| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Currently, for percpu memory allocation, say if the user
requests allocation size to be 32 bytes, the actually
calculated size will be 40 bytes and it further rounds
to 64 bytes, and eventually 64 bytes are allocated,
wasting 32-byte memory.
Change bpf_mem_alloc() to calculate the cache index
based on the user-provided allocation size so unnecessary
extra memory can be avoided.
Suggested-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch simplifies the verification of size arguments associated to
pointer arguments to helpers and kfuncs. Many helpers take a pointer
argument followed by the size of the memory access performed to be
performed through that pointer. Before this patch, the handling of the
size argument in check_mem_size_reg() was confusing and wasteful: if the
size register's lower bound was 0, then the verification was done twice:
once considering the size of the access to be the lower-bound of the
respective argument, and once considering the upper bound (even if the
two are the same). The upper bound checking is a super-set of the
lower-bound checking(*), except: the only point of the lower-bound check
is to handle the case where zero-sized-accesses are explicitly not
allowed and the lower-bound is zero. This static condition is now
checked explicitly, replacing a much more complex, expensive and
confusing verification call to check_helper_mem_access().
Error messages change in this patch. Before, messages about illegal
zero-size accesses depended on the type of the pointer and on other
conditions, and sometimes the message was plain wrong: in some tests
that changed you'll see that the old message was something like "R1 min
value is outside of the allowed memory range", where R1 is the pointer
register; the error was wrongly claiming that the pointer was bad
instead of the size being bad. Other times the information that the size
came for a register with a possible range of values was wrong, and the
error presented the size as a fixed zero. Now the errors refer to the
right register. However, the old error messages did contain useful
information about the pointer register which is now lost; recovering
this information was deemed not important enough.
(*) Besides standing to reason that the checks for a bigger size access
are a super-set of the checks for a smaller size access, I have also
mechanically verified this by reading the code for all types of
pointers. I could convince myself that it's true for all but
PTR_TO_BTF_ID (check_ptr_to_btf_access). There, simply looking
line-by-line does not immediately prove what we want. If anyone has any
qualms, let me know.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
by moving cond_resched_rcu() to rcupdate_wait.h, we can kill another big
sched.h dependency.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <[email protected]>
|
|
Although it does not seem to have any untoward side-effects, the use
of ';' to separate to assignments seems more appropriate than ','.
Flagged by clang-17 -Wcomma
No functional change intended. Compile tested only.
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
For a clean, conflict-free revert of the token-related patches in commit
d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality"), the bpf fs commit
750e785796bb ("bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs") was undone
temporarily as well.
This patch manually re-adds the functionality from the original one back
in 750e785796bb, no other functional changes intended.
Testing:
# mount -t bpf -o uid=65534,gid=65534 bpffs ./foo
# ls -la . | grep foo
drwxrwxrwt 2 nobody nogroup 0 Dec 20 13:16 foo
# mount -t bpf
bpffs on /root/foo type bpf (rw,relatime,uid=65534,gid=65534)
Also, passing invalid arguments for uid/gid are properly rejected as expected.
Fixes: d17aff807f84 ("Revert BPF token-related functionality")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Cc: Jie Jiang <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
At present, bpf memory allocator uses check_obj_size() to ensure that
ksize() of allocated pointer is equal with the unit_size of used
bpf_mem_cache. Its purpose is to prevent bpf_mem_free() from selecting
a bpf_mem_cache which has different unit_size compared with the
bpf_mem_cache used for allocation. But as reported by lkp, the return
value of ksize() or kmalloc_size_roundup() may change due to slab merge
and it will lead to the warning report in check_obj_size().
The reported warning happened as follows:
(1) in bpf_mem_cache_adjust_size(), kmalloc_size_roundup(96) returns the
object_size of kmalloc-96 instead of kmalloc-cg-96. The object_size of
kmalloc-96 is 96, so size_index for 96 is not adjusted accordingly.
(2) the object_size of kmalloc-cg-96 is adjust from 96 to 128 due to
slab merge in __kmem_cache_alias(). For SLAB, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN is
enabled by default for kmalloc slab, so align is 64 and size is 128 for
kmalloc-cg-96. SLUB has a similar merge logic, but its object_size will
not be changed, because its align is 8 under x86-64.
(3) when unit_alloc() does kmalloc_node(96, __GFP_ACCOUNT, node),
ksize() returns 128 instead of 96 for the returned pointer.
(4) the warning in check_obj_size() is triggered.
Considering the slab merge can happen in anytime (e.g, a slab created in
a new module), the following case is also possible: during the
initialization of bpf_global_ma, there is no slab merge and ksize() for
a 96-bytes object returns 96. But after that a new slab created by a
kernel module is merged to kmalloc-cg-96 and the object_size of
kmalloc-cg-96 is adjust from 96 to 128 (which is possible for x86-64 +
CONFIG_SLAB, because its alignment requirement is 64 for 96-bytes slab).
So soon or later, when bpf_global_ma frees a 96-byte-sized pointer
which is allocated from bpf_mem_cache with unit_size=96, bpf_mem_free()
will free the pointer through a bpf_mem_cache in which unit_size is 128,
because the return value of ksize() changes. The warning for the
mismatch will be triggered again.
A feasible fix is introducing similar APIs compared with ksize() and
kmalloc_size_roundup() to return the actually-allocated size instead of
size which may change due to slab merge, but it will introduce
unnecessary dependency on the implementation details of mm subsystem.
As for now the pointer of bpf_mem_cache is saved in the 8-bytes area
(or 4-bytes under 32-bit host) above the returned pointer, using
unit_size in the saved bpf_mem_cache to select the target cache instead
of inferring the size from the pointer itself. Beside no extra
dependency on mm subsystem, the performance for bpf_mem_free_rcu() is
also improved as shown below.
Before applying the patch, the performances of bpf_mem_alloc() and
bpf_mem_free_rcu() on 8-CPUs VM with one producer are as follows:
kmalloc : alloc 11.69 ± 0.28M/s free 29.58 ± 0.93M/s
percpu : alloc 14.11 ± 0.52M/s free 14.29 ± 0.99M/s
After apply the patch, the performance for bpf_mem_free_rcu() increases
9% and 146% for kmalloc memory and per-cpu memory respectively:
kmalloc: alloc 11.01 ± 0.03M/s free 32.42 ± 0.48M/s
percpu: alloc 12.84 ± 0.12M/s free 35.24 ± 0.23M/s
After the fixes, there is no need to adjust size_index to fix the
mismatch between allocation and free, so remove it as well. Also return
NULL instead of ZERO_SIZE_PTR for zero-sized alloc in bpf_mem_alloc(),
because there is no bpf_mem_cache pointer saved above ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
Fixes: 9077fc228f09 ("bpf: Use kmalloc_size_roundup() to adjust size_index")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Add ability to pass a pointer to dynptr into global functions.
This allows to have global subprogs that accept and work with generic
dynptrs that are created by caller. Dynptr argument is detected based on
the name of a struct type, if it's "bpf_dynptr", it's assumed to be
a proper dynptr pointer. Both actual struct and forward struct
declaration types are supported.
This is conceptually exactly the same semantics as
bpf_user_ringbuf_drain()'s use of dynptr to pass a variable-sized
pointer to ringbuf record. So we heavily rely on CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR
bits of already existing logic in the verifier.
During global subprog validation, we mark such CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR as
having LOCAL type, as that's the most unassuming type of dynptr and it
doesn't have any special helpers that can try to free or acquire extra
references (unlike skb, xdp, or ringbuf dynptr). So that seems like a safe
"choice" to make from correctness standpoint. It's still possible to
pass any type of dynptr to such subprog, though, because generic dynptr
helpers, like getting data/slice pointers, read/write memory copying
routines, dynptr adjustment and getter routines all work correctly with
any type of dynptr.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Add support for annotating global BPF subprog arguments to provide more
information about expected semantics of the argument. Currently,
verifier relies purely on argument's BTF type information, and supports
three general use cases: scalar, pointer-to-context, and
pointer-to-fixed-size-memory.
Scalar and pointer-to-fixed-mem work well in practice and are quite
natural to use. But pointer-to-context is a bit problematic, as typical
BPF users don't realize that they need to use a special type name to
signal to verifier that argument is not just some pointer, but actually
a PTR_TO_CTX. Further, even if users do know which type to use, it is
limiting in situations where the same BPF program logic is used across
few different program types. Common case is kprobes, tracepoints, and
perf_event programs having a helper to send some data over BPF perf
buffer. bpf_perf_event_output() requires `ctx` argument, and so it's
quite cumbersome to share such global subprog across few BPF programs of
different types, necessitating extra static subprog that is context
type-agnostic.
Long story short, there is a need to go beyond types and allow users to
add hints to global subprog arguments to define expectations.
This patch adds such support for two initial special tags:
- pointer to context;
- non-null qualifier for generic pointer arguments.
All of the above came up in practice already and seem generally useful
additions. Non-null qualifier is an often requested feature, which
currently has to be worked around by having unnecessary NULL checks
inside subprogs even if we know that arguments are never NULL. Pointer
to context was discussed earlier.
As for implementation, we utilize btf_decl_tag attribute and set up an
"arg:xxx" convention to specify argument hint. As such:
- btf_decl_tag("arg:ctx") is a PTR_TO_CTX hint;
- btf_decl_tag("arg:nonnull") marks pointer argument as not allowed to
be NULL, making NULL check inside global subprog unnecessary.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Remove duplicated BTF parsing logic when it comes to subprog call check.
Instead, use (potentially cached) results of btf_prepare_func_args() to
abstract away expectations of each subprog argument in generic terms
(e.g., "this is pointer to context", or "this is a pointer to memory of
size X"), and then use those simple high-level argument type
expectations to validate actual register states to check if they match
expectations.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Subprog call logic in btf_check_subprog_call() currently has both a lot
of BTF parsing logic (which is, presumably, what justified putting it
into btf.c), but also a bunch of register state checks, some of each
utilize deep verifier logic helpers, necessarily exported from
verifier.c: check_ptr_off_reg(), check_func_arg_reg_off(),
and check_mem_reg().
Going forward, btf_check_subprog_call() will have a minimum of
BTF-related logic, but will get more internal verifier logic related to
register state manipulation. So move it into verifier.c to minimize
amount of verifier-specific logic exposed to btf.c.
We do this move before refactoring btf_check_func_arg_match() to
preserve as much history post-refactoring as possible.
No functional changes.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Generalize btf_prepare_func_args() to support both global and static
subprogs. We are going to utilize this property in the next patch,
reusing btf_prepare_func_args() for subprog call logic instead of
reparsing BTF information in a completely separate implementation.
btf_prepare_func_args() now detects whether subprog is global or static
makes slight logic adjustments for static func cases, like not failing
fatally (-EFAULT) for conditions that are allowable for static subprogs.
Somewhat subtle (but major!) difference is the handling of pointer arguments.
Both global and static functions need to handle special context
arguments (which are pointers to predefined type names), but static
subprogs give up on any other pointers, falling back to marking subprog
as "unreliable", disabling the use of BTF type information altogether.
For global functions, though, we are assuming that such pointers to
unrecognized types are just pointers to fixed-sized memory region (or
error out if size cannot be established, like for `void *` pointers).
This patch accommodates these small differences and sets up a stage for
refactoring in the next patch, eliminating a separate BTF-based parsing
logic in btf_check_func_arg_match().
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Instead of btf_check_subprog_arg_match(), use btf_prepare_func_args()
logic to validate "trustworthiness" of main BPF program's BTF information,
if it is present.
We ignored results of original BTF check anyway, often times producing
confusing and ominously-sounding "reg type unsupported for arg#0
function" message, which has no apparent effect on program correctness
and verification process.
All the -EFAULT returning sanity checks are already performed in
check_btf_info_early(), so there is zero reason to have this duplication
of logic between btf_check_subprog_call() and btf_check_subprog_arg_match().
Dropping btf_check_subprog_arg_match() simplifies
btf_check_func_arg_match() further removing `bool processing_call` flag.
One subtle bit that was done by btf_check_subprog_arg_match() was
potentially marking main program's BTF as unreliable. We do this
explicitly now with a dedicated simple check, preserving the original
behavior, but now based on well factored btf_prepare_func_args() logic.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
btf_prepare_func_args() is used to understand expectations and
restrictions on global subprog arguments. But current implementation is
hard to extend, as it intermixes BTF-based func prototype parsing and
interpretation logic with setting up register state at subprog entry.
Worse still, those registers are not completely set up inside
btf_prepare_func_args(), requiring some more logic later in
do_check_common(). Like calling mark_reg_unknown() and similar
initialization operations.
This intermixing of BTF interpretation and register state setup is
problematic. First, it causes duplication of BTF parsing logic for global
subprog verification (to set up initial state of global subprog) and
global subprog call sites analysis (when we need to check that whatever
is being passed into global subprog matches expectations), performed in
btf_check_subprog_call().
Given we want to extend global func argument with tags later, this
duplication is problematic. So refactor btf_prepare_func_args() to do
only BTF-based func proto and args parsing, returning high-level
argument "expectations" only, with no regard to specifics of register
state. I.e., if it's a context argument, instead of setting register
state to PTR_TO_CTX, we return ARG_PTR_TO_CTX enum for that argument as
"an argument specification" for further processing inside
do_check_common(). Similarly for SCALAR arguments, PTR_TO_MEM, etc.
This allows to reuse btf_prepare_func_args() in following patches at
global subprog call site analysis time. It also keeps register setup
code consistently in one place, do_check_common().
Besides all this, we cache this argument specs information inside
env->subprog_info, eliminating the need to redo these potentially
expensive BTF traversals, especially if BPF program's BTF is big and/or
there are lots of global subprog calls.
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
We can derive some new information for BPF_JNE in regs_refine_cond_op().
Take following code for example:
/* The type of "a" is u32 */
if (a > 0 && a < 100) {
/* the range of the register for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99],
* and will cause the following error:
*
* invalid zero-sized read
*
* as a can be 0.
*/
bpf_skb_store_bytes(skb, xx, xx, a, 0);
}
In the code above, "a > 0" will be compiled to "jmp xxx if a == 0". In the
TRUE branch, the dst_reg will be marked as known to 0. However, in the
fallthrough(FALSE) branch, the dst_reg will not be handled, which makes
the [min, max] for a is [0, 99], not [1, 99].
For BPF_JNE, we can reduce the range of the dst reg if the src reg is a
const and is exactly the edge of the dst reg.
Signed-off-by: Menglong Dong <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch includes the following revert (one conflicting BPF FS
patch and three token patch sets, represented by merge commits):
- revert 0f5d5454c723 "Merge branch 'bpf-fs-mount-options-parsing-follow-ups'";
- revert 750e785796bb "bpf: Support uid and gid when mounting bpffs";
- revert 733763285acf "Merge branch 'bpf-token-support-in-libbpf-s-bpf-object'";
- revert c35919dcce28 "Merge branch 'bpf-token-and-bpf-fs-based-delegation'".
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAHk-=wg7JuFYwGy=GOMbRCtOL+jwSQsdUaBsRWkDVYbxipbM5A@mail.gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
|
|
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2023-12-18
This PR is larger than usual and contains changes in various parts
of the kernel.
The main changes are:
1) Fix kCFI bugs in BPF, from Peter Zijlstra.
End result: all forms of indirect calls from BPF into kernel
and from kernel into BPF work with CFI enabled. This allows BPF
to work with CONFIG_FINEIBT=y.
2) Introduce BPF token object, from Andrii Nakryiko.
It adds an ability to delegate a subset of BPF features from privileged
daemon (e.g., systemd) through special mount options for userns-bound
BPF FS to a trusted unprivileged application. The design accommodates
suggestions from Christian Brauner and Paul Moore.
Example:
$ sudo mkdir -p /sys/fs/bpf/token
$ sudo mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf/token \
-o delegate_cmds=prog_load:MAP_CREATE \
-o delegate_progs=kprobe \
-o delegate_attachs=xdp
3) Various verifier improvements and fixes, from Andrii Nakryiko, Andrei Matei.
- Complete precision tracking support for register spills
- Fix verification of possibly-zero-sized stack accesses
- Fix access to uninit stack slots
- Track aligned STACK_ZERO cases as imprecise spilled registers.
It improves the verifier "instructions processed" metric from single
digit to 50-60% for some programs.
- Fix verifier retval logic
4) Support for VLAN tag in XDP hints, from Larysa Zaremba.
5) Allocate BPF trampoline via bpf_prog_pack mechanism, from Song Liu.
End result: better memory utilization and lower I$ miss for calls to BPF
via BPF trampoline.
6) Fix race between BPF prog accessing inner map and parallel delete,
from Hou Tao.
7) Add bpf_xdp_get_xfrm_state() kfunc, from Daniel Xu.
It allows BPF interact with IPSEC infra. The intent is to support
software RSS (via XDP) for the upcoming ipsec pcpu work.
Experiments on AWS demonstrate single tunnel pcpu ipsec reaching
line rate on 100G ENA nics.
8) Expand bpf_cgrp_storage to support cgroup1 non-attach, from Yafang Shao.
9) BPF file verification via fsverity, from Song Liu.
It allows BPF progs get fsverity digest.
* tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (164 commits)
bpf: Ensure precise is reset to false in __mark_reg_const_zero()
selftests/bpf: Add more uprobe multi fail tests
bpf: Fail uprobe multi link with negative offset
selftests/bpf: Test the release of map btf
s390/bpf: Fix indirect trampoline generation
selftests/bpf: Temporarily disable dummy_struct_ops test on s390
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_exception_cb() signature
bpf: Fix dtor CFI
cfi: Add CFI_NOSEAL()
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_struct_ops CFI
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_callback_t CFI
x86/cfi,bpf: Fix BPF JIT call
cfi: Flip headers
selftests/bpf: Add test for abnormal cnt during multi-kprobe attachment
selftests/bpf: Don't use libbpf_get_error() in kprobe_multi_test
selftests/bpf: Add test for abnormal cnt during multi-uprobe attachment
bpf: Limit the number of kprobes when attaching program to multiple kprobes
bpf: Limit the number of uprobes when attaching program to multiple uprobes
bpf: xdp: Register generic_kfunc_set with XDP programs
selftests/bpf: utilize string values for delegate_xxx mount options
...
====================
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
|
|
It is safe to always start with imprecise SCALAR_VALUE register.
Previously __mark_reg_const_zero() relied on caller to reset precise
mark, but it's very error prone and we already missed it in a few
places. So instead make __mark_reg_const_zero() reset precision always,
as it's a safe default for SCALAR_VALUE. Explanation is basically the
same as for why we are resetting (or rather not setting) precision in
current state. If necessary, precision propagation will set it to
precise correctly.
As such, also remove a big comment about forward precision propagation
in mark_reg_stack_read() and avoid unnecessarily setting precision to
true after reading from STACK_ZERO stack. Again, precision propagation
will correctly handle this, if that SCALAR_VALUE register will ever be
needed to be precise.
Reported-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
As per the earlier patches, BPF sub-programs have bpf_callback_t
signature and CFI expects callers to have matching signature. This is
violated by bpf_prog_aux::bpf_exception_cb().
[peterz: Changelog]
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAADnVQ+Z7UcXXBBhMubhcMM=R-dExk-uHtfOLtoLxQ1XxEpqEA@mail.gmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Ensure the various dtor functions match their prototype and retain
their CFI signatures, since they don't have their address taken, they
are prone to not getting CFI, making them impossible to call
indirectly.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
BPF struct_ops uses __arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() to write
trampolines for indirect function calls. These tramplines much have
matching CFI.
In order to obtain the correct CFI hash for the various methods, add a
matching structure that contains stub functions, the compiler will
generate correct CFI which we can pilfer for the trampolines.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The current BPF call convention is __nocfi, except when it calls !JIT things,
then it calls regular C functions.
It so happens that with FineIBT the __nocfi and C calling conventions are
incompatible. Specifically __nocfi will call at func+0, while FineIBT will have
endbr-poison there, which is not a valid indirect target. Causing #CP.
Notably this only triggers on IBT enabled hardware, which is probably why this
hasn't been reported (also, most people will have JIT on anyway).
Implement proper CFI prologues for the BPF JIT codegen and drop __nocfi for
x86.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Registering generic_kfunc_set with XDP programs enables some of the
newer BPF features inside XDP -- namely tree based data structures and
BPF exceptions.
The current motivation for this commit is to enable assertions inside
XDP bpf progs. Assertions are a standard and useful tool to encode
intent.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d07d4614b81ca6aada44fcb89bb6b618fb66e4ca.1702594357.git.dxu@dxuuu.xyz
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Besides already supported special "any" value and hex bit mask, support
string-based parsing of delegation masks based on exact enumerator
names. Utilize BTF information of `enum bpf_cmd`, `enum bpf_map_type`,
`enum bpf_prog_type`, and `enum bpf_attach_type` types to find supported
symbolic names (ignoring __MAX_xxx guard values and stripping repetitive
prefixes like BPF_ for cmd and attach types, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ for maps, and
BPF_PROG_TYPE_ for prog types). The case doesn't matter, but it is
normalized to lower case in mount option output. So "PROG_LOAD",
"prog_load", and "MAP_create" are all valid values to specify for
delegate_cmds options, "array" is among supported for map types, etc.
Besides supporting string values, we also support multiple values
specified at the same time, using colon (':') separator.
There are corresponding changes on bpf_show_options side to use known
values to print them in human-readable format, falling back to hex mask
printing, if there are any unrecognized bits. This shouldn't be
necessary when enum BTF information is present, but in general we should
always be able to fall back to this even if kernel was built without BTF.
As mentioned, emitted symbolic names are normalized to be all lower case.
Example below shows various ways to specify delegate_cmds options
through mount command and how mount options are printed back:
12/14 14:39:07.604
vmuser@archvm:~/local/linux/tools/testing/selftests/bpf
$ mount | rg token
$ sudo mkdir -p /sys/fs/bpf/token
$ sudo mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf/token \
-o delegate_cmds=prog_load:MAP_CREATE \
-o delegate_progs=kprobe \
-o delegate_attachs=xdp
$ mount | grep token
bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf/token type bpf (rw,relatime,delegate_cmds=map_create:prog_load,delegate_progs=kprobe,delegate_attachs=xdp)
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When running `./test_progs -j` in my local vm with latest kernel,
I once hit a kasan error like below:
[ 1887.184724] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
[ 1887.185599] Read of size 4 at addr ffff888106806910 by task kworker/u12:2/2830
[ 1887.186498]
[ 1887.186712] CPU: 3 PID: 2830 Comm: kworker/u12:2 Tainted: G OEL 6.7.0-rc3-00699-g90679706d486-dirty #494
[ 1887.188034] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 1887.189618] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred
[ 1887.190341] Call Trace:
[ 1887.190666] <TASK>
[ 1887.190949] dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xe0
[ 1887.191423] ? nf_tcp_handle_invalid+0x1b0/0x1b0
[ 1887.192019] ? panic+0x3c0/0x3c0
[ 1887.192449] print_report+0x14f/0x720
[ 1887.192930] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
[ 1887.193459] ? __virt_addr_valid+0xac/0x120
[ 1887.194004] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
[ 1887.194572] kasan_report+0xc3/0x100
[ 1887.195085] ? bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
[ 1887.195668] bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0
[ 1887.196183] ? __bpf_obj_drop_impl+0xb0/0xb0
[ 1887.196736] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
[ 1887.197270] ? preempt_count_sub+0x1c/0xd0
[ 1887.197802] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x1f/0x40
[ 1887.198319] bpf_obj_free_fields+0x1d4/0x260
[ 1887.198883] array_map_free+0x1a3/0x260
[ 1887.199380] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x7b/0xe0
[ 1887.199943] process_scheduled_works+0x3a2/0x6c0
[ 1887.200549] worker_thread+0x633/0x890
[ 1887.201047] ? __kthread_parkme+0xd7/0xf0
[ 1887.201574] ? kthread+0x102/0x1d0
[ 1887.202020] kthread+0x1ab/0x1d0
[ 1887.202447] ? pr_cont_work+0x270/0x270
[ 1887.202954] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50
[ 1887.203444] ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
[ 1887.203914] ? kthread_blkcg+0x50/0x50
[ 1887.204397] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 1887.204913] </TASK>
[ 1887.204913] </TASK>
[ 1887.205209]
[ 1887.205416] Allocated by task 2197:
[ 1887.205881] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60
[ 1887.206366] __kasan_kmalloc+0x6e/0x80
[ 1887.206856] __kmalloc+0xac/0x1a0
[ 1887.207293] btf_parse_fields+0xa15/0x1480
[ 1887.207836] btf_parse_struct_metas+0x566/0x670
[ 1887.208387] btf_new_fd+0x294/0x4d0
[ 1887.208851] __sys_bpf+0x4ba/0x600
[ 1887.209292] __x64_sys_bpf+0x41/0x50
[ 1887.209762] do_syscall_64+0x4c/0xf0
[ 1887.210222] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
[ 1887.210868]
[ 1887.211074] Freed by task 36:
[ 1887.211460] kasan_set_track+0x3f/0x60
[ 1887.211951] kasan_save_free_info+0x28/0x40
[ 1887.212485] ____kasan_slab_free+0x101/0x180
[ 1887.213027] __kmem_cache_free+0xe4/0x210
[ 1887.213514] btf_free+0x5b/0x130
[ 1887.213918] rcu_core+0x638/0xcc0
[ 1887.214347] __do_softirq+0x114/0x37e
The error happens at bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8/0x2b0:
00000000000034c0 <bpf_rb_root_free>:
; {
34c0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
34c4: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x34c9 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x9>
34c9: 55 pushq %rbp
34ca: 48 89 e5 movq %rsp, %rbp
...
; if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 &&
36aa: 4d 85 ed testq %r13, %r13
36ad: 74 a9 je 0x3658 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x198>
36af: 49 8d 7d 10 leaq 0x10(%r13), %rdi
36b3: e8 00 00 00 00 callq 0x36b8 <bpf_rb_root_free+0x1f8>
<==== kasan function
36b8: 45 8b 7d 10 movl 0x10(%r13), %r15d
<==== use-after-free load
36bc: 45 85 ff testl %r15d, %r15d
36bf: 78 8c js 0x364d <bpf_rb_root_free+0x18d>
So the problem is at rec->refcount_off in the above.
I did some source code analysis and find the reason.
CPU A CPU B
bpf_map_put:
...
btf_put with rcu callback
...
bpf_map_free_deferred
with system_unbound_wq
... ... ...
... btf_free_rcu: ...
... ... bpf_map_free_deferred:
... ...
... ---------> btf_struct_metas_free()
... | race condition ...
... ---------> map->ops->map_free()
...
... btf->struct_meta_tab = NULL
In the above, map_free() corresponds to array_map_free() and eventually
calling bpf_rb_root_free() which calls:
...
__bpf_obj_drop_impl(obj, field->graph_root.value_rec, false);
...
Here, 'value_rec' is assigned in btf_check_and_fixup_fields() with following code:
meta = btf_find_struct_meta(btf, btf_id);
if (!meta)
return -EFAULT;
rec->fields[i].graph_root.value_rec = meta->record;
So basically, 'value_rec' is a pointer to the record in struct_metas_tab.
And it is possible that that particular record has been freed by
btf_struct_metas_free() and hence we have a kasan error here.
Actually it is very hard to reproduce the failure with current bpf/bpf-next
code, I only got the above error once. To increase reproducibility, I added
a delay in bpf_map_free_deferred() to delay map->ops->map_free(), which
significantly increased reproducibility.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
index 5e43ddd1b83f..aae5b5213e93 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -695,6 +695,7 @@ static void bpf_map_free_deferred(struct work_struct *work)
struct bpf_map *map = container_of(work, struct bpf_map, work);
struct btf_record *rec = map->record;
+ mdelay(100);
security_bpf_map_free(map);
bpf_map_release_memcg(map);
/* implementation dependent freeing */
Hao also provided test cases ([1]) for easily reproducing the above issue.
There are two ways to fix the issue, the v1 of the patch ([2]) moving
btf_put() after map_free callback, and the v5 of the patch ([3]) using
a kptr style fix which tries to get a btf reference during
map_check_btf(). Each approach has its pro and cons. The first approach
delays freeing btf while the second approach needs to acquire reference
depending on context which makes logic not very elegant and may
complicate things with future new data structures. Alexei
suggested in [4] going back to v1 which is what this patch
tries to do.
Rerun './test_progs -j' with the above mdelay() hack for a couple
of times and didn't observe the error for the above rb_root test cases.
Running Hou's test ([1]) is also successful.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
[2] v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
[3] v5: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
[4] v4: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJ3FiXUhZJwX_81sjZvSYYKCFB3BT6P8D59RS2Gu+0Z7g@mail.gmail.com/
Cc: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Fixes: 958cf2e273f0 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_new")
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
rcu_read_lock() is no longer held when invoking bpf_event_entry_gen()
which is called by perf_event_fd_array_get_ptr(), so using GFP_KERNEL
instead of GFP_ATOMIC to reduce the possibility of failures due to
out-of-memory.
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
There is no rcu-read-lock requirement for ops->map_fd_get_ptr() or
ops->map_fd_put_ptr(), so doesn't use rcu-read-lock for these two
callbacks.
For bpf_fd_array_map_update_elem(), accessing array->ptrs doesn't need
rcu-read-lock because array->ptrs must still be allocated. For
bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem(), htab_map_update_elem() only requires
rcu-read-lock to be held to avoid the WARN_ON_ONCE(), so only use
rcu_read_lock() during the invocation of htab_map_update_elem().
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 638e4b825d52 ("bpf: Allows per-cpu maps and map-in-map in
sleepable programs"), sleepable BPF program can also use map-in-map, but
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() doesn't handle it accordingly. The main reason
is that using synchronize_rcu_tasks_trace() to wait for the completions
of these sleepable BPF programs may incur a very long delay and
userspace may think it is hung, so the wait for sleepable BPF programs
is skipped. Update the comments in maybe_wait_bpf_programs() to reflect
the reason.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
security_path_* based LSM hooks appear to be generally missing from
the sleepable_lsm_hooks list. Initially add a small subset of them to
the preexisting sleepable_lsm_hooks list so that sleepable BPF helpers
like bpf_d_path() can be used from sleepable BPF LSM based programs.
The security_path_* hooks added in this patch are similar to the
security_inode_* counterparts that already exist in the
sleepable_lsm_hooks list, and are called in roughly similar points and
contexts. Presumably, making them OK to be also annotated as
sleepable.
Building a kernel with DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP options enabled and running
reasonable workloads stimulating activity that would be intercepted by
such security hooks didn't show any splats.
Notably, I haven't added all the security_path_* LSM hooks that are
available as I don't need them at this point in time.
Signed-off-by: Matt Bobrowski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: KP Singh <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
It's quite confusing in practice when it's possible to successfully
create a BPF token from BPF FS that didn't have any of delegate_xxx
mount options set up. While it's not wrong, it's actually more
meaningful to reject BPF_TOKEN_CREATE with specific error code (-ENOENT)
to let user-space know that no token delegation is setup up.
So, instead of creating empty BPF token that will be always ignored
because it doesn't have any of the allow_xxx bits set, reject it with
-ENOENT. If we ever need empty BPF token to be possible, we can support
that with extra flag passed into BPF_TOKEN_CREATE.
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Parse uid and gid in bpf_parse_param() so that they can be passed in as
the `data` parameter when mount() bpffs. This will be useful when we
want to control which user/group has the control to the mounted bpffs,
otherwise a separate chown() call will be needed.
Signed-off-by: Jie Jiang <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This patch adds a comment to check_mem_size_reg -- a function whose
meaning is not very transparent. The function implicitly deals with two
registers connected by convention, which is not obvious.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
The function are defined in the verifier.c file, but not called
elsewhere, so delete the unused function.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3448:20: warning: unused function 'bt_set_slot'
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3453:20: warning: unused function 'bt_clear_slot'
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3488:20: warning: unused function 'bt_is_slot_set'
Reported-by: Abaci Robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Li <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=7714
|
|
Use the fact that we are passing subprog index around and have
a corresponding struct bpf_subprog_info in bpf_verifier_env for each
subprogram. We don't need to separately pass around a flag whether
subprog is exception callback or not, each relevant verifier function
can determine this using provided subprog index if we maintain
bpf_subprog_info properly.
Also move out exception callback-specific logic from
btf_prepare_func_args(), keeping it generic. We can enforce all these
restriction right before exception callback verification pass. We add
out parameter, arg_cnt, for now, but this will be unnecessary with
subsequent refactoring and will be removed.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Emit dynptr type for CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR register. Also emit id,
ref_obj_id, and dynptr_id fields for STACK_DYNPTR stack slots.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Emit valid memory size addressable through PTR_TO_MEM register.
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
It can be useful to query how many bits are set in a cpumask. For
example, if you want to perform special logic for the last remaining
core that's set in a mask. Let's therefore add a new
bpf_cpumask_weight() kfunc which checks how many bits are set in a mask.
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When verifier validates BPF_ST_MEM instruction that stores known
constant to stack (e.g., *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = 123), it effectively spills
a fake register with a constant (but initially imprecise) value to
a stack slot. Because read-side logic treats it as a proper register
fill from stack slot, we need to mark such stack slot initialization as
INSN_F_STACK_ACCESS instruction to stop precision backtracking from
missing it.
Fixes: 41f6f64e6999 ("bpf: support non-r10 register spill/fill to/from stack in precision tracking")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
generic_map_{delete,update}_batch() doesn't set uattr->batch.count as
zero before it tries to allocate memory for key. If the memory
allocation fails, the value of uattr->batch.count will be incorrect.
Fix it by setting uattr->batch.count as zero beore batched update or
deletion.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
There is no need to call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or deletion
operation fails. So only call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() if update or
deletion operation succeeds.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When doing batched lookup and deletion operations on htab of maps,
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() is needed to ensure all programs don't use the
inner map after the bpf syscall returns.
Instead of adding the wait in __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(),
adding the wait in bpf_map_do_batch() and also removing the calling of
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from generic_map_{delete,update}_batch().
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Just like commit 9087c6ff8dfe ("bpf: Call maybe_wait_bpf_programs() only
once from generic_map_delete_batch()"), there is also no need to call
maybe_wait_bpf_programs() for each update in batched update, so only
call it once in generic_map_update_batch().
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Both map_lookup_elem() and generic_map_lookup_batch() use
bpf_map_copy_value() to lookup and copy the value, and there is no
update operation in bpf_map_copy_value(), so just remove the invocation
of maybe_wait_bpf_programs() from it.
Fixes: 15c14a3dca42 ("bpf: Add bpf_map_{value_size, update_value, map_copy_value} functions")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
In the current cgroup1 environment, associating operations between cgroups
and applications in a BPF program requires storing a mapping of cgroup_id
to application either in a hash map or maintaining it in userspace.
However, by enabling bpf_cgrp_storage for cgroup1, it becomes possible to
conveniently store application-specific information in cgroup-local storage
and utilize it within BPF programs. Furthermore, enabling this feature for
cgroup1 involves minor modifications for the non-attach case, streamlining
the process.
However, when it comes to enabling this functionality for the cgroup1
attach case, it presents challenges. Therefore, the decision is to focus on
enabling it solely for the cgroup1 non-attach case at present. If
attempting to attach to a cgroup1 fd, the operation will simply fail with
the error code -EBADF.
Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
|
|
Push the rounding up of stack offsets into the function responsible for
growing the stack, rather than relying on all the callers to do it.
Uncertainty about whether the callers did it or not tripped up people in
a previous review.
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Privileged programs are supposed to be able to read uninitialized stack
memory (ever since 6715df8d5) but, before this patch, these accesses
were permitted inconsistently. In particular, accesses were permitted
above state->allocated_stack, but not below it. In other words, if the
stack was already "large enough", the access was permitted, but
otherwise the access was rejected instead of being allowed to "grow the
stack". This undesired rejection was happening in two places:
- in check_stack_slot_within_bounds()
- in check_stack_range_initialized()
This patch arranges for these accesses to be permitted. A bunch of tests
that were relying on the old rejection had to change; all of them were
changed to add also run unprivileged, in which case the old behavior
persists. One tests couldn't be updated - global_func16 - because it
can't run unprivileged for other reasons.
This patch also fixes the tracking of the stack size for variable-offset
reads. This second fix is bundled in the same commit as the first one
because they're inter-related. Before this patch, writes to the stack
using registers containing a variable offset (as opposed to registers
with fixed, known values) were not properly contributing to the
function's needed stack size. As a result, it was possible for a program
to verify, but then to attempt to read out-of-bounds data at runtime
because a too small stack had been allocated for it.
Each function tracks the size of the stack it needs in
bpf_subprog_info.stack_depth, which is maintained by
update_stack_depth(). For regular memory accesses, check_mem_access()
was calling update_state_depth() but it was passing in only the fixed
part of the offset register, ignoring the variable offset. This was
incorrect; the minimum possible value of that register should be used
instead.
This tracking is now fixed by centralizing the tracking of stack size in
grow_stack_state(), and by lifting the calls to grow_stack_state() to
check_stack_access_within_bounds() as suggested by Andrii. The code is
now simpler and more convincingly tracks the correct maximum stack size.
check_stack_range_initialized() can now rely on enough stack having been
allocated for the access; this helps with the fix for the first issue.
A few tests were changed to also check the stack depth computation. The
one that fails without this patch is verifier_var_off:stack_write_priv_vs_unpriv.
Fixes: 01f810ace9ed3 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CABWLsev9g8UP_c3a=1qbuZUi20tGoUXoU07FPf-5FLvhOKOY+Q@mail.gmail.com/
|
|
Cross-merge networking fixes after downstream PR.
Conflicts:
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac5.c
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac5.h
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/hwif.h
37e4b8df27bc ("net: stmmac: fix FPE events losing")
c3f3b97238f6 ("net: stmmac: Refactor EST implementation")
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Adjacent changes:
net/ipv4/tcp_ao.c
9396c4ee93f9 ("net/tcp: Don't store TCP-AO maclen on reqsk")
7b0f570f879a ("tcp: Move TCP-AO bits from cookie_v[46]_check() to tcp_ao_syncookie().")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
|
|
This patch promotes the arithmetic around checking stack bounds to be
done in the 64-bit domain, instead of the current 32bit. The arithmetic
implies adding together a 64-bit register with a int offset. The
register was checked to be below 1<<29 when it was variable, but not
when it was fixed. The offset either comes from an instruction (in which
case it is 16 bit), from another register (in which case the caller
checked it to be below 1<<29 [1]), or from the size of an argument to a
kfunc (in which case it can be a u32 [2]). Between the register being
inconsistently checked to be below 1<<29, and the offset being up to an
u32, it appears that we were open to overflowing the `int`s which were
currently used for arithmetic.
[1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/815fb87b753055df2d9e50f6cd80eb10235fe3e9/kernel/bpf/verifier.c#L7494-L7498
[2] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/815fb87b753055df2d9e50f6cd80eb10235fe3e9/kernel/bpf/verifier.c#L11904
Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
This patch fixes a bug around the verification of possibly-zero-sized
stack accesses. When the access was done through a var-offset stack
pointer, check_stack_access_within_bounds was incorrectly computing the
maximum-offset of a zero-sized read to be the same as the register's min
offset. Instead, we have to take in account the register's maximum
possible value. The patch also simplifies how the max offset is checked;
the check is now simpler than for min offset.
The bug was allowing accesses to erroneously pass the
check_stack_access_within_bounds() checks, only to later crash in
check_stack_range_initialized() when all the possibly-affected stack
slots are iterated (this time with a correct max offset).
check_stack_range_initialized() is relying on
check_stack_access_within_bounds() for its accesses to the
stack-tracking vector to be within bounds; in the case of zero-sized
accesses, we were essentially only verifying that the lowest possible
slot was within bounds. We would crash when the max-offset of the stack
pointer was >= 0 (which shouldn't pass verification, and hopefully is
not something anyone's code attempts to do in practice).
Thanks Hao for reporting!
Fixes: 01f810ace9ed3 ("bpf: Allow variable-offset stack access")
Reported-by: Hao Sun <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrei Matei <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsZGEUaRCHsmaX=h-efVogsRfK1FPxmkgb0Os_frnHiNdw@mail.gmail.com/
|
|
Instead of blindly allocating PAGE_SIZE for each trampoline, check the size
of the trampoline with arch_bpf_trampoline_size(). This size is saved in
bpf_tramp_image->size, and used for modmem charge/uncharge. The fallback
arch_alloc_bpf_trampoline() still allocates a whole page because we need to
use set_memory_* to protect the memory.
struct_ops trampoline still uses a whole page for multiple trampolines.
With this size check at caller (regular trampoline and struct_ops
trampoline), remove arch_bpf_trampoline_size() from
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() in archs.
Also, update bpf_image_ksym_add() to handle symbol of different sizes.
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
This helper will be used to calculate the size of the trampoline before
allocating the memory.
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for arm64 and riscv64 can use
arch_bpf_trampoline_size() to check the trampoline fits in the image.
OTOH, arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() for s390 has to call the JIT process
twice, so it cannot use arch_bpf_trampoline_size().
Signed-off-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]> # on s390x
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Björn Töpel <[email protected]> # on riscv
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|