg->load_avg can be
unbound. As a result, the two mentioned functions showed noticeable
overhead. With netperf/nr_client=nr_cpu/UDP_RR, the problem is worse:
during a 5s window, wakeup number is 21millions and migration number is
14millions; update_cfs_group() costs ~25% and update_load_avg() costs ~16%.
Reduce the overhead by limiting updates to tg->load_avg to at most once
per ms. The update frequency is a tradeoff between tracking accuracy and
overhead. 1ms is chosen because PELT window is roughly 1ms and it
delivered good results for the tests that I've done. After this change,
the cost of accessing tg->load_avg is greatly reduced and performance
improved. Detailed test results below.
==============================
postgres_sysbench on SPR:
25%
base: 42382±19.8%
patch: 50174±9.5% (noise)
50%
base: 67626±1.3%
patch: 67365±3.1% (noise)
75%
base: 100216±1.2%
patch: 112470±0.1% +12.2%
100%
base: 93671±0.4%
patch: 113563±0.2% +21.2%
==============================
hackbench on ICL:
group=1
base: 114912±5.2%
patch: 117857±2.5% (noise)
group=4
base: 359902±1.6%
patch: 361685±2.7% (noise)
group=8
base: 461070±0.8%
patch: 491713±0.3% +6.6%
group=16
base: 309032±5.0%
patch: 378337±1.3% +22.4%
=============================
hackbench on SPR:
group=1
base: 100768±2.9%
patch: 103134±2.9% (noise)
group=4
base: 413830±12.5%
patch: 378660±16.6% (noise)
group=8
base: 436124±0.6%
patch: 490787±3.2% +12.5%
group=16
base: 457730±3.2%
patch: 680452±1.3% +48.8%
============================
netperf/udp_rr on ICL
25%
base: 114413±0.1%
patch: 115111±0.0% +0.6%
50%
base: 86803±0.5%
patch: 86611±0.0% (noise)
75%
base: 35959±5.3%
patch: 49801±0.6% +38.5%
100%
base: 61951±6.4%
patch: 70224±0.8% +13.4%
===========================
netperf/udp_rr on SPR
25%
base: 104954±1.3%
patch: 107312±2.8% (noise)
50%
base: 55394±4.6%
patch: 54940±7.4% (noise)
75%
base: 13779±3.1%
patch: 36105±1.1% +162%
100%
base: 9703±3.7%
patch: 28011±0.2% +189%
==============================================
netperf/tcp_stream on ICL (all in noise range)
25%
base: 43092±0.1%
patch: 42891±0.5%
50%
base: 19278±14.9%
patch: 22369±7.2%
75%
base: 16822±3.0%
patch: 17086±2.3%
100%
base: 18216±0.6%
patch: 18078±2.9%
===============================================
netperf/tcp_stream on SPR (all in noise range)
25%
base: 34491±0.3%
patch: 34886±0.5%
50%
base: 19278±14.9%
patch: 22369±7.2%
75%
base: 16822±3.0%
patch: 17086±2.3%
100%
base: 18216±0.6%
patch: 18078±2.9%
Reported-by: Nitin Tekchandani <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Aaron Lu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Swapnil Sapkal <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
After commit f5d39b020809 ("freezer,sched: Rewrite core freezer logic"),
tasks that transition directly from TASK_FREEZABLE to TASK_FROZEN are
always woken up on the thaw path. Prior to that commit, tasks could ask
freezer to consider them "frozen enough" via freezer_do_not_count(). The
commit replaced freezer_do_not_count() with a TASK_FREEZABLE state which
allows freezer to immediately mark the task as TASK_FROZEN without
waking up the task. This is efficient for the suspend path, but on the
thaw path, the task is always woken up even if the task didn't need to
wake up and goes back to its TASK_(UN)INTERRUPTIBLE state. Although
these tasks are capable of handling of the wakeup, we can observe a
power/perf impact from the extra wakeup.
We observed on Android many tasks wait in the TASK_FREEZABLE state
(particularly due to many of them being binder clients). We observed
nearly 4x the number of tasks and a corresponding linear increase in
latency and power consumption when thawing the system. The latency
increased from ~15ms to ~50ms.
Avoid the spurious wakeups by saving the state of TASK_FREEZABLE tasks.
If the task was running before entering TASK_FROZEN state
(__refrigerator()) or if the task received a wake up for the saved
state, then the task is woken on thaw. saved_state from PREEMPT_RT locks
can be re-used because freezer would not stomp on the rtlock wait flow:
TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT isn't considered freezable.
Reported-by: Prakash Viswalingam <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
In preparation for freezer to also use saved_state, remove the
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT compilation guard around saved_state.
On the arm64 platform I tested which did not have CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT,
there was no statistically significant deviation by applying this patch.
Test methodology:
perf bench sched message -g 40 -l 40
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use equivalent do-while loop instead of infinite for loop.
There are no asm code changes.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
We don't need to maintain per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list on !SMP, since
it's used for cfs_rq load tracking & balancing on SMP.
But sched debug interface uses it to print per-cfs_rq stats.
This patch fixes the !SMP version of cfs_rq_is_decayed(), so the
per-queue leaf_cfs_rq_list is also maintained correctly on !SMP,
to fix the warning in assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq().
Fixes: 0a00a354644e ("sched/fair: Delete useless condition in tg_unthrottle_up()")
Reported-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Leo Yu-Chi Liang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZN87UsqkWcFLDxea@swlinux02/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Reword sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() comment and make it kernel-doc compatible.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() doesn't handle NUMA_NO_NODE properly, and
may crash kernel if passed with it. On the other hand, the only user
of sched_numa_find_nth_cpu() has to check NUMA_NO_NODE case explicitly.
It would be easier for users if this logic will get moved into
sched_numa_find_nth_cpu().
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
When the node provided by user is CPU-less, corresponding record in
sched_domains_numa_masks is not set. Trying to dereference it in the
following code leads to kernel crash.
To avoid it, start searching from the nearest node with CPUs.
Fixes: cd7f55359c90 ("sched: add sched_numa_find_nth_cpu()")
Reported-by: Yicong Yang <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yicong Yang <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAAH8bW8C5humYnfpW3y5ypwx0E-09A3QxFE1JFzR66v+mO4XfA@mail.gmail.com/T/
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZMHSNQfv39HN068m@yury-ThinkPad/T/#mf6431cb0b7f6f05193c41adeee444bc95bf2b1c4
|
|
task_numa_placement() searches for a nearest node to migrate by calling
for_each_node_state(). Now that we have numa_nearest_node(), switch to
using it.
Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
For SMT4, any group with more than 2 tasks will be marked as
group_smt_balance. Retain the behaviour of group_has_spare by marking
the busiest group as the group which has the least number of idle_cpus.
Also, handle rounding effect of adding (ncores_local + ncores_busy) when
the local is fully idle and busy group imbalance is less than 2 tasks.
Local group should try to pull at least 1 task in this case so imbalance
should be set to 2 instead.
Fixes: fee1759e4f04 ("sched/fair: Determine active load balance for SMT sched groups")
Acked-by: Shrikanth Hegde <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Random remaining guard use...
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
The Itanium architecture is obsolete, and an informal survey [0] reveals
that any residual use of Itanium hardware in production is mostly HP-UX
or OpenVMS based. The use of Linux on Itanium appears to be limited to
enthusiasts that occasionally boot a fresh Linux kernel to see whether
things are still working as intended, and perhaps to churn out some
distro packages that are rarely used in practice.
None of the original companies behind Itanium still produce or support
any hardware or software for the architecture, and it is listed as
'Orphaned' in the MAINTAINERS file, as apparently, none of the engineers
that contributed on behalf of those companies (nor anyone else, for that
matter) have been willing to support or maintain the architecture
upstream or even be responsible for applying the odd fix. The Intel
firmware team removed all IA-64 support from the Tianocore/EDK2
reference implementation of EFI in 2018. (Itanium is the original
architecture for which EFI was developed, and the way Linux supports it
deviates significantly from other architectures.) Some distros, such as
Debian and Gentoo, still maintain [unofficial] ia64 ports, but many have
dropped support years ago.
While the argument is being made [1] that there is a 'for the common
good' angle to being able to build and run existing projects such as the
Grid Community Toolkit [2] on Itanium for interoperability testing, the
fact remains that none of those projects are known to be deployed on
Linux/ia64, and very few people actually have access to such a system in
the first place. Even if there were ways imaginable in which Linux/ia64
could be put to good use today, what matters is whether anyone is
actually doing that, and this does not appear to be the case.
There are no emulators widely available, and so boot testing Itanium is
generally infeasible for ordinary contributors. GCC still supports IA-64
but its compile farm [3] no longer has any IA-64 machines. GLIBC would
like to get rid of IA-64 [4] too because it would permit some overdue
code cleanups. In summary, the benefits to the ecosystem of having IA-64
be part of it are mostly theoretical, whereas the maintenance overhead
of keeping it supported is real.
So let's rip off the band aid, and remove the IA-64 arch code entirely.
This follows the timeline proposed by the Debian/ia64 maintainer [5],
which removes support in a controlled manner, leaving IA-64 in a known
good state in the most recent LTS release. Other projects will follow
once the kernel support is removed.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAMj1kXFCMh_578jniKpUtx_j8ByHnt=s7S+yQ+vGbKt9ud7+kQ@mail.gmail.com/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[2] https://gridcf.org/gct-docs/latest/index.html
[3] https://cfarm.tetaneutral.net/machines/list/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ff58a3e76e5102c94bb5946d99187b358def688a.camel@physik.fu-berlin.de/
Acked-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
|
|
should_we_balance() is called in load_balance() to find out if the CPU that
is trying to do the load balance is the right one or not.
With commit:
b1bfeab9b002("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance")
the code tries to find an idle core to do the load balancing
and falls back on an idle sibling CPU if there is no idle core.
However, on larger SMT systems, it could be needlessly iterating to find a
idle by scanning all the CPUs in an non-idle core. If the core is not idle,
and first SMT sibling which is idle has been found, then its not needed to
check other SMT siblings for idleness
Lets say in SMT4, Core0 has 0,2,4,6 and CPU0 is BUSY and rest are IDLE.
balancing domain is MC/DIE. CPU2 will be set as the first idle_smt and
same process would be repeated for CPU4 and CPU6 but this is unnecessary.
Since calling is_core_idle loops through all CPU's in the SMT mask, effect
is multiplied by weight of smt_mask. For example,when say 1 CPU is busy,
we would skip loop for 2 CPU's and skip iterating over 8CPU's. That
effect would be more in DIE/NUMA domain where there are more cores.
Testing and performance evaluation
==================================
The test has been done on this system which has 12 cores, i.e 24 small
cores with SMT=4:
lscpu
Architecture: ppc64le
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 96
On-line CPU(s) list: 0-95
Model name: POWER10 (architected), altivec supported
Thread(s) per core: 8
Used funclatency bcc tool to evaluate the time taken by should_we_balance(). For
base tip/sched/core the time taken is collected by making the
should_we_balance() noinline. time is in nanoseconds. The values are
collected by running the funclatency tracer for 60 seconds. values are
average of 3 such runs. This represents the expected reduced time with
patch.
tip/sched/core was at commit:
2f88c8e802c8 ("sched/eevdf/doc: Modify the documented knob to base_slice_ns as well")
Results:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
workload tip/sched/core with_patch(%gain)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
idle system 809.3 695.0(16.45)
stress ng – 12 threads -l 100 1013.5 893.1(13.49)
stress ng – 24 threads -l 100 1073.5 980.0(9.54)
stress ng – 48 threads -l 100 683.0 641.0(6.55)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 100 2421.0 2300(5.26)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 15 375.5 377.5(-0.53)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 25 635.5 637.5(-0.31)
stress ng – 96 threads -l 35 934.0 891.0(4.83)
Ran schbench(old), hackbench and stress_ng to evaluate the workload
performance between tip/sched/core and with patch.
No modification to tip/sched/core
TL;DR:
Good improvement is seen with schbench. when hackbench and stress_ng
runs for longer good improvement is seen.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
schbench(old) tip +patch(%gain)
10 iterations sched/core
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Threads
50.0th: 8.00 9.00(-12.50)
75.0th: 9.60 9.00(6.25)
90.0th: 11.80 10.20(13.56)
95.0th: 12.60 10.40(17.46)
99.0th: 13.60 11.90(12.50)
99.5th: 14.10 12.60(10.64)
99.9th: 15.90 14.60(8.18)
2 Threads
50.0th: 9.90 9.20(7.07)
75.0th: 12.60 10.10(19.84)
90.0th: 15.50 12.00(22.58)
95.0th: 17.70 14.00(20.90)
99.0th: 21.20 16.90(20.28)
99.5th: 22.60 17.50(22.57)
99.9th: 30.40 19.40(36.18)
4 Threads
50.0th: 12.50 10.60(15.20)
75.0th: 15.30 12.00(21.57)
90.0th: 18.60 14.10(24.19)
95.0th: 21.30 16.20(23.94)
99.0th: 26.00 20.70(20.38)
99.5th: 27.60 22.50(18.48)
99.9th: 33.90 31.40(7.37)
8 Threads
50.0th: 16.30 14.30(12.27)
75.0th: 20.20 17.40(13.86)
90.0th: 24.50 21.90(10.61)
95.0th: 27.30 24.70(9.52)
99.0th: 35.00 31.20(10.86)
99.5th: 46.40 33.30(28.23)
99.9th: 89.30 57.50(35.61)
16 Threads
50.0th: 22.70 20.70(8.81)
75.0th: 30.10 27.40(8.97)
90.0th: 36.00 32.80(8.89)
95.0th: 39.60 36.40(8.08)
99.0th: 49.20 44.10(10.37)
99.5th: 64.90 50.50(22.19)
99.9th: 143.50 100.60(29.90)
32 Threads
50.0th: 34.60 35.50(-2.60)
75.0th: 48.20 50.50(-4.77)
90.0th: 59.20 62.40(-5.41)
95.0th: 65.20 69.00(-5.83)
99.0th: 80.40 83.80(-4.23)
99.5th: 102.10 98.90(3.13)
99.9th: 727.10 506.80(30.30)
schbench does improve in general. There is some run to run variation with
schbench. Did a validation run to confirm that trend is similar.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hackbench tip +patch(%gain)
20 iterations, 50000 loops sched/core
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Process 10 groups : 11.74 11.70(0.34)
Process 20 groups : 22.73 22.69(0.18)
Process 30 groups : 33.39 33.40(-0.03)
Process 40 groups : 43.73 43.61(0.27)
Process 50 groups : 53.82 54.35(-0.98)
Process 60 groups : 64.16 65.29(-1.76)
thread 10 Time : 12.81 12.79(0.16)
thread 20 Time : 24.63 24.47(0.65)
Process(Pipe) 10 Time : 6.40 6.34(0.94)
Process(Pipe) 20 Time : 10.62 10.63(-0.09)
Process(Pipe) 30 Time : 15.09 14.84(1.66)
Process(Pipe) 40 Time : 19.42 19.01(2.11)
Process(Pipe) 50 Time : 24.04 23.34(2.91)
Process(Pipe) 60 Time : 28.94 27.51(4.94)
thread(Pipe) 10 Time : 6.96 6.87(1.29)
thread(Pipe) 20 Time : 11.74 11.73(0.09)
hackbench shows slight improvement with pipe. Slight degradation in process.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
stress_ng tip +patch(%gain)
10 iterations 100000 cpu_ops sched/core
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--cpu=96 -util=100 Time taken : 5.30, 5.01(5.47)
--cpu=48 -util=100 Time taken : 7.94, 6.73(15.24)
--cpu=24 -util=100 Time taken : 11.67, 8.75(25.02)
--cpu=12 -util=100 Time taken : 15.71, 15.02(4.39)
--cpu=96 -util=10 Time taken : 22.71, 22.19(2.29)
--cpu=96 -util=20 Time taken : 12.14, 12.37(-1.89)
--cpu=96 -util=30 Time taken : 8.76, 8.86(-1.14)
--cpu=96 -util=40 Time taken : 7.13, 7.14(-0.14)
--cpu=96 -util=50 Time taken : 6.10, 6.13(-0.49)
--cpu=96 -util=60 Time taken : 5.42, 5.41(0.18)
--cpu=96 -util=70 Time taken : 4.94, 4.94(0.00)
--cpu=96 -util=80 Time taken : 4.56, 4.53(0.66)
--cpu=96 -util=90 Time taken : 4.27, 4.26(0.23)
Good improvement seen with 24 CPUs. In this case only one CPU is busy,
and no core is idle. Decent improvement with 100% utilization case. no
difference in other utilization.
Fixes: b1bfeab9b002 ("sched/fair: Consider the idle state of the whole core for load balance")
Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The function update_entity_lag() is only used inside the kernel/sched/fair.c file.
Make it static.
Signed-off-by: Hao Jia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull misc x86 cleanups from Ingo Molnar:
"The following commit deserves special mention:
22dc02f81cddd Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header"
This is in x86/cleanups, because the revert is a re-application of a
number of cleanups that got removed inadvertedly"
[ This also effectively undoes the amd_check_microcode() microcode
declaration change I had done in my microcode loader merge in commit
42a7f6e3ffe0 ("Merge tag 'x86_microcode_for_v6.6_rc1' [...]").
I picked the declaration change by Arnd from this branch instead,
which put it in <asm/processor.h> instead of <asm/microcode.h> like I
had done in my merge resolution - Linus ]
* tag 'x86-cleanups-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
x86/platform/uv: Refactor code using deprecated strncpy() interface to use strscpy()
x86/hpet: Refactor code using deprecated strncpy() interface to use strscpy()
x86/platform/uv: Refactor code using deprecated strcpy()/strncpy() interfaces to use strscpy()
x86/qspinlock-paravirt: Fix missing-prototype warning
x86/paravirt: Silence unused native_pv_lock_init() function warning
x86/alternative: Add a __alt_reloc_selftest() prototype
x86/purgatory: Include header for warn() declaration
x86/asm: Avoid unneeded __div64_32 function definition
Revert "sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header"
x86/apic: Hide unused safe_smp_processor_id() on 32-bit UP
x86/cpu: Fix amd_check_microcode() declaration
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar:
- The biggest change is introduction of a new iteration of the
SCHED_FAIR interactivity code: the EEVDF ("Earliest Eligible Virtual
Deadline First") scheduler
EEVDF too is a virtual-time scheduler, with two parameters (weight
and relative deadline), compared to CFS that had weight only. It
completely reworks the base scheduler: placement, preemption, picking
-- everything
LWN.net, as usual, has a terrific writeup about EEVDF:
https://lwn.net/Articles/925371/
Preemption (both tick and wakeup) is driven by testing against a
fresh pick. Because the tree is now effectively an interval tree, and
the selection is no longer the 'leftmost' task, over-scheduling is
less of a problem. A lot of the CFS heuristics are removed or
replaced by more natural latency-space parameters & constructs
In terms of expected performance regressions: we will and can fix
everything where a 'good' workload misbehaves with the new scheduler,
but EEVDF inevitably changes workload scheduling in a binary fashion,
hopefully for the better in the overwhelming majority of cases, but
in some cases it won't, especially in adversarial loads that got
lucky with the previous code, such as some variants of hackbench. We
are trying hard to err on the side of fixing all performance
regressions, but we expect some inevitable post-release iterations of
that process
- Improve load-balancing on hybrid x86 systems: enable cluster
scheduling (again)
- Improve & fix bandwidth-scheduling on nohz systems
- Improve bandwidth-throttling
- Use lock guards to simplify and de-goto-ify control flow
- Misc improvements, cleanups and fixes
* tag 'sched-core-2023-08-28' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (43 commits)
sched/eevdf/doc: Modify the documented knob to base_slice_ns as well
sched/eevdf: Curb wakeup-preemption
sched: Simplify sched_core_cpu_{starting,deactivate}()
sched: Simplify try_steal_cookie()
sched: Simplify sched_tick_remote()
sched: Simplify sched_exec()
sched: Simplify ttwu()
sched: Simplify wake_up_if_idle()
sched: Simplify: migrate_swap_stop()
sched: Simplify sysctl_sched_uclamp_handler()
sched: Simplify get_nohz_timer_target()
sched/rt: sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice show default timeslice after reset
sched/rt: Fix sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice intial value
sched/fair: Block nohz tick_stop when cfs bandwidth in use
sched, cgroup: Restore meaning to hierarchical_quota
MAINTAINERS: Add Peter explicitly to the psi section
sched/psi: Select KERNFS as needed
sched/topology: Align group flags when removing degenerate domain
sched/fair: remove util_est boosting
sched/fair: Propagate enqueue flags into place_entity()
...
|
|
Mike and others noticed that EEVDF does like to over-schedule quite a
bit -- which does hurt performance of a number of benchmarks /
workloads.
In particular, what seems to cause over-scheduling is that when lag is
of the same order (or larger) than the request / slice then placement
will not only cause the task to be placed left of current, but also
with a smaller deadline than current, which causes immediate
preemption.
[ notably, lag bounds are relative to HZ ]
Mike suggested we stick to picking 'current' for as long as it's
eligible to run, giving it uninterrupted runtime until it reaches
parity with the pack.
Augment Mike's suggestion by only allowing it to exhaust it's initial
request.
One random data point:
echo NO_RUN_TO_PARITY > /debug/sched/features
perf stat -a -e context-switches --repeat 10 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 20 -t -l 5000
3,723,554 context-switches ( +- 0.56% )
9.5136 +- 0.0394 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.41% )
echo RUN_TO_PARITY > /debug/sched/features
perf stat -a -e context-switches --repeat 10 -- perf bench sched messaging -g 20 -t -l 5000
2,556,535 context-switches ( +- 0.51% )
9.2427 +- 0.0302 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.33% )
Suggested-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Use guards to reduce gotos and simplify control flow.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
The sched_rr_timeslice can be reset to default by writing value that is
<= 0. However after reading from this file we always got the last value
written, which is not useful at all.
$ echo -1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms
$ cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms
-1
Fix this by setting the variable that holds the sysctl file value to the
jiffies_to_msecs(RR_TIMESLICE) in case that <= 0 value was written.
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
There is a 10% rounding error in the intial value of the
sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice with CONFIG_HZ_300=y.
This was found with LTP test sched_rr_get_interval01:
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:57: TPASS: sched_rr_get_interval() passed
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:64: TPASS: Time quantum 0s 99999990ns
sched_rr_get_interval01.c:72: TFAIL: /proc/sys/kernel/sched_rr_timeslice_ms != 100 got 90
What this test does is to compare the return value from the
sched_rr_get_interval() and the sched_rr_timeslice_ms sysctl file and
fails if they do not match.
The problem it found is the intial sysctl file value which was computed as:
static int sysctl_sched_rr_timeslice = (MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * RR_TIMESLICE;
which works fine as long as MSEC_PER_SEC is multiple of HZ, however it
introduces 10% rounding error for CONFIG_HZ_300:
(MSEC_PER_SEC / HZ) * (100 * HZ / 1000)
(1000 / 300) * (100 * 300 / 1000)
3 * 30 = 90
This can be easily fixed by reversing the order of the multiplication
and division. After this fix we get:
(MSEC_PER_SEC * (100 * HZ / 1000)) / HZ
(1000 * (100 * 300 / 1000)) / 300
(1000 * 30) / 300 = 100
Fixes: 975e155ed873 ("sched/rt: Show the 'sched_rr_timeslice' SCHED_RR timeslice tuning knob in milliseconds")
Signed-off-by: Cyril Hrubis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Petr Vorel <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Pick up the EEVDF work into the main branch - it's looking good so far.
Conflicts:
kernel/sched/features.h
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
CFS bandwidth limits and NOHZ full don't play well together. Tasks
can easily run well past their quotas before a remote tick does
accounting. This leads to long, multi-period stalls before such
tasks can run again. Currently, when presented with these conflicting
requirements the scheduler is favoring nohz_full and letting the tick
be stopped. However, nohz tick stopping is already best-effort, there
are a number of conditions that can prevent it, whereas cfs runtime
bandwidth is expected to be enforced.
Make the scheduler favor bandwidth over stopping the tick by setting
TICK_DEP_BIT_SCHED when the only running task is a cfs task with
runtime limit enabled. We use cfs_b->hierarchical_quota to
determine if the task requires the tick.
Add check in pick_next_task_fair() as well since that is where
we have a handle on the task that is actually going to be running.
Add check in sched_can_stop_tick() to cover some edge cases such
as nr_running going from 2->1 and the 1 remains the running task.
Reviewed-By: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
In cgroupv2 cfs_b->hierarchical_quota is set to -1 for all task
groups due to the previous fix simply taking the min. It should
reflect a limit imposed at that level or by an ancestor. Even
though cgroupv2 does not require child quota to be less than or
equal to that of its ancestors the task group will still be
constrained by such a quota so this should be shown here. Cgroupv1
continues to set this correctly.
In both cases, add initialization when a new task group is created
based on the current parent's value (or RUNTIME_INF in the case of
root_task_group). Otherwise, the field is wrong until a quota is
changed after creation and __cfs_schedulable() is called.
Fixes: c53593e5cb69 ("sched, cgroup: Don't reject lower cpu.max on ancestors")
Signed-off-by: Phil Auld <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Revert commit 7aa55f2a5902 ("sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to
header"), for while it has the right Changelog, the actual patch
content a revert of the previous 4 patches:
f7df852ad6db ("sched: Make task_vruntime_update() prototype visible")
c0bdfd72fbfb ("sched/fair: Hide unused init_cfs_bandwidth() stub")
378be384e01f ("sched: Add schedule_user() declaration")
d55ebae3f312 ("sched: Hide unused sched_update_scaling()")
So in effect this is a revert of a revert and re-applies those
patches.
Fixes: 7aa55f2a5902 ("sched/fair: Move unused stub functions to header")
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <[email protected]>
|
|
The flags of the child of a given scheduling domain are used to initialize
the flags of its scheduling groups. When the child of a scheduling domain
is degenerated, the flags of its local scheduling group need to be updated
to align with the flags of its new child domain.
The flag SD_SHARE_CPUCAPACITY was aligned in
Commit bf2dc42d6beb ("sched/topology: Propagate SMT flags when removing degenerate domain").
Further generalize this alignment so other flags can be used later, such as
in cluster-based task wakeup. [1]
Reported-by: Yicong Yang <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Ricardo Neri <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chen Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tim Chen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Yicong Yang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
There is no need to use runnable_avg when estimating util_est and that
even generates wrong behavior because one includes blocked tasks whereas
the other one doesn't. This can lead to accounting twice the waking task p,
once with the blocked runnable_avg and another one when adding its
util_est.
cpu's runnable_avg is already used when computing util_avg which is then
compared with util_est.
In some situation, feec will not select prev_cpu but another one on the
same performance domain because of higher max_util
Fixes: 7d0583cf9ec7 ("sched/fair, cpufreq: Introduce 'runnable boosting'")
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Dietmar Eggemann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
This allows place_entity() to consider ENQUEUE_WAKEUP and
ENQUEUE_MIGRATED.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
EEVDF uses this tunable as the base request/slice -- make sure the
name reflects this.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
EEVDF is a better defined scheduling policy, as a result it has less
heuristics/tunables. There is no compelling reason to keep CFS around.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Using lag is both more correct and simpler when moving between
runqueues.
Notable, min_vruntime() was invented as a cheap approximation of
avg_vruntime() for this very purpose (SMP migration). Since we now
have the real thing; use it.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Removes the FAIR_SLEEPERS code in favour of the new LAG based
placement.
Specifically, the whole FAIR_SLEEPER thing was a very crude
approximation to make up for the lack of lag based placement,
specifically the 'service owed' part. This is important for things
like 'starve' and 'hackbench'.
One side effect of FAIR_SLEEPER is that it caused 'small' unfairness,
specifically, by always ignoring up-to 'thresh' sleeptime it would
have a 50%/50% time distribution for a 50% sleeper vs a 100% runner,
while strictly speaking this should (of course) result in a 33%/67%
split (as CFS will also do if the sleep period exceeds 'thresh').
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
Where CFS is currently a WFQ based scheduler with only a single knob,
the weight. The addition of a second, latency oriented parameter,
makes something like WF2Q or EEVDF based a much better fit.
Specifically, EEVDF does EDF like scheduling in the left half of the
tree -- those entities that are owed service. Except because this is a
virtual time scheduler, the deadlines are in virtual time as well,
which is what allows over-subscription.
EEVDF has two parameters:
- weight, or time-slope: which is mapped to nice just as before
- request size, or slice length: which is used to compute
the virtual deadline as: vd_i = ve_i + r_i/w_i
Basically, by setting a smaller slice, the deadline will be earlier
and the task will be more eligible and ran earlier.
Tick driven preemption is driven by request/slice completion; while
wakeup preemption is driven by the deadline.
Because the tree is now effectively an interval tree, and the
selection is no longer 'leftmost', over-scheduling is less of a
problem.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|
|
With the introduction of avg_vruntime, it is possible to approximate
lag (the entire purpose of introducing it in fact). Use this to do lag
based placement over sleep+wake.
Specifically, the FAIR_SLEEPERS thing places things too far to the
left and messes up the deadline aspect of EEVDF.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
|