aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-08-26drm/i915/panel: mass rename functions to have intel_panel_ prefixJani Nikula1-7/+18
Follow the usual naming conventions. Also pull HAS_GMCH() check to intel_panel_fitting(). No functional changes. Cc: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/9ff6e42e377bdb0c9349f50d9ea79671059633c7.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-08-26drm/i915/backlight: mass rename functions to have intel_backlight_ prefixJani Nikula1-2/+2
Follow the usual naming conventions. As a drive-by cleanup, also pass intel_connector instead of drm_connector to intel_backlight_setup(). No functional changes. Cc: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ea1c22370210abdd4f5547af73c71b902061ea50.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-08-26drm/i915/backlight: extract backlight code to a separate fileJani Nikula1-1766/+1
In a long overdue refactoring, split out backlight code to new intel_backlight.[ch]. Simple code movement, leave renames for follow-up work. No functional changes. Cc: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/97d310848f03061473b9b2328e2c5c4dcf263cfa.1629888677.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-08-20drm/i915/panel: move intel_panel_use_ssc() out of headersJani Nikula1-0/+8
There's no performance reason to have it as static inline; move it out of intel_display_types.h to reduce clutter and dependency on i915_drv.h. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6f2c05005e4fa43a5572b02b3f41363725ffdb4f.1629281426.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-05-05drm/i915: Don't include intel_de.h from intel_display_types.hVille Syrjälä1-0/+1
Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h. This little cocci script did most of the work for me: @find@ @@ ( intel_de_read(...) | intel_de_read_fw(...) | intel_de_write(...) | intel_de_write_fw(...) ) @has_include@ @@ ( #include "intel_de.h" | #include "display/intel_de.h" ) @depends on find && !has_include@ @@ + #include "intel_de.h" #include "intel_display_types.h" @depends on find && !has_include@ @@ + #include "display/intel_de.h" #include "display/intel_display_types.h" Cc: Cooper Chiou <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Gupta <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-05-03drm/i915/backlight: use unique backlight device namesJani Nikula1-4/+19
Registering multiple backlight devices with intel_backlight name will obviously fail, regardless of whether they're two connectors in the same drm device or two different drm devices. It would be preferrable to switch to completely unique names, and sunset the generic intel_backlight name. However, there are apparently users out there that hardcode the name, so the change would break backward compatibility. As a compromise, register the first device with intel_backlight name. In the common case, this is the only backlight device anyway. From the second device on, use card%d-%s-backlight format, for example card0-eDP-2-backlight, to make the name unique. This approach does not preclude us from registering the first device using the same naming scheme in the future. v2: Keep using intel_backlight name for first backlight device Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/2794 Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7dc3f6974711ce44522189dc9db05d1e6e24e6d8.1619604743.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-05-03drm/i915/backlight: clean up backlight device registerJani Nikula1-14/+23
Add connector and backlight device name to logging, and propagate error code from backlight_device_register() instead of flattening to -ENODEV. Storing the name in an allocated buffer is unnecessary here, but makes follow-up work on names much cleaner. Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/271206461d9c0f42755792236330b588df3b532e.1619604743.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2021-04-14drm/i915/display: rename display version macrosLucas De Marchi1-4/+4
While converting the rest of the driver to use GRAPHICS_VER() and MEDIA_VER(), following what was done for display, some discussions went back on what we did for display: 1) Why is the == comparison special that deserves a separate macro instead of just getting the version and comparing directly like is done for >, >=, <=? 2) IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() is weird in that it omits the "_VER" for brevity. If we remove the current users of IS_DISPLAY_VER(), we could actually repurpose it for a range check With (1) there could be an advantage if we used gen_mask since multiple conditionals be combined by the compiler in a single and instruction and check the result. However a) INTEL_GEN() doesn't use the mask since it would make the code bigger everywhere else and b) in the cases it made sense, it also made sense to convert to the _RANGE() variant. So here we repurpose IS_DISPLAY_VER() to work with a [ from, to ] range like was the IS_DISPLAY_RANGE() and convert the current IS_DISPLAY_VER() users to use == and != operators. Aside from the definition changes, this was done by the following semantic patch: @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) != E1 @@ expression dev_priv, E1; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E1) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == E1 @@ expression dev_priv, from, until; @@ - IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, from, until) Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Cc: Matt Roper <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> [Jani: Minor conflict resolve while applying.] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-04-14drm/i915/display: Eliminate IS_GEN9_{BC,LP}Matt Roper1-1/+1
Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros too. We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms. v2: - Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid(). Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 70bfb30743d5da73058b0a2271e9c127a84fb494) [Jani: cherry picked to topic branch to reduce conflicts] Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
2021-03-23drm/i915/display: Eliminate most usage of INTEL_GEN()Matt Roper1-9/+9
Use Coccinelle to convert most of the usage of INTEL_GEN() and IS_GEN() in the display code to use DISPLAY_VER() comparisons instead. The following semantic patch was used: @@ expression dev_priv, E; @@ - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) == E + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E) @@ expression dev_priv; @@ - INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) + DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) @@ expression dev_priv; expression E; @@ - IS_GEN(dev_priv, E) + IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, E) @@ expression dev_priv; expression from, until; @@ - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) + IS_DISPLAY_RANGE(dev_priv, from, until) There are still some display-related uses of INTEL_GEN() in intel_pm.c (watermark code) and i915_irq.c. Those will be updated separately. v2: - Use new IS_DISPLAY_RANGE and IS_DISPLAY_VER helpers. (Jani) Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-02-02Merge tag 'topic/drm-device-pdev-2021-02-02' of ↵Jani Nikula1-2/+2
git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-intel into drm-intel-next Driver Changes: - drm/i915: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdev Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> From: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-02-02drm/i915: Remove references to struct drm_device.pdevThomas Zimmermann1-2/+2
Using struct drm_device.pdev is deprecated. Convert i915 to struct drm_device.dev. No functional changes. v6: * also remove assignment in selftests/ in a later patch (Chris) v5: * remove assignment in later patch (Chris) v3: * rebased v2: * move gt/ and gvt/ changes into separate patches Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-01-19drm/i915/dp: Enable Intel's HDR backlight interface (only SDR for now)Lyude Paul1-5/+35
So-recently a bunch of laptops on the market have started using DPCD backlight controls instead of the traditional DDI backlight controls. Originally we thought we had this handled by adding VESA backlight control support to i915, but the story ended up being a lot more complicated then that. Simply put-there's two main backlight interfaces Intel can see in the wild. Intel's proprietary HDR backlight interface, and the standard VESA backlight interface. Note that many panels have been observed to report support for both backlight interfaces, but testing has shown far more panels work with the Intel HDR backlight interface at the moment. Additionally, the VBT appears to be capable of reporting support for the VESA backlight interface but not the Intel HDR interface which needs to be probed by setting the right magic OUI. On top of that however, there's also actually two different variants of the Intel HDR backlight interface. The first uses the AUX channel for controlling the brightness of the screen in both SDR and HDR mode, and the second only uses the AUX channel for setting the brightness level in HDR mode - relying on PWM for setting the brightness level in SDR mode. For the time being we've been using EDIDs to maintain a list of quirks for panels that safely do support the VESA backlight interface. Adding support for Intel's HDR backlight interface in addition however, should finally allow us to auto-detect eDP backlight controls properly so long as we probe like so: * If the panel's VBT reports VESA backlight support, assume it really does support it * If the panel's VBT reports DDI backlight controls: * First probe for Intel's HDR backlight interface * If that fails, probe for VESA's backlight interface * If that fails, assume no DPCD backlight control * If the panel's VBT reports any other backlight type: just assume it doesn't have DPCD backlight controls Changes since v4: * Fix checkpatch issues Changes since v3: * Stop using drm_device and use drm_i915_private instead * Don't forget to return from intel_dp_aux_hdr_get_backlight() if we fail to read the current backlight mode from the DPCD * s/uint8_t/u8/ * Remove unneeded parenthesis in intel_dp_aux_hdr_enable_backlight() * Use drm_dbg_kms() in intel_dp_aux_init_backlight_funcs() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-01-19drm/i915: Keep track of pwm-related backlight hooks separatelyLyude Paul1-150/+182
Currently, every different type of backlight hook that i915 supports is pretty straight forward - you have a backlight, probably through PWM (but maybe DPCD), with a single set of platform-specific hooks that are used for controlling it. HDR backlights, in particular VESA and Intel's HDR backlight implementations, can end up being more complicated. With Intel's proprietary interface, HDR backlight controls always run through the DPCD. When the backlight is in SDR backlight mode however, the driver may need to bypass the TCON and control the backlight directly through PWM. So, in order to support this we'll need to split our backlight callbacks into two groups: a set of high-level backlight control callbacks in intel_panel, and an additional set of pwm-specific backlight control callbacks. This also implies a functional changes for how these callbacks are used: * We now keep track of two separate backlight level ranges, one for the high-level backlight, and one for the pwm backlight range * We also keep track of backlight enablement and PWM backlight enablement separately * Since the currently set backlight level might not be the same as the currently programmed PWM backlight level, we stop setting panel->backlight.level with the currently programmed PWM backlight level in panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->setup(). Instead, we rely on the higher level backlight control functions to retrieve the current PWM backlight level (in this case, intel_pwm_get_backlight()). Note that there are still a few PWM backlight setup callbacks that do actually need to retrieve the current PWM backlight level, although we no longer save this value in panel->backlight.level like before. Additionally, we drop the call to lpt_get_backlight() in lpt_setup_backlight(), and avoid unconditionally writing the PWM value that we get from it and only write it back if we're in CPU mode, and switching to PCH mode. The reason for this is because in the original codepath for this, it was expected that the intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() hook would be responsible for fetching the initial backlight level. On lpt systems, the only time we could ever be in PCH backlight mode is during the initial driver load - meaning that outside of the setup() hook, lpt_get_backlight() will always be the callback used for retrieving the current backlight level. After this patch we still need to fetch and write-back the PCH backlight value if we're switching from CPU mode to PCH, but because intel_pwm_setup_backlight() will retrieve the backlight level after setup() using the get() hook, which always ends up being lpt_get_backlight(). Thus - an additional call to lpt_get_backlight() in lpt_setup_backlight() is made redundant. v9: * Drop the intel_panel_invert_pwm_level() call in lpt_setup_backlight() * Remove leftover detritus from lpt_setup_backlight() v8: * Go back to getting initial brightness level with intel_pwm_get_backlight(), the other fix we had was definitely wrong. v7: * Use panel->backlight.pwm_funcs->get() to get the backlight level in intel_pwm_setup_backlight(), lest we upset lockdep * Rebase * Rename intel_panel_sanitize_pwm_level() to intel_panel_invert_pwm_level() v6: * Make sure to grab connection_mutex before calling intel_pwm_get_backlight() in intel_pwm_setup_backlight() v5: * Fix indenting warnings from checkpatch v4: * Fix commit message * Remove outdated comment in intel_panel.c * Rename pwm_(min|max) to pwm_level_(min|max) * Use intel_pwm_get_backlight() in intel_pwm_setup_backlight() instead of indirection * Don't move intel_dp_aux_init_bcklight_funcs() call to bottom of intel_panel_init_backlight_funcs() quite yet v3: * Reuse intel_panel_bl_funcs() for pwm_funcs * Explain why we drop lpt_get_backlight() Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-01-15drm/i915: Pass port to intel_panel_bl_funcs.get()Lyude Paul1-23/+17
In the next commit where we split PWM related backlight functions from higher-level backlight functions, we'll want to be able to retrieve the backlight level for the current display panel from the intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() function using pwm_funcs->get(). Since intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() is called before we've fully read in the current hardware state into our atomic state, we can't grab atomic modesetting locks safely anyway in intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup(), and some PWM backlight functions (vlv_get_backlight() in particular) require knowing the currently used pipe we need to be able to discern the current display pipe through other means. Luckily, we're already passing the current display pipe to intel_panel_bl_funcs->setup() so all we have to do in order to achieve this is pass down that parameter to intel_panel_bl_funcs->get(). So, fix this by accepting an additional pipe parameter in intel_panel_bl_funcs->get(), and leave figuring out the current display pipe up to the caller. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2021-01-11drm/i915/backlight: fix CPU mode backlight takeover on LPTJani Nikula1-4/+5
The pch_get_backlight(), lpt_get_backlight(), and lpt_set_backlight() functions operate directly on the hardware registers. If inverting the value is needed, using intel_panel_compute_brightness(), it should only be done in the interface between hardware registers and panel->backlight.level. The CPU mode takeover code added in commit 5b1ec9ac7ab5 ("drm/i915/backlight: Fix backlight takeover on LPT, v3.") reads the hardware register and converts to panel->backlight.level correctly, however the value written back should remain in the hardware register "domain". This hasn't been an issue, because GM45 machines are the only known users of i915.invert_brightness and the brightness invert quirk, and without one of them no conversion is made. It's likely nobody's ever hit the problem. Fixes: 5b1ec9ac7ab5 ("drm/i915/backlight: Fix backlight takeover on LPT, v3.") Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Cc: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Cc: <[email protected]> # v5.1+ Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-12-23drm/i915: Pass down brightness values to enable/disable backlight callbacksLyude Paul1-34/+33
Instead of using intel_panel->backlight.level, have the caller provide us with the current panel backlight value. We'll need this for when we separate PWM-related backlight callbacks from other means of backlight control (like DPCD backlight controls), as the caller of each PWM callback will be responsible for converting the current brightness value to it's respective PWM level. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-12-23drm/i915: Rename pwm_* backlight callbacks to ext_pwm_*Lyude Paul1-14/+14
Since we're going to need to add a set of lower-level PWM backlight control hooks to be shared by normal backlight controls and HDR backlight controls in SDR mode, let's add a prefix to the external PWM backlight functions so that the difference between them and the high level PWM-only backlight functions is a bit more obvious. This introduces no functional changes. Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-12-03drm/i915: refactor panel backlight control functions. (v2)Dave Airlie1-56/+97
This moves the functions into static const instead of having funcs and data in the same struct. It leaves the power callback alone, as it is used in a different manner. v2: leave power callback alone (Jani) Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-09-15drm/i915: Reduce INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED to just treat outputs as disconnectedVille Syrjälä1-0/+11
Since the display hardware is all there even when INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLED return false we have to be capable of shutting it down cleanly so as to not anger the hw. To that end let's reduce the effect of !INTEL_DISPLAY_ENABLE to just treating all outputs as disconnected. Should prevent anyone from automagically enabling any of them, while still allowing us to cleanly shut them down. v2: Put the check into the right place for CRT Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
2020-09-11Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next-queuedRodrigo Vivi1-1/+1
Sync drm-intel-gt-next here so we can have an unified fixes flow. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
2020-09-06drm/i915: panel: Use atomic PWM API for devs with an external PWM controllerHans de Goede1-39/+31
Now that the PWM drivers which we use have been converted to the atomic PWM API, we can move the i915 panel code over to using the atomic PWM API. The removes a long standing FIXME and this removes a flicker where the backlight brightness would jump to 100% when i915 loads even if using the fastset path. Note that this commit also simplifies pwm_disable_backlight(), by dropping the intel_panel_actually_set_backlight(..., 0) call. This call sets the PWM to 0% duty-cycle. I believe that this call was only present as a workaround for a bug in the pwm-crc.c driver where it failed to clear the PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE bit. This is fixed by an earlier patch in this series. After the dropping of this workaround, the usleep call, which seems unnecessary to begin with, has no useful effect anymore, so drop that too. Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-09-06drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM min setting for devs with an external PWM ↵Hans de Goede1-3/+4
controller So far for devices using an external PWM controller (devices using pwm_setup_backlight()), we have been hardcoding the minimum allowed PWM level to 0. But several of these devices specify a non 0 minimum setting in their VBT. Change pwm_setup_backlight() to use get_backlight_min_vbt() to get the minimum level. Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-09-06drm/i915: panel: Honor the VBT PWM frequency for devs with an external PWM ↵Hans de Goede1-8/+11
controller So far for devices using an external PWM controller (devices using pwm_setup_backlight()), we have been hardcoding the period-time passed to pwm_config() to 21333 ns. I suspect this was done because many VBTs set the PWM frequency to 200 which corresponds to a period-time of 5000000 ns, which greatly exceeds the PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS define in the Crystal Cove PMIC PWM driver, which used to be 21333. This PWM_MAX_PERIOD_NS define was actually based on a bug in the PWM driver where its period and duty-cycle times where off by a factor of 256. Due to this bug the hardcoded CRC_PMIC_PWM_PERIOD_NS value of 21333 would result in the PWM driver using its divider of 128, which would result in a PWM output frequency of 6000000 Hz / 256 / 128 = 183 Hz. So actually pretty close to the default VBT value of 200 Hz. Now that this bug in the pwm-crc driver is fixed, we can actually use the VBT defined frequency. This is important because: a) With the pwm-crc driver fixed it will now translate the hardcoded CRC_PMIC_PWM_PERIOD_NS value of 21333 ns / 46 Khz to a PWM output frequency of 23 KHz (the max it can do). b) The pwm-lpss driver used on many models has always honored the 21333 ns / 46 Khz request Some panels do not like such high output frequencies. E.g. on a Terra Pad 1061 tablet, using the LPSS PWM controller, the backlight would go from off to max, when changing the sysfs backlight brightness value from 90-100%, anything under aprox. 90% would turn the backlight fully off. Honoring the VBT specified PWM frequency will also hopefully fix the various bug reports which we have received about users perceiving the backlight to flicker after a suspend/resume cycle. Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-09-06drm/i915: panel: Add get_vbt_pwm_freq() helperHans de Goede1-10/+17
Factor the code which checks and drm_dbg_kms-s the VBT PWM frequency out of get_backlight_max_vbt(). This is a preparation patch for honering the VBT PWM frequency for devices which use an external PWM controller (devices using pwm_setup_backlight()). Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-08-23treewide: Use fallthrough pseudo-keywordGustavo A. R. Silva1-1/+1
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1]. Also, remove unnecessary fall-through markings when it is the case. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
2020-08-14Merge tag 'pwm/for-5.9-rc1' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm Pull pwm updates from Thierry Reding: "The majority of this batch is conversion of the PWM period and duty cycle to 64-bit unsigned integers, which is required so that some types of hardware can generate the full range of signals that they're capable of. The remainder is mostly minor fixes and cleanups" * tag 'pwm/for-5.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm: pwm: bcm-iproc: handle clk_get_rate() return pwm: Replace HTTP links with HTTPS ones pwm: omap-dmtimer: Repair pwm_omap_dmtimer_chip's broken kerneldoc header pwm: mediatek: Provide missing kerneldoc description for 'soc' arg pwm: bcm-kona: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle pwm: bcm-iproc: Remove impossible comparison when validating duty cycle pwm: iqs620a: Use lowercase hexadecimal literals for consistency pwm: Convert period and duty cycle to u64 clk: pwm: Use 64-bit division function backlight: pwm_bl: Use 64-bit division function pwm: sun4i: Use nsecs_to_jiffies to avoid a division pwm: sifive: Use 64-bit division macro pwm: iqs620a: Use 64-bit division pwm: imx27: Use 64-bit division macro pwm: imx-tpm: Use 64-bit division macro pwm: clps711x: Use 64-bit division macro hwmon: pwm-fan: Use 64-bit division macro drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macro
2020-06-22drm/i915/params: switch to device specific parametersJani Nikula1-2/+2
Start using device specific parameters instead of module parameters for most things. The module parameters become the immutable initial values for i915 parameters. The device specific parameters in i915->params start life as a copy of i915_modparams. Any later changes are only reflected in the debugfs. The stragglers are: * i915.force_probe and i915.modeset. Needed before dev_priv is available. This is fine because the parameters are read-only and never modified. * i915.verbose_state_checks. Passing dev_priv to I915_STATE_WARN and I915_STATE_WARN_ON would result in massive and ugly churn. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs, and leaving the parameter writable in sysfs. This may be fixed up in follow-up work. * i915.inject_probe_failure. Only makes sense in terms of the module, not the device. This is handled by not exposing the parameter via debugfs. v2: Fix uc i915 lookup code (Michał Winiarski) Cc: Juha-Pekka Heikkilä <[email protected]> Cc: Venkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <[email protected]> Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Acked-by: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-06-16drm/i915: Use 64-bit division macroGuru Das Srinagesh1-1/+1
Since the PWM framework is switching struct pwm_state.duty_cycle's datatype to u64, prepare for this transition by using DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL to handle a 64-bit dividend. Signed-off-by: Guru Das Srinagesh <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <[email protected]>
2020-05-19drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warningArnd Bergmann1-10/+10
After the function is no longer marked 'inline', there is now a new warning pointing out that the only caller is inside of an #ifdef: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c:493:12: warning: 'scale_user_to_hw' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 493 | static u32 scale_user_to_hw(struct intel_connector *connector, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Move the function itself into that #ifdef as well. Fixes: 81b55ef1f47b ("drm/i915: drop a bunch of superfluous inlines") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] (cherry picked from commit 794bdcf71f47b98f6e003190069d5064123067ed) Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
2020-05-15drm/i915: avoid unused scale_user_to_hw() warningArnd Bergmann1-10/+10
After the function is no longer marked 'inline', there is now a new warning pointing out that the only caller is inside of an #ifdef: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_panel.c:493:12: warning: 'scale_user_to_hw' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] 493 | static u32 scale_user_to_hw(struct intel_connector *connector, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Move the function itself into that #ifdef as well. Fixes: 81b55ef1f47b ("drm/i915: drop a bunch of superfluous inlines") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-04-24drm/i915: Have pfit calculations return an error codeVille Syrjälä1-8/+11
Change intel_{gmch,pch}_panel_fitting() to return a normal error vs. success int. We'll need this later to validate that the margin properties aren't misconfigured. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
2020-04-24drm/i915: Pass connector state to pfit calculationsVille Syrjälä1-7/+10
Pass the entire connector state to intel_{gmch,pch}_panel_fitting(). For now we just need to get at .scaling_mode but in the future we'll want access to the margin properties as well. v2: Deal with intel_dp_ycbcr420_config() Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
2020-04-24drm/i915: s/pipe_config/crtc_state/ in pfit functionsVille Syrjälä1-46/+47
Follow the new naming convention and call the crtc state "crtc_state", and while at it drop the redundant crtc argument. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
2020-04-24drm/i915: Use drm_rect to store the pfit window pos/sizeVille Syrjälä1-7/+6
Make things a bit more abstract by replacing the pch_pfit.pos/size raw register values with a drm_rect. Makes it slighly more convenient to eg. compute the scaling factors. v2: Use drm_rect_init() Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <[email protected]>
2020-04-21drm/i915: drop a bunch of superfluous inlinesJani Nikula1-7/+7
Remove a number of inlines from .c files, and let the compiler decide what's best. There's more to do, but need to start somewhere, and need to start setting the example. Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-04-08drm/i915/panel: use struct drm_device based loggingJani Nikula1-8/+11
Convert all the DRM_* logging macros to the struct drm_device based macros to provide device specific logging. No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch, originally written by Wambui Karuga <[email protected]>, with manual fixups on top: @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_NOTE( +drm_notice(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_NOTE( +drm_notice(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Cc: Wambui Karuga <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Wambui Karuga <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-04-03drm/i915: Pass atomic state to encoder hooksVille Syrjälä1-1/+2
We're going to want access to the atomic state for iterating the slave crtcs when enabling the port sync master crtc. Pass the atomic state all the way down. The alternative would be yet another encoder hook which we'll have to call after all the normal modeset stuff is done. Not really a fan of yet another hook just for this. Note that during readout state sanitation we are now going to pass NULL as the atomic state since we don't have one. We need to change that and then we can also s/crtc_state/crtc/ and s/conn_state/conn/ for the encoder hooks as well. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <[email protected]>
2020-03-04drm/i915: panel: Use intel_panel_compute_brightness() from pwm_setup_backlight()Hans de Goede1-7/+11
Use intel_panel_compute_brightness() from pwm_setup_backlight() so that we correctly take i915_modparams.invert_brightness and/or QUIRK_INVERT_BRIGHTNESS into account when setting + getting the initial brightness value. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-02-20drm/i915: Parametrize PFIT_PIPEVille Syrjälä1-2/+1
Make the PFIT_PIPE stuff less ugly via parametrization. Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected] Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
2020-02-19drm/i915: Read rawclk_freq earlierChris Wilson1-5/+7
Read the rawclk_freq during runtime info probing, prior to its first use in computing the CS timestamp frequency. Then store it in the runtime info, and include it in the debug printouts. Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/834 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-02-04drm/i915/panel: automatic conversion to drm_device based logging macros.Wambui Karuga1-41/+59
Converts various instances of the printk based drm logging macros to the struct drm_device based logging macros in i915/display/intel_panel.c using the following coccinelle script that transforms based on the existence of a struct drm_i915_private device pointer: @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } @@ identifier fn, T; @@ fn(...,struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <+... ( -DRM_INFO( +drm_info(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_ERROR( +drm_err(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_WARN( +drm_warn(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER( +drm_dbg(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_KMS( +drm_dbg_kms(&T->drm, ...) | -DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC( +drm_dbg_atomic(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Checkpatch warnings were addressed manually. Signed-off-by: Wambui Karuga <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-02-04drm/i915/display/panel: Make WARN* drm specific where drm_priv ptr is availablePankaj Bharadiya1-9/+10
drm specific WARN* calls include device information in the backtrace, so we know what device the warnings originate from. Covert all the calls of WARN* with device specific drm_WARN* variants in functions where drm_i915_private struct pointer is readily available. The conversion was done automatically with below coccinelle semantic patch. @rule1@ identifier func, T; @@ func(...) { ... struct drm_i915_private *T = ...; <+... ( -WARN( +drm_WARN(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON( +drm_WARN_ON(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } @rule2@ identifier func, T; @@ func(struct drm_i915_private *T,...) { <+... ( -WARN( +drm_WARN(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON( +drm_WARN_ON(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) | -WARN_ON_ONCE( +drm_WARN_ON_ONCE(&T->drm, ...) ) ...+> } Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bharadiya <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2020-01-27drm/i915/panel: use intel_de_*() functions for register accessJani Nikula1-115/+140
The implicit "dev_priv" local variable use has been a long-standing pain point in the register access macros I915_READ(), I915_WRITE(), POSTING_READ(), I915_READ_FW(), and I915_WRITE_FW(). Replace them with the corresponding new display engine register accessors intel_de_read(), intel_de_write(), intel_de_posting_read(), intel_de_read_fw(), and intel_de_write_fw(). No functional changes. Generated using the following semantic patch: @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_READ(REG) + intel_de_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - POSTING_READ(REG) + intel_de_posting_read(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) @@ expression REG; @@ - I915_READ_FW(REG) + intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, REG) @@ expression REG, OFFSET; @@ - I915_WRITE_FW(REG, OFFSET) + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, REG, OFFSET) Acked-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Acked-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/efd117ff0a63ef6ec1a4514f2ee133ca33b3f0a0.1579871655.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
2019-12-17drm/i915: DSI: select correct PWM controller to use based on the VBTHans de Goede1-3/+13
At least Bay Trail (BYT) and Cherry Trail (CHT) devices can use 1 of 2 different PWM controllers for controlling the LCD's backlight brightness. Either the one integrated into the PMIC or the one integrated into the SoC (the 1st LPSS PWM controller). So far in the LPSS code on BYT we have skipped registering the LPSS PWM controller "pwm_backlight" lookup entry when a Crystal Cove PMIC is present, assuming that in this case the PMIC PWM controller will be used. On CHT we have been relying on only 1 of the 2 PWM controllers being enabled in the DSDT at the same time; and always registered the lookup. So far this has been working, but the correct way to determine which PWM controller needs to be used is by checking a bit in the VBT table and recently I've learned about 2 different BYT devices: Point of View MOBII TAB-P800W Acer Switch 10 SW5-012 Which use a Crystal Cove PMIC, yet the LCD is connected to the SoC/LPSS PWM controller (and the VBT correctly indicates this), so here our old heuristics fail. This commit fixes using the wrong PWM controller on these devices by calling pwm_get() for the right PWM controller based on the VBT dsi.config.pwm_blc bit. Note this is part of a series which contains 2 other patches which renames the PWM lookup for the 1st SoC/LPSS PWM from "pwm_backlight" to "pwm_pmic_backlight" and the PWM lookup for the Crystal Cove PMIC PWM from "pwm_backlight" to "pwm_pmic_backlight". Acked-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2019-11-01drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, base -> uapi.Maarten Lankhorst1-3/+3
Split up crtc_state->base to uapi. This is done using the following patch, ran after the previous commit that splits out any hw references: @@ struct intel_crtc_state *T; @@ -T->base +T->uapi Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2019-11-01drm/i915: Perform automated conversions for crtc uapi/hw split, base -> hw.Maarten Lankhorst1-4/+4
Split up crtc_state->base to hw where appropriate. This is done using the following patch: @@ struct intel_crtc_state *T; identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$"; @@ -T->base.x +T->hw.x @@ struct drm_crtc_state *T; identifier x =~ "^(active|enable|degamma_lut|gamma_lut|ctm|mode|adjusted_mode)$"; @@ -to_intel_crtc_state(T)->base.x +to_intel_crtc_state(T)->hw.x Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2019-08-07drm/i915: rename intel_drv.h to display/intel_display_types.hJani Nikula1-1/+1
Everything about the file is about display, and mostly about types related to display. Move under display/ as intel_display_types.h to reflect the facts. There's still plenty to clean up, but start off with moving the file where it logically belongs and naming according to contents. v2: fix the include guard name in the renamed file Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
2019-06-17drm/i915: move modesetting output/encoder code under display/Jani Nikula1-0/+2051
Add a new subdirectory for display code, and start off by moving modesetting output/encoder code. Judging by the include changes, this is a surprisingly clean operation. v2: - move intel_sdvo_regs.h too - use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]> Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]> Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
Powered by cgit, Gruvboxed by Blaster4385.