| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
When "arg#%d expected pointer to ctx, but got %s" error is printed, both
template parts actually point to the type of the argument, therefore, it
will also say "but got PTR", regardless of what was the actual register
type.
Fix the message to print the register type in the second part of the
template, change the existing test to adapt to the new format, and add a
new test to test the case when arg is a pointer to context, but reg is a
scalar.
Fixes: 00b85860feb8 ("bpf: Rewrite kfunc argument handling")
Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Associate tracepoint and perf event program types with the kfunc tracing
hook. This allows calling kfuncs within these types of programs.
Signed-off-by: JP Kobryn <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This improves BTF data recorded about this function and makes
debugging/tracing better, because now command can be displayed as
symbolic name, instead of obscure number.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Commit 980ca8ceeae6 ("bpf: check bpf_dummy_struct_ops program params for
test runs") does bitwise AND between reg_type and PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which
is correct, but due to type difference the compiler complains:
net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c:118:31: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('const enum bpf_reg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
118 | if (info && (info->reg_type & PTR_MAYBE_NULL))
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Workaround the warning by moving the type_may_be_null() helper from
verifier.c into bpf_verifier.h, and reuse it here to check whether param
is nullable.
Fixes: 980ca8ceeae6 ("bpf: check bpf_dummy_struct_ops program params for test runs")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
There is a report on new indentation issue in epilogue_idx.
This patch fixed it.
Fixes: 169c31761c8d ("bpf: Add gen_epilogue to bpf_verifier_ops")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch removes the insn_buf array stack usage from the
inline_bpf_loop(). Instead, the env->insn_buf is used. The
usage in inline_bpf_loop() needs more than 16 insn, so the
INSN_BUF_SIZE needs to be increased from 16 to 32.
The compiler stack size warning on the verifier is gone
after this change.
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
If the length of the name string is 1 and the value of name[0] is NULL
byte, an OOB vulnerability occurs in btf_name_valid_section() and the
return value is true, so the invalid name passes the check.
To solve this, you need to check if the first position is NULL byte and
if the first character is printable.
Suggested-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Fixes: bd70a8fb7ca4 ("bpf: Allow all printable characters in BTF DATASEC names")
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
|
|
The pointer returned by btf_parse_base could be an error pointer.
IS_ERR() check is needed before calling btf_free(base_btf).
Fixes: 8646db238997 ("libbpf,bpf: Share BTF relocate-related code with kernel")
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Replace fput() with sockfd_put() in bpf_fd_reuseport_array_update_elem().
Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
According to the documentation, when building a kernel with the C=2
parameter, all source files should be checked. But this does not happen
for the kernel/bpf/ directory.
$ touch kernel/bpf/core.o
$ make C=2 CHECK=true kernel/bpf/core.o
Outputs:
CHECK scripts/mod/empty.c
CALL scripts/checksyscalls.sh
DESCEND objtool
INSTALL libsubcmd_headers
CC kernel/bpf/core.o
As can be seen the compilation is done, but CHECK is not executed. This
happens because kernel/bpf/Makefile has defined its own rule for
compilation and forgotten the macro that does the check.
There is no need to duplicate the build code, and this rule can be
removed to use generic rules.
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Oleg Nesterov <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Gladkov <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently we cannot pass the pointer returned by iter next method as
argument to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS or KF_RCU kfuncs, because the pointer
returned by iter next method is not "valid".
This patch sets the pointer returned by iter next method to be valid.
This is based on the fact that if the iterator is implemented correctly,
then the pointer returned from the iter next method should be valid.
This does not make NULL pointer valid. If the iter next method has
KF_RET_NULL flag, then the verifier will ask the ebpf program to
check NULL pointer.
KF_RCU_PROTECTED iterator is a special case, the pointer returned by
iter next method should only be valid within RCU critical section,
so it should be with MEM_RCU, not PTR_TRUSTED.
Another special case is bpf_iter_num_next, which returns a pointer with
base type PTR_TO_MEM. PTR_TO_MEM should not be combined with type flag
PTR_TRUSTED (PTR_TO_MEM already means the pointer is valid).
The pointer returned by iter next method of other types of iterators
is with PTR_TRUSTED.
In addition, this patch adds get_iter_from_state to help us get the
current iterator from the current state.
Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB584869F8B448EA1C87B7CDA399962@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The bpf_testmod needs to use the bpf_tail_call helper in
a later selftest patch. This patch is to EXPORT_GPL_SYMBOL
the bpf_base_func_proto.
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch adds a .gen_epilogue to the bpf_verifier_ops. It is similar
to the existing .gen_prologue. Instead of allowing a subsystem
to run code at the beginning of a bpf prog, it allows the subsystem
to run code just before the bpf prog exit.
One of the use case is to allow the upcoming bpf qdisc to ensure that
the skb->dev is the same as the qdisc->dev_queue->dev. The bpf qdisc
struct_ops implementation could either fix it up or drop the skb.
Another use case could be in bpf_tcp_ca.c to enforce snd_cwnd
has sane value (e.g. non zero).
The epilogue can do the useful thing (like checking skb->dev) if it
can access the bpf prog's ctx. Unlike prologue, r1 may not hold the
ctx pointer. This patch saves the r1 in the stack if the .gen_epilogue
has returned some instructions in the "epilogue_buf".
The existing .gen_prologue is done in convert_ctx_accesses().
The new .gen_epilogue is done in the convert_ctx_accesses() also.
When it sees the (BPF_JMP | BPF_EXIT) instruction, it will be patched
with the earlier generated "epilogue_buf". The epilogue patching is
only done for the main prog.
Only one epilogue will be patched to the main program. When the
bpf prog has multiple BPF_EXIT instructions, a BPF_JA is used
to goto the earlier patched epilogue. Majority of the archs
support (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA): x86, arm, s390, risv64, loongarch,
powerpc and arc. This patch keeps it simple and always
use (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA). A new macro BPF_JMP32_A is added to
generate the (BPF_JMP32 | BPF_JA) insn.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The next patch will add a ctx ptr saving instruction
"(r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -8)" at the beginning for the main prog
when there is an epilogue patch (by the .gen_epilogue() verifier
ops added in the next patch).
There is one corner case if the bpf prog has a BPF_JMP that jumps
to the 1st instruction. It needs an adjustment such that
those BPF_JMP instructions won't jump to the newly added
ctx saving instruction.
The commit 5337ac4c9b80 ("bpf: Fix the corner case with may_goto and jump to the 1st insn.")
has the details on this case.
Note that the jump back to 1st instruction is not limited to the
ctx ptr saving instruction. The same also applies to the prologue.
A later test, pro_epilogue_goto_start.c, has a test for the prologue
only case.
Thus, this patch does one adjustment after gen_prologue and
the future ctx ptr saving. It is done by
adjust_jmp_off(env->prog, 0, delta) where delta has the total
number of instructions in the prologue and
the future ctx ptr saving instruction.
The adjust_jmp_off(env->prog, 0, delta) assumes that the
prologue does not have a goto 1st instruction itself.
To accommodate the prologue might have a goto 1st insn itself,
this patch changes the adjust_jmp_off() to skip considering
the instructions between [tgt_idx, tgt_idx + delta).
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch moves the 'struct bpf_insn insn_buf[16]' stack usage
to the bpf_verifier_env. A '#define INSN_BUF_SIZE 16' is also added
to replace the ARRAY_SIZE(insn_buf) usages.
Both convert_ctx_accesses() and do_misc_fixup() are changed
to use the env->insn_buf.
It is a refactoring work for adding the epilogue_buf[16] in a later patch.
With this patch, the stack size usage decreased.
Before:
./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22133:5: warning: stack frame size (2584)
After:
./kernel/bpf/verifier.c:22184:5: warning: stack frame size (2264)
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Use kvmemdup instead of kvmalloc() + memcpy() to simplify the
code.
No functional change intended.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hongbo Li <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently we cannot pass zero offset (implicit cast) or non-zero offset
pointers to KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs. This is because KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs
requires strict type matching, but zero offset or non-zero offset does
not change the type of pointer, which causes the ebpf program to be
rejected by the verifier.
This can cause some problems, one example is that bpf_skb_peek_tail
kfunc [0] cannot be implemented by just passing in non-zero offset
pointers. We cannot pass pointers like &sk->sk_write_queue (non-zero
offset) or &sk->__sk_common (zero offset) to KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs.
This patch makes KF_ACQUIRE kfuncs not require strict type matching.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/AM6PR03MB5848CA39CB4B7A4397D380B099B12@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com/
Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/AM6PR03MB5848FD2BD89BF0B6B5AA3B4C99952@AM6PR03MB5848.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This adds a kfunc wrapper around strncpy_from_user,
which can be called from sleepable BPF programs.
This matches the non-sleepable 'bpf_probe_read_user_str'
helper except it includes an additional 'flags'
param, which allows consumers to clear the entire
destination buffer on success or failure.
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently, users can only stash kptr into map values with bpf_kptr_xchg().
This patch further supports stashing kptr into local kptr by adding local
kptr as a valid destination type.
When stashing into local kptr, btf_record in program BTF is used instead
of btf_record in map to search for the btf_field of the local kptr.
The local kptr specific checks in check_reg_type() only apply when the
source argument of bpf_kptr_xchg() is local kptr. Therefore, we make the
scope of the check explicit as the destination now can also be local kptr.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
ARG_PTR_TO_KPTR is currently only used by the bpf_kptr_xchg helper.
Although it limits reg types for that helper's first arg to
PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, any arbitrary mapval won't do: further custom
verification logic ensures that the mapval reg being xchgd-into is
pointing to a kptr field. If this is not the case, it's not safe to xchg
into that reg's pointee.
Let's rename the bpf_arg_type to more accurately describe the fairly
specific expectations that this arg type encodes.
This is a nonfunctional change.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently btf_parse_fields is used in two places to create struct
btf_record's for structs: when looking at mapval type, and when looking
at any struct in program BTF. The former looks for kptr fields while the
latter does not. This patch modifies the btf_parse_fields call made when
looking at prog BTF struct types to search for kptrs as well.
Before this series there was no reason to search for kptrs in non-mapval
types: a referenced kptr needs some owner to guarantee resource cleanup,
and map values were the only owner that supported this. If a struct with
a kptr field were to have some non-kptr-aware owner, the kptr field
might not be properly cleaned up and result in resources leaking. Only
searching for kptr fields in mapval was a simple way to avoid this
problem.
In practice, though, searching for BPF_KPTR when populating
struct_meta_tab does not expose us to this risk, as struct_meta_tab is
only accessed through btf_find_struct_meta helper, and that helper is
only called in contexts where recognizing the kptr field is safe:
* PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg w/ MEM_ALLOC flag
* Such a reg is a local kptr and must be free'd via bpf_obj_drop,
which will correctly handle kptr field
* When handling specific kfuncs which either expect MEM_ALLOC input or
return MEM_ALLOC output (obj_{new,drop}, percpu_obj_{new,drop},
list+rbtree funcs, refcount_acquire)
* Will correctly handle kptr field for same reasons as above
* When looking at kptr pointee type
* Called by functions which implement "correct kptr resource
handling"
* In btf_check_and_fixup_fields
* Helper that ensures no ownership loops for lists and rbtrees,
doesn't care about kptr field existence
So we should be able to find BPF_KPTR fields in all prog BTF structs
without leaking resources.
Further patches in the series will build on this change to support
kptr_xchg into non-mapval local kptr. Without this change there would be
no kptr field found in such a type.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
btf_parse_kptr() and btf_record_free() do btf_get() and btf_put()
respectively when working on btf_record in program and map if there are
kptr fields. If the kptr is from program BTF, since both callers has
already tracked the life cycle of program BTF, it is safe to remove the
btf_get() and btf_put().
This change prevents memory leak of program BTF later when we start
searching for kptr fields when building btf_record for program. It can
happen when the btf fd is closed. The btf_put() corresponding to the
btf_get() in btf_parse_kptr() was supposed to be called by
btf_record_free() in btf_free_struct_meta_tab() in btf_free(). However,
it will never happen since the invocation of btf_free() depends on the
refcount of the btf to become 0 in the first place.
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Cross-merge bpf fixes after downstream PR including
important fixes (from bpf-next point of view):
commit 41c24102af7b ("selftests/bpf: Filter out _GNU_SOURCE when compiling test_cpp")
commit fdad456cbcca ("bpf: Fix updating attached freplace prog in prog_array map")
No conflicts.
Adjacent changes in:
include/linux/bpf_verifier.h
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
do_misc_fixups() relaces bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() and bpf_rdonly_cast()
by a single instruction "r0 = r1". This follows bpf_fastcall contract.
This commit allows bpf_fastcall pattern rewrite for these two
functions in order to use them in bpf_fastcall selftests.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Recognize bpf_fastcall patterns around kfunc calls.
For example, suppose bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() follows bpf_fastcall
contract (which it does), in such a case allow verifier to rewrite BPF
program below:
r2 = 1;
*(u64 *)(r10 - 32) = r2;
call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx];
r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 32);
r0 = r2;
By removing the spill/fill pair:
r2 = 1;
call %[bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx];
r0 = r2;
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Attribute used by LLVM implementation of the feature had been changed
from no_caller_saved_registers to bpf_fastcall (see [1]).
This commit replaces references to nocsr by references to bpf_fastcall
to keep LLVM and Kernel parts in sync.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/105417
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
In arraymap.c:
In bpf_array_map_seq_start() and bpf_array_map_seq_next()
cast return values from the __percpu address space to
the generic address space via uintptr_t [1].
Correct the declaration of pptr pointer in __bpf_array_map_seq_show()
to void __percpu * and cast the value from the generic address
space to the __percpu address space via uintptr_t [1].
In hashtab.c:
Assign the return value from bpf_mem_cache_alloc() to void pointer
and cast the value to void __percpu ** (void pointer to percpu void
pointer) before dereferencing.
In memalloc.c:
Explicitly declare __percpu variables.
Cast obj to void __percpu **.
In helpers.c:
Cast ptr in BPF_CALL_1 and BPF_CALL_2 from generic address space
to __percpu address space via const uintptr_t [1].
Found by GCC's named address space checks.
There were no changes in the resulting object files.
[1] https://sparse.docs.kernel.org/en/latest/annotations.html#address-space-name
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Cc: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Cc: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Cc: KP Singh <[email protected]>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]>
Cc: Hao Luo <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
In case of malformed relocation record of kind BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL
referencing a non-existing BTF type, function bpf_core_calc_relo_insn
would cause a null pointer deference.
Fix this by adding a proper check upper in call stack, as malformed
relocation records could be passed from user space.
Simplest reproducer is a program:
r0 = 0
exit
With a single relocation record:
.insn_off = 0, /* patch first instruction */
.type_id = 100500, /* this type id does not exist */
.access_str_off = 6, /* offset of string "0" */
.kind = BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL,
See the link for original reproducer or next commit for a test case.
Fixes: 74753e1462e7 ("libbpf: Replace btf__type_by_id() with btf_type_by_id().")
Reported-by: Liu RuiTong <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAK55_s6do7C+DVwbwY_7nKfUz0YLDoiA1v6X3Y9+p0sWzipFSA@mail.gmail.com/
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
There are potentially useful cases where a specific iterator type might
need to be passed into some kfunc. So, in addition to existing
bpf_iter_<type>_{new,next,destroy}() kfuncs, allow to pass iterator
pointer to any kfunc.
We employ "__iter" naming suffix for arguments that are meant to accept
iterators. We also enforce that they accept PTR -> STRUCT btf_iter_<type>
type chain and point to a valid initialized on-the-stack iterator state.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Verifier enforces that all iterator structs are named `bpf_iter_<name>`
and that whenever iterator is passed to a kfunc it's passed as a valid PTR ->
STRUCT chain (with potentially const modifiers in between).
We'll need this check for upcoming changes, so instead of duplicating
the logic, extract it into a helper function.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The helper bpf_current_task_under_cgroup() currently is only allowed for
tracing programs, allow its usage also in the BPF_CGROUP_* program types.
Move the code from kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c to kernel/bpf/helpers.c,
so it compiles also without CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS.
This will be used in systemd-networkd to monitor the sysctl writes,
and filter it's own writes from others:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/32212
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
These kfuncs are enabled even in BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, so they
should be safe also in BPF_CGROUP_* programs.
Since all BPF_CGROUP_* programs share the same hook,
call register_btf_kfunc_id_set() only once.
In enum btf_kfunc_hook, rename BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_CGROUP_SKB to a more
generic BTF_KFUNC_HOOK_CGROUP, since it's used for all the cgroup
related program types.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
__btf_name_valid() can be completely replaced with
btf_name_valid_identifier, and since most of the time you already call
btf_name_valid_identifier instead of __btf_name_valid , it would be
appropriate to rename the __btf_name_valid function to
btf_name_valid_identifier and remove __btf_name_valid.
Signed-off-by: Jeongjun Park <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alan Maguire <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
All failure exits prior to fdget() leave the scope, all matching fdput()
are immediately followed by leaving the scope.
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
fdget() is the first thing done in scope, all matching fdput() are
immediately followed by leaving the scope.
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
Calling conventions for __bpf_map_get() would be more convenient
if it left fpdut() on failure to callers. Makes for simpler logics
in the callers.
Among other things, the proof of memory safety no longer has to
rely upon file->private_data never being ERR_PTR(...) for bpffs files.
Original calling conventions made it impossible for the caller to tell
whether __bpf_map_get() has returned ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) because it has found
the file not be a bpf map one (in which case it would've done fdput())
or because it found that ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) in file->private_data of a
bpf map file (in which case fdput() would _not_ have been done).
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
Factor out the logic to extract bpf_map instances from FD embedded in
bpf_insns, adding it to the list of used_maps (unless it's already
there, in which case we just reuse map's index). This simplifies the
logic in resolve_pseudo_ldimm64(), especially around `struct fd`
handling, as all that is now neatly contained in the helper and doesn't
leak into a dozen error handling paths.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
Swith fdget_raw() use cases in bpf_inode_storage.c to CLASS(fd_raw).
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
Irregularity here is fdput() not in the same scope as fdget();
just fold ____bpf_prog_get() into its (only) caller and that's
it...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
Merge Al Viro's struct fd refactorings.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
For any changes of struct fd representation we need to
turn existing accesses to fields into calls of wrappers.
Accesses to struct fd::flags are very few (3 in linux/file.h,
1 in net/socket.c, 3 in fs/overlayfs/file.c and 3 more in
explicit initializers).
Those can be dealt with in the commit converting to
new layout; accesses to struct fd::file are too many for that.
This commit converts (almost) all of f.file to
fd_file(f). It's not entirely mechanical ('file' is used as
a member name more than just in struct fd) and it does not
even attempt to distinguish the uses in pointer context from
those in boolean context; the latter will be eventually turned
into a separate helper (fd_empty()).
NOTE: mass conversion to fd_empty(), tempting as it
might be, is a bad idea; better do that piecewise in commit
that convert from fdget...() to CLASS(...).
[conflicts in fs/fhandle.c, kernel/bpf/syscall.c, mm/memcontrol.c
caught by git; fs/stat.c one got caught by git grep]
[fs/xattr.c conflict]
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <[email protected]>
|
|
Daniel Hodges reported a kernel verifier crash when playing with sched-ext.
Further investigation shows that the crash is due to invalid memory access
in stacksafe(). More specifically, it is the following code:
if (exact != NOT_EXACT &&
old->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] !=
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE])
return false;
The 'i' iterates old->allocated_stack.
If cur->allocated_stack < old->allocated_stack the out-of-bound
access will happen.
To fix the issue add 'i >= cur->allocated_stack' check such that if
the condition is true, stacksafe() should fail. Otherwise,
cur->stack[spi].slot_type[i % BPF_REG_SIZE] memory access is legal.
Fixes: 2793a8b015f7 ("bpf: exact states comparison for iterator convergence checks")
Cc: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Daniel Hodges <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The function bpf_get_smp_processor_id() is processed in a different
way, depending on the arch:
- on x86 verifier replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a
sequence of instructions that modify only r0;
- on riscv64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a
sequence of instructions that modify only r0;
- on arm64 jit replaces call to bpf_get_smp_processor_id() with a
sequence of instructions that modify only r0 and tmp registers.
These rewrites satisfy attribute no_caller_saved_registers contract.
Allow rewrite of no_caller_saved_registers patterns for
bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in order to use this function as a canary
for no_caller_saved_registers tests.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
GCC and LLVM define a no_caller_saved_registers function attribute.
This attribute means that function scratches only some of
the caller saved registers defined by ABI.
For BPF the set of such registers could be defined as follows:
- R0 is scratched only if function is non-void;
- R1-R5 are scratched only if corresponding parameter type is defined
in the function prototype.
This commit introduces flag bpf_func_prot->allow_nocsr.
If this flag is set for some helper function, verifier assumes that
it follows no_caller_saved_registers calling convention.
The contract between kernel and clang allows to simultaneously use
such functions and maintain backwards compatibility with old
kernels that don't understand no_caller_saved_registers calls
(nocsr for short):
- clang generates a simple pattern for nocsr calls, e.g.:
r1 = 1;
r2 = 2;
*(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1;
*(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r2;
call %[to_be_inlined]
r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 16);
r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8);
r0 = r1;
r0 += r2;
exit;
- kernel removes unnecessary spills and fills, if called function is
inlined by verifier or current JIT (with assumption that patch
inserted by verifier or JIT honors nocsr contract, e.g. does not
scratch r3-r5 for the example above), e.g. the code above would be
transformed to:
r1 = 1;
r2 = 2;
call %[to_be_inlined]
r0 = r1;
r0 += r2;
exit;
Technically, the transformation is split into the following phases:
- function mark_nocsr_patterns(), called from bpf_check()
searches and marks potential patterns in instruction auxiliary data;
- upon stack read or write access,
function check_nocsr_stack_contract() is used to verify if
stack offsets, presumably reserved for nocsr patterns, are used
only from those patterns;
- function remove_nocsr_spills_fills(), called from bpf_check(),
applies the rewrite for valid patterns.
See comment in mark_nocsr_pattern_for_call() for more details.
Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
Extract the part of check_helper_call() as a utility function allowing
to query 'struct bpf_func_proto' for a specific helper function id.
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
With latest llvm19, the selftest iters/iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count
failed with -mcpu=v4.
The following are the details:
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; int iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count(const void *ctx) @ iters.c:1420
0: (b4) w7 = 0 ; R7_w=0
; int i, n = loop_data.n, sum = 0; @ iters.c:1422
1: (18) r1 = 0xffffc90000191478 ; R1_w=map_value(map=iters.bss,ks=4,vs=1280,off=1144)
3: (61) r6 = *(u32 *)(r1 +128) ; R1_w=map_value(map=iters.bss,ks=4,vs=1280,off=1144) R6_w=scalar(smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
; if (n > ARRAY_SIZE(loop_data.data)) @ iters.c:1424
4: (26) if w6 > 0x20 goto pc+27 ; R6_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f))
5: (bf) r8 = r10 ; R8_w=fp0 R10=fp0
6: (07) r8 += -8 ; R8_w=fp-8
; bpf_for(i, 0, n) { @ iters.c:1427
7: (bf) r1 = r8 ; R1_w=fp-8 R8_w=fp-8
8: (b4) w2 = 0 ; R2_w=0
9: (bc) w3 = w6 ; R3_w=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R6_w=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f))
10: (85) call bpf_iter_num_new#45179 ; R0=scalar() fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=0) refs=2
11: (bf) r1 = r8 ; R1=fp-8 R8=fp-8 refs=2
12: (85) call bpf_iter_num_next#45181 13: R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R6=scalar(id=1,smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R7=0 R8=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=1) refs=2
; bpf_for(i, 0, n) { @ iters.c:1427
13: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+2 ; R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) refs=2
14: (81) r1 = *(s32 *)(r0 +0) ; R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R1_w=scalar(smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff) refs=2
15: (ae) if w1 < w6 goto pc+4 20: R0=rdonly_mem(id=3,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R1=scalar(smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=smax32=umax32=31,umax=0xffffffff0000001f,smin32=0,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff0000001f)) R6=scalar(id=1,smin=umin=smin32=umin32=1,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R7=0 R8=fp-8 R10=fp0 fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=1) refs=2
; sum += loop_data.data[i]; @ iters.c:1429
20: (67) r1 <<= 2 ; R1_w=scalar(smax=0x7ffffffc0000007c,umax=0xfffffffc0000007c,smin32=0,smax32=umax32=124,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffc0000007c)) refs=2
21: (18) r2 = 0xffffc90000191478 ; R2_w=map_value(map=iters.bss,ks=4,vs=1280,off=1144) refs=2
23: (0f) r2 += r1
math between map_value pointer and register with unbounded min value is not allowed
The source code:
int iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count(const void *ctx)
{
int i, n = loop_data.n, sum = 0;
if (n > ARRAY_SIZE(loop_data.data))
return 0;
bpf_for(i, 0, n) {
/* no rechecking of i against ARRAY_SIZE(loop_data.n) */
sum += loop_data.data[i];
}
return sum;
}
The insn #14 is a sign-extenstion load which is related to 'int i'.
The insn #15 did a subreg comparision. Note that smin=0xffffffff80000000 and this caused later
insn #23 failed verification due to unbounded min value.
Actually insn #15 R1 smin range can be better. Before insn #15, we have
R1_w=scalar(smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff)
With the above range, we know for R1, upper 32bit can only be 0xffffffff or 0.
Otherwise, the value range for R1 could be beyond [smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff].
After insn #15, for the true patch, we know smin32=0 and smax32=32. With the upper 32bit 0xffffffff,
then the corresponding value is [0xffffffff00000000, 0xffffffff00000020]. The range is
obviously beyond the original range [smin=0xffffffff80000000,smax=0x7fffffff] and the
range is not possible. So the upper 32bit must be 0, which implies smin = smin32 and
smax = smax32.
This patch fixed the issue by adding additional register deduction after 32-bit compare
insn. If the signed 32-bit register range is non-negative then 64-bit smin is
in range of [S32_MIN, S32_MAX], then the actual 64-bit smin/smax should be the same
as 32-bit smin32/smax32.
With this patch, iters/iter_arr_with_actual_elem_count succeeded with better register range:
from 15 to 20: R0=rdonly_mem(id=7,ref_obj_id=2,sz=4) R1_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=31,var_off=(0x0; 0x1f)) R6=scalar(id=1,smin=umin=smin32=umin32=1,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=32,var_off=(0x0; 0x3f)) R7=scalar(id=9,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R8=scalar(id=9,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R10=fp0 fp-8=iter_num(ref_id=2,state=active,depth=3) refs=2
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
syzbot reported a kernel crash due to
commit 1f1e864b6555 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses").
The reason is due to sign-extension of 32-bit load for
packet data/data_end/data_meta uapi field.
The original code looks like:
r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */
r3 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 80) /* load __sk_buff->data_end */
r0 = r2
r0 += 8
if r3 > r0 goto +1
...
Note that __sk_buff->data load has 32-bit sign extension.
After verification and convert_ctx_accesses(), the final asm code looks like:
r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208)
r2 = (s32)r2
r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80)
r0 = r2
r0 += 8
if r3 > r0 goto pc+1
...
Note that 'r2 = (s32)r2' may make the kernel __sk_buff->data address invalid
which may cause runtime failure.
Currently, in C code, typically we have
void *data = (void *)(long)skb->data;
void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
...
and it will generate
r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208)
r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80)
r0 = r2
r0 += 8
if r3 > r0 goto pc+1
If we allow sign-extension,
void *data = (void *)(long)(int)skb->data;
void *data_end = (void *)(long)skb->data_end;
...
the generated code looks like
r2 = *(u64 *)(r1 +208)
r2 <<= 32
r2 s>>= 32
r3 = *(u64 *)(r1 +80)
r0 = r2
r0 += 8
if r3 > r0 goto pc+1
and this will cause verification failure since "r2 <<= 32" is not allowed
as "r2" is a packet pointer.
To fix this issue for case
r2 = *(s32 *)(r1 + 76) /* load __sk_buff->data */
this patch added additional checking in is_valid_access() callback
function for packet data/data_end/data_meta access. If those accesses
are with sign-extenstion, the verification will fail.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Reported-by: [email protected]
Fixes: 1f1e864b6555 ("bpf: Handle sign-extenstin ctx member accesses")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
After checking lsm hook return range in verifier, the test case
"test_progs -t test_lsm" failed, and the failure log says:
libbpf: prog 'test_int_hook': BPF program load failed: Invalid argument
libbpf: prog 'test_int_hook': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG --
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @ lsm.c:89
0: (79) r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 +24) ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-4095,smax=smax32=0) R1=ctx()
[...]
24: (b4) w0 = -1 ; R0_w=0xffffffff
; int BPF_PROG(test_int_hook, struct vm_area_struct *vma, @ lsm.c:89
25: (95) exit
At program exit the register R0 has smin=4294967295 smax=4294967295 should have been in [-4095, 0]
It can be seen that instruction "w0 = -1" zero extended -1 to 64-bit
register r0, setting both smin and smax values of r0 to 4294967295.
This resulted in a false reject when r0 was checked with range [-4095, 0].
Given bpf lsm does not return 64-bit values, this patch fixes it by changing
the compare between r0 and return range from 64-bit operation to 32-bit
operation for bpf lsm.
Fixes: 8fa4ecd49b81 ("bpf: enforce exact retval range on subprog/callback exit")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
bpf progs can be attached to kernel functions, and the attached functions
can take different parameters or return different return values. If
prog attached to one kernel function tail calls prog attached to another
kernel function, the ctx access or return value verification could be
bypassed.
For example, if prog1 is attached to func1 which takes only 1 parameter
and prog2 is attached to func2 which takes two parameters. Since verifier
assumes the bpf ctx passed to prog2 is constructed based on func2's
prototype, verifier allows prog2 to access the second parameter from
the bpf ctx passed to it. The problem is that verifier does not prevent
prog1 from passing its bpf ctx to prog2 via tail call. In this case,
the bpf ctx passed to prog2 is constructed from func1 instead of func2,
that is, the assumption for ctx access verification is bypassed.
Another example, if BPF LSM prog1 is attached to hook file_alloc_security,
and BPF LSM prog2 is attached to hook bpf_lsm_audit_rule_known. Verifier
knows the return value rules for these two hooks, e.g. it is legal for
bpf_lsm_audit_rule_known to return positive number 1, and it is illegal
for file_alloc_security to return positive number. So verifier allows
prog2 to return positive number 1, but does not allow prog1 to return
positive number. The problem is that verifier does not prevent prog1
from calling prog2 via tail call. In this case, prog2's return value 1
will be used as the return value for prog1's hook file_alloc_security.
That is, the return value rule is bypassed.
This patch adds restriction for tail call to prevent such bypasses.
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
A bpf prog returning a positive number attached to file_alloc_security
hook makes kernel panic.
This happens because file system can not filter out the positive number
returned by the LSM prog using IS_ERR, and misinterprets this positive
number as a file pointer.
Given that hook file_alloc_security never returned positive number
before the introduction of BPF LSM, and other BPF LSM hooks may
encounter similar issues, this patch adds LSM return value check
in verifier, to ensure no unexpected value is returned.
Fixes: 520b7aa00d8c ("bpf: lsm: Initialize the BPF LSM hooks")
Reported-by: Xin Liu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|