| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
[ Upstream commit b238e187b4a2d3b54d80aec05a9cab6466b79dde ]
Use BPF helper number instead of function pointer in
bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(). This would simplify usage of this
function in verifier.c:check_cfg() (in a follow-up patch),
where only helper number is easily available and there is no real need
to lookup helper proto.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Stable-dep-of: 1a4607ffba35 ("bpf: consider that tail calls invalidate packet pointers")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit c4441ca86afe4814039ee1b32c39d833c1a16bbc ]
The bpf_remove_insns() function returns WARN_ON_ONCE(error), where
error is a result of bpf_adj_branches(), and thus should be always 0
However, if for any reason it is not 0, then it will be converted to
boolean by WARN_ON_ONCE and returned to user space as 1, not an actual
error value. Fix this by returning the original err after the WARN check.
Signed-off-by: Anton Protopopov <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit bd74e238ae6944b462f57ce8752440a011ba4530 ]
Andrii spotted that process_dynptr_func's rejection of incorrect
argument register type will print an error string where argument numbers
are not zero-indexed, unlike elsewhere in the verifier. Fix this by
subtracting 1 from regno. The same scenario exists for iterator
messages. Fix selftest error strings that match on the exact argument
number while we're at it to ensure clean bisection.
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 23579010cf0a12476e96a5f1acdf78a9c5843657 ]
On x86-64 calling bpf_get_smp_processor_id() in a kernel with CONFIG_SMP
disabled can trigger the following bug, as pcpu_hot is unavailable:
[ 8.471774] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 00000000936a290c
[ 8.471849] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 8.471881] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
Fix by inlining a return 0 in the !CONFIG_SMP case.
Fixes: 1ae6921009e5 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_smp_processor_id() helper")
Signed-off-by: Andrea Righi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
commit 838a10bd2ebfe11a60dd67687533a7cfc220cc86 upstream.
Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the
semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases,
a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this
issue is available in [0].
Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments can
actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never NULL,
causing explicit NULL check branch to be dead code eliminated.
A previous attempt [1], i.e. the second fixed commit, was made to
simulate symbolic execution as if in most accesses, the argument is a
non-NULL raw_tp, except for conditional jumps. This tried to suppress
branch prediction while preserving compatibility, but surfaced issues
with production programs that were difficult to solve without increasing
verifier complexity. A more complete discussion of issues and fixes is
available at [2].
Fix this by maintaining an explicit list of tracepoints where the
arguments are known to be NULL, and mark the positional arguments as
PTR_MAYBE_NULL. Additionally, capture the tracepoints where arguments
are known to be ERR_PTR, and mark these arguments as scalar values to
prevent potential dereference.
Each hex digit is used to encode NULL-ness (0x1) or ERR_PTR-ness (0x2),
shifted by the zero-indexed argument number x 4. This can be represented
as follows:
1st arg: 0x1
2nd arg: 0x10
3rd arg: 0x100
... and so on (likewise for ERR_PTR case).
In the future, an automated pass will be used to produce such a list, or
insert __nullable annotations automatically for tracepoints. Each
compilation unit will be analyzed and results will be collated to find
whether a tracepoint pointer is definitely not null, maybe null, or an
unknown state where verifier conservatively marks it PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
A proof of concept of this tool from Eduard is available at [3].
Note that in case we don't find a specification in the raw_tp_null_args
array and the tracepoint belongs to a kernel module, we will
conservatively mark the arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL. This is because
unlike for in-tree modules, out-of-tree module tracepoints may pass NULL
freely to the tracepoint. We don't protect against such tracepoints
passing ERR_PTR (which is uncommon anyway), lest we mark all such
arguments as SCALAR_VALUE.
While we are it, let's adjust the test raw_tp_null to not perform
dereference of the skb->mark, as that won't be allowed anymore, and make
it more robust by using inline assembly to test the dead code
elimination behavior, which should still stay the same.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
[3]: https://github.com/eddyz87/llvm-project/tree/nullness-for-tracepoint-params
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]> # original bug
Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]> # bugs in masking fix
Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs")
Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL")
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
commit 659b9ba7cb2d7adb64618b87ddfaa528a143766e upstream.
Robert Morris reported the following program type which passes the
verifier in [0]:
SEC("struct_ops/bpf_cubic_init")
void BPF_PROG(bpf_cubic_init, struct sock *sk)
{
asm volatile("r2 = *(u16*)(r1 + 0)"); // verifier should demand u64
asm volatile("*(u32 *)(r2 +1504) = 0"); // 1280 in some configs
}
The second line may or may not work, but the first instruction shouldn't
pass, as it's a narrow load into the context structure of the struct ops
callback. The code falls back to btf_ctx_access to ensure correctness
and obtaining the types of pointers. Ensure that the size of the access
is correctly checked to be 8 bytes, otherwise the verifier thinks the
narrow load obtained a trusted BTF pointer and will permit loads/stores
as it sees fit.
Perform the check on size after we've verified that the load is for a
pointer field, as for scalar values narrow loads are fine. Access to
structs passed as arguments to a BPF program are also treated as
scalars, therefore no adjustment is needed in their case.
Existing verifier selftests are broken by this change, but because they
were incorrect. Verifier tests for d_path were performing narrow load
into context to obtain path pointer, had this program actually run it
would cause a crash. The same holds for verifier_btf_ctx_access tests.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/51338.1732985814@localhost
Fixes: 9e15db66136a ("bpf: Implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF")
Reported-by: Robert Morris <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
commit c00d738e1673ab801e1577e4e3c780ccf88b1a5b upstream.
This patch reverts commit
cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL"). The
patch was well-intended and meant to be as a stop-gap fixing branch
prediction when the pointer may actually be NULL at runtime. Eventually,
it was supposed to be replaced by an automated script or compiler pass
detecting possibly NULL arguments and marking them accordingly.
However, it caused two main issues observed for production programs and
failed to preserve backwards compatibility. First, programs relied on
the verifier not exploring == NULL branch when pointer is not NULL, thus
they started failing with a 'dereference of scalar' error. Next,
allowing raw_tp arguments to be modified surfaced the warning in the
verifier that warns against reg->off when PTR_MAYBE_NULL is set.
More information, context, and discusson on both problems is available
in [0]. Overall, this approach had several shortcomings, and the fixes
would further complicate the verifier's logic, and the entire masking
scheme would have to be removed eventually anyway.
Hence, revert the patch in preparation of a better fix avoiding these
issues to replace this commit.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Reported-by: Manu Bretelle <[email protected]>
Fixes: cb4158ce8ec8 ("bpf: Mark raw_tp arguments with PTR_MAYBE_NULL")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit f44ec8733a8469143fde1984b5e6931b2e2f6f3f ]
In general, BPF link's underlying BPF program should be considered to be
reachable through attach hook -> link -> prog chain, and, pessimistically,
we have to assume that as long as link's memory is not safe to free,
attach hook's code might hold a pointer to BPF program and use it.
As such, it's not (generally) correct to put link's program early before
waiting for RCU GPs to go through. More eager bpf_prog_put() that we
currently do is mostly correct due to BPF program's release code doing
similar RCU GP waiting, but as will be shown in the following patches,
BPF program can be non-sleepable (and, thus, reliant on only "classic"
RCU GP), while BPF link's attach hook can have sleepable semantics and
needs to be protected by RCU Tasks Trace, and for such cases BPF link
has to go through RCU Tasks Trace + "classic" RCU GPs before being
deallocated. And so, if we put BPF program early, we might free BPF
program before we free BPF link, leading to use-after-free situation.
So, this patch defers bpf_prog_put() until we are ready to perform
bpf_link's deallocation. At worst, this delays BPF program freeing by
one extra RCU GP, but that seems completely acceptable. Alternatively,
we'd need more elaborate ways to determine BPF hook, BPF link, and BPF
program lifetimes, and how they relate to each other, which seems like
an unnecessary complication.
Note, for most BPF links we still will perform eager bpf_prog_put() and
link dealloc, so for those BPF links there are no observable changes
whatsoever. Only BPF links that use deferred dealloc might notice
slightly delayed freeing of BPF programs.
Also, to reduce code and logic duplication, extract program put + link
dealloc logic into bpf_link_dealloc() helper.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
Tested-by: Jordan Rife <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit b9e9ed90b10c82a4e9d4d70a2890f06bfcdd3b78 ]
For htab of maps, when the map is removed from the htab, it may hold the
last reference of the map. bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() will invoke
bpf_map_free_id() to free the id of the removed map element. However,
bpf_map_fd_put_ptr() is invoked while holding a bucket lock
(raw_spin_lock_t), and bpf_map_free_id() attempts to acquire map_idr_lock
(spinlock_t), triggering the following lockdep warning:
=============================
[ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
6.11.0-rc4+ #49 Not tainted
-----------------------------
test_maps/4881 is trying to lock:
ffffffff84884578 (map_idr_lock){+...}-{3:3}, at: bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70
other info that might help us debug this:
context-{5:5}
2 locks held by test_maps/4881:
#0: ffffffff846caf60 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0xf9/0x270
#1: ffff888149ced148 (&htab->lockdep_key#2){....}-{2:2}, at: htab_map_update_elem+0x178/0xa80
stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 4881 Comm: test_maps Not tainted 6.11.0-rc4+ #49
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), ...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x6e/0xb0
dump_stack+0x10/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x73e/0x36c0
lock_acquire+0x182/0x450
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x43/0x70
bpf_map_free_id.part.0+0x21/0x70
bpf_map_put+0xcf/0x110
bpf_map_fd_put_ptr+0x9a/0xb0
free_htab_elem+0x69/0xe0
htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80
bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270
htab_map_update_elem+0x50f/0xa80
bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem+0x131/0x270
bpf_map_update_value+0x266/0x380
__sys_bpf+0x21bb/0x36b0
__x64_sys_bpf+0x45/0x60
x64_sys_call+0x1b2a/0x20d0
do_syscall_64+0x5d/0x100
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
One way to fix the lockdep warning is using raw_spinlock_t for
map_idr_lock as well. However, bpf_map_alloc_id() invokes
idr_alloc_cyclic() after acquiring map_idr_lock, it will trigger a
similar lockdep warning because the slab's lock (s->cpu_slab->lock) is
still a spinlock.
Instead of changing map_idr_lock's type, fix the issue by invoking
htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket(). However, only deferring
the invocation of htab_put_fd_value() is not enough, because the old map
pointers in htab of maps can not be saved during batched deletion.
Therefore, also defer the invocation of free_htab_elem(), so these
to-be-freed elements could be linked together similar to lru map.
There are four callers for ->map_fd_put_ptr:
(1) alloc_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value())
It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr() under a raw_spinlock_t. The invocation of
htab_put_fd_value() can not simply move after htab_unlock_bucket(),
because the old element has already been stashed in htab->extra_elems.
It may be reused immediately after htab_unlock_bucket() and the
invocation of htab_put_fd_value() after htab_unlock_bucket() may release
the newly-added element incorrectly. Therefore, saving the map pointer
of the old element for htab of maps before unlocking the bucket and
releasing the map_ptr after unlock. Beside the map pointer in the old
element, should do the same thing for the special fields in the old
element as well.
(2) free_htab_elem() (through htab_put_fd_value())
Its caller includes __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem(),
htab_map_delete_elem() and __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch().
For htab_map_delete_elem(), simply invoke free_htab_elem() after
htab_unlock_bucket(). For __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_batch(), just
like lru map, linking the to-be-freed element into node_to_free list
and invoking free_htab_elem() for these element after unlock. It is safe
to reuse batch_flink as the link for node_to_free, because these
elements have been removed from the hash llist.
Because htab of maps doesn't support lookup_and_delete operation,
__htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem() doesn't have the problem, so kept
it as is.
(3) fd_htab_map_free()
It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t.
(4) bpf_fd_htab_map_update_elem()
It invokes ->map_fd_put_ptr without raw_spinlock_t.
After moving free_htab_elem() outside htab bucket lock scope, using
pcpu_freelist_push() instead of __pcpu_freelist_push() to disable
the irq before freeing elements, and protecting the invocations of
bpf_mem_cache_free() with migrate_{disable|enable} pair.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit d6083f040d5d8f8d748462c77e90547097df936e ]
There is a potential infinite loop issue that can occur when using a
combination of tail calls and freplace.
In an upcoming selftest, the attach target for entry_freplace of
tailcall_freplace.c is subprog_tc of tc_bpf2bpf.c, while the tail call in
entry_freplace leads to entry_tc. This results in an infinite loop:
entry_tc -> subprog_tc -> entry_freplace --tailcall-> entry_tc.
The problem arises because the tail_call_cnt in entry_freplace resets to
zero each time entry_freplace is executed, causing the tail call mechanism
to never terminate, eventually leading to a kernel panic.
To fix this issue, the solution is twofold:
1. Prevent updating a program extended by an freplace program to a
prog_array map.
2. Prevent extending a program that is already part of a prog_array map
with an freplace program.
This ensures that:
* If a program or its subprogram has been extended by an freplace program,
it can no longer be updated to a prog_array map.
* If a program has been added to a prog_array map, neither it nor its
subprograms can be extended by an freplace program.
Moreover, an extension program should not be tailcalled. As such, return
-EINVAL if the program has a type of BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT when adding it to a
prog_array map.
Additionally, fix a minor code style issue by replacing eight spaces with a
tab for proper formatting.
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
commit ab244dd7cf4c291f82faacdc50b45cc0f55b674d upstream.
Jordy reported issue against XSKMAP which also applies to DEVMAP - the
index used for accessing map entry, due to being a signed integer,
causes the OOB writes. Fix is simple as changing the type from int to
u32, however, when compared to XSKMAP case, one more thing needs to be
addressed.
When map is released from system via dev_map_free(), we iterate through
all of the entries and an iterator variable is also an int, which
implies OOB accesses. Again, change it to be u32.
Example splat below:
[ 160.724676] BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffffc8fc2c001000
[ 160.731662] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
[ 160.736876] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
[ 160.742095] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 160.744678] Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 160.749106] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 520 Comm: kworker/u145:12 Not tainted 6.12.0-rc1+ #487
[ 160.757050] Hardware name: Intel Corporation S2600WFT/S2600WFT, BIOS SE5C620.86B.02.01.0008.031920191559 03/19/2019
[ 160.767642] Workqueue: events_unbound bpf_map_free_deferred
[ 160.773308] RIP: 0010:dev_map_free+0x77/0x170
[ 160.777735] Code: 00 e8 fd 91 ed ff e8 b8 73 ed ff 41 83 7d 18 19 74 6e 41 8b 45 24 49 8b bd f8 00 00 00 31 db 85 c0 74 48 48 63 c3 48 8d 04 c7 <48> 8b 28 48 85 ed 74 30 48 8b 7d 18 48 85 ff 74 05 e8 b3 52 fa ff
[ 160.796777] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000ee1fe38 EFLAGS: 00010202
[ 160.802086] RAX: ffffc8fc2c001000 RBX: 0000000080000000 RCX: 0000000000000024
[ 160.809331] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000024 RDI: ffffc9002c001000
[ 160.816576] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000023 R09: 0000000000000001
[ 160.823823] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 00000000000ee6b2 R12: dead000000000122
[ 160.831066] R13: ffff88810c928e00 R14: ffff8881002df405 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 160.838310] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8897e0c40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 160.846528] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 160.852357] CR2: ffffc8fc2c001000 CR3: 0000000005c32006 CR4: 00000000007726f0
[ 160.859604] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[ 160.866847] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[ 160.874092] PKRU: 55555554
[ 160.876847] Call Trace:
[ 160.879338] <TASK>
[ 160.881477] ? __die+0x20/0x60
[ 160.884586] ? page_fault_oops+0x15a/0x450
[ 160.888746] ? search_extable+0x22/0x30
[ 160.892647] ? search_bpf_extables+0x5f/0x80
[ 160.896988] ? exc_page_fault+0xa9/0x140
[ 160.900973] ? asm_exc_page_fault+0x22/0x30
[ 160.905232] ? dev_map_free+0x77/0x170
[ 160.909043] ? dev_map_free+0x58/0x170
[ 160.912857] bpf_map_free_deferred+0x51/0x90
[ 160.917196] process_one_work+0x142/0x370
[ 160.921272] worker_thread+0x29e/0x3b0
[ 160.925082] ? rescuer_thread+0x4b0/0x4b0
[ 160.929157] kthread+0xd4/0x110
[ 160.932355] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[ 160.936079] ret_from_fork+0x2d/0x50
[ 160.943396] ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
[ 160.950803] ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20
[ 160.958482] </TASK>
Fixes: 546ac1ffb70d ("bpf: add devmap, a map for storing net device references")
CC: [email protected]
Reported-by: Jordy Zomer <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Jordy Zomer <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 27abc7b3fa2e09bbe41e2924d328121546865eda ]
trie_get_next_key() uses node->prefixlen == key->prefixlen to identify
an exact match, However, it is incorrect because when the target key
doesn't fully match the found node (e.g., node->prefixlen != matchlen),
these two nodes may also have the same prefixlen. It will return
expected result when the passed key exist in the trie. However when a
recently-deleted key or nonexistent key is passed to
trie_get_next_key(), it may skip keys and return incorrect result.
Fix it by using node->prefixlen == matchlen to identify exact matches.
When the condition is true after the search, it also implies
node->prefixlen equals key->prefixlen, otherwise, the search would
return NULL instead.
Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 532d6b36b2bfac5514426a97a4df8d103d700d43 ]
When a LPM trie is full, in-place updates of existing elements
incorrectly return -ENOSPC.
Fix this by deferring the check of trie->n_entries. For new insertions,
n_entries must not exceed max_entries. However, in-place updates are
allowed even when the trie is full.
Fixes: b95a5c4db09b ("bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation")
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 3d5611b4d7efbefb85a74fcdbc35c603847cc022 ]
There is no need to call kfree(im_node) when updating element fails,
because im_node must be NULL. Remove the unnecessary kfree() for
im_node.
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Stable-dep-of: 532d6b36b2bf ("bpf: Handle in-place update for full LPM trie correctly")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit eae6a075e9537dd69891cf77ca5a88fa8a28b4a1 ]
Add the currently missing handling for the BPF_EXIST and BPF_NOEXIST
flags. These flags can be specified by users and are relevant since LPM
trie supports exact matches during update.
Fixes: b95a5c4db09b ("bpf: add a longest prefix match trie map implementation")
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit b0e66977dc072906bb76555fb1a64261d7f63d0f ]
When CAP_PERFMON and CAP_SYS_ADMIN (allow_ptr_leaks) are disabled, the
verifier aims to reject partial overwrite on an 8-byte stack slot that
contains a spilled pointer.
However, in such a scenario, it rejects all partial stack overwrites as
long as the targeted stack slot is a spilled register, because it does
not check if the stack slot is a spilled pointer.
Incomplete checks will result in the rejection of valid programs, which
spill narrower scalar values onto scalar slots, as shown below.
0: R1=ctx() R10=fp0
; asm volatile ( @ repro.bpf.c:679
0: (7a) *(u64 *)(r10 -8) = 1 ; R10=fp0 fp-8_w=1
1: (62) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = 1
attempt to corrupt spilled pointer on stack
processed 2 insns (limit 1000000) max_states_per_insn 0 total_states 0 peak_states 0 mark_read 0.
Fix this by expanding the check to not consider spilled scalar registers
when rejecting the write into the stack.
Previous discussion on this patch is at link [0].
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Fixes: ab125ed3ec1c ("bpf: fix check for attempt to corrupt spilled pointer")
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tao Lyu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 69772f509e084ec6bca12dbcdeeeff41b0103774 ]
Inside mark_stack_slot_misc, we should not upgrade STACK_INVALID to
STACK_MISC when allow_ptr_leaks is false, since invalid contents
shouldn't be read unless the program has the relevant capabilities.
The relaxation only makes sense when env->allow_ptr_leaks is true.
However, such conversion in privileged mode becomes unnecessary, as
invalid slots can be read without being upgraded to STACK_MISC.
Currently, the condition is inverted (i.e. checking for true instead of
false), simply remove it to restore correct behavior.
Fixes: eaf18febd6eb ("bpf: preserve STACK_ZERO slots on partial reg spills")
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Tao Lyu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 12659d28615d606b36e382f4de2dd05550d202af ]
Currently, KF_ARG_PTR_TO_ITER handling missed checking the reg->type and
ensuring it is PTR_TO_STACK. Instead of enforcing this in the caller of
process_iter_arg, move the check into it instead so that all callers
will gain the check by default. This is similar to process_dynptr_func.
An existing selftest in verifier_bits_iter.c fails due to this change,
but it's because it was passing a NULL pointer into iter_next helper and
getting an error further down the checks, but probably meant to pass an
uninitialized iterator on the stack (as is done in the subsequent test
below it). We will gain coverage for non-PTR_TO_STACK arguments in later
patches hence just change the declaration to zero-ed stack object.
Fixes: 06accc8779c1 ("bpf: add support for open-coded iterator loops")
Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tao Lyu <[email protected]>
[ Kartikeya: move check into process_iter_arg, rewrite commit log ]
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 7c8ce4ffb684676039b1ff9ff81c126794e8d88e ]
Without kernel symbols for struct_ops trampoline, the unwinder may
produce unexpected stacktraces.
For example, the x86 ORC and FP unwinders check if an IP is in kernel
text by verifying the presence of the IP's kernel symbol. When a
struct_ops trampoline address is encountered, the unwinder stops due
to the absence of symbol, resulting in an incomplete stacktrace that
consists only of direct and indirect child functions called from the
trampoline.
The arm64 unwinder is another example. While the arm64 unwinder can
proceed across a struct_ops trampoline address, the corresponding
symbol name is displayed as "unknown", which is confusing.
Thus, add kernel symbol for struct_ops trampoline. The name is
bpf__<struct_ops_name>_<member_name>, where <struct_ops_name> is the
type name of the struct_ops, and <member_name> is the name of
the member that the trampoline is linked to.
Below is a comparison of stacktraces captured on x86 by perf record,
before and after this patch.
Before:
ffffffff8116545d __lock_acquire+0xad ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81167fcc lock_acquire+0xcc ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff813088f4 __bpf_prog_enter+0x34 ([kernel.kallsyms])
After:
ffffffff811656bd __lock_acquire+0x30d ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81167fcc lock_acquire+0xcc ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81309024 __bpf_prog_enter+0x34 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffffc000d7e9 bpf__tcp_congestion_ops_cong_avoid+0x3e ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81f250a5 tcp_ack+0x10d5 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81f27c66 tcp_rcv_established+0x3b6 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81f3ad03 tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x193 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81d65a18 __release_sock+0xd8 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81d65af4 release_sock+0x34 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81f15c4b tcp_sendmsg+0x3b ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81f663d7 inet_sendmsg+0x47 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81d5ab40 sock_write_iter+0x160 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff8149c67b vfs_write+0x3fb ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff8149caf6 ksys_write+0xc6 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff8149cb5d __x64_sys_write+0x1d ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff81009200 x64_sys_call+0x1d30 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff82232d28 do_syscall_64+0x68 ([kernel.kallsyms])
ffffffff8240012f entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76 ([kernel.kallsyms])
Fixes: 85d33df357b6 ("bpf: Introduce BPF_MAP_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 821a3fa32bbe3bc0fa23b3189325d3720a49a24c ]
Only function pointers in a struct_ops structure can be linked to bpf
progs, so set the links count to the function pointers count, instead
of the total members count in the structure.
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Stable-dep-of: 7c8ce4ffb684 ("bpf: Add kernel symbol for struct_ops trampoline")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 17c4b65a24938c6dd79496cce5df15f70d9c253c ]
The kprobe session program can return only 0 or 1,
instruct verifier to check for that.
Fixes: 535a3692ba72 ("bpf: Add support for kprobe session attach")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit cb4158ce8ec8a5bb528cc1693356a5eb8058094d ]
Arguments to a raw tracepoint are tagged as trusted, which carries the
semantics that the pointer will be non-NULL. However, in certain cases,
a raw tracepoint argument may end up being NULL. More context about this
issue is available in [0].
Thus, there is a discrepancy between the reality, that raw_tp arguments
can actually be NULL, and the verifier's knowledge, that they are never
NULL, causing explicit NULL checks to be deleted, and accesses to such
pointers potentially crashing the kernel.
To fix this, mark raw_tp arguments as PTR_MAYBE_NULL, and then special
case the dereference and pointer arithmetic to permit it, and allow
passing them into helpers/kfuncs; these exceptions are made for raw_tp
programs only. Ensure that we don't do this when ref_obj_id > 0, as in
that case this is an acquired object and doesn't need such adjustment.
The reason we do mask_raw_tp_trusted_reg logic is because other will
recheck in places whether the register is a trusted_reg, and then
consider our register as untrusted when detecting the presence of the
PTR_MAYBE_NULL flag.
To allow safe dereference, we enable PROBE_MEM marking when we see loads
into trusted pointers with PTR_MAYBE_NULL.
While trusted raw_tp arguments can also be passed into helpers or kfuncs
where such broken assumption may cause issues, a future patch set will
tackle their case separately, as PTR_TO_BTF_ID (without PTR_TRUSTED) can
already be passed into helpers and causes similar problems. Thus, they
are left alone for now.
It is possible that these checks also permit passing non-raw_tp args
that are trusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID with null marking. In such a case,
allowing dereference when pointer is NULL expands allowed behavior, so
won't regress existing programs, and the case of passing these into
helpers is the same as above and will be dealt with later.
Also update the failure case in tp_btf_nullable selftest to capture the
new behavior, as the verifier will no longer cause an error when
directly dereference a raw tracepoint argument marked as __nullable.
[0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <[email protected]>
Fixes: 3f00c5239344 ("bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
[ Upstream commit 46f7ed32f7a873d6675ea72e1d6317df41a55f81 ]
There are three situations when a program logically exits and transfers
control to the kernel or another program: bpf_throw, BPF_EXIT, and tail
calls. The former two check for any lingering locks and references, but
tail calls currently do not. Expand the checks to check for spin locks,
RCU read sections and preempt disabled sections.
Spin locks are indirectly preventing tail calls as function calls are
disallowed, but the checks for preemption and RCU are more relaxed,
hence ensure tail calls are prevented in their presence.
Fixes: 9bb00b2895cb ("bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()")
Fixes: fc7566ad0a82 ("bpf: Introduce bpf_preempt_[disable,enable] kfuncs")
Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <[email protected]>
|
|
Pull bpf fixes from Daniel Borkmann:
- Fix BPF verifier to force a checkpoint when the program's jump
history becomes too long (Eduard Zingerman)
- Add several fixes to the BPF bits iterator addressing issues like
memory leaks and overflow problems (Hou Tao)
- Fix an out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key (Byeonguk Jeong)
- Fix BPF test infra's LIVE_FRAME frame update after a page has been
recycled (Toke Høiland-Jørgensen)
- Fix BPF verifier and undo the 40-bytes extra stack space for
bpf_fastcall patterns due to various bugs (Eduard Zingerman)
- Fix a BPF sockmap race condition which could trigger a NULL pointer
dereference in sock_map_link_update_prog (Cong Wang)
- Fix tcp_bpf_recvmsg_parser to retrieve seq_copied from tcp_sk under
the socket lock (Jiayuan Chen)
* tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf:
bpf, test_run: Fix LIVE_FRAME frame update after a page has been recycled
selftests/bpf: Add three test cases for bits_iter
bpf: Use __u64 to save the bits in bits iterator
bpf: Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new()
bpf: Add bpf_mem_alloc_check_size() helper
bpf: Free dynamically allocated bits in bpf_iter_bits_destroy()
bpf: disallow 40-bytes extra stack for bpf_fastcall patterns
selftests/bpf: Add test for trie_get_next_key()
bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key()
selftests/bpf: Test with a very short loop
bpf: Force checkpoint when jmp history is too long
bpf: fix filed access without lock
sock_map: fix a NULL pointer dereference in sock_map_link_update_prog()
|
|
On 32-bit hosts (e.g., arm32), when a bpf program passes a u64 to
bpf_iter_bits_new(), bpf_iter_bits_new() will use bits_copy to store the
content of the u64. However, bits_copy is only 4 bytes, leading to stack
corruption.
The straightforward solution would be to replace u64 with unsigned long
in bpf_iter_bits_new(). However, this introduces confusion and problems
for 32-bit hosts because the size of ulong in bpf program is 8 bytes,
but it is treated as 4-bytes after passed to bpf_iter_bits_new().
Fix it by changing the type of both bits and bit_count from unsigned
long to u64. However, the change is not enough. The main reason is that
bpf_iter_bits_next() uses find_next_bit() to find the next bit and the
pointer passed to find_next_bit() is an unsigned long pointer instead
of a u64 pointer. For 32-bit little-endian host, it is fine but it is
not the case for 32-bit big-endian host. Because under 32-bit big-endian
host, the first iterated unsigned long will be the bits 32-63 of the u64
instead of the expected bits 0-31. Therefore, in addition to changing
the type, swap the two unsigned longs within the u64 for 32-bit
big-endian host.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Check the validity of nr_words in bpf_iter_bits_new(). Without this
check, when multiplication overflow occurs for nr_bits (e.g., when
nr_words = 0x0400-0001, nr_bits becomes 64), stack corruption may occur
due to bpf_probe_read_kernel_common(..., nr_bytes = 0x2000-0008).
Fix it by limiting the maximum value of nr_words to 511. The value is
derived from the current implementation of BPF memory allocator. To
ensure compatibility if the BPF memory allocator's size limitation
changes in the future, use the helper bpf_mem_alloc_check_size() to
check whether nr_bytes is too larger. And return -E2BIG instead of
-ENOMEM for oversized nr_bytes.
Fixes: 4665415975b0 ("bpf: Add bits iterator")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Introduce bpf_mem_alloc_check_size() to check whether the allocation
size exceeds the limitation for the kmalloc-equivalent allocator. The
upper limit for percpu allocation is LLIST_NODE_SZ bytes larger than
non-percpu allocation, so a percpu argument is added to the helper.
The helper will be used in the following patch to check whether the size
parameter passed to bpf_mem_alloc() is too big.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
bpf_iter_bits_destroy() uses "kit->nr_bits <= 64" to check whether the
bits are dynamically allocated. However, the check is incorrect and may
cause a kmemleak as shown below:
unreferenced object 0xffff88812628c8c0 (size 32):
comm "swapper/0", pid 1, jiffies 4294727320
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
b0 c1 55 f5 81 88 ff ff f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 ..U...........
f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..............
backtrace (crc 781e32cc):
[<00000000c452b4ab>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4b/0x80
[<0000000004e09f80>] __kmalloc_node_noprof+0x480/0x5c0
[<00000000597124d6>] __alloc.isra.0+0x89/0xb0
[<000000004ebfffcd>] alloc_bulk+0x2af/0x720
[<00000000d9c10145>] prefill_mem_cache+0x7f/0xb0
[<00000000ff9738ff>] bpf_mem_alloc_init+0x3e2/0x610
[<000000008b616eac>] bpf_global_ma_init+0x19/0x30
[<00000000fc473efc>] do_one_initcall+0xd3/0x3c0
[<00000000ec81498c>] kernel_init_freeable+0x66a/0x940
[<00000000b119f72f>] kernel_init+0x20/0x160
[<00000000f11ac9a7>] ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x70
[<0000000004671da4>] ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
That is because nr_bits will be set as zero in bpf_iter_bits_next()
after all bits have been iterated.
Fix the issue by setting kit->bit to kit->nr_bits instead of setting
kit->nr_bits to zero when the iteration completes in
bpf_iter_bits_next(). In addition, use "!nr_bits || bits >= nr_bits" to
check whether the iteration is complete and still use "nr_bits > 64" to
indicate whether bits are dynamically allocated. The "!nr_bits" check is
necessary because bpf_iter_bits_new() may fail before setting
kit->nr_bits, and this condition will stop the iteration early instead
of accessing the zeroed or freed kit->bits.
Considering the initial value of kit->bits is -1 and the type of
kit->nr_bits is unsigned int, change the type of kit->nr_bits to int.
The potential overflow problem will be handled in the following patch.
Fixes: 4665415975b0 ("bpf: Add bits iterator")
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Hou Tao reported an issue with bpf_fastcall patterns allowing extra
stack space above MAX_BPF_STACK limit. This extra stack allowance is
not integrated properly with the following verifier parts:
- backtracking logic still assumes that stack can't exceed
MAX_BPF_STACK;
- bpf_verifier_env->scratched_stack_slots assumes only 64 slots are
available.
Here is an example of an issue with precision tracking
(note stack slot -8 tracked as precise instead of -520):
0: (b7) r1 = 42 ; R1_w=42
1: (b7) r2 = 42 ; R2_w=42
2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -512) = r1 ; R1_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-512_w=42
3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -520) = r2 ; R2_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-520_w=42
4: (85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#8 ; R0_w=scalar(...)
5: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -520) ; R2_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-520_w=42
6: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -512) ; R1_w=42 R10=fp0 fp-512_w=42
7: (bf) r3 = r10 ; R3_w=fp0 R10=fp0
8: (0f) r3 += r2
mark_precise: frame0: last_idx 8 first_idx 0 subseq_idx -1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 7: (bf) r3 = r10
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 6: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 -512)
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 5: (79) r2 = *(u64 *)(r10 -520)
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 4: (85) call bpf_get_smp_processor_id#8
mark_precise: frame0: regs= stack=-8 before 3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -520) = r2
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -512) = r1
mark_precise: frame0: regs=r2 stack= before 1: (b7) r2 = 42
9: R2_w=42 R3_w=fp42
9: (95) exit
This patch disables the additional allowance for the moment.
Also, two test cases are removed:
- bpf_fastcall_max_stack_ok:
it fails w/o additional stack allowance;
- bpf_fastcall_max_stack_fail:
this test is no longer necessary, stack size follows
regular rules, pattern invalidation is checked by other
test cases.
Reported-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Fixes: 5b5f51bff1b6 ("bpf: no_caller_saved_registers attribute for helper calls")
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup
Pull cgroup fixes from Tejun Heo:
- cgroup_bpf_release_fn() could saturate system_wq with
cgrp->bpf.release_work which can then form a circular dependency
leading to deadlocks. Fix by using a dedicated workqueue. The
system_wq's max concurrency limit is being increased separately.
- Fix theoretical off-by-one bug when enforcing max cgroup hierarchy
depth
* tag 'cgroup-for-6.12-rc5-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/cgroup:
cgroup: Fix potential overflow issue when checking max_depth
cgroup/bpf: use a dedicated workqueue for cgroup bpf destruction
|
|
trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen,
while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has
full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with
max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ...
0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with
.prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.
Fixes: b471f2f1de8b ("bpf: implement MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command for LPM_TRIE map")
Signed-off-by: Byeonguk Jeong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
A specifically crafted program might trick verifier into growing very
long jump history within a single bpf_verifier_state instance.
Very long jump history makes mark_chain_precision() unreasonably slow,
especially in case if verifier processes a loop.
Mitigate this by forcing new state in is_state_visited() in case if
current state's jump history is too long.
Use same constant as in `skip_inf_loop_check`, but multiply it by
arbitrarily chosen value 2 to account for jump history containing not
only information about jumps, but also information about stack access.
For an example of problematic program consider the code below,
w/o this patch the example is processed by verifier for ~15 minutes,
before failing to allocate big-enough chunk for jmp_history.
0: r7 = *(u16 *)(r1 +0);"
1: r7 += 0x1ab064b9;"
2: if r7 & 0x702000 goto 1b;
3: r7 &= 0x1ee60e;"
4: r7 += r1;"
5: if r7 s> 0x37d2 goto +0;"
6: r0 = 0;"
7: exit;"
Perf profiling shows that most of the time is spent in
mark_chain_precision() ~95%.
The easiest way to explain why this program causes problems is to
apply the following patch:
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 0c216e71cec7..4b4823961abe 100644
\--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
\+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
\@@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@ struct bpf_array {
};
};
-#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 1000000 /* yes. 1M insns */
+#define BPF_COMPLEXITY_LIMIT_INSNS 256 /* yes. 1M insns */
#define MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT 33
/* Maximum number of loops for bpf_loop and bpf_iter_num.
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index f514247ba8ba..75e88be3bb3e 100644
\--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
\+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
\@@ -18024,8 +18024,13 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
skip_inf_loop_check:
if (!force_new_state &&
env->jmps_processed - env->prev_jmps_processed < 20 &&
- env->insn_processed - env->prev_insn_processed < 100)
+ env->insn_processed - env->prev_insn_processed < 100) {
+ verbose(env, "is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at %d, %d jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is %d\n",
+ env->insn_idx,
+ env->jmps_processed - env->prev_jmps_processed,
+ cur->jmp_history_cnt);
add_new_state = false;
+ }
goto miss;
}
/* If sl->state is a part of a loop and this loop's entry is a part of
\@@ -18142,6 +18147,9 @@ static int is_state_visited(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx)
if (!add_new_state)
return 0;
+ verbose(env, "is_state_visited: new checkpoint at %d, resetting env->jmps_processed\n",
+ env->insn_idx);
+
/* There were no equivalent states, remember the current one.
* Technically the current state is not proven to be safe yet,
* but it will either reach outer most bpf_exit (which means it's safe)
And observe verification log:
...
is_state_visited: new checkpoint at 5, resetting env->jmps_processed
5: R1=ctx() R7=ctx(...)
5: (65) if r7 s> 0x37d2 goto pc+0 ; R7=ctx(...)
6: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
7: (95) exit
from 5 to 6: R1=ctx() R7=ctx(...) R10=fp0
6: R1=ctx() R7=ctx(...) R10=fp0
6: (b7) r0 = 0 ; R0_w=0
7: (95) exit
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 1, 3 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 74
from 2 to 1: R1=ctx() R7_w=scalar(...) R10=fp0
1: R1=ctx() R7_w=scalar(...) R10=fp0
1: (07) r7 += 447767737
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 2, 3 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 75
2: R7_w=scalar(...)
2: (45) if r7 & 0x702000 goto pc-2
... mark_precise 152 steps for r7 ...
2: R7_w=scalar(...)
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 1, 4 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 75
1: (07) r7 += 447767737
is_state_visited: suppressing checkpoint at 2, 4 jmps processed, cur->jmp_history_cnt is 76
2: R7_w=scalar(...)
2: (45) if r7 & 0x702000 goto pc-2
...
BPF program is too large. Processed 257 insn
The log output shows that checkpoint at label (1) is never created,
because it is suppressed by `skip_inf_loop_check` logic:
a. When 'if' at (2) is processed it pushes a state with insn_idx (1)
onto stack and proceeds to (3);
b. At (5) checkpoint is created, and this resets
env->{jmps,insns}_processed.
c. Verification proceeds and reaches `exit`;
d. State saved at step (a) is popped from stack and is_state_visited()
considers if checkpoint needs to be added, but because
env->{jmps,insns}_processed had been just reset at step (b)
the `skip_inf_loop_check` logic forces `add_new_state` to false.
e. Verifier proceeds with current state, which slowly accumulates
more and more entries in the jump history.
The accumulation of entries in the jump history is a problem because
of two factors:
- it eventually exhausts memory available for kmalloc() allocation;
- mark_chain_precision() traverses the jump history of a state,
meaning that if `r7` is marked precise, verifier would iterate
ever growing jump history until parent state boundary is reached.
(note: the log also shows a REG INVARIANTS VIOLATION warning
upon jset processing, but that's another bug to fix).
With this patch applied, the example above is rejected by verifier
under 1s of time, reaching 1M instructions limit.
The program is a simplified reproducer from syzbot report.
Previous discussion could be found at [1].
The patch does not cause any changes in verification performance,
when tested on selftests from veristat.cfg and cilium programs taken
from [2].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
[2] https://github.com/anakryiko/cilium
Changelog:
- v1 -> v2:
- moved patch to bpf tree;
- moved force_new_state variable initialization after declaration and
shortened the comment.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
Fixes: 2589726d12a1 ("bpf: introduce bounded loops")
Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]/
|
|
If a newly-added link type doesn't invoke BPF_LINK_TYPE(), accessing
bpf_link_type_strs[link->type] may result in an out-of-bounds access.
To spot such missed invocations early in the future, checking the
validity of link->type in bpf_link_show_fdinfo() and emitting a warning
when such invocations are missed.
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
We need `goto next_insn;` at the end of patching instead of `continue;`.
It currently works by accident by making verifier re-process patched
instructions.
Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Fixes: 314a53623cd4 ("bpf: inline bpf_get_branch_snapshot() helper")
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Lonial reported an issue in the BPF verifier where check_mem_size_reg()
has the following code:
if (!tnum_is_const(reg->var_off))
/* For unprivileged variable accesses, disable raw
* mode so that the program is required to
* initialize all the memory that the helper could
* just partially fill up.
*/
meta = NULL;
This means that writes are not checked when the register containing the
size of the passed buffer has not a fixed size. Through this bug, a BPF
program can write to a map which is marked as read-only, for example,
.rodata global maps.
The problem is that MEM_UNINIT's initial meaning that "the passed buffer
to the BPF helper does not need to be initialized" which was added back
in commit 435faee1aae9 ("bpf, verifier: add ARG_PTR_TO_RAW_STACK type")
got overloaded over time with "the passed buffer is being written to".
The problem however is that checks such as the above which were added later
via 06c1c049721a ("bpf: allow helpers access to variable memory") set meta
to NULL in order force the user to always initialize the passed buffer to
the helper. Due to the current double meaning of MEM_UNINIT, this bypasses
verifier write checks to the memory (not boundary checks though) and only
assumes the latter memory is read instead.
Fix this by reverting MEM_UNINIT back to its original meaning, and having
MEM_WRITE as an annotation to BPF helpers in order to then trigger the
BPF verifier checks for writing to memory.
Some notes: check_arg_pair_ok() ensures that for ARG_CONST_SIZE{,_OR_ZERO}
we can access fn->arg_type[arg - 1] since it must contain a preceding
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM. For check_mem_reg() the meta argument can be removed
altogether since we do check both BPF_READ and BPF_WRITE. Same for the
equivalent check_kfunc_mem_size_reg().
Fixes: 7b3552d3f9f6 ("bpf: Reject writes for PTR_TO_MAP_KEY in check_helper_mem_access")
Fixes: 97e6d7dab1ca ("bpf: Check PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY in check_helper_mem_access")
Fixes: 15baa55ff5b0 ("bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context")
Reported-by: Lonial Con <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Add a MEM_WRITE attribute for BPF helper functions which can be used in
bpf_func_proto to annotate an argument type in order to let the verifier
know that the helper writes into the memory passed as an argument. In
the past MEM_UNINIT has been (ab)used for this function, but the latter
merely tells the verifier that the passed memory can be uninitialized.
There have been bugs with overloading the latter but aside from that
there are also cases where the passed memory is read + written which
currently cannot be expressed, see also 4b3786a6c539 ("bpf: Zero former
ARG_PTR_TO_{LONG,INT} args in case of error").
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
In bpf_parse_param(), keep the value of param->string intact so it can
be freed later. Otherwise, the kmalloc area pointed to by param->string
will be leaked as shown below:
unreferenced object 0xffff888118c46d20 (size 8):
comm "new_name", pid 12109, jiffies 4295580214
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
61 6e 79 00 38 c9 5c 7e any.8.\~
backtrace (crc e1b7f876):
[<00000000c6848ac7>] kmemleak_alloc+0x4b/0x80
[<00000000de9f7d00>] __kmalloc_node_track_caller_noprof+0x36e/0x4a0
[<000000003e29b886>] memdup_user+0x32/0xa0
[<0000000007248326>] strndup_user+0x46/0x60
[<0000000035b3dd29>] __x64_sys_fsconfig+0x368/0x3d0
[<0000000018657927>] x64_sys_call+0xff/0x9f0
[<00000000c0cabc95>] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
[<000000002f331597>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
Fixes: 6c1752e0b6ca ("bpf: Support symbolic BPF FS delegation mount options")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Pull bpf fixes from Daniel Borkmann:
- Fix BPF verifier to not affect subreg_def marks in its range
propagation (Eduard Zingerman)
- Fix a truncation bug in the BPF verifier's handling of
coerce_reg_to_size_sx (Dimitar Kanaliev)
- Fix the BPF verifier's delta propagation between linked registers
under 32-bit addition (Daniel Borkmann)
- Fix a NULL pointer dereference in BPF devmap due to missing rxq
information (Florian Kauer)
- Fix a memory leak in bpf_core_apply (Jiri Olsa)
- Fix an UBSAN-reported array-index-out-of-bounds in BTF parsing for
arrays of nested structs (Hou Tao)
- Fix build ID fetching where memory areas backing the file were
created with memfd_secret (Andrii Nakryiko)
- Fix BPF task iterator tid filtering which was incorrectly using pid
instead of tid (Jordan Rome)
- Several fixes for BPF sockmap and BPF sockhash redirection in
combination with vsocks (Michal Luczaj)
- Fix riscv BPF JIT and make BPF_CMPXCHG fully ordered (Andrea Parri)
- Fix riscv BPF JIT under CONFIG_CFI_CLANG to prevent the possibility
of an infinite BPF tailcall (Pu Lehui)
- Fix a build warning from resolve_btfids that bpf_lsm_key_free cannot
be resolved (Thomas Weißschuh)
- Fix a bug in kfunc BTF caching for modules where the wrong BTF object
was returned (Toke Høiland-Jørgensen)
- Fix a BPF selftest compilation error in cgroup-related tests with
musl libc (Tony Ambardar)
- Several fixes to BPF link info dumps to fill missing fields (Tyrone
Wu)
- Add BPF selftests for kfuncs from multiple modules, checking that the
correct kfuncs are called (Simon Sundberg)
- Ensure that internal and user-facing bpf_redirect flags don't overlap
(Toke Høiland-Jørgensen)
- Switch to use kvzmalloc to allocate BPF verifier environment (Rik van
Riel)
- Use raw_spinlock_t in BPF ringbuf to fix a sleep in atomic splat
under RT (Wander Lairson Costa)
* tag 'bpf-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf: (38 commits)
lib/buildid: Handle memfd_secret() files in build_id_parse()
selftests/bpf: Add test case for delta propagation
bpf: Fix print_reg_state's constant scalar dump
bpf: Fix incorrect delta propagation between linked registers
bpf: Properly test iter/task tid filtering
bpf: Fix iter/task tid filtering
riscv, bpf: Make BPF_CMPXCHG fully ordered
bpf, vsock: Drop static vsock_bpf_prot initialization
vsock: Update msg_count on read_skb()
vsock: Update rx_bytes on read_skb()
bpf, sockmap: SK_DROP on attempted redirects of unsupported af_vsock
selftests/bpf: Add asserts for netfilter link info
bpf: Fix link info netfilter flags to populate defrag flag
selftests/bpf: Add test for sign extension in coerce_subreg_to_size_sx()
selftests/bpf: Add test for truncation after sign extension in coerce_reg_to_size_sx()
bpf: Fix truncation bug in coerce_reg_to_size_sx()
selftests/bpf: Assert link info uprobe_multi count & path_size if unset
bpf: Fix unpopulated path_size when uprobe_multi fields unset
selftests/bpf: Fix cross-compiling urandom_read
selftests/bpf: Add test for kfunc module order
...
|
|
print_reg_state() should not consider adding reg->off to reg->var_off.value
when dumping scalars. Scalars can be produced with reg->off != 0 through
BPF_ADD_CONST, and thus as-is this can skew the register log dump.
Fixes: 98d7ca374ba4 ("bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers.")
Reported-by: Nathaniel Theis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
Nathaniel reported a bug in the linked scalar delta tracking, which can lead
to accepting a program with OOB access. The specific code is related to the
sync_linked_regs() function and the BPF_ADD_CONST flag, which signifies a
constant offset between two scalar registers tracked by the same register id.
The verifier attempts to track "similar" scalars in order to propagate bounds
information learned about one scalar to others. For instance, if r1 and r2
are known to contain the same value, then upon encountering 'if (r1 != 0x1234)
goto xyz', not only does it know that r1 is equal to 0x1234 on the path where
that conditional jump is not taken, it also knows that r2 is.
Additionally, with env->bpf_capable set, the verifier will track scalars
which should be a constant delta apart (if r1 is known to be one greater than
r2, then if r1 is known to be equal to 0x1234, r2 must be equal to 0x1233.)
The code path for the latter in adjust_reg_min_max_vals() is reached when
processing both 32 and 64-bit addition operations. While adjust_reg_min_max_vals()
knows whether dst_reg was produced by a 32 or a 64-bit addition (based on the
alu32 bool), the only information saved in dst_reg is the id of the source
register (reg->id, or'ed by BPF_ADD_CONST) and the value of the constant
offset (reg->off).
Later, the function sync_linked_regs() will attempt to use this information
to propagate bounds information from one register (known_reg) to others,
meaning, for all R in linked_regs, it copies known_reg range (and possibly
adjusting delta) into R for the case of R->id == known_reg->id.
For the delta adjustment, meaning, matching reg->id with BPF_ADD_CONST, the
verifier adjusts the register as reg = known_reg; reg += delta where delta
is computed as (s32)reg->off - (s32)known_reg->off and placed as a scalar
into a fake_reg to then simulate the addition of reg += fake_reg. This is
only correct, however, if the value in reg was created by a 64-bit addition.
When reg contains the result of a 32-bit addition operation, its upper 32
bits will always be zero. sync_linked_regs() on the other hand, may cause
the verifier to believe that the addition between fake_reg and reg overflows
into those upper bits. For example, if reg was generated by adding the
constant 1 to known_reg using a 32-bit alu operation, then reg->off is 1
and known_reg->off is 0. If known_reg is known to be the constant 0xFFFFFFFF,
sync_linked_regs() will tell the verifier that reg is equal to the constant
0x100000000. This is incorrect as the actual value of reg will be 0, as the
32-bit addition will wrap around.
Example:
0: (b7) r0 = 0; R0_w=0
1: (18) r1 = 0x80000001; R1_w=0x80000001
3: (37) r1 /= 1; R1_w=scalar()
4: (bf) r2 = r1; R1_w=scalar(id=1) R2_w=scalar(id=1)
5: (bf) r4 = r1; R1_w=scalar(id=1) R4_w=scalar(id=1)
6: (04) w2 += 2147483647; R2_w=scalar(id=1+2147483647,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
7: (04) w4 += 0 ; R4_w=scalar(id=1+0,smin=0,smax=umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
8: (15) if r2 == 0x0 goto pc+1
10: R0=0 R1=0xffffffff80000001 R2=0x7fffffff R4=0xffffffff80000001 R10=fp0
What can be seen here is that r1 is copied to r2 and r4, such that {r1,r2,r4}.id
are all the same which later lets sync_linked_regs() to be invoked. Then, in
a next step constants are added with alu32 to r2 and r4, setting their ->off,
as well as id |= BPF_ADD_CONST. Next, the conditional will bind r2 and
propagate ranges to its linked registers. The verifier now believes the upper
32 bits of r4 are r4=0xffffffff80000001, while actually r4=r1=0x80000001.
One approach for a simple fix suitable also for stable is to limit the constant
delta tracking to only 64-bit alu addition. If necessary at some later point,
BPF_ADD_CONST could be split into BPF_ADD_CONST64 and BPF_ADD_CONST32 to avoid
mixing the two under the tradeoff to further complicate sync_linked_regs().
However, none of the added tests from dedf56d775c0 ("selftests/bpf: Add tests
for add_const") make this necessary at this point, meaning, BPF CI also passes
with just limiting tracking to 64-bit alu addition.
Fixes: 98d7ca374ba4 ("bpf: Track delta between "linked" registers.")
Reported-by: Nathaniel Theis <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
In userspace, you can add a tid filter by setting
the "task.tid" field for "bpf_iter_link_info".
However, `get_pid_task` when called for the
`BPF_TASK_ITER_TID` type should have been using
`PIDTYPE_PID` (tid) instead of `PIDTYPE_TGID` (pid).
Fixes: f0d74c4da1f0 ("bpf: Parameterize task iterators.")
Signed-off-by: Jordan Rome <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
coerce_reg_to_size_sx() updates the register state after a sign-extension
operation. However, there's a bug in the assignment order of the unsigned
min/max values, leading to incorrect truncation:
0: (85) call bpf_get_prandom_u32#7 ; R0_w=scalar()
1: (57) r0 &= 1 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=0,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x1))
2: (07) r0 += 254 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=umin=smin32=umin32=254,smax=umax=smax32=umax32=255,var_off=(0xfe; 0x1))
3: (bf) r0 = (s8)r0 ; R0_w=scalar(smin=smin32=-2,smax=smax32=-1,umin=umin32=0xfffffffe,umax=0xffffffff,var_off=(0xfffffffffffffffe; 0x1))
In the current implementation, the unsigned 32-bit min/max values
(u32_min_value and u32_max_value) are assigned directly from the 64-bit
signed min/max values (s64_min and s64_max):
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value = s64_min;
reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value = s64_max;
Due to the chain assigmnent, this is equivalent to:
reg->u32_min_value = s64_min; // Unintended truncation
reg->umin_value = reg->u32_min_value;
reg->u32_max_value = s64_max; // Unintended truncation
reg->umax_value = reg->u32_max_value;
Fixes: 1f9a1ea821ff ("bpf: Support new sign-extension load insns")
Reported-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Zac Ecob <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Kanaliev <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The verifier contains a cache for looking up module BTF objects when
calling kfuncs defined in modules. This cache uses a 'struct
bpf_kfunc_btf_tab', which contains a sorted list of BTF objects that
were already seen in the current verifier run, and the BTF objects are
looked up by the offset stored in the relocated call instruction using
bsearch().
The first time a given offset is seen, the module BTF is loaded from the
file descriptor passed in by libbpf, and stored into the cache. However,
there's a bug in the code storing the new entry: it stores a pointer to
the new cache entry, then calls sort() to keep the cache sorted for the
next lookup using bsearch(), and then returns the entry that was just
stored through the stored pointer. However, because sort() modifies the
list of entries in place *by value*, the stored pointer may no longer
point to the right entry, in which case the wrong BTF object will be
returned.
The end result of this is an intermittent bug where, if a BPF program
calls two functions with the same signature in two different modules,
the function from the wrong module may sometimes end up being called.
Whether this happens depends on the order of the calls in the BPF
program (as that affects whether sort() reorders the array of BTF
objects), making it especially hard to track down. Simon, credited as
reporter below, spent significant effort analysing and creating a
reproducer for this issue. The reproducer is added as a selftest in a
subsequent patch.
The fix is straight forward: simply don't use the stored pointer after
calling sort(). Since we already have an on-stack pointer to the BTF
object itself at the point where the function return, just use that, and
populate it from the cache entry in the branch where the lookup
succeeds.
Fixes: 2357672c54c3 ("bpf: Introduce BPF support for kernel module function calls")
Reported-by: Simon Sundberg <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241010-fix-kfunc-btf-caching-for-modules-v2-1-745af6c1af98@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
Previously when retrieving `bpf_link_info.perf_event` for
kprobe/uprobe/tracepoint, the `name_len` field was not populated by the
kernel, leaving it to reflect the value initially set by the user. This
behavior was inconsistent with how other input/output string buffer
fields function (e.g. `raw_tracepoint.tp_name_len`).
This patch fills `name_len` with the actual size of the string name.
Fixes: 1b715e1b0ec5 ("bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event")
Signed-off-by: Tyrone Wu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The kzmalloc call in bpf_check can fail when memory is very fragmented,
which in turn can lead to an OOM kill.
Use kvzmalloc to fall back to vmalloc when memory is too fragmented to
allocate an order 3 sized bpf verifier environment.
Admittedly this is not a very common case, and only happens on systems
where memory has already been squeezed close to the limit, but this does
not seem like much of a hot path, and it's a simple enough fix.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
When trying to repeat the btf fields for array of nested struct, it
doesn't check the remaining info_cnt. The following splat will be
reported when the value of ret * nelems is greater than BTF_FIELDS_MAX:
------------[ cut here ]------------
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in ../kernel/bpf/btf.c:3951:49
index 11 is out of range for type 'btf_field_info [11]'
CPU: 6 UID: 0 PID: 411 Comm: test_progs ...... 6.11.0-rc4+ #1
Tainted: [O]=OOT_MODULE
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS ...
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x70
dump_stack+0x10/0x20
ubsan_epilogue+0x9/0x40
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x6f/0x80
? kallsyms_lookup_name+0x48/0xb0
btf_parse_fields+0x992/0xce0
map_create+0x591/0x770
__sys_bpf+0x229/0x2410
__x64_sys_bpf+0x1f/0x30
x64_sys_call+0x199/0x9f0
do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53
RIP: 0033:0x7fea56f2cc5d
......
</TASK>
---[ end trace ]---
Fix it by checking the remaining info_cnt in btf_repeat_fields() before
repeating the btf fields.
Fixes: 64e8ee814819 ("bpf: look into the types of the fields of a struct type recursively.")
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
|
|
The key_free LSM hook has been removed.
Remove the corresponding BPF hook.
Avoid warnings during the build:
BTFIDS vmlinux
WARN: resolve_btfids: unresolved symbol bpf_lsm_key_free
Fixes: 5f8d28f6d7d5 ("lsm: infrastructure management of the key security blob")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
A hung_task problem shown below was found:
INFO: task kworker/0:0:8 blocked for more than 327 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
Workqueue: events cgroup_bpf_release
Call Trace:
<TASK>
__schedule+0x5a2/0x2050
? find_held_lock+0x33/0x100
? wq_worker_sleeping+0x9e/0xe0
schedule+0x9f/0x180
schedule_preempt_disabled+0x25/0x50
__mutex_lock+0x512/0x740
? cgroup_bpf_release+0x1e/0x4d0
? cgroup_bpf_release+0xcf/0x4d0
? process_scheduled_works+0x161/0x8a0
? cgroup_bpf_release+0x1e/0x4d0
? mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
? __pfx_delay_tsc+0x10/0x10
mutex_lock_nested+0x2b/0x40
cgroup_bpf_release+0xcf/0x4d0
? process_scheduled_works+0x161/0x8a0
? trace_event_raw_event_workqueue_execute_start+0x64/0xd0
? process_scheduled_works+0x161/0x8a0
process_scheduled_works+0x23a/0x8a0
worker_thread+0x231/0x5b0
? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
kthread+0x14d/0x1c0
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork+0x59/0x70
? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30
</TASK>
This issue can be reproduced by the following pressuse test:
1. A large number of cpuset cgroups are deleted.
2. Set cpu on and off repeatly.
3. Set watchdog_thresh repeatly.
The scripts can be obtained at LINK mentioned above the signature.
The reason for this issue is cgroup_mutex and cpu_hotplug_lock are
acquired in different tasks, which may lead to deadlock.
It can lead to a deadlock through the following steps:
1. A large number of cpusets are deleted asynchronously, which puts a
large number of cgroup_bpf_release works into system_wq. The max_active
of system_wq is WQ_DFL_ACTIVE(256). Consequently, all active works are
cgroup_bpf_release works, and many cgroup_bpf_release works will be put
into inactive queue. As illustrated in the diagram, there are 256 (in
the acvtive queue) + n (in the inactive queue) works.
2. Setting watchdog_thresh will hold cpu_hotplug_lock.read and put
smp_call_on_cpu work into system_wq. However step 1 has already filled
system_wq, 'sscs.work' is put into inactive queue. 'sscs.work' has
to wait until the works that were put into the inacvtive queue earlier
have executed (n cgroup_bpf_release), so it will be blocked for a while.
3. Cpu offline requires cpu_hotplug_lock.write, which is blocked by step 2.
4. Cpusets that were deleted at step 1 put cgroup_release works into
cgroup_destroy_wq. They are competing to get cgroup_mutex all the time.
When cgroup_metux is acqured by work at css_killed_work_fn, it will
call cpuset_css_offline, which needs to acqure cpu_hotplug_lock.read.
However, cpuset_css_offline will be blocked for step 3.
5. At this moment, there are 256 works in active queue that are
cgroup_bpf_release, they are attempting to acquire cgroup_mutex, and as
a result, all of them are blocked. Consequently, sscs.work can not be
executed. Ultimately, this situation leads to four processes being
blocked, forming a deadlock.
system_wq(step1) WatchDog(step2) cpu offline(step3) cgroup_destroy_wq(step4)
...
2000+ cgroups deleted asyn
256 actives + n inactives
__lockup_detector_reconfigure
P(cpu_hotplug_lock.read)
put sscs.work into system_wq
256 + n + 1(sscs.work)
sscs.work wait to be executed
warting sscs.work finish
percpu_down_write
P(cpu_hotplug_lock.write)
...blocking...
css_killed_work_fn
P(cgroup_mutex)
cpuset_css_offline
P(cpu_hotplug_lock.read)
...blocking...
256 cgroup_bpf_release
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
..blocking...
To fix the problem, place cgroup_bpf_release works on a dedicated
workqueue which can break the loop and solve the problem. System wqs are
for misc things which shouldn't create a large number of concurrent work
items. If something is going to generate >WQ_DFL_ACTIVE(256) concurrent
work items, it should use its own dedicated workqueue.
Fixes: 4bfc0bb2c60e ("bpf: decouple the lifetime of cgroup_bpf from cgroup itself")
Cc: [email protected] # v5.3+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/cgroups/[email protected]/T/#t
Tested-by: Vishal Chourasia <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chen Ridong <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
|
|
We need to free specs properly.
Fixes: 3d2786d65aaa ("bpf: correctly handle malformed BPF_CORE_TYPE_ID_LOCAL relos")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Eduard Zingerman <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
|
|
asm/unaligned.h is always an include of asm-generic/unaligned.h;
might as well move that thing to linux/unaligned.h and include
that - there's nothing arch-specific in that header.
auto-generated by the following:
for i in `git grep -l -w asm/unaligned.h`; do
sed -i -e "s/asm\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i
done
for i in `git grep -l -w asm-generic/unaligned.h`; do
sed -i -e "s/asm-generic\/unaligned.h/linux\/unaligned.h/" $i
done
git mv include/asm-generic/unaligned.h include/linux/unaligned.h
git mv tools/include/asm-generic/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
sed -i -e "/unaligned.h/d" include/asm-generic/Kbuild
sed -i -e "s/__ASM_GENERIC/__LINUX/" include/linux/unaligned.h tools/include/linux/unaligned.h
|