aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/include/linux/bpf.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2023-03-07bpf: add new map ops ->map_mem_usageYafang Shao1-0/+2
Add a new map ops ->map_mem_usage to print the memory usage of a bpf map. This is a preparation for the followup change. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-03-03bpf: Refactor RCU enforcement in the verifier.Alexei Starovoitov1-1/+1
bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() are only available in clang compiled kernels. Lack of such key mechanism makes it impossible for sleepable bpf programs to use RCU pointers. Allow bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock() in GCC compiled kernels (though GCC doesn't support btf_type_tag yet) and allowlist certain field dereferences in important data structures like tast_struct, cgroup, socket that are used by sleepable programs either as RCU pointer or full trusted pointer (which is valid outside of RCU CS). Use BTF_TYPE_SAFE_RCU and BTF_TYPE_SAFE_TRUSTED macros for such tagging. They will be removed once GCC supports btf_type_tag. With that refactor check_ptr_to_btf_access(). Make it strict in enforcing PTR_TRUSTED and PTR_UNTRUSTED while deprecating old PTR_TO_BTF_ID without modifier flags. There is a chance that this strict enforcement might break existing programs (especially on GCC compiled kernels), but this cleanup has to start sooner than later. Note PTR_TO_CTX access still yields old deprecated PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Once it's converted to strict PTR_TRUSTED or PTR_UNTRUSTED the kfuncs and helpers will be able to default to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS. KF_RCU will remain as a weaker version of KF_TRUSTED_ARGS where obj refcnt could be 0. Adjust rcu_read_lock selftest to run on gcc and clang compiled kernels. Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-03-01bpf: Add xdp dynptrsJoanne Koong1-1/+7
Add xdp dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points to a xdp_buff. The dynptr acts on xdp data. xdp dynptrs have two main benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses). Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of through direct access of xdp->data and xdp->data_end) can be more ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for being within bounds of data_end). For reads and writes on the dynptr, this includes reading/writing from/to and across fragments. Data slices through the bpf_dynptr_data API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() should be used. For examples of how xdp dynptrs can be used, please see the attached selftests. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-03-01bpf: Add skb dynptrsJoanne Koong1-1/+13
Add skb dynptrs, which are dynptrs whose underlying pointer points to a skb. The dynptr acts on skb data. skb dynptrs have two main benefits. One is that they allow operations on sizes that are not statically known at compile-time (eg variable-sized accesses). Another is that parsing the packet data through dynptrs (instead of through direct access of skb->data and skb->data_end) can be more ergonomic and less brittle (eg does not need manual if checking for being within bounds of data_end). For bpf prog types that don't support writes on skb data, the dynptr is read-only (bpf_dynptr_write() will return an error) For reads and writes through the bpf_dynptr_read() and bpf_dynptr_write() interfaces, reading and writing from/to data in the head as well as from/to non-linear paged buffers is supported. Data slices through the bpf_dynptr_data API are not supported; instead bpf_dynptr_slice() and bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr() (added in subsequent commit) should be used. For examples of how skb dynptrs can be used, please see the attached selftests. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-03-01bpf: Define no-ops for externally called bpf dynptr functionsJoanne Koong1-30/+45
Some bpf dynptr functions will be called from places where if CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not set, then the dynptr function is undefined. For example, when skb type dynptrs are added in the next commit, dynptr functions are called from net/core/filter.c This patch defines no-op implementations of these dynptr functions so that they do not break compilation by being an undefined reference. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-02-15bpf: Zeroing allocated object from slab in bpf memory allocatorHou Tao1-0/+7
Currently the freed element in bpf memory allocator may be immediately reused, for htab map the reuse will reinitialize special fields in map value (e.g., bpf_spin_lock), but lookup procedure may still access these special fields, and it may lead to hard-lockup as shown below: NMI backtrace for cpu 16 CPU: 16 PID: 2574 Comm: htab.bin Tainted: G L 6.1.0+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), RIP: 0010:queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x283/0x2c0 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> copy_map_value_locked+0xb7/0x170 bpf_map_copy_value+0x113/0x3c0 __sys_bpf+0x1c67/0x2780 __x64_sys_bpf+0x1c/0x20 do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0 ...... </TASK> For htab map, just like the preallocated case, these is no need to initialize these special fields in map value again once these fields have been initialized. For preallocated htab map, these fields are initialized through __GFP_ZERO in bpf_map_area_alloc(), so do the similar thing for non-preallocated htab in bpf memory allocator. And there is no need to use __GFP_ZERO for per-cpu bpf memory allocator, because __alloc_percpu_gfp() does it implicitly. Fixes: 0fd7c5d43339 ("bpf: Optimize call_rcu in non-preallocated hash map.") Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-02-13bpf: Add basic bpf_rb_{root,node} supportDave Marchevsky1-1/+19
This patch adds special BPF_RB_{ROOT,NODE} btf_field_types similar to BPF_LIST_{HEAD,NODE}, adds the necessary plumbing to detect the new types, and adds bpf_rb_root_free function for freeing bpf_rb_root in map_values. structs bpf_rb_root and bpf_rb_node are opaque types meant to obscure structs rb_root_cached rb_node, respectively. btf_struct_access will prevent BPF programs from touching these special fields automatically now that they're recognized. btf_check_and_fixup_fields now groups list_head and rb_root together as "graph root" fields and {list,rb}_node as "graph node", and does same ownership cycle checking as before. Note that this function does _not_ prevent ownership type mixups (e.g. rb_root owning list_node) - that's handled by btf_parse_graph_root. After this patch, a bpf program can have a struct bpf_rb_root in a map_value, but not add anything to nor do anything useful with it. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-02-13bpf: Migrate release_on_unlock logic to non-owning ref semanticsDave Marchevsky1-0/+6
This patch introduces non-owning reference semantics to the verifier, specifically linked_list API kfunc handling. release_on_unlock logic for refs is refactored - with small functional changes - to implement these semantics, and bpf_list_push_{front,back} are migrated to use them. When a list node is pushed to a list, the program still has a pointer to the node: n = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*n)); bpf_spin_lock(&l); bpf_list_push_back(&l, n); /* n still points to the just-added node */ bpf_spin_unlock(&l); What the verifier considers n to be after the push, and thus what can be done with n, are changed by this patch. Common properties both before/after this patch: * After push, n is only a valid reference to the node until end of critical section * After push, n cannot be pushed to any list * After push, the program can read the node's fields using n Before: * After push, n retains the ref_obj_id which it received on bpf_obj_new, but the associated bpf_reference_state's release_on_unlock field is set to true * release_on_unlock field and associated logic is used to implement "n is only a valid ref until end of critical section" * After push, n cannot be written to, the node must be removed from the list before writing to its fields * After push, n is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED After: * After push, n's ref is released and ref_obj_id set to 0. NON_OWN_REF type flag is added to reg's type, indicating that it's a non-owning reference. * NON_OWN_REF flag and logic is used to implement "n is only a valid ref until end of critical section" * n can be written to (except for special fields e.g. bpf_list_node, timer, ...) Summary of specific implementation changes to achieve the above: * release_on_unlock field, ref_set_release_on_unlock helper, and logic to "release on unlock" based on that field are removed * The anonymous active_lock struct used by bpf_verifier_state is pulled out into a named struct bpf_active_lock. * NON_OWN_REF type flag is introduced along with verifier logic changes to handle non-owning refs * Helpers are added to use NON_OWN_REF flag to implement non-owning ref semantics as described above * invalidate_non_owning_refs - helper to clobber all non-owning refs matching a particular bpf_active_lock identity. Replaces release_on_unlock logic in process_spin_lock. * ref_set_non_owning - set NON_OWN_REF type flag after doing some sanity checking * ref_convert_owning_non_owning - convert owning reference w/ specified ref_obj_id to non-owning references. Set NON_OWN_REF flag for each reg with that ref_obj_id and 0-out its ref_obj_id * Update linked_list selftests to account for minor semantic differences introduced by this patch * Writes to a release_on_unlock node ref are not allowed, while writes to non-owning reference pointees are. As a result the linked_list "write after push" failure tests are no longer scenarios that should fail. * The test##missing_lock##op and test##incorrect_lock##op macro-generated failure tests need to have a valid node argument in order to have the same error output as before. Otherwise verification will fail early and the expected error output won't be seen. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-02-10bpf: allow to disable bpf map memory accountingYafang Shao1-0/+8
We can simply set root memcg as the map's memcg to disable bpf memory accounting. bpf_map_area_alloc is a little special as it gets the memcg from current rather than from the map, so we need to disable GFP_ACCOUNT specifically for it. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-02-10bpf: use bpf_map_kvcalloc in bpf_local_storageYafang Shao1-0/+8
Introduce new helper bpf_map_kvcalloc() for the memory allocation in bpf_local_storage(). Then the allocation will charge the memory from the map instead of from current, though currently they are the same thing as it is only used in map creation path now. By charging map's memory into the memcg from the map, it will be more clear. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <[email protected]> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-02-02bpf: Drop always true do_idr_lock parameter to bpf_map_free_idTobias Klauser1-1/+1
The do_idr_lock parameter to bpf_map_free_id was introduced by commit bd5f5f4ecb78 ("bpf: Add BPF_MAP_GET_FD_BY_ID"). However, all callers set do_idr_lock = true since commit 1e0bd5a091e5 ("bpf: Switch bpf_map ref counter to atomic64_t so bpf_map_inc() never fails"). While at it also inline __bpf_map_put into its only caller bpf_map_put now that do_idr_lock can be dropped from its signature. Signed-off-by: Tobias Klauser <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-29s390/bpf: Implement arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline()Ilya Leoshkevich1-0/+4
arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline() is used for direct attachment of eBPF programs to various places, bypassing kprobes. It's responsible for calling a number of eBPF programs before, instead and/or after whatever they are attached to. Add a s390x implementation, paying attention to the following: - Reuse the existing JIT infrastructure, where possible. - Like the existing JIT, prefer making multiple passes instead of backpatching. Currently 2 passes is enough. If literal pool is introduced, this needs to be raised to 3. However, at the moment adding literal pool only makes the code larger. If branch shortening is introduced, the number of passes needs to be increased even further. - Support both regular and ftrace calling conventions, depending on the trampoline flags. - Use expolines for indirect calls. - Handle the mismatch between the eBPF and the s390x ABIs. - Sign-extend fmod_ret return values. invoke_bpf_prog() produces about 120 bytes; it might be possible to slightly optimize this, but reaching 50 bytes, like on x86_64, looks unrealistic: just loading cookie, __bpf_prog_enter, bpf_func, insnsi and __bpf_prog_exit as literals already takes at least 5 * 12 = 60 bytes, and we can't use relative addressing for most of them. Therefore, lower BPF_MAX_TRAMP_LINKS on s390x. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-28bpf: btf: Add BTF_FMODEL_SIGNED_ARG flagIlya Leoshkevich1-0/+4
s390x eBPF JIT needs to know whether a function return value is signed and which function arguments are signed, in order to generate code compliant with the s390x ABI. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-28bpf: Change BPF_MAX_TRAMP_LINKS to enumIlya Leoshkevich1-1/+3
This way it's possible to query its value from testcases using BTF. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-28Merge tag 'for-netdev' of ↵Jakub Kicinski1-12/+67
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== bpf-next 2023-01-28 We've added 124 non-merge commits during the last 22 day(s) which contain a total of 124 files changed, 6386 insertions(+), 1827 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Implement XDP hints via kfuncs with initial support for RX hash and timestamp metadata kfuncs, from Stanislav Fomichev and Toke Høiland-Jørgensen. Measurements on overhead: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected] 2) Extend libbpf's bpf_tracing.h support for tracing arguments of kprobes/uprobes and syscall as a special case, from Andrii Nakryiko. 3) Significantly reduce the search time for module symbols by livepatch and BPF, from Jiri Olsa and Zhen Lei. 4) Enable cpumasks to be used as kptrs, which is useful for tracing programs tracking which tasks end up running on which CPUs in different time intervals, from David Vernet. 5) Fix several issues in the dynptr processing such as stack slot liveness propagation, missing checks for PTR_TO_STACK variable offset, etc, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi. 6) Various performance improvements, fixes, and introduction of more than just one XDP program to XSK selftests, from Magnus Karlsson. 7) Big batch to BPF samples to reduce deprecated functionality, from Daniel T. Lee. 8) Enable struct_ops programs to be sleepable in verifier, from David Vernet. 9) Reduce pr_warn() noise on BTF mismatches when they are expected under the CONFIG_MODULE_ALLOW_BTF_MISMATCH config anyway, from Connor O'Brien. 10) Describe modulo and division by zero behavior of the BPF runtime in BPF's instruction specification document, from Dave Thaler. 11) Several improvements to libbpf API documentation in libbpf.h, from Grant Seltzer. 12) Improve resolve_btfids header dependencies related to subcmd and add proper support for HOSTCC, from Ian Rogers. 13) Add ipip6 and ip6ip decapsulation support for bpf_skb_adjust_room() helper along with BPF selftests, from Ziyang Xuan. 14) Simplify the parsing logic of structure parameters for BPF trampoline in the x86-64 JIT compiler, from Pu Lehui. 15) Get BTF working for kernels with CONFIG_RUST enabled by excluding Rust compilation units with pahole, from Martin Rodriguez Reboredo. 16) Get bpf_setsockopt() working for kTLS on top of TCP sockets, from Kui-Feng Lee. 17) Disable stack protection for BPF objects in bpftool given BPF backends don't support it, from Holger Hoffstätte. * tag 'for-netdev' of https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (124 commits) selftest/bpf: Make crashes more debuggable in test_progs libbpf: Add documentation to map pinning API functions libbpf: Fix malformed documentation formatting selftests/bpf: Properly enable hwtstamp in xdp_hw_metadata selftests/bpf: Calls bpf_setsockopt() on a ktls enabled socket. bpf: Check the protocol of a sock to agree the calls to bpf_setsockopt(). bpf/selftests: Verify struct_ops prog sleepable behavior bpf: Pass const struct bpf_prog * to .check_member libbpf: Support sleepable struct_ops.s section bpf: Allow BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS programs to be sleepable selftests/bpf: Fix vmtest static compilation error tools/resolve_btfids: Alter how HOSTCC is forced tools/resolve_btfids: Install subcmd headers bpf/docs: Document the nocast aliasing behavior of ___init bpf/docs: Document how nested trusted fields may be defined bpf/docs: Document cpumask kfuncs in a new file selftests/bpf: Add selftest suite for cpumask kfuncs selftests/bpf: Add nested trust selftests suite bpf: Enable cpumasks to be queried and used as kptrs bpf: Disallow NULLable pointers for trusted kfuncs ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2023-01-25bpf/selftests: Verify struct_ops prog sleepable behaviorDavid Vernet1-0/+1
In a set of prior changes, we added the ability for struct_ops programs to be sleepable. This patch enhances the dummy_st_ops selftest suite to validate this behavior by adding a new sleepable struct_ops entry to dummy_st_ops. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-25bpf: Pass const struct bpf_prog * to .check_memberDavid Vernet1-1/+2
The .check_member field of struct bpf_struct_ops is currently passed the member's btf_type via const struct btf_type *t, and a const struct btf_member *member. This allows the struct_ops implementation to check whether e.g. an ops is supported, but it would be useful to also enforce that the struct_ops prog being loaded for that member has other qualities, like being sleepable (or not). This patch therefore updates the .check_member() callback to also take a const struct bpf_prog *prog argument. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-24bpf: Allow trusted args to walk struct when checking BTF IDsDavid Vernet1-0/+4
When validating BTF types for KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncs, the verifier currently enforces that the top-level type must match when calling the kfunc. In other words, the verifier does not allow the BPF program to pass a bitwise equivalent struct, despite it being allowed according to the C standard. For example, if you have the following type: struct nf_conn___init { struct nf_conn ct; }; The C standard stipulates that it would be safe to pass a struct nf_conn___init to a kfunc expecting a struct nf_conn. The verifier currently disallows this, however, as semantically kfuncs may want to enforce that structs that have equivalent types according to the C standard, but have different BTF IDs, are not able to be passed to kfuncs expecting one or the other. For example, struct nf_conn___init may not be queried / looked up, as it is allocated but may not yet be fully initialized. On the other hand, being able to pass types that are equivalent according to the C standard will be useful for other types of kfunc / kptrs enabled by BPF. For example, in a follow-on patch, a series of kfuncs will be added which allow programs to do bitwise queries on cpumasks that are either allocated by the program (in which case they'll be a 'struct bpf_cpumask' type that wraps a cpumask_t as its first element), or a cpumask that was allocated by the main kernel (in which case it will just be a straight cpumask_t, as in task->cpus_ptr). Having the two types of cpumasks allows us to distinguish between the two for when a cpumask is read-only vs. mutatable. A struct bpf_cpumask can be mutated by e.g. bpf_cpumask_clear(), whereas a regular cpumask_t cannot be. On the other hand, a struct bpf_cpumask can of course be queried in the exact same manner as a cpumask_t, with e.g. bpf_cpumask_test_cpu(). If we were to enforce that top level types match, then a user that's passing a struct bpf_cpumask to a read-only cpumask_t argument would have to cast with something like bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() (which itself would need to be updated to expect the alias, and currently it only accommodates a single alias per prog type). Additionally, not specifying KF_TRUSTED_ARGS is not an option, as some kfuncs take one argument as a struct bpf_cpumask *, and another as a struct cpumask * (i.e. cpumask_t). In order to enable this, this patch relaxes the constraint that a KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc must have strict type matching, and instead only enforces strict type matching if a type is observed to be a "no-cast alias" (i.e., that the type names are equivalent, but one is suffixed with ___init). Additionally, in order to try and be conservative and match existing behavior / expectations, this patch also enforces strict type checking for acquire kfuncs. We were already enforcing it for release kfuncs, so this should also improve the consistency of the semantics for kfuncs. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-24bpf: Enable annotating trusted nested pointersDavid Vernet1-0/+4
In kfuncs, a "trusted" pointer is a pointer that the kfunc can assume is safe, and which the verifier will allow to be passed to a KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc. Currently, a KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc disallows any pointer to be passed at a nonzero offset, but sometimes this is in fact safe if the "nested" pointer's lifetime is inherited from its parent. For example, the const cpumask_t *cpus_ptr field in a struct task_struct will remain valid until the task itself is destroyed, and thus would also be safe to pass to a KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc. While it would be conceptually simple to enable this by using BTF tags, gcc unfortunately does not yet support this. In the interim, this patch enables support for this by using a type-naming convention. A new BTF_TYPE_SAFE_NESTED macro is defined in verifier.c which allows a developer to specify the nested fields of a type which are considered trusted if its parent is also trusted. The verifier is also updated to account for this. A patch with selftests will be added in a follow-on change, along with documentation for this feature. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2023-01-23bpf: Support consuming XDP HW metadata from fext programsToke Høiland-Jørgensen1-0/+14
Instead of rejecting the attaching of PROG_TYPE_EXT programs to XDP programs that consume HW metadata, implement support for propagating the offload information. The extension program doesn't need to set a flag or ifindex, these will just be propagated from the target by the verifier. We need to create a separate offload object for the extension program, though, since it can be reattached to a different program later (which means we can't just inherit the offload information from the target). An additional check is added on attach that the new target is compatible with the offload information in the extension prog. Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-01-23bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncsStanislav Fomichev1-1/+16
Define a new kfunc set (xdp_metadata_kfunc_ids) which implements all possible XDP metatada kfuncs. Not all devices have to implement them. If kfunc is not supported by the target device, the default implementation is called instead. The verifier, at load time, replaces a call to the generic kfunc with a call to the per-device one. Per-device kfunc pointers are stored in separate struct xdp_metadata_ops. Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> Cc: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]> Cc: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> Cc: Maryam Tahhan <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-01-23bpf: Introduce device-bound XDP programsStanislav Fomichev1-4/+20
New flag BPF_F_XDP_DEV_BOUND_ONLY plus all the infra to have a way to associate a netdev with a BPF program at load time. netdevsim checks are dropped in favor of generic check in dev_xdp_attach. Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> Cc: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]> Cc: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> Cc: Maryam Tahhan <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-01-23bpf: Rename bpf_{prog,map}_is_dev_bound to is_offloadedStanislav Fomichev1-4/+4
BPF offloading infra will be reused to implement bound-but-not-offloaded bpf programs. Rename existing helpers for clarity. No functional changes. Cc: John Fastabend <[email protected]> Cc: David Ahern <[email protected]> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <[email protected]> Cc: Anatoly Burakov <[email protected]> Cc: Alexander Lobakin <[email protected]> Cc: Magnus Karlsson <[email protected]> Cc: Maryam Tahhan <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
2023-01-20Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-1/+1
drivers/net/ipa/ipa_interrupt.c drivers/net/ipa/ipa_interrupt.h 9ec9b2a30853 ("net: ipa: disable ipa interrupt during suspend") 8e461e1f092b ("net: ipa: introduce ipa_interrupt_enable()") d50ed3558719 ("net: ipa: enable IPA interrupt handlers separate from registration") https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2023-01-10bpf: Replace 0-length arrays with flexible arraysKees Cook1-3/+3
Zero-length arrays are deprecated [1]. Replace struct bpf_array's union of 0-length arrays with flexible arrays. Detected with GCC 13, by using -fstrict-flex-arrays=3: arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function 'bpf_tail_call_direct_fixup': arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:606:37: warning: array subscript <unknown> is outside array bounds of 'void *[0]' [-Warray-bounds=] 606 | target = array->ptrs[poke->tail_call.key]; | ~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from include/linux/filter.h:9, from arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:9: include/linux/bpf.h:1527:23: note: while referencing 'ptrs' 1527 | void *ptrs[0] __aligned(8); | ^~~~ [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2023-01-09bpf: remove the do_idr_lock parameter from bpf_prog_free_id()Paul Moore1-1/+1
It was determined that the do_idr_lock parameter to bpf_prog_free_id() was not necessary as it should always be true. Suggested-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <[email protected]> Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-12-28bpf: rename list_head -> graph_root in field info typesDave Marchevsky1-2/+2
Many of the structs recently added to track field info for linked-list head are useful as-is for rbtree root. So let's do a mechanical renaming of list_head-related types and fields: include/linux/bpf.h: struct btf_field_list_head -> struct btf_field_graph_root list_head -> graph_root in struct btf_field union kernel/bpf/btf.c: list_head -> graph_root in struct btf_field_info This is a nonfunctional change, functionality to actually use these fields for rbtree will be added in further patches. Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-12-19bpf: Remove trace_printk_lockJiri Olsa1-0/+3
Both bpf_trace_printk and bpf_trace_vprintk helpers use static buffer guarded with trace_printk_lock spin lock. The spin lock contention causes issues with bpf programs attached to contention_begin tracepoint [1][2]. Andrii suggested we could get rid of the contention by using trylock, but we could actually get rid of the spinlock completely by using percpu buffers the same way as for bin_args in bpf_bprintf_prepare function. Adding new return 'buf' argument to struct bpf_bprintf_data and making bpf_bprintf_prepare to return also the buffer for printk helpers. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsakT_yWxnSWr4r-0TpPvbKm9-OBmVUhJb7hV3hY8fdCkw@mail.gmail.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CACkBjsaCsTovQHFfkqJKto6S4Z8d02ud1D7MPESrHa1cVNNTrw@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Hao Sun <[email protected]> Suggested-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-12-19bpf: Do cleanup in bpf_bprintf_cleanup only when neededJiri Olsa1-1/+1
Currently we always cleanup/decrement bpf_bprintf_nest_level variable in bpf_bprintf_cleanup if it's > 0. There's possible scenario where this could cause a problem, when bpf_bprintf_prepare does not get bin_args buffer (because num_args is 0) and following bpf_bprintf_cleanup call decrements bpf_bprintf_nest_level variable, like: in task context: bpf_bprintf_prepare(num_args != 0) increments 'bpf_bprintf_nest_level = 1' -> first irq : bpf_bprintf_prepare(num_args == 0) bpf_bprintf_cleanup decrements 'bpf_bprintf_nest_level = 0' -> second irq: bpf_bprintf_prepare(num_args != 0) bpf_bprintf_nest_level = 1 gets same buffer as task context above Adding check to bpf_bprintf_cleanup and doing the real cleanup only if we got bin_args data in the first place. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-12-19bpf: Add struct for bin_args arg in bpf_bprintf_prepareJiri Olsa1-1/+6
Adding struct bpf_bprintf_data to hold bin_args argument for bpf_bprintf_prepare function. We will add another return argument to bpf_bprintf_prepare and pass the struct to bpf_bprintf_cleanup for proper cleanup in following changes. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-12-08bpf: Rework process_dynptr_funcKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-2/+2
Recently, user ringbuf support introduced a PTR_TO_DYNPTR register type for use in callback state, because in case of user ringbuf helpers, there is no dynptr on the stack that is passed into the callback. To reflect such a state, a special register type was created. However, some checks have been bypassed incorrectly during the addition of this feature. First, for arg_type with MEM_UNINIT flag which initialize a dynptr, they must be rejected for such register type. Secondly, in the future, there are plans to add dynptr helpers that operate on the dynptr itself and may change its offset and other properties. In all of these cases, PTR_TO_DYNPTR shouldn't be allowed to be passed to such helpers, however the current code simply returns 0. The rejection for helpers that release the dynptr is already handled. For fixing this, we take a step back and rework existing code in a way that will allow fitting in all classes of helpers and have a coherent model for dealing with the variety of use cases in which dynptr is used. First, for ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR, it can either be set alone or together with a DYNPTR_TYPE_* constant that denotes the only type it accepts. Next, helpers which initialize a dynptr use MEM_UNINIT to indicate this fact. To make the distinction clear, use MEM_RDONLY flag to indicate that the helper only operates on the memory pointed to by the dynptr, not the dynptr itself. In C parlance, it would be equivalent to taking the dynptr as a point to const argument. When either of these flags are not present, the helper is allowed to mutate both the dynptr itself and also the memory it points to. Currently, the read only status of the memory is not tracked in the dynptr, but it would be trivial to add this support inside dynptr state of the register. With these changes and renaming PTR_TO_DYNPTR to CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to better reflect its usage, it can no longer be passed to helpers that initialize a dynptr, i.e. bpf_dynptr_from_mem, bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr. A note to reviewers is that in code that does mark_stack_slots_dynptr, and unmark_stack_slots_dynptr, we implicitly rely on the fact that PTR_TO_STACK reg is the only case that can reach that code path, as one cannot pass CONST_PTR_TO_DYNPTR to helpers that don't set MEM_RDONLY. In both cases such helpers won't be setting that flag. The next patch will add a couple of selftest cases to make sure this doesn't break. Fixes: 205715673844 ("bpf: Add bpf_user_ringbuf_drain() helper") Acked-by: Joanne Koong <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-30bpf: Tighten ptr_to_btf_id checks.Alexei Starovoitov1-5/+0
The networking programs typically don't require CAP_PERFMON, but through kfuncs like bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx() they can access memory through PTR_TO_BTF_ID. In such case enforce CAP_PERFMON. Also make sure that only GPL programs can access kernel data structures. All kfuncs require GPL already. Also remove allow_ptr_to_map_access. It's the same as allow_ptr_leaks and different name for the same check only causes confusion. Fixes: fd264ca02094 ("bpf: Add a kfunc to type cast from bpf uapi ctx to kernel ctx") Fixes: 50c6b8a9aea2 ("selftests/bpf: Add a test for btf_type_tag "percpu"") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-11-28Daniel Borkmann says:Jakub Kicinski1-47/+107
==================== bpf-next 2022-11-25 We've added 101 non-merge commits during the last 11 day(s) which contain a total of 109 files changed, 8827 insertions(+), 1129 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Support for user defined BPF objects: the use case is to allocate own objects, build own object hierarchies and use the building blocks to build own data structures flexibly, for example, linked lists in BPF, from Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi. 2) Add bpf_rcu_read_{,un}lock() support for sleepable programs, from Yonghong Song. 3) Add support storing struct task_struct objects as kptrs in maps, from David Vernet. 4) Batch of BPF map documentation improvements, from Maryam Tahhan and Donald Hunter. 5) Improve BPF verifier to propagate nullness information for branches of register to register comparisons, from Eduard Zingerman. 6) Fix cgroup BPF iter infra to hold reference on the start cgroup, from Hou Tao. 7) Fix BPF verifier to not mark fentry/fexit program arguments as trusted given it is not the case for them, from Alexei Starovoitov. 8) Improve BPF verifier's realloc handling to better play along with dynamic runtime analysis tools like KASAN and friends, from Kees Cook. 9) Remove legacy libbpf mode support from bpftool, from Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui. 10) Rework zero-len skb redirection checks to avoid potentially breaking existing BPF test infra users, from Stanislav Fomichev. 11) Two small refactorings which are independent and have been split out of the XDP queueing RFC series, from Toke Høiland-Jørgensen. 12) Fix a memory leak in LSM cgroup BPF selftest, from Wang Yufen. 13) Documentation on how to run BPF CI without patch submission, from Daniel Müller. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]> ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2022-11-24bpf: Add kfunc bpf_rcu_read_lock/unlock()Yonghong Song1-0/+3
Add two kfunc's bpf_rcu_read_lock() and bpf_rcu_read_unlock(). These two kfunc's can be used for all program types. The following is an example about how rcu pointer are used w.r.t. bpf_rcu_read_lock()/bpf_rcu_read_unlock(). struct task_struct { ... struct task_struct *last_wakee; struct task_struct __rcu *real_parent; ... }; Let us say prog does 'task = bpf_get_current_task_btf()' to get a 'task' pointer. The basic rules are: - 'real_parent = task->real_parent' should be inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region. This is to simulate rcu_dereference() operation. The 'real_parent' is marked as MEM_RCU only if (1). task->real_parent is inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region, and (2). task is a trusted ptr. So MEM_RCU marked ptr can be 'trusted' inside the bpf_rcu_read_lock region. - 'last_wakee = real_parent->last_wakee' should be inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region since it tries to access rcu protected memory. - the ptr 'last_wakee' will be marked as PTR_UNTRUSTED since in general it is not clear whether the object pointed by 'last_wakee' is valid or not even inside bpf_rcu_read_lock region. The verifier will reset all rcu pointer register states to untrusted at bpf_rcu_read_unlock() kfunc call site, so any such rcu pointer won't be trusted any more outside the bpf_rcu_read_lock() region. The current implementation does not support nested rcu read lock region in the prog. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-24bpf: Introduce might_sleep field in bpf_func_protoYonghong Song1-0/+1
Introduce bpf_func_proto->might_sleep to indicate a particular helper might sleep. This will make later check whether a helper might be sleepable or not easier. Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-20bpf: Allow trusted pointers to be passed to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfuncsDavid Vernet1-0/+30
Kfuncs currently support specifying the KF_TRUSTED_ARGS flag to signal to the verifier that it should enforce that a BPF program passes it a "safe", trusted pointer. Currently, "safe" means that the pointer is either PTR_TO_CTX, or is refcounted. There may be cases, however, where the kernel passes a BPF program a safe / trusted pointer to an object that the BPF program wishes to use as a kptr, but because the object does not yet have a ref_obj_id from the perspective of the verifier, the program would be unable to pass it to a KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc. The solution is to expand the set of pointers that are considered trusted according to KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, so that programs can invoke kfuncs with these pointers without getting rejected by the verifier. There is already a PTR_UNTRUSTED flag that is set in some scenarios, such as when a BPF program reads a kptr directly from a map without performing a bpf_kptr_xchg() call. These pointers of course can and should be rejected by the verifier. Unfortunately, however, PTR_UNTRUSTED does not cover all the cases for safety that need to be addressed to adequately protect kfuncs. Specifically, pointers obtained by a BPF program "walking" a struct are _not_ considered PTR_UNTRUSTED according to BPF. For example, say that we were to add a kfunc called bpf_task_acquire(), with KF_ACQUIRE | KF_TRUSTED_ARGS, to acquire a struct task_struct *. If we only used PTR_UNTRUSTED to signal that a task was unsafe to pass to a kfunc, the verifier would mistakenly allow the following unsafe BPF program to be loaded: SEC("tp_btf/task_newtask") int BPF_PROG(unsafe_acquire_task, struct task_struct *task, u64 clone_flags) { struct task_struct *acquired, *nested; nested = task->last_wakee; /* Would not be rejected by the verifier. */ acquired = bpf_task_acquire(nested); if (!acquired) return 0; bpf_task_release(acquired); return 0; } To address this, this patch defines a new type flag called PTR_TRUSTED which tracks whether a PTR_TO_BTF_ID pointer is safe to pass to a KF_TRUSTED_ARGS kfunc or a BPF helper function. PTR_TRUSTED pointers are passed directly from the kernel as a tracepoint or struct_ops callback argument. Any nested pointer that is obtained from walking a PTR_TRUSTED pointer is no longer PTR_TRUSTED. From the example above, the struct task_struct *task argument is PTR_TRUSTED, but the 'nested' pointer obtained from 'task->last_wakee' is not PTR_TRUSTED. A subsequent patch will add kfuncs for storing a task kfunc as a kptr, and then another patch will add selftests to validate. Signed-off-by: David Vernet <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-17bpf: Introduce bpf_obj_newKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-8/+13
Introduce type safe memory allocator bpf_obj_new for BPF programs. The kernel side kfunc is named bpf_obj_new_impl, as passing hidden arguments to kfuncs still requires having them in prototype, unlike BPF helpers which always take 5 arguments and have them checked using bpf_func_proto in verifier, ignoring unset argument types. Introduce __ign suffix to ignore a specific kfunc argument during type checks, then use this to introduce support for passing type metadata to the bpf_obj_new_impl kfunc. The user passes BTF ID of the type it wants to allocates in program BTF, the verifier then rewrites the first argument as the size of this type, after performing some sanity checks (to ensure it exists and it is a struct type). The second argument is also fixed up and passed by the verifier. This is the btf_struct_meta for the type being allocated. It would be needed mostly for the offset array which is required for zero initializing special fields while leaving the rest of storage in unitialized state. It would also be needed in the next patch to perform proper destruction of the object's special fields. Under the hood, bpf_obj_new will call bpf_mem_alloc and bpf_mem_free, using the any context BPF memory allocator introduced recently. To this end, a global instance of the BPF memory allocator is initialized on boot to be used for this purpose. This 'bpf_global_ma' serves all allocations for bpf_obj_new. In the future, bpf_obj_new variants will allow specifying a custom allocator. Note that now that bpf_obj_new can be used to allocate objects that can be linked to BPF linked list (when future linked list helpers are available), we need to also free the elements using bpf_mem_free. However, since the draining of elements is done outside the bpf_spin_lock, we need to do migrate_disable around the call since bpf_list_head_free can be called from map free path where migration is enabled. Otherwise, when called from BPF programs migration is already disabled. A convenience macro is included in the bpf_experimental.h header to hide over the ugly details of the implementation, leading to user code looking similar to a language level extension which allocates and constructs fields of a user type. struct bar { struct bpf_list_node node; }; struct foo { struct bpf_spin_lock lock; struct bpf_list_head head __contains(bar, node); }; void prog(void) { struct foo *f; f = bpf_obj_new(typeof(*f)); if (!f) return; ... } A key piece of this story is still missing, i.e. the free function, which will come in the next patch. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-17bpf: Rewrite kfunc argument handlingKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-11/+0
As we continue to add more features, argument types, kfunc flags, and different extensions to kfuncs, the code to verify the correctness of the kfunc prototype wrt the passed in registers has become ad-hoc and ugly to read. To make life easier, and make a very clear split between different stages of argument processing, move all the code into verifier.c and refactor into easier to read helpers and functions. This also makes sharing code within the verifier easier with kfunc argument processing. This will be more and more useful in later patches as we are now moving to implement very core BPF helpers as kfuncs, to keep them experimental before baking into UAPI. Remove all kfunc related bits now from btf_check_func_arg_match, as users have been converted away to refactored kfunc argument handling. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-17bpf: Verify ownership relationships for user BTF typesKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+1
Ensure that there can be no ownership cycles among different types by way of having owning objects that can hold some other type as their element. For instance, a map value can only hold allocated objects, but these are allowed to have another bpf_list_head. To prevent unbounded recursion while freeing resources, elements of bpf_list_head in local kptrs can never have a bpf_list_head which are part of list in a map value. Later patches will verify this by having dedicated BTF selftests. Also, to make runtime destruction easier, once btf_struct_metas is fully populated, we can stash the metadata of the value type directly in the metadata of the list_head fields, as that allows easier access to the value type's layout to destruct it at runtime from the btf_field entry of the list head itself. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-17bpf: Recognize lock and list fields in allocated objectsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+7
Allow specifying bpf_spin_lock, bpf_list_head, bpf_list_node fields in a allocated object. Also update btf_struct_access to reject direct access to these special fields. A bpf_list_head allows implementing map-in-map style use cases, where an allocated object with bpf_list_head is linked into a list in a map value. This would require embedding a bpf_list_node, support for which is also included. The bpf_spin_lock is used to protect the bpf_list_head and other data. While we strictly don't require to hold a bpf_spin_lock while touching the bpf_list_head in such objects, as when have access to it, we have complete ownership of the object, the locking constraint is still kept and may be conditionally lifted in the future. Note that the specification of such types can be done just like map values, e.g.: struct bar { struct bpf_list_node node; }; struct foo { struct bpf_spin_lock lock; struct bpf_list_head head __contains(bar, node); struct bpf_list_node node; }; struct map_value { struct bpf_spin_lock lock; struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node); }; To recognize such types in user BTF, we build a btf_struct_metas array of metadata items corresponding to each BTF ID. This is done once during the btf_parse stage to avoid having to do it each time during the verification process's requirement to inspect the metadata. Moreover, the computed metadata needs to be passed to some helpers in future patches which requires allocating them and storing them in the BTF that is pinned by the program itself, so that valid access can be assumed to such data during program runtime. A key thing to note is that once a btf_struct_meta is available for a type, both the btf_record and btf_field_offs should be available. It is critical that btf_field_offs is available in case special fields are present, as we extensively rely on special fields being zeroed out in map values and allocated objects in later patches. The code ensures that by bailing out in case of errors and ensuring both are available together. If the record is not available, the special fields won't be recognized, so not having both is also fine (in terms of being a verification error and not a runtime bug). Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-17bpf: Introduce allocated objects supportKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+11
Introduce support for representing pointers to objects allocated by the BPF program, i.e. PTR_TO_BTF_ID that point to a type in program BTF. This is indicated by the presence of MEM_ALLOC type flag in reg->type to avoid having to check btf_is_kernel when trying to match argument types in helpers. Whenever walking such types, any pointers being walked will always yield a SCALAR instead of pointer. In the future we might permit kptr inside such allocated objects (either kernel or program allocated), and it will then form a PTR_TO_BTF_ID of the respective type. For now, such allocated objects will always be referenced in verifier context, hence ref_obj_id == 0 for them is a bug. It is allowed to write to such objects, as long fields that are special are not touched (support for which will be added in subsequent patches). Note that once such a pointer is marked PTR_UNTRUSTED, it is no longer allowed to write to it. No PROBE_MEM handling is therefore done for loads into this type unless PTR_UNTRUSTED is part of the register type, since they can never be in an undefined state, and their lifetime will always be valid. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-17Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-21/+39
include/linux/bpf.h 1f6e04a1c7b8 ("bpf: Fix offset calculation error in __copy_map_value and zero_map_value") aa3496accc41 ("bpf: Refactor kptr_off_tab into btf_record") f71b2f64177a ("bpf: Refactor map->off_arr handling") https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/ Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
2022-11-17bpf: Pass map file to .map_update_batch directlyHou Tao1-2/+3
Currently bpf_map_do_batch() first invokes fdget(batch.map_fd) to get the target map file, then it invokes generic_map_update_batch() to do batch update. generic_map_update_batch() will get the target map file by using fdget(batch.map_fd) again and pass it to bpf_map_update_value(). The problem is map file returned by the second fdget() may be NULL or a totally different file compared by map file in bpf_map_do_batch(). The reason is that the first fdget() only guarantees the liveness of struct file instead of file descriptor and the file description may be released by concurrent close() through pick_file(). It doesn't incur any problem as for now, because maps with batch update support don't use map file in .map_fd_get_ptr() ops. But it is better to fix the potential access of an invalid map file. Using __bpf_map_get() again in generic_map_update_batch() can not fix the problem, because batch.map_fd may be closed and reopened, and the returned map file may be different with map file got in bpf_map_do_batch(), so just passing the map file directly to .map_update_batch() in bpf_map_do_batch(). Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <[email protected]> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/[email protected]
2022-11-15bpf: Expand map key argument of bpf_redirect_map to u64Toke Høiland-Jørgensen1-1/+1
For queueing packets in XDP we want to add a new redirect map type with support for 64-bit indexes. To prepare fore this, expand the width of the 'key' argument to the bpf_redirect_map() helper. Since BPF registers are always 64-bit, this should be safe to do after the fact. Acked-by: Song Liu <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-14bpf: Refactor btf_struct_accessKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-9/+8
Instead of having to pass multiple arguments that describe the register, pass the bpf_reg_state into the btf_struct_access callback. Currently, all call sites simply reuse the btf and btf_id of the reg they want to check the access of. The only exception to this pattern is the callsite in check_ptr_to_map_access, hence for that case create a dummy reg to simulate PTR_TO_BTF_ID access. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-14bpf: Rename MEM_ALLOC to MEM_RINGBUFKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-7/+4
Currently, verifier uses MEM_ALLOC type tag to specially tag memory returned from bpf_ringbuf_reserve helper. However, this is currently only used for this purpose and there is an implicit assumption that it only refers to ringbuf memory (e.g. the check for ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM in check_func_arg_reg_off). Hence, rename MEM_ALLOC to MEM_RINGBUF to indicate this special relationship and instead open the use of MEM_ALLOC for more generic allocations made for user types. Also, since ARG_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL is unused, simply drop it. Finally, update selftests using 'alloc_' verifier string to 'ringbuf_'. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-14bpf: Rename RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEMKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-3/+3
Currently, the verifier has two return types, RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM, and RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM_OR_NULL, however the former is confusingly named to imply that it carries MEM_ALLOC, while only the latter does. This causes confusion during code review leading to conclusions like that the return value of RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL (which is RET_PTR_TO_ALLOC_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL) may be consumable by bpf_ringbuf_{submit,commit}. Rename it to make it clear MEM_ALLOC needs to be tacked on top of RET_PTR_TO_MEM. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-14bpf: Support bpf_list_head in map valuesKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+17
Add the support on the map side to parse, recognize, verify, and build metadata table for a new special field of the type struct bpf_list_head. To parameterize the bpf_list_head for a certain value type and the list_node member it will accept in that value type, we use BTF declaration tags. The definition of bpf_list_head in a map value will be done as follows: struct foo { struct bpf_list_node node; int data; }; struct map_value { struct bpf_list_head head __contains(foo, node); }; Then, the bpf_list_head only allows adding to the list 'head' using the bpf_list_node 'node' for the type struct foo. The 'contains' annotation is a BTF declaration tag composed of four parts, "contains:name:node" where the name is then used to look up the type in the map BTF, with its kind hardcoded to BTF_KIND_STRUCT during the lookup. The node defines name of the member in this type that has the type struct bpf_list_node, which is actually used for linking into the linked list. For now, 'kind' part is hardcoded as struct. This allows building intrusive linked lists in BPF, using container_of to obtain pointer to entry, while being completely type safe from the perspective of the verifier. The verifier knows exactly the type of the nodes, and knows that list helpers return that type at some fixed offset where the bpf_list_node member used for this list exists. The verifier also uses this information to disallow adding types that are not accepted by a certain list. For now, no elements can be added to such lists. Support for that is coming in future patches, hence draining and freeing items is done with a TODO that will be resolved in a future patch. Note that the bpf_list_head_free function moves the list out to a local variable under the lock and releases it, doing the actual draining of the list items outside the lock. While this helps with not holding the lock for too long pessimizing other concurrent list operations, it is also necessary for deadlock prevention: unless every function called in the critical section would be notrace, a fentry/fexit program could attach and call bpf_map_update_elem again on the map, leading to the same lock being acquired if the key matches and lead to a deadlock. While this requires some special effort on part of the BPF programmer to trigger and is highly unlikely to occur in practice, it is always better if we can avoid such a condition. While notrace would prevent this, doing the draining outside the lock has advantages of its own, hence it is used to also fix the deadlock related problem. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-14bpf: Fix copy_map_value, zero_map_valueKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-2/+2
The current offset needs to also skip over the already copied region in addition to the size of the next field. This case manifests where there are gaps between adjacent special fields. It was observed that for a map value with size 48, having fields at: off: 0, 16, 32 size: 4, 16, 16 The current code does: memcpy(dst + 0, src + 0, 0) memcpy(dst + 4, src + 4, 12) memcpy(dst + 20, src + 20, 12) memcpy(dst + 36, src + 36, 12) With the fix, it is done correctly as: memcpy(dst + 0, src + 0, 0) memcpy(dst + 4, src + 4, 12) memcpy(dst + 32, src + 32, 0) memcpy(dst + 48, src + 48, 0) Fixes: 4d7d7f69f4b1 ("bpf: Adapt copy_map_value for multiple offset case") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>
2022-11-14bpf: Remove BPF_MAP_OFF_ARR_MAXKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-5/+4
In f71b2f64177a ("bpf: Refactor map->off_arr handling"), map->off_arr was refactored to be btf_field_offs. The number of field offsets is equal to maximum possible fields limited by BTF_FIELDS_MAX. Hence, reuse BTF_FIELDS_MAX as spin_lock and timer no longer are to be handled specially for offset sorting, fix the comment, and remove incorrect WARN_ON as its rec->cnt can never exceed this value. The reason to keep separate constant was the it was always more 2 more than total kptrs. This is no longer the case. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <[email protected]>