| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
As there is only a 32-bit ac_btime field in taskstat and
we should handle dates after the overflow, add a new field
with the same information but 64-bit width that can hold
a full time64_t.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
|
|
In 'struct acct', 'struct acct_v3', and 'struct taskstats' we have
a 32-bit 'ac_btime' field containing an absolute time value, which
will overflow in year 2106.
There are two possible ways to deal with it:
a) let it overflow and have user space code deal with reconstructing
the data based on the current time, or
b) truncate the times based on the range of the u32 type.
Neither of them solves the actual problem. Pick the second
one to best document what the issue is, and have someone
fix it in a future version.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
|
|
Delay accounting already measures the time a task spends in direct reclaim
and waiting for swapin, but in low memory situations tasks spend can spend
a significant amount of their time waiting on thrashing page cache. This
isn't tracked right now.
To know the full impact of memory contention on an individual task,
measure the delay when waiting for a recently evicted active cache page to
read back into memory.
Also update tools/accounting/getdelays.c:
[hannes@computer accounting]$ sudo ./getdelays -d -p 1
print delayacct stats ON
PID 1
CPU count real total virtual total delay total delay average
50318 745000000 847346785 400533713 0.008ms
IO count delay total delay average
435 122601218 0ms
SWAP count delay total delay average
0 0 0ms
RECLAIM count delay total delay average
0 0 0ms
THRASHING count delay total delay average
19 12621439 0ms
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Daniel Drake <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <[email protected]>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Enderborg <[email protected]>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
Cc: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
|
|
Many user space API headers have licensing information, which is either
incomplete, badly formatted or just a shorthand for referring to the
license under which the file is supposed to be. This makes it hard for
compliance tools to determine the correct license.
Update these files with an SPDX license identifier. The identifier was
chosen based on the license information in the file.
GPL/LGPL licensed headers get the matching GPL/LGPL SPDX license
identifier with the added 'WITH Linux-syscall-note' exception, which is
the officially assigned exception identifier for the kernel syscall
exception:
NOTE! This copyright does *not* cover user programs that use kernel
services by normal system calls - this is merely considered normal use
of the kernel, and does *not* fall under the heading of "derived work".
This exception makes it possible to include GPL headers into non GPL
code, without confusing license compliance tools.
Headers which have either explicit dual licensing or are just licensed
under a non GPL license are updated with the corresponding SPDX
identifier and the GPLv2 with syscall exception identifier. The format
is:
((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR SPDX-ID-OF-OTHER-LICENSE)
SPDX license identifiers are a legally binding shorthand, which can be
used instead of the full boiler plate text. The update does not remove
existing license information as this has to be done on a case by case
basis and the copyright holders might have to be consulted. This will
happen in a separate step.
This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
Philippe Ombredanne. See the previous patch in this series for the
methodology of how this patch was researched.
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
Signed-off-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Dave Jones <[email protected]>
|