| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Since obj->frontbuffer is no longer protected by the struct_mutex, as we
are processing the execbuf, it may be removed. Mark the
intel_frontbuffer as rcu protected, and so acquire a reference to
the struct as we track activity upon it.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/827
Fixes: 8e7cb1799b4f ("drm/i915: Extract intel_frontbuffer active tracking")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]> # v5.4+
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
Move the active tracking for the frontbuffer operations out of the
i915_gem_object and into its own first class (refcounted) object. In the
process of detangling, we switch from low level request tracking to the
easier i915_active -- with the plan that this avoids any potential
atomic callbacks as the frontbuffer tracking wishes to sleep as it
flushes.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|
|
Now that we have a new subdirectory for display code, continue by moving
modesetting core code.
display/intel_frontbuffer.h sticks out like a sore thumb, otherwise this
is, again, a surprisingly clean operation.
v2:
- don't move intel_sideband.[ch] (Ville)
- use tabs for Makefile file lists and sort them
Cc: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
|