| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Two boots + a make defconfig, the first didn't have the redundant bit
in, the second did:
lock-classes: 1168 1169 [max: 8191]
direct dependencies: 7688 5812 [max: 32768]
indirect dependencies: 25492 25937
all direct dependencies: 220113 217512
dependency chains: 9005 9008 [max: 65536]
dependency chain hlocks: 34450 34366 [max: 327680]
in-hardirq chains: 55 51
in-softirq chains: 371 378
in-process chains: 8579 8579
stack-trace entries: 108073 88474 [max: 524288]
combined max dependencies: 178738560 169094640
max locking depth: 15 15
max bfs queue depth: 320 329
cyclic checks: 9123 9190
redundant checks: 5046
redundant links: 1828
find-mask forwards checks: 2564 2599
find-mask backwards checks: 39521 39789
So it saves nearly 2k links and a fair chunk of stack-trace entries, but
as expected, makes no real difference on the indirect dependencies.
At the same time, you see the max BFS depth increase, which is also
expected, although it could easily be boot variance -- these numbers are
not entirely stable between boots.
The down side is that the cycles in the graph become larger and thus
the reports harder to read.
XXX: do we want this as a CONFIG variable, implied by LOCKDEP_SMALL?
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Byungchul Park <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
This was entirely automated, using the script by Al:
PATT='^[[:blank:]]*#[[:blank:]]*include[[:blank:]]*<asm/uaccess.h>'
sed -i -e "s!$PATT!#include <linux/uaccess.h>!" \
$(git grep -l "$PATT"|grep -v ^include/linux/uaccess.h)
to do the replacement at the end of the merge window.
Requested-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
lock_chain::base is used to store an index into the chain_hlocks[]
array, however that array contains more elements than can be indexed
using the u16.
Change the lock_chain structure to use a bitfield to encode the data
it needs and add BUILD_BUG_ON() assertions to check the fields are
wide enough.
Also, for DEBUG_LOCKDEP, assert that we don't run out of elements of
that array; as that would wreck the collision detectoring.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Alfredo Alvarez Fernandez <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
There were still a number of references to my old Red Hat email
address in the kernel source. Remove these while keeping the
Red Hat copyright notices intact.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: Vince Weaver <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
The lock_class iteration of /proc/lock_stat is not serialized against
the lockdep_free_key_range() call from module unload.
Therefore it can happen that we find a class of which ->name/->key are
no longer valid.
There is a further bug in zap_class() that left ->name dangling. Cure
this. Use RCU_INIT_POINTER() because NULL.
Since lockdep_free_key_range() is rcu_sched serialized, we can read
both ->name and ->key under rcu_read_lock_sched() (preempt-disable)
and be assured that if we observe a !NULL value it stays safe to use
for as long as we hold that lock.
If we observe both NULL, skip the entry.
Reported-by: Jerome Marchand <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Jerome Marchand <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
> kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c: In function 'seq_lock_time':
> >> kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:424:23: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
>
> 418 static void seq_lock_time(struct seq_file *m, struct lock_time *lt)
> 419 {
> 420 seq_printf(m, "%14lu", lt->nr);
> 421 seq_time(m, lt->min);
> 422 seq_time(m, lt->max);
> 423 seq_time(m, lt->total);
> > 424 seq_time(m, lt->nr ? do_div(lt->total, lt->nr) : 0);
> 425 }
My compiler refuses to actually say that; but it looks wrong in that
do_div() returns the remainder, not the divisor.
Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|
|
Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
|