| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
This prepares the pwm-crc driver to further changes of the pwm core
outlined in the commit introducing devm_pwmchip_alloc(). There is no
intended semantical change and the driver should behave as before.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/bbe4896eabc240c678c66fabb6329f4e6cd04eda.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
|
|
struct pwm_chip::dev is about to change. To not have to touch this
driver in the same commit as struct pwm_chip::dev, use the accessor
function provided for exactly this purpose.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/a41b62365295be9debd4a9aaa80ca87fca35b320.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
|
|
There is already a pointer to the pwmchip, make use of it directly
instead of using the struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm just obtained from
it. This also has the advantage of not using struct
crystalcove_pwm::chip any more which will be dropped soon.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/66d55649e13526bbd95d7bfd1cacfa0beb9efd43.1707900770.git.u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
|
|
All but one local variable of type pointer to struct crystalcove_pwm are
called "crc_pwm", the one outlier is called "pwm" which is usually
reserved for variables of type pointer to struct pwm_device.
So rename that one "pwm" to "crc_pwm" for consistency.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
The driver compiles just fine as a module. The parent driver's Kconfig
symbol already depends on X86 || COMPILE_TEST, so X86 can just be
dropped from the dependencies allowing compilation on other platforms
than x86.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
Most variables holding a pointer to a pwm_chip are called "chip" which
is also the usual name in most other PWM drivers. Rename the single
variable that have a different name to be called "chip", too, for
consistency.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
.get_state() can return an error indication. Make use of it to propagate
failing hardware accesses.
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
.get_state() might fail in some cases. To make it possible that a driver
signals such a failure change the prototype of .get_state() to return an
error code.
This patch was created using coccinelle and the following semantic patch:
@p1@
identifier getstatefunc;
identifier driver;
@@
struct pwm_ops driver = {
...,
.get_state = getstatefunc
,...
};
@p2@
identifier p1.getstatefunc;
identifier chip, pwm, state;
@@
-void
+int
getstatefunc(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, struct pwm_state *state)
{
...
- return;
+ return 0;
...
}
plus the actual change of the prototype in include/linux/pwm.h (plus some
manual fixing of indentions and empty lines).
So for now all drivers return success unconditionally. They are adapted
in the following patches to make the changes easier reviewable.
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Jernej Skrabec <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Conor Dooley <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
With devm_pwmchip_add() we can drop pwmchip_remove() from the device
remove callback. The latter can then go away, too and as this is the
only user of platform_get_drvdata(), the respective call to
platform_set_drvdata() can go, too.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
Since commit 5e5da1e9fbee ("pwm: ab8500: Explicitly allocate pwm chip
base dynamically") all drivers use dynamic ID allocation explicitly. New
drivers are supposed to do the same, so remove support for driver
specified base IDs and drop all assignments in the low-level drivers.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
Instead of using a mix of -EOPNOTSUPP and -ENOTSUPP, use the more
standard -EINVAL to signal that the specified polarity value was
invalid.
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
Implement the pwm_ops.get_state() method to complete the support for the
new atomic PWM API.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
Replace the enable, disable and config pwm_ops with an apply op,
to support the new atomic PWM API.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
The pwm-crc code is using 2 different enable bits:
1. bit 7 of the PWM0_CLK_DIV (PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE)
2. bit 0 of the BACKLIGHT_EN register
So far we've kept the PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit set when disabling the PWM,
this commit makes crc_pwm_disable() clear it on disable and makes
crc_pwm_enable() set it again on re-enable.
Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
The pwm-crc code is using 2 different enable bits:
1. bit 7 of the PWM0_CLK_DIV (PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE)
2. bit 0 of the BACKLIGHT_EN register
The BACKLIGHT_EN register at address 0x51 really controls a separate
output-only GPIO which is earmarked to be used as output connected to the
backlight-enable pin for LCD panels, this GPO is part of the PMIC's
"Display Panel Control Block." . This pin should probably be moved over
to a GPIO provider driver (and consumers modified accordingly), but that
is something for an(other) patch.
Enabling / disabling the actual PWM output is controlled by the
PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit of the PWM0_CLK_DIV register.
As the comment in the old code already indicates we must disable the PWM
before we can change the clock divider. But the crc_pwm_disable() and
crc_pwm_enable() calls the old code make for this only change the
BACKLIGHT_EN register; and the value of that register does not matter for
changing the period / the divider. What does matter is that the
PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit must be cleared before a new value can be written.
This commit modifies crc_pwm_config() to clear PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE instead
when changing the period, so that period changes actually work.
Note this fix will cause a significant behavior change on some devices
using the CRC PWM output to drive their backlight. Before the PWM would
always run with the output frequency configured by the BIOS at boot, now
the period time specified by the i915 driver will actually be honored.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
The CRC PWM controller has a clock-divider which divides the clock with
a value between 1-128. But as can seen from the PWM_DIV_CLK_xxx
defines, this range maps to a register value of 0-127.
So after calculating the clock-divider we must subtract 1 to get the
register value, unless the requested frequency was so high that the
calculation has already resulted in a (rounded) divider value of 0.
Note that before this fix, setting a period of PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS which
corresponds to the max. divider value of 128 could have resulted in a
bug where the code would use 128 as divider-register value which would
have resulted in an actual divider value of 0 (and the enable bit being
set). A rounding error stopped this bug from actually happen. This
same rounding error means that after the subtraction of 1 it is impossible
to set the divider to 128. Also bump PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS by 1 ns to allow
setting a divider of 128 (register-value 127).
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
While looking into adding atomic-pwm support to the pwm-crc driver I
noticed something odd, there is a PWM_BASE_CLK define of 6 MHz and
there is a clock-divider which divides this with a value between 1-128,
and there are 256 duty-cycle steps.
The pwm-crc code before this commit assumed that a clock-divider
setting of 1 means that the PWM output is running at 6 MHZ, if that
is true, where do these 256 duty-cycle steps come from?
This would require an internal frequency of 256 * 6 MHz = 1.5 GHz, that
seems unlikely for a PMIC which is using a silicon process optimized for
power-switching transistors. It is way more likely that there is an 8
bit counter for the duty cycle which acts as an extra fixed divider
wrt the PWM output frequency.
The main user of the pwm-crc driver is the i915 GPU driver which uses it
for backlight control. Lets compare the PWM register values set by the
video-BIOS (the GOP), assuming the extra fixed divider is present versus
the PWM frequency specified in the Video-BIOS-Tables:
Device: PWM Hz set by BIOS PWM Hz specified in VBT
Asus T100TA 200 200
Asus T100HA 200 200
Lenovo Miix 2 8 23437 20000
Toshiba WT8-A 23437 20000
So as we can see if we assume the extra division by 256 then the register
values set by the GOP are an exact match for the VBT values, where as
otherwise the values would be of by a factor of 256.
This commit fixes the period / duty_cycle calculations to take the
extra division by 256 into account.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s):
this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify
it under the terms of the gnu general public license version 2 as
published by the free software foundation this program is
distributed in the hope that it will be useful but without any
warranty without even the implied warranty of merchantability or
fitness for a particular purpose see the gnu general public license
for more details
extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier
GPL-2.0-only
has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 655 file(s).
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Richard Fontana <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
|
|
Use pwm_get/set_xxx() helpers instead of directly accessing the pwm->xxx
field. Doing that will ease adaptation of the PWM framework to support
atomic update.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
|
|
The Crystalcove PMIC provides three PWM signals and this driver exports
one of them on the BYT platform which is used to control backlight for
DSI panel. This is platform device implementation of the drivers/mfd
cell device for CRC PMIC.
CC: Samuel Ortiz <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandre Courbot <[email protected]>
Cc: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Bolle <[email protected]>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Varka Bhadram <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
|