aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/futex.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2017-04-04rtmutex: Deboost before waking up the top waiterXunlei Pang1-4/+1
We should deboost before waking the high-priority task, such that we don't run two tasks with the same "state" (priority, deadline, sched_class, etc). In order to make sure the boosting task doesn't start running between unlock and deboost (due to 'spurious' wakeup), we move the deboost under the wait_lock, that way its serialized against the wait loop in __rt_mutex_slowlock(). Doing the deboost early can however lead to priority-inversion if current would get preempted after the deboost but before waking our high-prio task, hence we disable preemption before doing deboost, and enabling it after the wake up is over. This gets us the right semantic order, but most importantly however; this change ensures pointer stability for the next patch, where we have rt_mutex_setprio() cache a pointer to the top-most waiter task. If we, as before this change, do the wakeup first and then deboost, this pointer might point into thin air. [peterz: Changelog + patch munging] Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Drop hb->lock before enqueueing on the rtmutexPeter Zijlstra1-9/+21
When PREEMPT_RT_FULL does the spinlock -> rt_mutex substitution the PI chain code will (falsely) report a deadlock and BUG. The problem is that it hold hb->lock (now an rt_mutex) while doing task_blocks_on_rt_mutex on the futex's pi_state::rtmutex. This, when interleaved just right with futex_unlock_pi() leads it to believe to see an AB-BA deadlock. Task1 (holds rt_mutex, Task2 (does FUTEX_LOCK_PI) does FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI) lock hb->lock lock rt_mutex (as per start_proxy) lock hb->lock Which is a trivial AB-BA. It is not an actual deadlock, because it won't be holding hb->lock by the time it actually blocks on the rt_mutex, but the chainwalk code doesn't know that and it would be a nightmare to handle this gracefully. To avoid this problem, do the same as in futex_unlock_pi() and drop hb->lock after acquiring wait_lock. This still fully serializes against futex_unlock_pi(), since adding to the wait_list does the very same lock dance, and removing it holds both locks. Aside of solving the RT problem this makes the lock and unlock mechanism symetric and reduces the hb->lock held time. Reported-and-tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Futex_unlock_pi() determinismPeter Zijlstra1-13/+11
The problem with returning -EAGAIN when the waiter state mismatches is that it becomes very hard to proof a bounded execution time on the operation. And seeing that this is a RT operation, this is somewhat important. While in practise; given the previous patch; it will be very unlikely to ever really take more than one or two rounds, proving so becomes rather hard. However, now that modifying wait_list is done while holding both hb->lock and wait_lock, the scenario can be avoided entirely by acquiring wait_lock while still holding hb-lock. Doing a hand-over, without leaving a hole. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Rework futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock()Peter Zijlstra1-22/+55
By changing futex_lock_pi() to use rt_mutex_*_proxy_lock() all wait_list modifications are done under both hb->lock and wait_lock. This closes the obvious interleave pattern between futex_lock_pi() and futex_unlock_pi(), but not entirely so. See below: Before: futex_lock_pi() futex_unlock_pi() unlock hb->lock lock hb->lock unlock hb->lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock unlock rt_mutex_wait_lock -EAGAIN lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_add unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock schedule() lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_del unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock <idem> -EAGAIN lock hb->lock After: futex_lock_pi() futex_unlock_pi() lock hb->lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_add unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock unlock hb->lock schedule() lock hb->lock unlock hb->lock lock hb->lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock list_del unlock rt_mutex->wait_lock lock rt_mutex->wait_lock unlock rt_mutex_wait_lock -EAGAIN unlock hb->lock It does however solve the earlier starvation/live-lock scenario which got introduced with the -EAGAIN since unlike the before scenario; where the -EAGAIN happens while futex_unlock_pi() doesn't hold any locks; in the after scenario it happens while futex_unlock_pi() actually holds a lock, and then it is serialized on that lock. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex,rt_mutex: Restructure rt_mutex_finish_proxy_lock()Peter Zijlstra1-2/+5
With the ultimate goal of keeping rt_mutex wait_list and futex_q waiters consistent it's necessary to split 'rt_mutex_futex_lock()' into finer parts, such that only the actual blocking can be done without hb->lock held. Split split_mutex_finish_proxy_lock() into two parts, one that does the blocking and one that does remove_waiter() when the lock acquire failed. When the rtmutex was acquired successfully the waiter can be removed in the acquisiton path safely, since there is no concurrency on the lock owner. This means that, except for futex_lock_pi(), all wait_list modifications are done with both hb->lock and wait_lock held. [[email protected]: fix for futex_requeue_pi_signal_restart] Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex,rt_mutex: Introduce rt_mutex_init_waiter()Peter Zijlstra1-4/+1
Since there's already two copies of this code, introduce a helper now before adding a third one. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under hb->lockPeter Zijlstra1-54/+100
There's a number of 'interesting' problems, all caused by holding hb->lock while doing the rt_mutex_unlock() equivalient. Notably: - a PI inversion on hb->lock; and, - a SCHED_DEADLINE crash because of pointer instability. The previous changes: - changed the locking rules to cover {uval,pi_state} with wait_lock. - allow to do rt_mutex_futex_unlock() without dropping wait_lock; which in turn allows to rely on wait_lock atomicity completely. - simplified the waiter conundrum. It's now sufficient to hold rtmutex::wait_lock and a reference on the pi_state to protect the state consistency, so hb->lock can be dropped before calling rt_mutex_futex_unlock(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q statePeter Zijlstra1-36/+14
There is a weird state in the futex_unlock_pi() path when it interleaves with a concurrent futex_lock_pi() at the point where it drops hb->lock. In this case, it can happen that the rt_mutex wait_list and the futex_q disagree on pending waiters, in particular rt_mutex will find no pending waiters where futex_q thinks there are. In this case the rt_mutex unlock code cannot assign an owner. The futex side fixup code has to cleanup the inconsistencies with quite a bunch of interesting corner cases. Simplify all this by changing wake_futex_pi() to return -EAGAIN when this situation occurs. This then gives the futex_lock_pi() code the opportunity to continue and the retried futex_unlock_pi() will now observe a coherent state. The only problem is that this breaks RT timeliness guarantees. That is, consider the following scenario: T1 and T2 are both pinned to CPU0. prio(T2) > prio(T1) CPU0 T1 lock_pi() queue_me() <- Waiter is visible preemption T2 unlock_pi() loops with -EAGAIN forever Which is undesirable for PI primitives. Future patches will rectify this. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Cleanup refcountingPeter Zijlstra1-4/+9
Add a put_pit_state() as counterpart for get_pi_state() so the refcounting becomes consistent. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Change locking rulesPeter Zijlstra1-33/+132
Currently futex-pi relies on hb->lock to serialize everything. But hb->lock creates another set of problems, especially priority inversions on RT where hb->lock becomes a rt_mutex itself. The rt_mutex::wait_lock is the most obvious protection for keeping the futex user space value and the kernel internal pi_state in sync. Rework and document the locking so rt_mutex::wait_lock is held accross all operations which modify the user space value and the pi state. This allows to invoke rt_mutex_unlock() (including deboost) without holding hb->lock as a next step. Nothing yet relies on the new locking rules. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex,rt_mutex: Provide futex specific rt_mutex APIPeter Zijlstra1-16/+14
Part of what makes futex_unlock_pi() intricate is that rt_mutex_futex_unlock() -> rt_mutex_slowunlock() can drop rt_mutex::wait_lock. This means it cannot rely on the atomicy of wait_lock, which would be preferred in order to not rely on hb->lock so much. The reason rt_mutex_slowunlock() needs to drop wait_lock is because it can race with the rt_mutex fastpath, however futexes have their own fast path. Since futexes already have a bunch of separate rt_mutex accessors, complete that set and implement a rt_mutex variant without fastpath for them. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex()Peter Zijlstra1-2/+1
Since the futex_q can dissapear the instruction after assigning NULL, this really should be a RELEASE barrier. That stops loads from hitting dead memory too. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-23futex: Cleanup variable names for futex_top_waiter()Peter Zijlstra1-15/+15
futex_top_waiter() returns the top-waiter on the pi_mutex. Assinging this to a variable 'match' totally obscures the code. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-14futex: Add missing error handling to FUTEX_REQUEUE_PIPeter Zijlstra1-0/+2
Thomas spotted that fixup_pi_state_owner() can return errors and we fail to unlock the rt_mutex in that case. Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-14futex: Fix potential use-after-free in FUTEX_REQUEUE_PIPeter Zijlstra1-9/+11
While working on the futex code, I stumbled over this potential use-after-free scenario. Dmitry triggered it later with syzkaller. pi_mutex is a pointer into pi_state, which we drop the reference on in unqueue_me_pi(). So any access to that pointer after that is bad. Since other sites already do rt_mutex_unlock() with hb->lock held, see for example futex_lock_pi(), simply move the unlock before unqueue_me_pi(). Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2017-03-02sched/headers: Prepare for new header dependencies before moving code to ↵Ingo Molnar1-0/+1
<linux/sched/mm.h> We are going to split <linux/sched/mm.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/mm.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. The APIs that are going to be moved first are: mm_alloc() __mmdrop() mmdrop() mmdrop_async_fn() mmdrop_async() mmget_not_zero() mmput() mmput_async() get_task_mm() mm_access() mm_release() Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-03-02sched/headers: Prepare for new header dependencies before moving code to ↵Ingo Molnar1-0/+1
<linux/sched/wake_q.h> We are going to split <linux/sched/wake_q.h> out of <linux/sched.h>, which will have to be picked up from other headers and a couple of .c files. Create a trivial placeholder <linux/sched/wake_q.h> file that just maps to <linux/sched.h> to make this patch obviously correct and bisectable. Include the new header in the files that are going to need it. Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2017-02-27mm: add new mmgrab() helperVegard Nossum1-1/+1
Apart from adding the helper function itself, the rest of the kernel is converted mechanically using: git grep -l 'atomic_inc.*mm_count' | xargs sed -i 's/atomic_inc(&\(.*\)->mm_count);/mmgrab\(\1\);/' git grep -l 'atomic_inc.*mm_count' | xargs sed -i 's/atomic_inc(&\(.*\)\.mm_count);/mmgrab\(\&\1\);/' This is needed for a later patch that hooks into the helper, but might be a worthwhile cleanup on its own. (Michal Hocko provided most of the kerneldoc comment.) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2017-02-13futex: Move futex_init() to core_initcallYang Yang1-1/+1
The UEVENT user mode helper is enabled before the initcalls are executed and is available when the root filesystem has been mounted. The user mode helper is triggered by device init calls and the executable might use the futex syscall. futex_init() is marked __initcall which maps to device_initcall, but there is no guarantee that futex_init() is invoked _before_ the first device init call which triggers the UEVENT user mode helper. If the user mode helper uses the futex syscall before futex_init() then the syscall crashes with a NULL pointer dereference because the futex subsystem has not been initialized yet. Move futex_init() to core_initcall so futexes are initialized before the root filesystem is mounted and the usermode helper becomes available. [ tglx: Rewrote changelog ] Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-12-25ktime: Get rid of the unionThomas Gleixner1-2/+2
ktime is a union because the initial implementation stored the time in scalar nanoseconds on 64 bit machine and in a endianess optimized timespec variant for 32bit machines. The Y2038 cleanup removed the timespec variant and switched everything to scalar nanoseconds. The union remained, but become completely pointless. Get rid of the union and just keep ktime_t as simple typedef of type s64. The conversion was done with coccinelle and some manual mopping up. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
2016-11-21sched/wake_q: Rename WAKE_Q to DEFINE_WAKE_QWaiman Long1-4/+4
Currently the wake_q data structure is defined by the WAKE_Q() macro. This macro, however, looks like a function doing something as "wake" is a verb. Even checkpatch.pl was confused as it reported warnings like WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations #548: FILE: kernel/futex.c:3665: + int ret; + WAKE_Q(wake_q); This patch renames the WAKE_Q() macro to DEFINE_WAKE_Q() which clarifies what the macro is doing and eliminates the checkpatch.pl warnings. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <[email protected]> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] [ Resolved conflict and added missing rename. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-09-05futex: Add some more function commentryThomas Gleixner1-3/+12
Add some more comments and reformat existing ones to kernel doc style. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-07-29futex: Assume all mappings are private on !MMU systemsThomas Gleixner1-1/+22
To quote Rick why there is no need for shared mapping on !MMU systems: |With MMU, shared futex keys need to identify the physical backing for |a memory address because it may be mapped at different addresses in |different processes (or even multiple times in the same process). |Without MMU this cannot happen. You only have physical addresses. So |the "private futex" behavior of using the virtual address as the key |is always correct (for both shared and private cases) on nommu |systems. This patch disables the FLAGS_SHARED in a way that allows the compiler to remove that code. [bigeasy: Added changelog ] Reported-by: Rich Felker <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-06-08futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for file-based futexesMel Gorman1-3/+11
Mike Galbraith reported that the LTP test case futex_wake04 was broken by commit 65d8fc777f6d ("futex: Remove requirement for lock_page() in get_futex_key()"). This test case uses futexes backed by hugetlbfs pages and so there is an associated inode with a futex stored on such pages. The problem is that the key is being calculated based on the head page index of the hugetlbfs page and not the tail page. Prior to the optimisation, the page lock was used to stabilise mappings and pin the inode is file-backed which is overkill. If the page was a compound page, the head page was automatically looked up as part of the page lock operation but the tail page index was used to calculate the futex key. After the optimisation, the compound head is looked up early and the page lock is only relied upon to identify truncated pages, special pages or a shmem page moving to swapcache. The head page is looked up because without the page lock, special care has to be taken to pin the inode correctly. However, the tail page is still required to calculate the futex key so this patch records the tail page. On vanilla 4.6, the output of the test case is; futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152 futex_wake04 1 TFAIL : futex_wake04.c:126: Bug: wait_thread2 did not wake after 30 secs. With the patch applied futex_wake04 0 TINFO : Hugepagesize 2097152 futex_wake04 1 TPASS : Hi hydra, thread2 awake! Fixes: 65d8fc777f6d "futex: Remove requirement for lock_page() in get_futex_key()" Reported-and-tested-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-05-22x86: remove more uaccess_32.h complexityLinus Torvalds1-1/+1
I'm looking at trying to possibly merge the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of the x86 uaccess.h implementation, but first this needs to be cleaned up. For example, the 32-bit version of "__copy_from_user_inatomic()" is mostly the special cases for the constant size, and it's actually almost never relevant. Most users aren't actually using a constant size anyway, and the few cases that do small constant copies are better off just using __get_user() instead. So get rid of the unnecessary complexity. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2016-04-21futex: Acknowledge a new waiter in counter before plistDavidlohr Bueso1-1/+1
Otherwise an incoming waker on the dest hash bucket can miss the waiter adding itself to the plist during the lockless check optimization (small window but still the correct way of doing this); similarly to the decrement counterpart. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-04-20futex: Handle unlock_pi race gracefullySebastian Andrzej Siewior1-3/+22
If userspace calls UNLOCK_PI unconditionally without trying the TID -> 0 transition in user space first then the user space value might not have the waiters bit set. This opens the following race: CPU0 CPU1 uval = get_user(futex) lock(hb) lock(hb) futex |= FUTEX_WAITERS .... unlock(hb) cmpxchg(futex, uval, newval) So the cmpxchg fails and returns -EINVAL to user space, which is wrong because the futex value is valid. To handle this (yes, yet another) corner case gracefully, check for a flag change and retry. [ tglx: Massaged changelog and slightly reworked implementation ] Fixes: ccf9e6a80d9e ("futex: Make unlock_pi more robust") Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-03-08futex: Replace barrier() in unqueue_me() with READ_ONCE()Jianyu Zhan1-2/+6
Commit e91467ecd1ef ("bug in futex unqueue_me") introduced a barrier() in unqueue_me() to prevent the compiler from rereading the lock pointer which might change after a check for NULL. Replace the barrier() with a READ_ONCE() for the following reasons: 1) READ_ONCE() is a weaker form of barrier() that affects only the specific load operation, while barrier() is a general compiler level memory barrier. READ_ONCE() was not available at the time when the barrier was added. 2) Aside of that READ_ONCE() is descriptive and self explainatory while a barrier without comment is not clear to the casual reader. No functional change. [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <[email protected]> Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> Acked-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2016-02-17futex: Remove requirement for lock_page() in get_futex_key()Mel Gorman1-8/+91
When dealing with key handling for shared futexes, we can drastically reduce the usage/need of the page lock. 1) For anonymous pages, the associated futex object is the mm_struct which does not require the page lock. 2) For inode based, keys, we can check under RCU read lock if the page mapping is still valid and take reference to the inode. This just leaves one rare race that requires the page lock in the slow path when examining the swapcache. Additionally realtime users currently have a problem with the page lock being contended for unbounded periods of time during futex operations. Task A get_futex_key() lock_page() ---> preempted Now any other task trying to lock that page will have to wait until task A gets scheduled back in, which is an unbound time. With this patch, we pretty much have a lockless futex_get_key(). Experiments show that this patch can boost/speedup the hashing of shared futexes with the perf futex benchmarks (which is good for measuring such change) by up to 45% when there are high (> 100) thread counts on a 60 core Westmere. Lower counts are pretty much in the noise range or less than 10%, but mid range can be seen at over 30% overall throughput (hash ops/sec). This makes anon-mem shared futexes much closer to its private counterpart. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> [ Ported on top of thp refcount rework, changelog, comments, fixes. ] Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Mason <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-02-17futex: Rename barrier references in ordering guaranteesDavidlohr Bueso1-17/+17
Ingo suggested we rename how we reference barriers A and B regarding futex ordering guarantees. This patch replaces, for both barriers, MB (A) with smp_mb(); (A), such that: - We explicitly state that the barriers are SMP, and - We standardize how we reference these across futex.c helping readers follow what barrier does what and where. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Chris Mason <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
2016-01-26rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safeThomas Gleixner1-9/+9
Sasha reported a lockdep splat about a potential deadlock between RCU boosting rtmutex and the posix timer it_lock. CPU0 CPU1 rtmutex_lock(&rcu->rt_mutex) spin_lock(&rcu->rt_mutex.wait_lock) local_irq_disable() spin_lock(&timer->it_lock) spin_lock(&rcu->mutex.wait_lock) --> Interrupt spin_lock(&timer->it_lock) This is caused by the following code sequence on CPU1 rcu_read_lock() x = lookup(); if (x) spin_lock_irqsave(&x->it_lock); rcu_read_unlock(); return x; We could fix that in the posix timer code by keeping rcu read locked across the spinlocked and irq disabled section, but the above sequence is common and there is no reason not to support it. Taking rt_mutex.wait_lock irq safe prevents the deadlock. Reported-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Paul McKenney <[email protected]>
2016-01-20ptrace: use fsuid, fsgid, effective creds for fs access checksJann Horn1-1/+1
By checking the effective credentials instead of the real UID / permitted capabilities, ensure that the calling process actually intended to use its credentials. To ensure that all ptrace checks use the correct caller credentials (e.g. in case out-of-tree code or newly added code omits the PTRACE_MODE_*CREDS flag), use two new flags and require one of them to be set. The problem was that when a privileged task had temporarily dropped its privileges, e.g. by calling setreuid(0, user_uid), with the intent to perform following syscalls with the credentials of a user, it still passed ptrace access checks that the user would not be able to pass. While an attacker should not be able to convince the privileged task to perform a ptrace() syscall, this is a problem because the ptrace access check is reused for things in procfs. In particular, the following somewhat interesting procfs entries only rely on ptrace access checks: /proc/$pid/stat - uses the check for determining whether pointers should be visible, useful for bypassing ASLR /proc/$pid/maps - also useful for bypassing ASLR /proc/$pid/cwd - useful for gaining access to restricted directories that contain files with lax permissions, e.g. in this scenario: lrwxrwxrwx root root /proc/13020/cwd -> /root/foobar drwx------ root root /root drwxr-xr-x root root /root/foobar -rw-r--r-- root root /root/foobar/secret Therefore, on a system where a root-owned mode 6755 binary changes its effective credentials as described and then dumps a user-specified file, this could be used by an attacker to reveal the memory layout of root's processes or reveal the contents of files he is not allowed to access (through /proc/$pid/cwd). [[email protected]: fix warning] Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <[email protected]> Acked-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Cc: James Morris <[email protected]> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <[email protected]> Cc: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2016-01-15mm: bring in additional flag for fixup_user_fault to signal unlockDominik Dingel1-1/+1
During Jason's work with postcopy migration support for s390 a problem regarding gmap faults was discovered. The gmap code will call fixup_user_fault which will end up always in handle_mm_fault. Till now we never cared about retries, but as the userfaultfd code kind of relies on it. this needs some fix. This patchset does not take care of the futex code. I will now look closer at this. This patch (of 2): With the introduction of userfaultfd, kvm on s390 needs fixup_user_fault to pass in FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and give feedback if during the faulting we ever unlocked mmap_sem. This patch brings in the logic to handle retries as well as it cleans up the current documentation. fixup_user_fault was not having the same semantics as filemap_fault. It never indicated if a retry happened and so a caller wasn't able to handle that case. So we now changed the behaviour to always retry a locked mmap_sem. Signed-off-by: Dominik Dingel <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <[email protected]> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]> Cc: "Jason J. Herne" <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Cc: Eric B Munson <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Heiko Carstens <[email protected]> Cc: Dominik Dingel <[email protected]> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2016-01-15futex, thp: remove special case for THP in get_futex_keyKirill A. Shutemov1-49/+14
With new THP refcounting, we don't need tricks to stabilize huge page. If we've got reference to tail page, it can't split under us. This patch effectively reverts a5b338f2b0b1 ("thp: update futex compound knowledge"). Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <[email protected]> Tested-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]> Tested-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <[email protected]> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <[email protected]> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <[email protected]> Cc: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]> Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]> Cc: Naoya Horiguchi <[email protected]> Cc: Steve Capper <[email protected]> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]> Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Cc: David Rientjes <[email protected]> Tested-by: Artem Savkov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
2015-12-20futex: Allow FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME with FUTEX_WAIT opDarren Hart1-1/+2
While reviewing Michael Kerrisk's recent futex manpage update, I noticed that we allow the FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME flag for FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET but not for FUTEX_WAIT. FUTEX_WAIT is treated as a simple version for FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET internally (with a bitmask of FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY). As such, I cannot come up with a reason for this exclusion for FUTEX_WAIT. This change does modify the behavior of the futex syscall, changing a call with FUTEX_WAIT | FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME from returning -ENOSYS, to be equivalent to FUTEX_WAIT_BITSET | FUTEX_CLOCK_REALTIME with a bitset of FUTEX_BITSET_MATCH_ANY. Reported-by: Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9f3bdc116d79d23f5ee72ceb9a2a857f5ff8fa29.1450474525.git.dvhart@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-12-20futex: Cleanup the goto confusion in requeue_pi()Thomas Gleixner1-2/+7
out_unlock: does not only drop the locks, it also drops the refcount on the pi_state. Really intuitive. Move the label after the put_pi_state() call and use 'break' in the error handling path of the requeue loop. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Andy Lowe <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-12-20futex: Remove pointless put_pi_state calls in requeue()Thomas Gleixner1-4/+2
In the error handling cases we neither have pi_state nor a reference to it. Remove the pointless code. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Andy Lowe <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-12-20futex: Document pi_state refcounting in requeue codeThomas Gleixner1-12/+39
Documentation of the pi_state refcounting in the requeue code is non existent. Add it. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Andy Lowe <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-12-20futex: Rename free_pi_state() to put_pi_state()Thomas Gleixner1-7/+10
free_pi_state() is confusing as it is in fact only freeing/caching the pi state when the last reference is gone. Rename it to put_pi_state() which reflects better what it is doing. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Andy Lowe <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-12-20futex: Drop refcount if requeue_pi() acquired the rtmutexThomas Gleixner1-0/+5
If the proxy lock in the requeue loop acquires the rtmutex for a waiter then it acquired also refcount on the pi_state related to the futex, but the waiter side does not drop the reference count. Add the missing free_pi_state() call. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Andy Lowe <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected]
2015-11-04Merge tag 'driver-core-4.4-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core Pull driver core updates from Greg KH: "Here's the "big" driver core updates for 4.4-rc1. Primarily a bunch of debugfs updates, with a smattering of minor driver core fixes and updates as well. All have been in linux-next for a long time" * tag 'driver-core-4.4-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core: debugfs: Add debugfs_create_ulong() of: to support binding numa node to specified device in devicetree debugfs: Add read-only/write-only bool file ops debugfs: Add read-only/write-only size_t file ops debugfs: Add read-only/write-only x64 file ops debugfs: Consolidate file mode checks in debugfs_create_*() Revert "mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering" driver-core: platform: Provide helpers for multi-driver modules mm: Check if section present during memory block (un)registering devres: fix a for loop bounds check CMA: fix CONFIG_CMA_SIZE_MBYTES overflow in 64bit base/platform: assert that dev_pm_domain callbacks are called unconditionally sysfs: correctly handle short reads on PREALLOC attrs. base: soc: siplify ida usage kobject: move EXPORT_SYMBOL() macros next to corresponding definitions kobject: explain what kobject's sd field is debugfs: document that debugfs_remove*() accepts NULL and error values debugfs: Pass bool pointer to debugfs_create_bool() ACPI / EC: Fix broken 64bit big-endian users of 'global_lock'
2015-10-04debugfs: Pass bool pointer to debugfs_create_bool()Viresh Kumar1-2/+2
Its a bit odd that debugfs_create_bool() takes 'u32 *' as an argument, when all it needs is a boolean pointer. It would be better to update this API to make it accept 'bool *' instead, as that will make it more consistent and often more convenient. Over that bool takes just a byte. That required updates to all user sites as well, in the same commit updating the API. regmap core was also using debugfs_{read|write}_file_bool(), directly and variable types were updated for that to be bool as well. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> Acked-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
2015-09-22futex: Force hot variables into a single cache lineRasmus Villemoes1-2/+11
futex_hash() references two global variables: the base pointer futex_queues and the size of the array futex_hashsize. The latter is marked __read_mostly, while the former is not, so they are likely to end up very far from each other. This means that futex_hash() is likely to encounter two cache misses. We could mark futex_queues as __read_mostly as well, but that doesn't guarantee they'll end up next to each other (and even if they do, they may still end up in different cache lines). So put the two variables in a small singleton struct with sufficient alignment and mark that as __read_mostly. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: kbuild test robot <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-07-20futex: Make should_fail_futex() statickbuild test robot1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]> Cc: Brian Silverman <[email protected]> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]> Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-07-20futex: Fault/error injection capabilitiesDavidlohr Bueso1-2/+87
Although futexes are well known for being a royal pita, we really have very little debugging capabilities - except for relying on tglx's eye half the time. By simply making use of the existing fault-injection machinery, we can improve this situation, allowing generating artificial uaddress faults and deadlock scenarios. Of course, when this is disabled in production systems, the overhead for failure checks is practically zero -- so this is very cheap at the same time. Future work would be nice to now enhance trinity to make use of this. There is a special tunable 'ignore-private', which can filter out private futexes. Given the tsk->make_it_fail filter and this option, pi futexes can be narrowed down pretty closely. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-07-20futex: Enhance comments in futex_lock_pi() for blocking pathsDavidlohr Bueso1-2/+9
... serves a bit better to clarify between blocking and non-blocking code paths. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Darren Hart <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
2015-06-24Merge branch 'sched-locking-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-3/+29
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Thomas Gleixner: "These locking updates depend on the alreay merged sched/core branch: - Lockless top waiter wakeup for rtmutex (Davidlohr) - Reduce hash bucket lock contention for PI futexes (Sebastian) - Documentation update (Davidlohr)" * 'sched-locking-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: locking/rtmutex: Update stale plist comments futex: Lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake up locking/rtmutex: Implement lockless top-waiter wakeup
2015-06-22Merge branch 'timers-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-4/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull timer updates from Thomas Gleixner: "A rather largish update for everything time and timer related: - Cache footprint optimizations for both hrtimers and timer wheel - Lower the NOHZ impact on systems which have NOHZ or timer migration disabled at runtime. - Optimize run time overhead of hrtimer interrupt by making the clock offset updates smarter - hrtimer cleanups and removal of restrictions to tackle some problems in sched/perf - Some more leap second tweaks - Another round of changes addressing the 2038 problem - First step to change the internals of clock event devices by introducing the necessary infrastructure - Allow constant folding for usecs/msecs_to_jiffies() - The usual pile of clockevent/clocksource driver updates The hrtimer changes contain updates to sched, perf and x86 as they depend on them plus changes all over the tree to cleanup API changes and redundant code, which got copied all over the place. The y2038 changes touch s390 to remove the last non 2038 safe code related to boot/persistant clock" * 'timers-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (114 commits) clocksource: Increase dependencies of timer-stm32 to limit build wreckage timer: Minimize nohz off overhead timer: Reduce timer migration overhead if disabled timer: Stats: Simplify the flags handling timer: Replace timer base by a cpu index timer: Use hlist for the timer wheel hash buckets timer: Remove FIFO "guarantee" timers: Sanitize catchup_timer_jiffies() usage hrtimer: Allow hrtimer::function() to free the timer seqcount: Introduce raw_write_seqcount_barrier() seqcount: Rename write_seqcount_barrier() hrtimer: Fix hrtimer_is_queued() hole hrtimer: Remove HRTIMER_STATE_MIGRATE selftest: Timers: Avoid signal deadlock in leap-a-day timekeeping: Copy the shadow-timekeeper over the real timekeeper last clockevents: Check state instead of mode in suspend/resume path selftests: timers: Add leap-second timer edge testing to leap-a-day.c ntp: Do leapsecond adjustment in adjtimex read path time: Prevent early expiry of hrtimers[CLOCK_REALTIME] at the leap second edge ntp: Introduce and use SECS_PER_DAY macro instead of 86400 ...
2015-06-22Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-16/+17
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes are: - lockless wakeup support for futexes and IPC message queues (Davidlohr Bueso, Peter Zijlstra) - Replace spinlocks with atomics in thread_group_cputimer(), to improve scalability (Jason Low) - NUMA balancing improvements (Rik van Riel) - SCHED_DEADLINE improvements (Wanpeng Li) - clean up and reorganize preemption helpers (Frederic Weisbecker) - decouple page fault disabling machinery from the preemption counter, to improve debuggability and robustness (David Hildenbrand) - SCHED_DEADLINE documentation updates (Luca Abeni) - topology CPU masks cleanups (Bartosz Golaszewski) - /proc/sched_debug improvements (Srikar Dronamraju)" * 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (79 commits) sched/deadline: Remove needless parameter in dl_runtime_exceeded() sched: Remove superfluous resetting of the p->dl_throttled flag sched/deadline: Drop duplicate init_sched_dl_class() declaration sched/deadline: Reduce rq lock contention by eliminating locking of non-feasible target sched/deadline: Make init_sched_dl_class() __init sched/deadline: Optimize pull_dl_task() sched/preempt: Add static_key() to preempt_notifiers sched/preempt: Fix preempt notifiers documentation about hlist_del() within unsafe iteration sched/stop_machine: Fix deadlock between multiple stop_two_cpus() sched/debug: Add sum_sleep_runtime to /proc/<pid>/sched sched/debug: Replace vruntime with wait_sum in /proc/sched_debug sched/debug: Properly format runnable tasks in /proc/sched_debug sched/numa: Only consider less busy nodes as numa balancing destinations Revert 095bebf61a46 ("sched/numa: Do not move past the balance point if unbalanced") sched/fair: Prevent throttling in early pick_next_task_fair() preempt: Reorganize the notrace definitions a bit preempt: Use preempt_schedule_context() as the official tracing preemption point sched: Make preempt_schedule_context() function-tracing safe x86: Remove cpu_sibling_mask() and cpu_core_mask() x86: Replace cpu_**_mask() with topology_**_cpumask() ...
2015-06-19futex: Lower the lock contention on the HB lock during wake upSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-3/+29
wake_futex_pi() wakes the task before releasing the hash bucket lock (HB). The first thing the woken up task usually does is to acquire the lock which requires the HB lock. On SMP Systems this leads to blocking on the HB lock which is released by the owner shortly after. This patch rearranges the unlock path by first releasing the HB lock and then waking up the task. [ tglx: Fixed up the rtmutex unlock path ] Originally-from: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> Cc: Steven Rostedt <[email protected]> Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <[email protected]> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>