| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
There have been instances when the default size (1M) of the STB is not
sufficient to get the complete traces of the failure. In such scenarios
we can use a module_param to enable full trace that shall contain more
debugging data. This is not a regular case and hence not enabling this
capability by default.
With this change, there will be two cases on how the driver fetches the
stb data:
1) A special case (proposed now) - which is required only for certain
platforms. Here, a new module param will be supplied to the driver that
will have a special PMFW supporting enhanced dram sizes for getting
the stb data. Without the special PMFW support, just setting the module
param will not help to get the enhanced stb data.
To adapt to this change, we will have a new amd_pmc_stb_handle_efr() to
handle enhanced firmware reporting mechanism. Note that, since num_samples
based r/w pointer offset calculation is not required for enhanced firmware
reporting we will have this mailbox command sent only in case of regular
STB cases.
2) Current code branch which fetches the stb data based on the parameters
like the num_samples, fsize and the r/w pointer.
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Co-developed-by: Harsh Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Harsh Jain <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ij: Renamed flex_arr -> stb_data_arr]
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
|
|
higher
In amd_pmc_stb_debugfs_open_v2(), the stb buffer is created based on the
num_samples and the read/write pointer offset. This holds good when the
num_samples reported by PMFW is less than S2D_TELEMETRY_BYTES_MAX; where
the stb buffer gets filled from 0th position until
S2D_TELEMETRY_BYTES_MAX - 1 based on the read/write pointer offset.
But when the num_samples exceeds the S2D_TELEMETRY_BYTES_MAX, the current
code does not handle it well as it does not account for the cases where
the stb buffer has to filled up as a circular buffer.
Handle this scenario into two cases, where first memcpy will have the
samples from location:
(num_samples % S2D_TELEMETRY_BYTES_MAX) - (S2D_TELEMETRY_BYTES_MAX - 1)
and next memcpy will have the newest ones i.e.
0 - (num_samples % S2D_TELEMETRY_BYTES_MAX - 1)
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ij: renamed flex_arr -> stb_data_arr]
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
|
|
Currently in amd_pmc_stb_debugfs_open_v2() the buffer size is assumed to
be fixed and a second call to amd_pmc_stb_debugfs_open_v2() may race with
a process holding open another fd. This could change "fsize" to a
bigger size causing an out of bounds read.
Instead create a struct with a flexarray to solve this.
Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ij: renamed flex_arr -> stb_data_arr]
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
|
|
Recent PMFW have the capability that can force flush the FIFO
contents to DRAM on sending a command id via the mailbox. Add this support
to the driver.
Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[ij: Corrected whitespace in dev_dbg_once()]
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <[email protected]>
|
|
With latest commits having PMC code spread across multiple files, it would
be easier to maintain them in a separate directory under amd/pmc.
Co-developed-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sanket Goswami <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
|