aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/kernel/bpf
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-01-24bpf: Add support for bpf iterator programs to use sleepable helpersKenny Yu1-5/+15
This patch allows bpf iterator programs to use sleepable helpers by changing `bpf_iter_run_prog` to use the appropriate synchronization. With sleepable bpf iterator programs, we can no longer use `rcu_read_lock()` and must use `rcu_read_lock_trace()` instead to protect the bpf program. Signed-off-by: Kenny Yu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-24Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski8-192/+588
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2022-01-24 We've added 80 non-merge commits during the last 14 day(s) which contain a total of 128 files changed, 4990 insertions(+), 895 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add XDP multi-buffer support and implement it for the mvneta driver, from Lorenzo Bianconi, Eelco Chaudron and Toke Høiland-Jørgensen. 2) Add unstable conntrack lookup helpers for BPF by using the BPF kfunc infra, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi. 3) Extend BPF cgroup programs to export custom ret value to userspace via two helpers bpf_get_retval() and bpf_set_retval(), from YiFei Zhu. 4) Add support for AF_UNIX iterator batching, from Kuniyuki Iwashima. 5) Complete missing UAPI BPF helper description and change bpf_doc.py script to enforce consistent & complete helper documentation, from Usama Arif. 6) Deprecate libbpf's legacy BPF map definitions and streamline XDP APIs to follow tc-based APIs, from Andrii Nakryiko. 7) Support BPF_PROG_QUERY for BPF programs attached to sockmap, from Di Zhu. 8) Deprecate libbpf's bpf_map__def() API and replace users with proper getters and setters, from Christy Lee. 9) Extend libbpf's btf__add_btf() with an additional hashmap for strings to reduce overhead, from Kui-Feng Lee. 10) Fix bpftool and libbpf error handling related to libbpf's hashmap__new() utility function, from Mauricio Vásquez. 11) Add support to BTF program names in bpftool's program dump, from Raman Shukhau. 12) Fix resolve_btfids build to pick up host flags, from Connor O'Brien. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (80 commits) selftests, bpf: Do not yet switch to new libbpf XDP APIs selftests, xsk: Fix rx_full stats test bpf: Fix flexible_array.cocci warnings xdp: disable XDP_REDIRECT for xdp frags bpf: selftests: add CPUMAP/DEVMAP selftests for xdp frags bpf: selftests: introduce bpf_xdp_{load,store}_bytes selftest net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_pointer utility routine bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility check libbpf: Add SEC name for xdp frags programs bpf: selftests: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include xdp frags bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature bpf: introduce frags support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init bpf: add frags support to xdp copy helpers bpf: add frags support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames if the loaded XDP program support frags bpf: introduce BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS flag in prog_flags loading the ebpf program net: mvneta: add frags support to XDP_TX xdp: add frags support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2022-01-23Merge tag 'powerpc-5.17-2' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-2/+3
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux Pull powerpc fixes from Michael Ellerman: - A series of bpf fixes, including an oops fix and some codegen fixes. - Fix a regression in syscall_get_arch() for compat processes. - Fix boot failure on some 32-bit systems with KASAN enabled. - A couple of other build/minor fixes. Thanks to Athira Rajeev, Christophe Leroy, Dmitry V. Levin, Jiri Olsa, Johan Almbladh, Maxime Bizon, Naveen N. Rao, and Nicholas Piggin. * tag 'powerpc-5.17-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux: powerpc/64s: Mask SRR0 before checking against the masked NIP powerpc/perf: Only define power_pmu_wants_prompt_pmi() for CONFIG_PPC64 powerpc/32s: Fix kasan_init_region() for KASAN powerpc/time: Fix build failure due to do_hard_irq_enable() on PPC32 powerpc/audit: Fix syscall_get_arch() powerpc64/bpf: Limit 'ldbrx' to processors compliant with ISA v2.06 tools/bpf: Rename 'struct event' to avoid naming conflict powerpc/bpf: Update ldimm64 instructions during extra pass powerpc32/bpf: Fix codegen for bpf-to-bpf calls bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack()
2022-01-21bpf: generalise tail call map compatibility checkToke Hoiland-Jorgensen5-29/+29
The check for tail call map compatibility ensures that tail calls only happen between maps of the same type. To ensure backwards compatibility for XDP frags we need a similar type of check for cpumap and devmap programs, so move the state from bpf_array_aux into bpf_map, add xdp_has_frags to the check, and apply the same check to cpumap and devmap. Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Co-developed-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/f19fd97c0328a39927f3ad03e1ca6b43fd53cdfd.1642758637.git.lorenzo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-21bpf: introduce BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS flag in prog_flags loading the ebpf programLorenzo Bianconi1-1/+3
Introduce BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS and the related field in bpf_prog_aux in order to notify the driver the loaded program support xdp frags. Acked-by: Toke Hoiland-Jorgensen <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/db2e8075b7032a356003f407d1b0deb99adaa0ed.1642758637.git.lorenzo@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-20bpf: support BPF_PROG_QUERY for progs attached to sockmapDi Zhu1-0/+5
Right now there is no way to query whether BPF programs are attached to a sockmap or not. we can use the standard interface in libbpf to query, such as: bpf_prog_query(mapFd, BPF_SK_SKB_STREAM_PARSER, 0, NULL, ...); the mapFd is the fd of sockmap. Signed-off-by: Di Zhu <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jakub Sitnicki <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Add cgroup helpers bpf_{get,set}_retval to get/set syscall return valueYiFei Zhu1-1/+37
The helpers continue to use int for retval because all the hooks are int-returning rather than long-returning. The return value of bpf_set_retval is int for future-proofing, in case in the future there may be errors trying to set the retval. After the previous patch, if a program rejects a syscall by returning 0, an -EPERM will be generated no matter if the retval is already set to -err. This patch change it being forced only if retval is not -err. This is because we want to support, for example, invoking bpf_set_retval(-EINVAL) and return 0, and have the syscall return value be -EINVAL not -EPERM. For BPF_PROG_CGROUP_INET_EGRESS_RUN_ARRAY, the prior behavior is that, if the return value is NET_XMIT_DROP, the packet is silently dropped. We preserve this behavior for backward compatibility reasons, so even if an errno is set, the errno does not return to caller. However, setting a non-err to retval cannot propagate so this is not allowed and we return a -EFAULT in that case. Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b4013fd5d16bed0b01977c1fafdeae12e1de61fb.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Move getsockopt retval to struct bpf_cg_run_ctxYiFei Zhu1-34/+48
The retval value is moved to struct bpf_cg_run_ctx for ease of access in different prog types with different context structs layouts. The helper implementation (to be added in a later patch in the series) can simply perform a container_of from current->bpf_ctx to retrieve bpf_cg_run_ctx. Unfortunately, there is no easy way to access the current task_struct via the verifier BPF bytecode rewrite, aside from possibly calling a helper, so a pointer to current task is added to struct bpf_sockopt_kern so that the rewritten BPF bytecode can access struct bpf_cg_run_ctx with an indirection. For backward compatibility, if a getsockopt program rejects a syscall by returning 0, an -EPERM will be generated, by having the BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY_CG family macros automatically set the retval to -EPERM. Unlike prior to this patch, this -EPERM will be visible to ctx->retval for any other hooks down the line in the prog array. Additionally, the restriction that getsockopt filters can only set the retval to 0 is removed, considering that certain getsockopt implementations may return optlen. Filters are now able to set the value arbitrarily. Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/73b0325f5c29912ccea7ea57ec1ed4d388fc1d37.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Make BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY return -err instead of allow booleanYiFei Zhu1-26/+15
Right now BPF_PROG_RUN_ARRAY and related macros return 1 or 0 for whether the prog array allows or rejects whatever is being hooked. The caller of these macros then return -EPERM or continue processing based on thw macro's return value. Unforunately this is inflexible, since -EPERM is the only err that can be returned. This patch should be a no-op; it prepares for the next patch. The returning of the -EPERM is moved to inside the macros, so the outer functions are directly returning what the macros returned if they are non-zero. Signed-off-by: YiFei Zhu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/788abcdca55886d1f43274c918eaa9f792a9f33b.1639619851.git.zhuyifei@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Fix ringbuf memory type confusion when passing to helpersDaniel Borkmann1-1/+5
The bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument, and thus both expect the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL. While the non-NULL memory from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() can be passed to other helpers, the two sinks (bpf_ringbuf_submit(), bpf_ringbuf_discard()) right now only enforce a register type of PTR_TO_MEM. This can lead to potential type confusion since it would allow other PTR_TO_MEM memory to be passed into the two sinks which did not come from bpf_ringbuf_reserve(). Add a new MEM_ALLOC composable type attribute for PTR_TO_MEM, and enforce that: - bpf_ringbuf_reserve() returns NULL or PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC - bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() only take PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC but not plain PTR_TO_MEM arguments via ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM - however, other helpers might treat PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_ALLOC as plain PTR_TO_MEM to populate the memory area when they use ARG_PTR_TO_{UNINIT_,}MEM in their func proto description Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it") Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Fix out of bounds access for ringbuf helpersDaniel Borkmann1-0/+6
Both bpf_ringbuf_submit() and bpf_ringbuf_discard() have ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM in their bpf_func_proto definition as their first argument. They both expect the result from a prior bpf_ringbuf_reserve() call which has a return type of RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL. Meaning, after a NULL check in the code, the verifier will promote the register type in the non-NULL branch to a PTR_TO_MEM and in the NULL branch to a known zero scalar. Generally, pointer arithmetic on PTR_TO_MEM is allowed, so the latter could have an offset. The ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM expects a PTR_TO_MEM register type. However, the non- zero result from bpf_ringbuf_reserve() must be fed into either bpf_ringbuf_submit() or bpf_ringbuf_discard() but with the original offset given it will then read out the struct bpf_ringbuf_hdr mapping. The verifier missed to enforce a zero offset, so that out of bounds access can be triggered which could be used to escalate privileges if unprivileged BPF was enabled (disabled by default in kernel). Fixes: 457f44363a88 ("bpf: Implement BPF ring buffer and verifier support for it") Reported-by: <[email protected]> (SecCoder Security Lab) Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Generally fix helper register offset checkDaniel Borkmann1-11/+28
Right now the assertion on check_ptr_off_reg() is only enforced for register types PTR_TO_CTX (and open coded also for PTR_TO_BTF_ID), however, this is insufficient since many other PTR_TO_* register types such as PTR_TO_FUNC do not handle/expect register offsets when passed to helper functions. Given this can slip-through easily when adding new types, make this an explicit allow-list and reject all other current and future types by default if this is encountered. Also, extend check_ptr_off_reg() to handle PTR_TO_BTF_ID as well instead of duplicating it. For PTR_TO_BTF_ID, reg->off is used for BTF to match expected BTF ids if struct offset is used. This part still needs to be allowed, but the dynamic off from the tnum must be rejected. Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Mark PTR_TO_FUNC register initially with zero offsetDaniel Borkmann1-3/+6
Similar as with other pointer types where we use ldimm64, clear the register content to zero first, and then populate the PTR_TO_FUNC type and subprogno number. Currently this is not done, and leads to reuse of stale register tracking data. Given for special ldimm64 cases we always clear the register offset, make it common for all cases, so it won't be forgotten in future. Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-19bpf: Generalize check_ctx_reg for reuse with other typesDaniel Borkmann2-11/+12
Generalize the check_ctx_reg() helper function into a more generic named one so that it can be reused for other register types as well to check whether their offset is non-zero. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-18bpf: Add reference tracking support to kfuncKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-12/+72
This patch adds verifier support for PTR_TO_BTF_ID return type of kfunc to be a reference, by reusing acquire_reference_state/release_reference support for existing in-kernel bpf helpers. We make use of the three kfunc types: - BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_ACQUIRE Return true if kfunc_btf_id is an acquire kfunc. This will acquire_reference_state for the returned PTR_TO_BTF_ID (this is the only allow return value). Note that acquire kfunc must always return a PTR_TO_BTF_ID{_OR_NULL}, otherwise the program is rejected. - BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RELEASE Return true if kfunc_btf_id is a release kfunc. This will release the reference to the passed in PTR_TO_BTF_ID which has a reference state (from earlier acquire kfunc). The btf_check_func_arg_match returns the regno (of argument register, hence > 0) if the kfunc is a release kfunc, and a proper referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is being passed to it. This is similar to how helper call check uses bpf_call_arg_meta to store the ref_obj_id that is later used to release the reference. Similar to in-kernel helper, we only allow passing one referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID as an argument. It can also be passed in to normal kfunc, but in case of release kfunc there must always be one PTR_TO_BTF_ID argument that is referenced. - BTF_KFUNC_TYPE_RET_NULL For kfunc returning PTR_TO_BTF_ID, tells if it can be NULL, hence force caller to mark the pointer not null (using check) before accessing it. Note that taking into account the case fixed by commit 93c230e3f5bd ("bpf: Enforce id generation for all may-be-null register type") we assign a non-zero id for mark_ptr_or_null_reg logic. Later, if more return types are supported by kfunc, which have a _OR_NULL variant, it might be better to move this id generation under a common reg_type_may_be_null check, similar to the case in the commit. Referenced PTR_TO_BTF_ID is currently only limited to kfunc, but can be extended in the future to other BPF helpers as well. For now, we can rely on the btf_struct_ids_match check to ensure we get the pointer to the expected struct type. In the future, care needs to be taken to avoid ambiguity for reference PTR_TO_BTF_ID passed to release function, in case multiple candidates can release same BTF ID. e.g. there might be two release kfuncs (or kfunc and helper): foo(struct abc *p); bar(struct abc *p); ... such that both release a PTR_TO_BTF_ID with btf_id of struct abc. In this case we would need to track the acquire function corresponding to the release function to avoid type confusion, and store this information in the register state so that an incorrect program can be rejected. This is not a problem right now, hence it is left as an exercise for the future patch introducing such a case in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-18bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfuncKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-48/+124
BPF helpers can associate two adjacent arguments together to pass memory of certain size, using ARG_PTR_TO_MEM and ARG_CONST_SIZE arguments. Since we don't use bpf_func_proto for kfunc, we need to leverage BTF to implement similar support. The ARG_CONST_SIZE processing for helpers is refactored into a common check_mem_size_reg helper that is shared with kfunc as well. kfunc ptr_to_mem support follows logic similar to global functions, where verification is done as if pointer is not null, even when it may be null. This leads to a simple to follow rule for writing kfunc: always check the argument pointer for NULL, except when it is PTR_TO_CTX. Also, the PTR_TO_CTX case is also only safe when the helper expecting pointer to program ctx is not exposed to other programs where same struct is not ctx type. In that case, the type check will fall through to other cases and would permit passing other types of pointers, possibly NULL at runtime. Currently, we require the size argument to be suffixed with "__sz" in the parameter name. This information is then recorded in kernel BTF and verified during function argument checking. In the future we can use BTF tagging instead, and modify the kernel function definitions. This will be a purely kernel-side change. This allows us to have some form of backwards compatibility for structures that are passed in to the kernel function with their size, and allow variable length structures to be passed in if they are accompanied by a size parameter. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-18bpf: Remove check_kfunc_call callback and old kfunc BTF ID APIKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi2-58/+8
Completely remove the old code for check_kfunc_call to help it work with modules, and also the callback itself. The previous commit adds infrastructure to register all sets and put them in vmlinux or module BTF, and concatenates all related sets organized by the hook and the type. Once populated, these sets remain immutable for the lifetime of the struct btf. Also, since we don't need the 'owner' module anywhere when doing check_kfunc_call, drop the 'btf_modp' module parameter from find_kfunc_desc_btf. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-18bpf: Populate kfunc BTF ID sets in struct btfKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-1/+243
This patch prepares the kernel to support putting all kinds of kfunc BTF ID sets in the struct btf itself. The various kernel subsystems will make register_btf_kfunc_id_set call in the initcalls (for built-in code and modules). The 'hook' is one of the many program types, e.g. XDP and TC/SCHED_CLS, STRUCT_OPS, and 'types' are check (allowed or not), acquire, release, and ret_null (with PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL return type). A maximum of BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT (32) kfunc BTF IDs are permitted in a set of certain hook and type for vmlinux sets, since they are allocated on demand, and otherwise set as NULL. Module sets can only be registered once per hook and type, hence they are directly assigned. A new btf_kfunc_id_set_contains function is exposed for use in verifier, this new method is faster than the existing list searching method, and is also automatic. It also lets other code not care whether the set is unallocated or not. Note that module code can only do single register_btf_kfunc_id_set call per hook. This is why sorting is only done for in-kernel vmlinux sets, because there might be multiple sets for the same hook and type that must be concatenated, hence sorting them is required to ensure bsearch in btf_id_set_contains continues to work correctly. Next commit will update the kernel users to make use of this infrastructure. Finally, add __maybe_unused annotation for BTF ID macros for the !CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF case, so that they don't produce warnings during build time. The previous patch is also needed to provide synchronization against initialization for module BTF's kfunc_set_tab introduced here, as described below: The kfunc_set_tab pointer in struct btf is write-once (if we consider the registration phase (comprised of multiple register_btf_kfunc_id_set calls) as a single operation). In this sense, once it has been fully prepared, it isn't modified, only used for lookup (from the verifier context). For btf_vmlinux, it is initialized fully during the do_initcalls phase, which happens fairly early in the boot process, before any processes are present. This also eliminates the possibility of bpf_check being called at that point, thus relieving us of ensuring any synchronization between the registration and lookup function (btf_kfunc_id_set_contains). However, the case for module BTF is a bit tricky. The BTF is parsed, prepared, and published from the MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier callback. After this, the module initcalls are invoked, where our registration function will be called to populate the kfunc_set_tab for module BTF. At this point, BTF may be available to userspace while its corresponding module is still intializing. A BTF fd can then be passed to verifier using bpf syscall (e.g. for kfunc call insn). Hence, there is a race window where verifier may concurrently try to lookup the kfunc_set_tab. To prevent this race, we must ensure the operations are serialized, or waiting for the __init functions to complete. In the earlier registration API, this race was alleviated as verifier bpf_check_mod_kfunc_call didn't find the kfunc BTF ID until it was added by the registration function (called usually at the end of module __init function after all module resources have been initialized). If the verifier made the check_kfunc_call before kfunc BTF ID was added to the list, it would fail verification (saying call isn't allowed). The access to list was protected using a mutex. Now, it would still fail verification, but for a different reason (returning ENXIO due to the failed btf_try_get_module call in add_kfunc_call), because if the __init call is in progress the module will be in the middle of MODULE_STATE_COMING -> MODULE_STATE_LIVE transition, and the BTF_MODULE_LIVE flag for btf_module instance will not be set, so the btf_try_get_module call will fail. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-18bpf: Fix UAF due to race between btf_try_get_module and load_moduleKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-2/+24
While working on code to populate kfunc BTF ID sets for module BTF from its initcall, I noticed that by the time the initcall is invoked, the module BTF can already be seen by userspace (and the BPF verifier). The existing btf_try_get_module calls try_module_get which only fails if mod->state == MODULE_STATE_GOING, i.e. it can increment module reference when module initcall is happening in parallel. Currently, BTF parsing happens from MODULE_STATE_COMING notifier callback. At this point, the module initcalls have not been invoked. The notifier callback parses and prepares the module BTF, allocates an ID, which publishes it to userspace, and then adds it to the btf_modules list allowing the kernel to invoke btf_try_get_module for the BTF. However, at this point, the module has not been fully initialized (i.e. its initcalls have not finished). The code in module.c can still fail and free the module, without caring for other users. However, nothing stops btf_try_get_module from succeeding between the state transition from MODULE_STATE_COMING to MODULE_STATE_LIVE. This leads to a use-after-free issue when BPF program loads successfully in the state transition, load_module's do_init_module call fails and frees the module, and BPF program fd on close calls module_put for the freed module. Future patch has test case to verify we don't regress in this area in future. There are multiple points after prepare_coming_module (in load_module) where failure can occur and module loading can return error. We illustrate and test for the race using the last point where it can practically occur (in module __init function). An illustration of the race: CPU 0 CPU 1 load_module notifier_call(MODULE_STATE_COMING) btf_parse_module btf_alloc_id // Published to userspace list_add(&btf_mod->list, btf_modules) mod->init(...) ... ^ bpf_check | check_pseudo_btf_id | btf_try_get_module | returns true | ... ... | module __init in progress return prog_fd | ... ... V if (ret < 0) free_module(mod) ... close(prog_fd) ... bpf_prog_free_deferred module_put(used_btf.mod) // use-after-free We fix this issue by setting a flag BTF_MODULE_F_LIVE, from the notifier callback when MODULE_STATE_LIVE state is reached for the module, so that we return NULL from btf_try_get_module for modules that are not fully formed. Since try_module_get already checks that module is not in MODULE_STATE_GOING state, and that is the only transition a live module can make before being removed from btf_modules list, this is enough to close the race and prevent the bug. A later selftest patch crafts the race condition artifically to verify that it has been fixed, and that verifier fails to load program (with ENXIO). Lastly, a couple of comments: 1. Even if this race didn't exist, it seems more appropriate to only access resources (ksyms and kfuncs) of a fully formed module which has been initialized completely. 2. This patch was born out of need for synchronization against module initcall for the next patch, so it is needed for correctness even without the aforementioned race condition. The BTF resources initialized by module initcall are set up once and then only looked up, so just waiting until the initcall has finished ensures correct behavior. Fixes: 541c3bad8dc5 ("bpf: Support BPF ksym variables in kernel modules") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-15bpf: Guard against accessing NULL pt_regs in bpf_get_task_stack()Naveen N. Rao1-2/+3
task_pt_regs() can return NULL on powerpc for kernel threads. This is then used in __bpf_get_stack() to check for user mode, resulting in a kernel oops. Guard against this by checking return value of task_pt_regs() before trying to obtain the call chain. Fixes: fa28dcb82a38f8 ("bpf: Introduce helper bpf_get_task_stack()") Cc: [email protected] # v5.9+ Signed-off-by: Naveen N. Rao <[email protected]> Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d5ef83c361cc255494afd15ff1b4fb02a36e1dcf.1641468127.git.naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com
2022-01-11bpf: Fix incorrect integer literal used for marking scratched stack.Christy Lee1-3/+3
env->scratched_stack_slots is a 64-bit value, we should use ULL instead of UL literal values. Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <[email protected]> Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-01-11bpf: Fix mount source show for bpffsYafang Shao1-2/+12
We noticed our tc ebpf tools can't start after we upgrade our in-house kernel version from 4.19 to 5.10. That is because of the behaviour change in bpffs caused by commit d2935de7e4fd ("vfs: Convert bpf to use the new mount API"). In our tc ebpf tools, we do strict environment check. If the environment is not matched, we won't allow to start the ebpf progs. One of the check is whether bpffs is properly mounted. The mount information of bpffs in kernel-4.19 and kernel-5.10 are as follows: - kernel 4.19 $ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf $ mount -t bpf bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime) - kernel 5.10 $ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf $ mount -t bpf none on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime) The device name in kernel-5.10 is displayed as none instead of bpffs, then our environment check fails. Currently we modify the tools to adopt to the kernel behaviour change, but I think we'd better change the kernel code to keep the behavior consistent. After this change, the mount information will be displayed the same with the behavior in kernel-4.19, for example: $ mount -t bpf bpffs /sys/fs/bpf $ mount -t bpf bpffs on /sys/fs/bpf type bpf (rw,relatime) Fixes: d2935de7e4fd ("vfs: Convert bpf to use the new mount API") Suggested-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]> Cc: David Howells <[email protected]> Cc: Al Viro <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-01-05xdp: Move conversion to xdp_frame out of map functionsToke Høiland-Jørgensen2-28/+12
All map redirect functions except XSK maps convert xdp_buff to xdp_frame before enqueueing it. So move this conversion of out the map functions and into xdp_do_redirect(). This removes a bit of duplicated code, but more importantly it makes it possible to support caller-allocated xdp_frame structures, which will be added in a subsequent commit. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-01-05bpf: Fix verifier support for validation of async callbacksKris Van Hees1-0/+1
Commit bfc6bb74e4f1 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.") added support for BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback to the __check_func_call() function. The test in __check_func_call() is flaweed because it can mis-interpret a regular BPF-to-BPF pseudo-call as a BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback callback call. Consider the conditional in the code: if (insn->code == (BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL) && insn->imm == BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback) { The BPF_FUNC_timer_set_callback has value 170. This means that if you have a BPF program that contains a pseudo-call with an instruction delta of 170, this conditional will be found to be true by the verifier, and it will interpret the pseudo-call as a callback. This leads to a mess with the verification of the program because it makes the wrong assumptions about the nature of this call. Solution: include an explicit check to ensure that insn->src_reg == 0. This ensures that calls cannot be mis-interpreted as an async callback call. Fixes: bfc6bb74e4f1 ("bpf: Implement verifier support for validation of async callbacks.") Signed-off-by: Kris Van Hees <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-01-05bpf: Don't promote bogus looking registers after null check.Daniel Borkmann1-6/+6
If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would allow to leak a kernel pointer this way. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2021-12-31Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextDavid S. Miller18-355/+601
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2021-12-30 The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree. We've added 72 non-merge commits during the last 20 day(s) which contain a total of 223 files changed, 3510 insertions(+), 1591 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Automatic setrlimit in libbpf when bpf is memcg's in the kernel, from Andrii. 2) Beautify and de-verbose verifier logs, from Christy. 3) Composable verifier types, from Hao. 4) bpf_strncmp helper, from Hou. 5) bpf.h header dependency cleanup, from Jakub. 6) get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpers, from Jiri. 7) Sleepable local storage, from KP. 8) Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument support, from Kumar. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
2021-12-30bpf: Fix typo in a comment in bpf lpm_trie.Leon Huayra1-1/+1
Fix typo in a comment in trie_update_elem(). Signed-off-by: Leon Huayra <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-29net: Add includes masked by netdevice.h including uapi/bpf.hJakub Kicinski1-0/+1
Add missing includes unmasked by the subsequent change. Mostly network drivers missing an include for XDP_PACKET_HEADROOM. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-29bpf: Allow bpf_local_storage to be used by sleepable programsKP Singh4-15/+50
Other maps like hashmaps are already available to sleepable programs. Sleepable BPF programs run under trace RCU. Allow task, sk and inode storage to be used from sleepable programs. This allows sleepable and non-sleepable programs to provide shareable annotations on kernel objects. Sleepable programs run in trace RCU where as non-sleepable programs run in a normal RCU critical section i.e. __bpf_prog_enter{_sleepable} and __bpf_prog_exit{_sleepable}) (rcu_read_lock or rcu_read_lock_trace). In order to make the local storage maps accessible to both sleepable and non-sleepable programs, one needs to call both call_rcu_tasks_trace and call_rcu to wait for both trace and classical RCU grace periods to expire before freeing memory. Paul's work on call_rcu_tasks_trace allows us to have per CPU queueing for call_rcu_tasks_trace. This behaviour can be achieved by setting rcupdate.rcu_task_enqueue_lim=<num_cpus> boot parameter. In light of these new performance changes and to keep the local storage code simple, avoid adding a new flag for sleepable maps / local storage to select the RCU synchronization (trace / classical). Also, update the dereferencing of the pointers to use rcu_derference_check (with either the trace or normal RCU locks held) with a common bpf_rcu_lock_held helper method. Signed-off-by: KP Singh <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-29bpf: Add missing map_get_next_key method to bloom filter map.Haimin Zhang1-0/+6
Without it, kernel crashes in map_get_next_key(). Fixes: 9330986c0300 ("bpf: Add bloom filter map implementation") Reported-by: TCS Robot <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Haimin Zhang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-21bpf: Use struct_size() helperXiu Jianfeng2-7/+2
In an effort to avoid open-coded arithmetic in the kernel, use the struct_size() helper instead of open-coded calculation. Signed-off-by: Xiu Jianfeng <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/160 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Extend kfunc with PTR_TO_CTX, PTR_TO_MEM argument supportKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-21/+73
Allow passing PTR_TO_CTX, if the kfunc expects a matching struct type, and punt to PTR_TO_MEM block if reg->type does not fall in one of PTR_TO_BTF_ID or PTR_TO_SOCK* types. This will be used by future commits to get access to XDP and TC PTR_TO_CTX, and pass various data (flags, l4proto, netns_id, etc.) encoded in opts struct passed as pointer to kfunc. For PTR_TO_MEM support, arguments are currently limited to pointer to scalar, or pointer to struct composed of scalars. This is done so that unsafe scenarios (like passing PTR_TO_MEM where PTR_TO_BTF_ID of in-kernel valid structure is expected, which may have pointers) are avoided. Since the argument checking happens basd on argument register type, it is not easy to ascertain what the expected type is. In the future, support for PTR_TO_MEM for kfunc can be extended to serve other usecases. The struct type whose pointer is passed in may have maximum nesting depth of 4, all recursively composed of scalars or struct with scalars. Future commits will add negative tests that check whether these restrictions imposed for kfunc arguments are duly rejected by BPF verifier or not. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Add MEM_RDONLY for helper args that are pointers to rdonly mem.Hao Luo6-11/+25
Some helper functions may modify its arguments, for example, bpf_d_path, bpf_get_stack etc. Previously, their argument types were marked as ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, which is compatible with read-only mem types, such as PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF. Therefore it's legitimate, but technically incorrect, to modify a read-only memory by passing it into one of such helper functions. This patch tags the bpf_args compatible with immutable memory with MEM_RDONLY flag. The arguments that don't have this flag will be only compatible with mutable memory types, preventing the helper from modifying a read-only memory. The bpf_args that have MEM_RDONLY are compatible with both mutable memory and immutable memory. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.Hao Luo2-6/+28
Tag the return type of {per, this}_cpu_ptr with RDONLY_MEM. The returned value of this pair of helpers is kernel object, which can not be updated by bpf programs. Previously these two helpers return PTR_OT_MEM for kernel objects of scalar type, which allows one to directly modify the memory. Now with RDONLY_MEM tagging, the verifier will reject programs that write into RDONLY_MEM. Fixes: 63d9b80dcf2c ("bpf: Introducte bpf_this_cpu_ptr()") Fixes: eaa6bcb71ef6 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_per_cpu_ptr()") Fixes: 4976b718c355 ("bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id") Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Convert PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to composable types.Hao Luo2-2/+2
Remove PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL and replace it with PTR_TO_MEM combined with flag PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Introduce MEM_RDONLY flagHao Luo3-38/+53
This patch introduce a flag MEM_RDONLY to tag a reg value pointing to read-only memory. It makes the following changes: 1. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF 2. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF -> PTR_TO_BUF | MEM_RDONLY Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Replace PTR_TO_XXX_OR_NULL with PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULLHao Luo3-177/+132
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_reg composable, by allocating bits in the type to represent flags. One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer may be NULL. This patch switches the qualified reg_types to use this flag. The reg_types changed in this patch include: 1. PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL 2. PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL 3. PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL 4. PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL 5. PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL 6. PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL 7. PTR_TO_RDONLY_BUF_OR_NULL 8. PTR_TO_RDWR_BUF_OR_NULL Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Replace RET_XXX_OR_NULL with RET_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULLHao Luo2-27/+27
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_ret composable, by reserving high bits to represent flags. One of the flag is PTR_MAYBE_NULL, which indicates a pointer may be NULL. When applying this flag to ret_types, it means the returned value could be a NULL pointer. This patch switches the qualified arg_types to use this flag. The ret_types changed in this patch include: 1. RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL 2. RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL 3. RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL 4. RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL 5. RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL 6. RET_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_BTF_ID_OR_NULL 7. RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL This patch doesn't eliminate the use of these names, instead it makes them aliases to 'RET_PTR_TO_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-18bpf: Replace ARG_XXX_OR_NULL with ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULLHao Luo1-25/+14
We have introduced a new type to make bpf_arg composable, by reserving high bits of bpf_arg to represent flags of a type. One of the flags is PTR_MAYBE_NULL which indicates a pointer may be NULL. When applying this flag to an arg_type, it means the arg can take NULL pointer. This patch switches the qualified arg_types to use this flag. The arg_types changed in this patch include: 1. ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL 2. ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL 3. ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL 4. ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL 5. ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL 6. ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL This patch does not eliminate the use of these arg_types, instead it makes them an alias to the 'ARG_XXX | PTR_MAYBE_NULL'. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-16Only output backtracking information in log level 2Christy Lee1-3/+3
Backtracking information is very verbose, don't print it in log level 1 to improve readability. Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-16bpf: Right align verifier states in verifier logs.Christy Lee1-21/+36
Make the verifier logs more readable, print the verifier states on the corresponding instruction line. If the previous line was not a bpf instruction, then print the verifier states on its own line. Before: Validating test_pkt_access_subprog3() func#3... 86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb) 86: (bf) r6 = r2 87: R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 87: (bc) w7 = w1 88: R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 88: (bf) r1 = r6 89: R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 89: (85) call pc+9 Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping. 90: R0_w=invP(id=0) 90: (bc) w8 = w0 91: R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 91: (b7) r1 = 123 92: R1_w=invP123 92: (85) call pc+65 Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping. 93: R0=invP(id=0) After: 86: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int test_pkt_access_subprog3(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb) 86: (bf) r6 = r2 ; R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 87: (bc) w7 = w1 ; R1=invP(id=0) R7_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 88: (bf) r1 = r6 ; R1_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R6_w=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) 89: (85) call pc+9 Func#4 is global and valid. Skipping. 90: R0_w=invP(id=0) 90: (bc) w8 = w0 ; R0_w=invP(id=0) R8_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return get_skb_len(skb) * get_skb_ifindex(val, skb, get_constant(123)); 91: (b7) r1 = 123 ; R1_w=invP123 92: (85) call pc+65 Func#5 is global and valid. Skipping. 93: R0=invP(id=0) Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2021-12-16bpf: Only print scratched registers and stack slots to verifier logs.Christy Lee1-14/+69
When printing verifier state for any log level, print full verifier state only on function calls or on errors. Otherwise, only print the registers and stack slots that were accessed. Log size differences: verif_scale_loop6 before: 234566564 verif_scale_loop6 after: 72143943 69% size reduction kfree_skb before: 166406 kfree_skb after: 55386 69% size reduction Before: 156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) 157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=invP0 R10=fp0 fp-8_w=00000000 fp-16_w=00\ 000000 fp-24_w=00000000 fp-32_w=00000000 fp-40_w=00000000 fp-48_w=00000000 fp-56_w=00000000 fp-64_w=00000000 fp-72_w=00000000 fp-80_w=00000\ 000 fp-88_w=00000000 fp-96_w=00000000 fp-104_w=00000000 fp-112_w=00000000 fp-120_w=00000000 fp-128_w=00000000 fp-136_w=00000000 fp-144_w=00\ 000000 fp-152_w=00000000 fp-160_w=00000000 fp-168_w=00000000 fp-176_w=00000000 fp-184_w=00000000 fp-192_w=00000000 fp-200_w=00000000 fp-208\ _w=00000000 fp-216_w=00000000 fp-224_w=00000000 fp-232_w=00000000 fp-240_w=00000000 fp-248_w=00000000 fp-256_w=00000000 fp-264_w=00000000 f\ p-272_w=00000000 fp-280_w=00000000 fp-288_w=00000000 fp-296_w=00000000 fp-304_w=00000000 fp-312_w=00000000 fp-320_w=00000000 fp-328_w=00000\ 000 fp-336_w=00000000 fp-344_w=00000000 fp-352_w=00000000 fp-360_w=00000000 fp-368_w=00000000 fp-376_w=00000000 fp-384_w=00000000 fp-392_w=\ 00000000 fp-400_w=00000000 fp-408_w=00000000 fp-416_w=00000000 fp-424_w=00000000 fp-432_w=00000000 fp-440_w=00000000 fp-448_w=00000000 ; return skb->len; 157: (95) exit Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_constant() func#5... 158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_constant(long val) 158: (bf) r0 = r1 159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0 ; return val - 122; 159: (04) w0 += -122 160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=1) R10=fp0 ; return val - 122; 160: (95) exit Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6... 161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var) 161: (bc) w0 = w3 162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 After: 156: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) 157: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; return skb->len; 157: (95) exit Func#4 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_constant() func#5... 158: R1=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_constant(long val) 158: (bf) r0 = r1 159: R0_w=invP(id=1) R1=invP(id=1) ; return val - 122; 159: (04) w0 += -122 160: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) ; return val - 122; 160: (95) exit Func#5 is safe for any args that match its prototype Validating get_skb_ifindex() func#6... 161: R1=invP(id=0) R2=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R3=invP(id=0) R10=fp0 ; int get_skb_ifindex(int val, struct __sk_buff *skb, int var) 161: (bc) w0 = w3 162: R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff)) R3=invP(id=0) Signed-off-by: Christy Lee <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-16Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-17/+36
No conflicts. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2021-12-16add missing bpf-cgroup.h includesJakub Kicinski3-0/+3
We're about to break the cgroup-defs.h -> bpf-cgroup.h dependency, make sure those who actually need more than the definition of struct cgroup_bpf include bpf-cgroup.h explicitly. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2021-12-16bpf: Make 32->64 bounds propagation slightly more robustDaniel Borkmann1-9/+15
Make the bounds propagation in __reg_assign_32_into_64() slightly more robust and readable by aligning it similarly as we did back in the __reg_combine_64_into_32() counterpart. Meaning, only propagate or pessimize them as a smin/smax pair. Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2021-12-16bpf: Fix signed bounds propagation after mov32Daniel Borkmann1-0/+4
For the case where both s32_{min,max}_value bounds are positive, the __reg_assign_32_into_64() directly propagates them to their 64 bit counterparts, otherwise it pessimises them into [0,u32_max] universe and tries to refine them later on by learning through the tnum as per comment in mentioned function. However, that does not always happen, for example, in mov32 operation we call zext_32_to_64(dst_reg) which invokes the __reg_assign_32_into_64() as is without subsequent bounds update as elsewhere thus no refinement based on tnum takes place. Thus, not calling into the __update_reg_bounds() / __reg_deduce_bounds() / __reg_bound_offset() triplet as we do, for example, in case of ALU ops via adjust_scalar_min_max_vals(), will lead to more pessimistic bounds when dumping the full register state: Before fix: 0: (b4) w0 = -1 1: R0_w=invP4294967295 (id=0,imm=ffffffff, smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295, umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295, var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0), s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1, u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1) 1: (bc) w0 = w0 2: R0_w=invP4294967295 (id=0,imm=ffffffff, smin_value=0,smax_value=4294967295, umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295, var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0), s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1, u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1) Technically, the smin_value=0 and smax_value=4294967295 bounds are not incorrect, but given the register is still a constant, they break assumptions about const scalars that smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value. After fix: 0: (b4) w0 = -1 1: R0_w=invP4294967295 (id=0,imm=ffffffff, smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295, umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295, var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0), s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1, u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1) 1: (bc) w0 = w0 2: R0_w=invP4294967295 (id=0,imm=ffffffff, smin_value=4294967295,smax_value=4294967295, umin_value=4294967295,umax_value=4294967295, var_off=(0xffffffff; 0x0), s32_min_value=-1,s32_max_value=-1, u32_min_value=-1,u32_max_value=-1) Without the smin_value == smax_value and umin_value == umax_value invariant being intact for const scalars, it is possible to leak out kernel pointers from unprivileged user space if the latter is enabled. For example, when such registers are involved in pointer arithmtics, then adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() will taint the destination register into an unknown scalar, and the latter can be exported and stored e.g. into a BPF map value. Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2021-12-14bpf: Fix kernel address leakage in atomic cmpxchg's r0 aux regDaniel Borkmann1-1/+8
The implementation of BPF_CMPXCHG on a high level has the following parameters: .-[old-val] .-[new-val] BPF_R0 = cmpxchg{32,64}(DST_REG + insn->off, BPF_R0, SRC_REG) `-[mem-loc] `-[old-val] Given a BPF insn can only have two registers (dst, src), the R0 is fixed and used as an auxilliary register for input (old value) as well as output (returning old value from memory location). While the verifier performs a number of safety checks, it misses to reject unprivileged programs where R0 contains a pointer as old value. Through brute-forcing it takes about ~16sec on my machine to leak a kernel pointer with BPF_CMPXCHG. The PoC is basically probing for kernel addresses by storing the guessed address into the map slot as a scalar, and using the map value pointer as R0 while SRC_REG has a canary value to detect a matching address. Fix it by checking R0 for pointers, and reject if that's the case for unprivileged programs. Fixes: 5ffa25502b5a ("bpf: Add instructions for atomic_[cmp]xchg") Reported-by: Ryota Shiga (Flatt Security) Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2021-12-14bpf: Fix kernel address leakage in atomic fetchDaniel Borkmann1-3/+9
The change in commit 37086bfdc737 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH") around check_mem_access() handling is buggy since this would allow for unprivileged users to leak kernel pointers. For example, an atomic fetch/and with -1 on a stack destination which holds a spilled pointer will migrate the spilled register type into a scalar, which can then be exported out of the program (since scalar != pointer) by dumping it into a map value. The original implementation of XADD was preventing this situation by using a double call to check_mem_access() one with BPF_READ and a subsequent one with BPF_WRITE, in both cases passing -1 as a placeholder value instead of register as per XADD semantics since it didn't contain a value fetch. The BPF_READ also included a check in check_stack_read_fixed_off() which rejects the program if the stack slot is of __is_pointer_value() if dst_regno < 0. The latter is to distinguish whether we're dealing with a regular stack spill/ fill or some arithmetical operation which is disallowed on non-scalars, see also 6e7e63cbb023 ("bpf: Forbid XADD on spilled pointers for unprivileged users") for more context on check_mem_access() and its handling of placeholder value -1. One minimally intrusive option to fix the leak is for the BPF_FETCH case to initially check the BPF_READ case via check_mem_access() with -1 as register, followed by the actual load case with non-negative load_reg to propagate stack bounds to registers. Fixes: 37086bfdc737 ("bpf: Propagate stack bounds to registers in atomics w/ BPF_FETCH") Reported-by: <[email protected]> Acked-by: Brendan Jackman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2021-12-13bpf: Let bpf_warn_invalid_xdp_action() report more infoPaolo Abeni2-4/+4
In non trivial scenarios, the action id alone is not sufficient to identify the program causing the warning. Before the previous patch, the generated stack-trace pointed out at least the involved device driver. Let's additionally include the program name and id, and the relevant device name. If the user needs additional infos, he can fetch them via a kernel probe, leveraging the arguments added here. Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ddb96bb975cbfddb1546cf5da60e77d5100b533c.1638189075.git.pabeni@redhat.com
2021-12-13bpf: Add get_func_[arg|ret|arg_cnt] helpersJiri Olsa2-5/+80
Adding following helpers for tracing programs: Get n-th argument of the traced function: long bpf_get_func_arg(void *ctx, u32 n, u64 *value) Get return value of the traced function: long bpf_get_func_ret(void *ctx, u64 *value) Get arguments count of the traced function: long bpf_get_func_arg_cnt(void *ctx) The trampoline now stores number of arguments on ctx-8 address, so it's easy to verify argument index and find return value argument's position. Moving function ip address on the trampoline stack behind the number of functions arguments, so it's now stored on ctx-16 address if it's needed. All helpers above are inlined by verifier. Also bit unrelated small change - using newly added function bpf_prog_has_trampoline in check_get_func_ip. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]