| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Alistair Francis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Just <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: John Keeping <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Vincent Knecht <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Sangwon Jee <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Jeff LaBundy <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jeff LaBundy <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Haibo Chen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Markuss Broks <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Joe Hung <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Anthony Kim <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Mack <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Trimarchi <[email protected]>
Cc: Dario Binacchi <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the #ifdef guards.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Zhu Yi <[email protected]>
Cc: Mark Jonas <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <[email protected]>
Cc: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() is deprecated as it requires explicit protection
against unused function warnings. The new combination of pm_sleep_ptr()
and DEFINE_SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() allows the compiler to see the functions,
thus suppressing the warning, but still allowing the unused code to be
removed. Thus also drop the __maybe_unused markings.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
Cc: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Michael Hennerich <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
Prepare input updates for 6.2 merge window.
|
|
The elan touchscreen datasheet says that the reset GPIO only needs to
be asserted for 500us in order to reset the regulator. The problem is
that some boards need a level shifter between the signals on the GPIO
controller and the signals on the touchscreen. All of these extra
components on the line can slow the transition of the signals. On one
board, we measured the reset line and saw that it took almost 1.8ms to
go low. Even after we bumped up the "drive strength" of the signal
from the default 2mA to 8mA we still saw it take 421us for the signal
to go low.
In order to account for this let's lengthen the amount of time that we
keep the reset asserted. Let's bump it up from 500us to 5000us.
That's still a relatively short amount of time and is much safer.
It should be noted that this fixes real problems. Case in point:
1. The touchscreen power rail may be shared with another device (like
an eDP panel). That means that at probe time power might already be
on.
2. In probe we grab the reset GPIO and assert it (make it low).
3. We turn on power (a noop since it was already on).
4. We wait 500us.
5. We deassert the reset GPIO.
With the above case and only a 500us delay we saw only a partial reset
asserted, which is bad. Giving it 5ms is overkill but feels safer in
case someone else has a different level shifter setup.
Note that bumping up the delay to 5000 means that some configs yell
about using udelay(). We'll change to using usleep_range(). We give a
small range here because:
- This isn't a delay that happens very often so we don't need to worry
about giving a big range to allow for power efficiency.
- usleep_range() is known to almost always pick the upper bound and
delay that long and we really don't want to slow down the power on
of the touchscreen that much.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221208180603.v2.5.I6edfb3f459662c041563a54e5b7df727c27caaba@changeid
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
There is a kmemleak when test the raydium_i2c_ts with bpf mock device:
unreferenced object 0xffff88812d3675a0 (size 8):
comm "python3", pid 349, jiffies 4294741067 (age 95.695s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
11 0e 10 c0 01 00 04 00 ........
backtrace:
[<0000000068427125>] __kmalloc+0x46/0x1b0
[<0000000090180f91>] raydium_i2c_send+0xd4/0x2bf [raydium_i2c_ts]
[<000000006e631aee>] raydium_i2c_initialize.cold+0xbc/0x3e4 [raydium_i2c_ts]
[<00000000dc6fcf38>] raydium_i2c_probe+0x3cd/0x6bc [raydium_i2c_ts]
[<00000000a310de16>] i2c_device_probe+0x651/0x680
[<00000000f5a96bf3>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0
[<00000000096ba499>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170
[<00000000c5acb4d9>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
[<00000000264fe082>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150
[<00000000f919423c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180
[<00000000e067feca>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0
[<0000000054301fc2>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140
[<00000000aad93b22>] device_add+0x810/0x1130
[<00000000c086a53f>] i2c_new_client_device+0x352/0x4e0
[<000000003c2c248c>] of_i2c_register_device+0xf1/0x110
[<00000000ffec4177>] of_i2c_notify+0x100/0x160
unreferenced object 0xffff88812d3675c8 (size 8):
comm "python3", pid 349, jiffies 4294741070 (age 95.692s)
hex dump (first 8 bytes):
22 00 36 2d 81 88 ff ff ".6-....
backtrace:
[<0000000068427125>] __kmalloc+0x46/0x1b0
[<0000000090180f91>] raydium_i2c_send+0xd4/0x2bf [raydium_i2c_ts]
[<000000001d5c9620>] raydium_i2c_initialize.cold+0x223/0x3e4 [raydium_i2c_ts]
[<00000000dc6fcf38>] raydium_i2c_probe+0x3cd/0x6bc [raydium_i2c_ts]
[<00000000a310de16>] i2c_device_probe+0x651/0x680
[<00000000f5a96bf3>] really_probe+0x17c/0x3f0
[<00000000096ba499>] __driver_probe_device+0xe3/0x170
[<00000000c5acb4d9>] driver_probe_device+0x49/0x120
[<00000000264fe082>] __device_attach_driver+0xf7/0x150
[<00000000f919423c>] bus_for_each_drv+0x114/0x180
[<00000000e067feca>] __device_attach+0x1e5/0x2d0
[<0000000054301fc2>] bus_probe_device+0x126/0x140
[<00000000aad93b22>] device_add+0x810/0x1130
[<00000000c086a53f>] i2c_new_client_device+0x352/0x4e0
[<000000003c2c248c>] of_i2c_register_device+0xf1/0x110
[<00000000ffec4177>] of_i2c_notify+0x100/0x160
After BANK_SWITCH command from i2c BUS, no matter success or error
happened, the tx_buf should be freed.
Fixes: 3b384bd6c3f2 ("Input: raydium_ts_i2c - do not split tx transactions")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Xiaoxu <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
.probe_new() doesn't get the i2c_device_id * parameter, so determine
that explicitly in the probe function.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|
|
The probe function doesn't make use of the i2c_device_id * parameter so it
can be trivially converted.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]>
|