| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | cleanup: Make no_free_ptr() __must_check | Peter Zijlstra | 1 | -3/+36 | |
| recent discussion brought about the realization that it makes sense for no_free_ptr() to have __must_check semantics in order to avoid leaking the resource. Additionally, add a few comments to clarify why/how things work. All credit to Linus on how to combine __must_check and the stmt-expression. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected] | |||||
| 2023-06-26 | locking: Introduce __cleanup() based infrastructure | Peter Zijlstra | 1 | -0/+171 | |
| Use __attribute__((__cleanup__(func))) to build: - simple auto-release pointers using __free() - 'classes' with constructor and destructor semantics for scope-based resource management. - lock guards based on the above classes. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <[email protected]> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230612093537.614161713%40infradead.org | |||||